Fixtures Sunday April 28th - Tottenham Hotspur - Tottenham Hotspur Stadium - 2:00 Pm

Kick-Off

       Injuries                 Steve Gleiber



Get the Latest Post Go to the Bottom of Page It is currently Sun Apr 28, 2024 3:42 pm

All times are UTC


  


Reply to topic

Users browsing this forum: AmericanGooner, dec and 83 guests

 
Post #320521  Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2019 6:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 4:33 pm
Posts: 7073

old man of hoy wrote:
DHD wrote:
I find the subject immensely depressing and sad.

In my view, the whole Brexit agenda has been foisted upon us by an elite group of very rich and influential toffs, many of whose ancestors came over on the boat with Willie the Conq. This thing has been brewing for years. These are people who don't need Europe - indeed they need for nothing. They have never experienced deprivation in any form and they have no fear whatever of 'consequences'. They thrive on uncertainty; it's an engine of prosperity for those in a position of financial strength who can take advantage of the opportunities a broken economy will offer. All they fear is transparency in the form of what they see as unwarranted governmental intrusion into their financial dealings and holdings, for which the EU has been pressing for some time now.

As TG says, by subtly moving the focus over a number of years onto immigration, foreigners, austerity and what they term as a non-elected legislature - as if they themselves have ever been elected - they have shaped the debate, convincing vast areas of this island nation that the old enemy - Europe - is at the bottom of all our problems. They have fanned the flames to the point where it's now a curious alliance of the wealthy, the elderly, the under-educated and the under-privileged (brutal but in essence, true) who now carry the fight.

Sadly, I don't think this thing can be stopped. More worryingly, I can't see how the UK can be mended.

Apologies if I offend anyone with this view.
Or, the Brexit referendum was put forward by an old Etonian and his chums who were arrogantly sure that the people would do as they were told and vote to remain in the European Union. How dare they make a different choice? How dare they subvert aeons of history (actually just over 40 years) and revert to a independent position previously familiar o the people of the UK? I struggle to understand why the EU has come to be seen as some sort of paradise we we should never leave, as if life is not possible outside of it. Yes to Europeans, no to the EU!

There was a vote. The result of the referendum should be honoured by the politicians. Even though it wasn't the result they expected.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #320522  Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2019 6:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 2:02 pm
Posts: 8186

old man of hoy wrote:

The big and the powerful do best out of the European Union



“The big and the powerful” - is that really how you see us Old Man?


 Profile  
 
 
Post #320523  Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2019 6:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18427

old man of hoy wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:
Fine give me an example of how the EU has made a decision we objected to that has affected you. How will having left the EU improve life for you and your family? What is the 1st thing you're hoping our govt does that the EU were preventing it from doing ?
I never wanted to be in the EEC, let alone the EU. Tell me exactly how being part of the EU has benefited ordinary people of the UK in terms of social housing, education, health and social equality, all of which have deteriorated in our years of EU membership. If being in it helped improve any of those vital issues then it could be worth it, but the EU seems to play no part in the things that matter to the mass of our population. The big and the powerful do best out of the European Union - bit like the football really.


So you can’t answer, ok gotcha

You’ve pretty much said exactly what I referred to earlier, you think housing, education and social equality are being determined by the EU rather than our own government. Brilliant it’s just not there for that, it enables the free movement of goods, people and services. It’s not a magic wand if you have a bunch of utter helmets in your government.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #320524  Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2019 6:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 2:02 pm
Posts: 8186

bromley gooner wrote:

Even though it wasn't the result they expected.


Nor, I’d suggest, is it the Brexit that those who voted ‘out’ expected.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #320525  Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2019 6:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18427

bromley gooner wrote:
old man of hoy wrote:
Or, the Brexit referendum was put forward by an old Etonian and his chums who were arrogantly sure that the people would do as they were told and vote to remain in the European Union. How dare they make a different choice? How dare they subvert aeons of history (actually just over 40 years) and revert to a independent position previously familiar o the people of the UK? I struggle to understand why the EU has come to be seen as some sort of paradise we we should never leave, as if life is not possible outside of it. Yes to Europeans, no to the EU!

