Fixtures Sunday April 28th - Tottenham Hotspur - Tottenham Hotspur Stadium - 2:00 Pm

Kick-Off

       Injuries                 Steve Gleiber



Get the Latest Post Go to the Bottom of Page It is currently Sun Apr 28, 2024 11:08 am

All times are UTC


  


Reply to topic

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Decaf, mcquilkie and 282 guests

 
Post #534041  Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2023 5:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

Update on caicedo

He’s either likely or unlikely to sign for us tomorrow. We made an imaginary bid earlier today for 70 million that’s been denied as Brighton want 80 million but will likely reject that too. He’s super keen to join Arsenal as well as any other club under the sun.

Video explanation https://youtu.be/gYF5C3uvM18


 Profile  
 
 
Post #534042  Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2023 5:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26777

Cancelo on loan to Bayern is not one I saw coming. Very versatile player for City but obviously a falling out has happened. This is all good news for us.

Enzo Fernandes looks like Chelsea’s last big deal this window, close to £120m

Some positive progress it seems on the Caicedo chase, Arsenal not leaving the table…. But it does seem we’re putting all our eggs in this basket which is a worry

Everton are looking to spend their Gordon money (£45m) on Gallagher from Chelsea. Not sure why Gallagher would go there right now. It helps chelsea cook their books though as they would bank the full £40-45m for accounting purpose and it would allow £280m of signings on 7 year deals to balance out that expenditure for this year….they’d have to make the same £40m sale each year but it shows how the long contracts can be used to manipulate FFP


 Profile  
 
 
Post #534043  Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2023 6:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26777

Jorginho from Chelsea as an alternative is being mooted


 Profile  
 
 
Post #534044  Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2023 7:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

I’d rather watch Dave Lee travis play Macbeth than sign another chelsea player but it might not be the worst idea.

It doesn’t hurt our attempts to sign caicedo the fact we are being linked publicly to other players now.

Don’t get or believe the onana links though. Why would Everton sell us their best player this season for just a 10 million profit when they are in the middle of a relegation battle


 Profile  
 
 
Post #534045  Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2023 8:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26777

Man U have been drawn at home in 13 of the last 14 domestic cup draws


 Profile  
 
 
Post #534046  Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2023 9:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26777

Brighton are free to reject or accept any bid they want but one way of looking at this is Brighton are able to get these players and are an attractive option for these players because they get a) playing time, b) prem league exposure and crucially, c) an unwritten promise that they will be allowed to move on to bigger things.

If Brighton are seen to block the moves for their players (which is completely their right) then maybe up and coming players might start to look elsewhere


 Profile  
 
 
Post #534047  Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2023 9:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:29 pm
Posts: 5015

Rich wrote:
Jorginho from Chelsea as an alternative is being mooted

Big NO from me
Have we not learnt our lesson with Willian???


 Profile  
 
 
Post #534048  Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2023 9:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 9:51 pm
Posts: 3574

TOP GUN wrote:
Zed wrote:
This from Fabrizio Romano, then taken down. Questionable to say they least.

Surely fakes. This nonsense is never ending

Only believe it when I see it. Straight from Arsenal.

_________________
Be careful who you call your friends. I'd rather have four quarters than one hundred pennies.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #534049  Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 3:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:58 am
Posts: 34119

Wow. 3 years already?


Attachments:



_________________
"Never relegated, Never Will Be" :)
 Profile  
 
 
Post #534050  Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 7:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:58 am
Posts: 34119

Since Xhaka is playing a bit more of an advanced position than he was previously, he's got better looks at goal. I'd love to see him try more shots from distance to keep the defense honest. I can picture Nketiah putting any rebounds in.

_________________
"Never relegated, Never Will Be" :)


 Profile  
 
 
Post #534051  Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 7:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:58 am
Posts: 34119

If (and I haven't seen anything so far but it could very well happen) we don't bring anyone else in, what do you think of our chances of getting the title?

_________________
"Never relegated, Never Will Be" :)


 Profile  
 
 
Post #534052  Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 8:17 am 
Online

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:06 am
Posts: 16485

Rich wrote:
Brighton are free to reject or accept any bid they want but one way of looking at this is Brighton are able to get these players and are an attractive option for these players because they get a) playing time, b) prem league exposure and crucially, c) an unwritten promise that they will be allowed to move on to bigger things.

If Brighton are seen to block the moves for their players (which is completely their right) then maybe up and coming players might start to look elsewhere

I think c would be include "at a time and in a manner that is not unreasonably detrimental for the club". That often is not the case in the January window. Clubs have to be able to say 'no'. Players agitating for moves on social media is a major problem too. You can see why a club would want to make a point about this.

_________________
Hamba kakuhle, Madiba


 Profile  
 
 
Post #534053  Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 8:25 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26777

I thought the only real concern from the City cup game was how well Ake dealt with Saka. He was excellent and kept Saka quieter than any full back I’ve seen this season. I’d expect the same match up in the league games. Having Ødegaard out there with Saka will help though.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #534054  Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 8:25 am 
Online

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:06 am
Posts: 16485

AmericanGooner wrote:
If (and I haven't seen anything so far but it could very well happen) we don't bring anyone else in, what do you think of our chances of getting the title?


0.5-X^aY^b

where X is the odds of Partey getting an injury and Y is the severity of the injury measured in number of league games missed, and a and b are parameters

_________________
Hamba kakuhle, Madiba


 Profile  
 
 
Post #534055  Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 8:26 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26777

Decaf wrote:
Rich wrote:
Brighton are free to reject or accept any bid they want but one way of looking at this is Brighton are able to get these players and are an attractive option for these players because they get a) playing time, b) prem league exposure and crucially, c) an unwritten promise that they will be allowed to move on to bigger things.

If Brighton are seen to block the moves for their players (which is completely their right) then maybe up and coming players might start to look elsewhere

I think c would be include "at a time and in a manner that is not unreasonably detrimental for the club". That often is not the case in the January window. Clubs have to be able to say 'no'. Players agitating for moves on social media is a major problem too. You can see why a club would want to make a point about this.

Agreed, I don’t blame Brighton for digging their heels in, particularly as this might be one of the times they don’t have a ready made replacement imbedded in the squad already.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #534056  Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 8:29 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26777

david.d wrote:
Rich wrote:
Jorginho from Chelsea as an alternative is being mooted

Big NO from me
Have we not learnt our lesson with Willian???

Wouldn’t be my choice. But I would take him as a last ditch thing if it was only on a 5 month deal. I don’t want him long term. I could see situations in some games where he could be useful. Arteta supposedly wanted him back in his first season, as did Pep at one point.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #534057  Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 8:34 am 
Online

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:06 am
Posts: 16485

Rich wrote:
I thought the only real concern from the City cup game was how well Ake dealt with Saka. He was excellent and kept Saka quieter than any full back I’ve seen this season. I’d expect the same match up in the league games. Having Ødegaard out there with Saka will help though.

That, and the fact that Saka is a big game player. My impression is that his weaker games have been against lesser opposition or in the cups. World cup quarterfinals, and top 6 opposition in the league what makes him tick. He'll be up for this one.

_________________
Hamba kakuhle, Madiba


 Profile  
 
 
Post #534058  Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 8:36 am 
Online

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:06 am
Posts: 16485

Rich wrote:
david.d wrote:
Big NO from me
Have we not learnt our lesson with Willian???

Wouldn’t be my choice. But I would take him as a last ditch thing if it was only on a 5 month deal. I don’t want him long term. I could see situations in some games where he could be useful. Arteta supposedly wanted him back in his first season, as did Pep at one point.

Exactly.

_________________
Hamba kakuhle, Madiba


 Profile  
 
 
Post #534059  Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 8:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:22 pm
Posts: 20613

Looks like no Caicedo then,

Why have we left things so late to try to sign the one type of player we absolutely need to cover Partey, even more so with Elneny's injury?