There was a vote. The result of the referendum should be honoured by the politicians. Even though it wasn't the result they expected.


A referendum is an advisory vote, nobody even mentioned no deal. An advisory vote is not a licence to wreck and divide the country at any cost.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #320526  Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2019 6:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:52 pm
Posts: 18760

DHD wrote:
old man of hoy wrote:

The big and the powerful do best out of the European Union



“The big and the powerful” - is that really how you see us Old Man?
My clumsy wording - what I meant is the big and powerful institutions and people benefit most from the EU more than the ordinary people.

_________________
"Young and caught up in life, we seldom watched the skies.”


 Profile  
 
 
Post #320527  Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2019 6:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 2:02 pm
Posts: 8186

old man of hoy wrote:
DHD wrote:

“The big and the powerful” - is that really how you see us Old Man?
My clumsy wording - what I meant is the big and powerful institutions and people benefit most from the EU more than the ordinary people.


Well when the UK - or what’s left of it - conclude that promised trade deal with Trump’s America, I suggest you prepare yourself for the interventions of USA’s much bigger and much more powerful institutions by assuming the position. Might be a bit of pain but it shouldn’t hurt for long.

Well, that’s what we’re promised, aren’t we?


 Profile  
 
 
Post #320528  Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2019 6:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:52 pm
Posts: 18760

TOP GUN wrote:
So you can’t answer, ok gotcha. You’ve pretty much said exactly what I referred to earlier, you think housing, education and social equality are being determined by the EU rather than our own government. Brilliant it’s just not there for that, it enables the free movement of goods, people and services. It’s not a magic wand if you have a bunch of utter helmets in your government.
Actually I am saying the opposite. If the EU had any major, determining positive impact on those issues as far as the ordinary person is concerned, it might just be worth staying in it, but as it clearly is unable to do anything in those key areas of our lives, then why remain? To my mind, if after almost half a century the EU can't help us build more homes; better educate our children and greatly influence our health or social equality, then it is not worth it. The EU remains an institution whose main priority is about protecting business, increasingly centralising political power, with the occasional nod to some social or environmental aspects. What it doesn't do is meet the fundamental needs of our people. We need to do that ourselves, helmets or no helmets.

_________________
"Young and caught up in life, we seldom watched the skies.”


 Profile  
 
 
Post #320529  Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2019 6:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:06 am
Posts: 16498

TOP GUN wrote:
Bernard wrote:
You clearly dislike him enough to exaggerate the problems about him. He has had plenty of good games. Prone to bad errors, I accept that. But not as bad as you try make out.


He’s about as useful as an ejector seat on a helicopter.

:laughing7: :laughing7:
I agree. He may turn out to be a decent player somewhere else but enough is enough.

_________________
Hamba kakuhle, Madiba


 Profile  
 
 
Post #320530  Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2019 6:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:52 pm
Posts: 18760

DHD wrote:
old man of hoy wrote:
My clumsy wording - what I meant is the big and powerful institutions and people benefit most from the EU more than the ordinary people.


Well when the UK - or what’s left of it - conclude that promised trade deal with Trump’s America, I suggest you prepare yourself for the interventions of USA’s much bigger and much more powerful institutions by assuming the position. Might be a bit of pain but it shouldn’t hurt for long.

Well, that’s what we’re promised, aren’t we?
My bet is that we will never leave the EU, so fear not!

_________________
"Young and caught up in life, we seldom watched the skies.”


 Profile  
 
 
Post #320531  Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2019 7:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 4:33 pm
Posts: 7073

TOP GUN wrote:
bromley gooner wrote:
There was a vote. The result of the referendum should be honoured by the politicians. Even though it wasn't the result they expected.


A referendum is an advisory vote, nobody even mentioned no deal. An advisory vote is not a licence to wreck and divide the country at any cost.

Would it have been an 'advisory' vote if the result had gone the other way - no it wouldn't.
Politicians both in the EU and here in Britain have been doing their best to stop Brexit from happening - it was supposed to happen in April (or was it March - I lose track). This is why 'no deal' is now a possibility.
The electorate were pretty clear on what they were voting on - do you want to remain in the EU or leave it. The vote should be honoured and our politicians (public servants, remember) should be doing all in their power to help the country move forward in a positive manner.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #320532  Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2019 7:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:52 pm
Posts: 18760

TOP GUN wrote:
bromley gooner wrote:
There was a vote. The result of the referendum should be honoured by the politicians. Even though it wasn't the result they expected.