We spent what seemed weeks chasing Mudryk, expecting Shakhter to cave-in and accept our offer. That went well.

We only signed Trossard after his agent apparently contacted us the day before he signed, so why did it take his agent contacting us to set the deal in motion? Was it just serendipity?

Kiwior looks like more of a successful planned signing.

Let's see what happens to day but its not looking good.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #534060  Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 9:12 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

socrates wrote:
Looks like no Caicedo then,

Why have we left things so late to try to sign the one type of player we absolutely need to cover Partey, even more so with Elneny's injury?

We spent what seemed weeks chasing Mudryk, expecting Shakhter to cave-in and accept our offer. That went well.

We only signed Trossard after his agent apparently contacted us the day before he signed, so why did it take his agent contacting us to set the deal in motion? Was it just serendipity?

Kiwior looks like more of a successful planned signing.

Let's see what happens to day but its not looking good.


At the end of the day we just don’t have the budget so we have to stretch it. What’s the alternative ? 8 year contracts for unproven players.

Even if Brighton accepted 75 million I’d feel uneasy about it. He’s hardly proven.

Every once in a while we go large. Last summer it was Jesus, apparently this summer it’s Rice but there’s an element of working to a budget. It’s always been this way with Arsenal

I’d rather we sat on our hands than sign Jorginho. Even play lokonga than sign him for 15 million and pay him 150k a week.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #534061  Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 9:13 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

No sooner do I post then Ornstein says…

Arsenal advancing towards agreement to sign Jorginho from Chelsea. 31yo Italy midfielder now most likely #DeadlineDay recruit. Acceptance at #AFC that Brighton stance on Moises Caicedo means pursuit of 21yo Ecuadorian is over


 Profile  
 
 
Post #534062  Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 9:19 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

The scale of the Jorginho issue will be on what terms he’s signed.

If he’s on a free and we just pick up his wages for the next 16 months it’s not much of a issue really. If he’s useless he won’t play for Arteta and we just move him in the summer. People moan about Willian but there’s wasn’t much loss there.

If we pay 15 million, 150k a week and it’s a 3 year deal it’s likely another situation where we have a player not adding value and could have to be paid off.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #534063  Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 9:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 7:45 am
Posts: 25814

The £105m that Chelsea are supposed to be bidding for Fernandez is quite remarkable. Benfica bought him from River Plate last summer for £9m.

_________________
I believe in our team, I believe in our quality and I am convinced that I am right. (Arsene Wenger Dec 08)


 Profile  
 
 
Post #534064  Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 9:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:22 pm
Posts: 20613

TOP GUN wrote:
No sooner do I post then Ornstein says…

Arsenal advancing towards agreement to sign Jorginho from Chelsea. 31yo Italy midfielder now most likely #DeadlineDay recruit. Acceptance at #AFC that Brighton stance on Moises Caicedo means pursuit of 21yo Ecuadorian is over


A club with our resources and souting network has to do better that Jorginho on the last day of the window.

We have a chance to win the league and you're telling me there is absolutely no one in europe, South America or even Africa who could have come in, even on loan, with a profile more similar to Partey than Jorginho.

Jorginho's contract is up in 6 months, if we end up paying £10-15m for him Chelsea will be laughing all the way to the bank.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #534065  Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 9:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 7:45 am
Posts: 25814

I’m surprised that Chelsea would consider letting one of their players come to us. With their dosh they can afford to keep him and thereby stop us strengthening.

_________________
I believe in our team, I believe in our quality and I am convinced that I am right. (Arsene Wenger Dec 08)


 Profile  
 
 
Post #534066  Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 9:24 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

socrates wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:
No sooner do I post then Ornstein says…

Arsenal advancing towards agreement to sign Jorginho from Chelsea. 31yo Italy midfielder now most likely #DeadlineDay recruit. Acceptance at #AFC that Brighton stance on Moises Caicedo means pursuit of 21yo Ecuadorian is over


A club with our resources and souting network has to do better that Jorginho on the last day of the window.

We have a chance to win the league and you're telling me there is absolutely no one in europe, South America or even Africa who could have come in, even on loan, with a profile more similar to Partey than Jorginho.


Who then? What obvious player can you extract in January.

Unless you pay an absolute fortune like chelsea you are signing a back up player, someone out of contract or someone like wouters who man united went for. It’s not really the time to do business but as Mikel said we have no option we have to use every window


 Profile  
 
 
Post #534067  Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 9:25 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

long time gooner wrote:
I’m surprised that Chelsea would consider letting one of their players come to us. With their dosh they can afford to keep him and thereby stop us strengthening.

They need to offload wages and squad numbers as a priority. I really hope we haven’t paid much though.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #534068  Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 9:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 7:45 am
Posts: 25814

I have seen it reported that Palace want to take Lakonga on loan. Assuming that we do actually get someone in through the door (not a definite by any means) then that would help us out quite a bit.

_________________
I believe in our team, I believe in our quality and I am convinced that I am right. (Arsene Wenger Dec 08)


 Profile  
 
 
Post #534069  Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 9:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:22 pm
Posts: 20613

long time gooner wrote:
I’m surprised that Chelsea would consider letting one of their players come to us. With their dosh they can afford to keep him and thereby stop us strengthening.



They probably don't care ltg, they won't catch us and if they get Enzo Fernandez he probably won't play anyway. The Chelsea signings are all about next season and thereafter so why not pick up a tidy little sum for a player who is leaving in a few months for free anyway.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #534070  Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 9:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 7:45 am
Posts: 25814

TOP GUN wrote:
long time gooner wrote:
I’m surprised that Chelsea would consider letting one of their players come to us. With their dosh they can afford to keep him and thereby stop us strengthening.

They need to offload wages and squad numbers as a priority. I really hope we haven’t paid much though.

Do they? They seem to be impervious to FFP. Is it the squad numbers thing then?

_________________
I believe in our team, I believe in our quality and I am convinced that I am right. (Arsene Wenger Dec 08)


 Profile  
 
 
Post #534071  Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 9:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 8:30 pm
Posts: 8154

TOP GUN wrote:
socrates wrote:
Looks like no Caicedo then,

Why have we left things so late to try to sign the one type of player we absolutely need to cover Partey, even more so with Elneny's injury?

We spent what seemed weeks chasing Mudryk, expecting Shakhter to cave-in and accept our offer. That went well.

We only signed Trossard after his agent apparently contacted us the day before he signed, so why did it take his agent contacting us to set the deal in motion? Was it just serendipity?

Kiwior looks like more of a successful planned signing.

Let's see what happens to day but its not looking good.


At the end of the day we just don’t have the budget so we have to stretch it. What’s the alternative ? 8 year contracts for unproven players.

Even if Brighton accepted 75 million I’d feel uneasy about it. He’s hardly proven.

Every once in a while we go large. Last summer it was Jesus, apparently this summer it’s Rice but there’s an element of working to a budget. It’s always been this way with Arsenal

I’d rather we sat on our hands than sign Jorginho. Even play lokonga than sign him for 15 million and pay him 150k a week.

I think "uneasy" is the appropriate word for the Caicedo fee. I feel the same. It's huge money for a guy who has done very little. If we are serious about Rice, you would wonder if we have the funds to get him in the summer if we have already spent £70/80m on Caicedo.

It's funny how being top of the table changes your perspective. If we were comfortably in 2nd but 5 points behind City, I would say we would be less inclined to favour huge spending in January.

_________________
"I just kept going pretty lively. Them killers wasn't too healthy company."


 Profile  
 
 
Post #534072  Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 9:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:22 pm
Posts: 20613

Jorginho is technically a very tidy player but he's got no pace and no legs, not really Parteyesque in any shape or form.