A referendum is an advisory vote, nobody even mentioned no deal. An advisory vote is not a licence to wreck and divide the country at any cost.
Yes the position of referenda in our "constitution" is contentious, especially to those who lose the argument, but if you think not honouring the result of the largest one ever held in our history will heal divisions, then you are in for a rude awakening. If we don't Brexit - as I expect - then all bets are off about democracy in our basically decent country.

_________________
"Young and caught up in life, we seldom watched the skies.”


 Profile  
 
 
Post #320533  Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2019 7:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:06 am
Posts: 16498

old man of hoy wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:
Fine give me an example of how the EU has made a decision we objected to that has affected you. How will having left the EU improve life for you and your family? What is the 1st thing you're hoping our govt does that the EU were preventing it from doing ?
I never wanted to be in the EEC, let alone the EU. Tell me exactly how being part of the EU has benefited ordinary people of the UK in terms of social housing, education, health and social equality, all of which have deteriorated in our years of EU membership. If being in it helped improve any of those vital issues then it could be worth it, but the EU seems to play no part in the things that matter to the mass of our population. The big and the powerful do best out of the European Union - bit like the football really.

I'm surprised you think the EU rather than your own politicians (and by extension those who vote them into power) is to blame for these things.

_________________
Hamba kakuhle, Madiba


 Profile  
 
 
Post #320534  Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2019 7:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18427

old man of hoy wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:
So you can’t answer, ok gotcha. You’ve pretty much said exactly what I referred to earlier, you think housing, education and social equality are being determined by the EU rather than our own government. Brilliant it’s just not there for that, it enables the free movement of goods, people and services. It’s not a magic wand if you have a bunch of utter helmets in your government.
Actually I am saying the opposite. If the EU had any major, determining positive impact on those issues as far as the ordinary person is concerned, it might just be worth staying in it, but as it clearly is unable to do anything in those key areas of our lives, then why remain?


Your saying exactly that. It’s a gateway for trade and movement. A platform. We have the 7th largest gdp in the world. However because the government are helmets your saying we should leave without being able to identify a logical reason for leaving.

I’m not having anymore kids so therefore I won’t bother getting laid anymore.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #320535  Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2019 7:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18427

Decaf wrote:
old man of hoy wrote:
I never wanted to be in the EEC, let alone the EU. Tell me exactly how being part of the EU has benefited ordinary people of the UK in terms of social housing, education, health and social equality, all of which have deteriorated in our years of EU membership. If being in it helped improve any of those vital issues then it could be worth it, but the EU seems to play no part in the things that matter to the mass of our population. The big and the powerful do best out of the European Union - bit like the football really.

I'm surprised you think the EU rather than your own politicians (and by extension those who vote them into power) is to blame for these things.


Precisely.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #320536  Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2019 7:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:52 pm
Posts: 18760

bromley gooner wrote:
Would it have been an 'advisory' vote if the result had gone the other way - no it wouldn't. Politicians both in the EU and here in Britain have been doing their best to stop Brexit from happening - it was supposed to happen in April (or was it March - I lose track). This is why 'no deal' is now a possibility. The electorate were pretty clear on what they were voting on - do you want to remain in the EU or leave it. The vote should be honoured and our politicians (public servants, remember) should be doing all in their power to help the country move forward in a positive manner.
I agree. If we are not careful the failure of Parliament to implement the result of something it asked the people to vote on will weaken Parliament itself.