In the event of a Partey injury, does that mean we drop Xhaka in Partey's role and play Jorginho higher up the pitch where his lack of pace and mobility is less of an issue?


 Profile  
 
 
Post #534073  Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 9:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 7:45 am
Posts: 25814

TOP GUN wrote:
long time gooner wrote:
I’m surprised that Chelsea would consider letting one of their players come to us. With their dosh they can afford to keep him and thereby stop us strengthening.

They need to offload wages and squad numbers as a priority. I really hope we haven’t paid much though.

Oh wow. I was assuming that he was a free. Anything else is not great.

_________________
I believe in our team, I believe in our quality and I am convinced that I am right. (Arsene Wenger Dec 08)


 Profile  
 
 
Post #534074  Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 9:35 am 
Online

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:06 am
Posts: 16485

long time gooner wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:
They need to offload wages and squad numbers as a priority. I really hope we haven’t paid much though.

Do they? They seem to be impervious to FFP. Is it the squad numbers thing then?

Can't fit triple digit numbers on shirts?

_________________
Hamba kakuhle, Madiba


 Profile  
 
 
Post #534075  Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 9:51 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

socrates wrote:
Jorginho is technically a very tidy player but he's got no pace and no legs, not really Parteyesque in any shape or form.

In the event of a Partey injury, does that mean we drop Xhaka in Partey's role and play Jorginho higher up the pitch where his lack of pace and mobility is less of an issue?

I would assume the system would get tweaked so it’s more of a 2 to protect the back 4


 Profile  
 
 
Post #534076  Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 9:54 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

Fee is 12m. That’s a lot for a player who is only signing a 16 month contract.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #534077  Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 9:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:22 pm
Posts: 20613

TOP GUN wrote:
socrates wrote:
Jorginho is technically a very tidy player but he's got no pace and no legs, not really Parteyesque in any shape or form.

In the event of a Partey injury, does that mean we drop Xhaka in Partey's role and play Jorginho higher up the pitch where his lack of pace and mobility is less of an issue?

I would assume the system would get tweaked so it’s more of a 2 to protect the back 4


Very slow, one-paced midfield.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #534078  Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 9:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:22 pm
Posts: 20613

TOP GUN wrote:
Fee is 12m. That’s a lot for a player who is only signing a 16 month contract.


Ridiculous.

Reeks of deadline day desperation.

Arteta wanted him apparently, lets hope he's got this one right.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #534079  Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 10:01 am 
Online

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:06 am
Posts: 16485

TOP GUN wrote:
socrates wrote:
Jorginho is technically a very tidy player but he's got no pace and no legs, not really Parteyesque in any shape or form.

In the event of a Partey injury, does that mean we drop Xhaka in Partey's role and play Jorginho higher up the pitch where his lack of pace and mobility is less of an issue?

I would assume the system would get tweaked so it’s more of a 2 to protect the back 4

Hardly a league-winning formula if there is a long term problem with Partey? But that was always going to be a big ask.

So a decent bench option maybe.

_________________
Hamba kakuhle, Madiba


 Profile  
 
 
Post #534080  Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 10:07 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

socrates wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:
Fee is 12m. That’s a lot for a player who is only signing a 16 month contract.


Ridiculous.

Reeks of deadline day desperation.

Arteta wanted him apparently, lets hope he's got this one right.

This is the most important thing really.

People are comparing it to the wengers chelsea signings but we have Arteta in control now. A control freak who can’t stand his players giving the ball away let alone tracking back. Nothing misses him.

He’s probably going to start 3-4 games at most before being sold in the summer. Honestly just don’t play Partey in any europa games.


 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
     [ 548398 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1 ... 13349, 13350, 13351, 13352, 13353, 13354, 13355 ... 13710  Next

All times are UTC

Gooners Online - Click to see what Everyones Doing

Colour Key:  Visited Profile    Members Profile      Admin

Get Latest Post

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Decaf, mcquilkie and 282 guests


Search for:

Go to Top

Powered by php BB © 1993 - 2018