_________________
"Young and caught up in life, we seldom watched the skies.”


 Profile  
 
 
Post #320537  Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2019 7:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 2:02 pm
Posts: 8186

old man of hoy wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:
So you can’t answer, ok gotcha. You’ve pretty much said exactly what I referred to earlier, you think housing, education and social equality are being determined by the EU rather than our own government. Brilliant it’s just not there for that, it enables the free movement of goods, people and services. It’s not a magic wand if you have a bunch of utter helmets in your government.
Actually I am saying the opposite. If the EU had any major, determining positive impact on those issues as far as the ordinary person is concerned, it might just be worth staying in it, but as it clearly is unable to do anything in those key areas of our lives, then why remain? To my mind, if after almost half a century the EU can't help us build more homes; better educate our children and greatly influence our health or social equality, then it is not worth it. The EU remains an institution whose main priority is about protecting business, increasingly centralising political power, with the occasional nod to some social or environmental aspects. What it doesn't do is meet the fundamental needs of our people. We need to do that ourselves, helmets or no helmets.

But all the stuff you’re quoting there is the prerogative of national governments. The EU has never intruded beyond setting some entirely reasonable and pan-European agreed standards that establish baseline human requirements for an acceptable standard of living.

It’s the UK government’s responsibility to provide for its people in the areas you mention. The fact that that hasn’t happened is the responsibility of successive administrations, not Europe.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #320538  Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2019 7:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:06 am
Posts: 16498

old man of hoy wrote:
DHD wrote:

Well when the UK - or what’s left of it - conclude that promised trade deal with Trump’s America, I suggest you prepare yourself for the interventions of USA’s much bigger and much more powerful institutions by assuming the position. Might be a bit of pain but it shouldn’t hurt for long.

Well, that’s what we’re promised, aren’t we?
My bet is that we will never leave the EU, so fear not!

Well that is your best hope.

Your view that not implementing the referendum shakes democracy to the roots makes no sense to me.

It is parliament that is the sovereign institution. How can you think that the way MPs vote must be bound by a referendum result? If you think your MP has done something wrong, vote him or her out.

What has happened here is that the TORIES have screwed this up completely. They played a game that backfired completely on them.

_________________
Hamba kakuhle, Madiba


 Profile  
 
 
Post #320539  Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2019 7:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:52 pm
Posts: 18760

Decaf wrote:
I'm surprised you think the EU rather than your own politicians (and by extension those who vote them into power) is to blame for these things.
I haven't blamed the EU at all. I have simply said it has in almost half a century made minimal positive impact on the key issues facing ordinary people in our country. You could say that in that respect it has been irrelevant to us, except for the huge resources that have been diverted from the UK supporting the EU policies. Of course our own politicians bear the ultimate responsibility for domestic matters, but if the membership of the EU can't make a big difference in solving our major issues, then why not try something else? If we Brexit we are not leaving paradise.

_________________
"Young and caught up in life, we seldom watched the skies.”


 Profile  
 
 
Post #320540  Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2019 7:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:06 am
Posts: 16498

DHD wrote:
old man of hoy wrote:
Actually I am saying the opposite. If the EU had any major, determining positive impact on those issues as far as the ordinary person is concerned, it might just be worth staying in it, but as it clearly is unable to do anything in those key areas of our lives, then why remain? To my mind, if after almost half a century the EU can't help us build more homes; better educate our children and greatly influence our health or social equality, then it is not worth it. The EU remains an institution whose main priority is about protecting business, increasingly centralising political power, with the occasional nod to some social or environmental aspects. What it doesn't do is meet the fundamental needs of our people. We need to do that ourselves, helmets or no helmets.

But all the stuff you’re quoting there is the prerogative of national governments. The EU has never intruded beyond setting some entirely reasonable and pan-European agreed standards that establish baseline human requirements for an acceptable standard of living.

It’s the UK government’s responsibility to provide for its people in the areas you mention. The fact that that hasn’t happened is the responsibility of successive administrations, not Europe.

Indeed! The EU didn't elect Thatcher or Blair. We are seeing this terrible scapegoatism in South Africa too. Everything from crime to unemployment is blamed on 'undocumented immigrants'.

Who are these men of lust, greed, and glory?
Rip off the masks and let see
But that's no right oh no, what's the story?
But there's you and there's me

_________________
Hamba kakuhle, Madiba


 Profile  
 
 
Post #320541  Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2019 7:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18427

old man of hoy wrote:
Decaf wrote:
I'm surprised you think the EU rather than your own politicians (and by extension those who vote them into power) is to blame for these things.
I haven't blamed the EU at all. I have simply said it has in almost half a century made minimal positive impact on the key issues facing ordinary people in our country. You could say that in that respect it has been irrelevant to us, except for the huge resources that have been diverted from the UK supporting the EU policies.


The CBI estimates that the net benefit of EU membership is worth 4-5% of GDP to the UK, or £62bn-£78bn per year.

The EU is responsible for 44.6 per cent of all UK exports of goods and services, and 53.2 per cent of the UK’s imports of goods and services.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #320542  Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2019 7:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:06 am
Posts: 16498

old man of hoy wrote:
Decaf wrote:
I'm surprised you think the EU rather than your own politicians (and by extension those who vote them into power) is to blame for these things.
I haven't blamed the EU at all. I have simply said it has in almost half a century made minimal positive impact on the key issues facing ordinary people in our country. You could say that in that respect it has been irrelevant to us, except for the huge resources that have been diverted from the UK supporting the EU policies. Of course our own politicians bear the ultimate responsibility for domestic matters, but if the membership of the EU can't make a big difference in solving our major issues, then why not try something else? If we Brexit we are not leaving paradise.

The achievements of the broader European project have been immense. 70 years of peace and prosperity. What's good for Europe is good for Britain.

_________________
Hamba kakuhle, Madiba


 Profile  
 
 
Post #320543  Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2019 7:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:06 am
Posts: 16498

old man of hoy wrote:
bromley gooner wrote:
Would it have been an 'advisory' vote if the result had gone the other way - no it wouldn't. Politicians both in the EU and here in Britain have been doing their best to stop Brexit from happening - it was supposed to happen in April (or was it March - I lose track). This is why 'no deal' is now a possibility. The electorate were pretty clear on what they were voting on - do you want to remain in the EU or leave it. The vote should be honoured and our politicians (public servants, remember) should be doing all in their power to help the country move forward in a positive manner.
I agree. If we are not careful the failure of Parliament to implement the result of something it asked the people to vote on will weaken Parliament itself.

Come again?

_________________
Hamba kakuhle, Madiba


 Profile  
 
 
Post #320544  Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2019 7:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:52 pm
Posts: 18760

DHD wrote:
But all the stuff you’re quoting there is the prerogative of national governments. The EU has never intruded beyond setting some entirely reasonable and pan-European agreed standards that establish baseline human requirements for an acceptable standard of living. It’s the UK government’s responsibility to provide for its people in the areas you mention. The fact that that hasn’t happened is the responsibility of successive administrations, not Europe.
Yes I agree where the ultimate domestic responsibility lies, but you make my point for me. EU membership is not about helping us solve our real social needs, but it may impact socially and economically on our ability to do so. I think it is widely accepted that overall we are a net contributor rather than beneficiaries of the market and its freedom of movement, and that has had an impact on our finances. In time we can probably do better outside the EU.

_________________
"Young and caught up in life, we seldom watched the skies.”


 Profile  
 
 
Post #320545  Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2019 7:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:52 pm
Posts: 18760

Decaf wrote:
DHD wrote:
But all the stuff you’re quoting there is the prerogative of national governments. The EU has never intruded beyond setting some entirely reasonable and pan-European agreed standards that establish baseline human requirements for an acceptable standard of living.

It’s the UK government’s responsibility to provide for its people in the areas you mention. The fact that that hasn’t happened is the responsibility of successive administrations, not Europe.

Indeed! The EU didn't elect Thatcher or Blair. We are seeing this terrible scapegoatism in South Africa too. Everything from crime to unemployment is blamed on 'undocumented immigrants'.

Who are these men of lust, greed, and glory?
Rip off the masks and let see
But that's no right oh no, what's the story?
But there's you and there's me
Show me the goat I have scaped!

_________________
"Young and caught up in life, we seldom watched the skies.”


 Profile  
 
 
Post #320546  Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2019 7:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:52 pm
Posts: 18760

Decaf wrote:
old man of hoy wrote:
I haven't blamed the EU at all. I have simply said it has in almost half a century made minimal positive impact on the key issues facing ordinary people in our country. You could say that in that respect it has been irrelevant to us, except for the huge resources that have been diverted from the UK supporting the EU policies. Of course our own politicians bear the ultimate responsibility for domestic matters, but if the membership of the EU can't make a big difference in solving our major issues, then why not try something else? If we Brexit we are not leaving paradise.

The achievements of the broader European project have been immense. 70 years of peace and prosperity. What's good for Europe is good for Britain.

Yes I like apples too, but I was talking about oranges!

_________________
"Young and caught up in life, we seldom watched the skies.”


 Profile  
 
 
Post #320547  Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2019 7:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18427

old man of hoy wrote:
DHD wrote:
But all the stuff you’re quoting there is the prerogative of national governments. The EU has never intruded beyond setting some entirely reasonable and pan-European agreed standards that establish baseline human requirements for an acceptable standard of living. It’s the UK government’s responsibility to provide for its people in the areas you mention. The fact that that hasn’t happened is the responsibility of successive administrations, not Europe.
Yes I agree where the ultimate domestic responsibility lies, but you make my point for me. EU membership is not about helping us solve our real social needs, but it may impact socially and economically on our ability to do so. I think it is widely accepted that overall we are a net contributor rather than beneficiaries of the market and its freedom of movement, and that has had an impact on our finances. In time we can probably do better outside the EU.


To repeat 5% of our total GDP is because we are in the EU.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #320548  Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2019 7:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:06 am
Posts: 16498

bromley gooner wrote:
Trips to Germany, Belgium and Portugal in the EL group. Not bad. Glad we’ve avoided a journey to Kazakhstan or the like.

Better check your passport is up to date and you have the necessary visas.

_________________
Hamba kakuhle, Madiba


 Profile  
 
 
Post #320549  Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2019 7:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:52 pm
Posts: 18760

Decaf wrote:
old man of hoy wrote:
I agree. If we are not careful the failure of Parliament to implement the result of something it asked the people to vote on will weaken Parliament itself.

Come again?
When Parliament asked the people to vote on the issue - and it did - and the people in huge numbers then made known their view - Parliament will lose credibility if it does not implement the vote.

_________________
"Young and caught up in life, we seldom watched the skies.”


 Profile  
 
 
Post #320550  Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2019 7:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:52 pm
Posts: 18760

TOP GUN wrote:
old man of hoy wrote:
Yes I agree where the ultimate domestic responsibility lies, but you make my point for me. EU membership is not about helping us solve our real social needs, but it may impact socially and economically on our ability to do so. I think it is widely accepted that overall we are a net contributor rather than beneficiaries of the market and its freedom of movement, and that has had an impact on our finances. In time we can probably do better outside the EU.


To repeat 5% of our total GDP is because we are in the EU.
Leaving the EU does not mean we cease trading with its members. It does mean we can trade with non-members on our, rather than EU terms. Swings and roundabouts. How high and fast the freer trade will go is not yet known, but trading there will be.

_________________
"Young and caught up in life, we seldom watched the skies.”


 Profile  
 
 
Post #320551  Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2019 8:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 4:33 pm
Posts: 7073

Decaf wrote:
bromley gooner wrote:
Trips to Germany, Belgium and Portugal in the EL group. Not bad. Glad we’ve avoided a journey to Kazakhstan or the like.

Better check your passport is up to date and you have the necessary visas.

Yes, my passport is up to date, and if we actually do leave the EU at any point I'm sure I'll manage. As far as I know I'm not on Interpol's wanted list so I'm sure I'll be allowed in to spend my hard earned and do my bit to help the aforementioned neighbours' economies.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #320552  Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2019 8:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:06 am
Posts: 16498

old man of hoy wrote:
DHD wrote:
But all the stuff you’re quoting there is the prerogative of national governments. The EU has never intruded beyond setting some entirely reasonable and pan-European agreed standards that establish baseline human requirements for an acceptable standard of living. It’s the UK government’s responsibility to provide for its people in the areas you mention. The fact that that hasn’t happened is the responsibility of successive administrations, not Europe.
Yes I agree where the ultimate domestic responsibility lies, but you make my point for me. EU membership is not about helping us solve our real social needs, but it may impact socially and economically on our ability to do so. I think it is widely accepted that overall we are a net contributor rather than beneficiaries of the market and its freedom of movement, and that has had an impact on our finances.

Even that is the fault of your politicians. You are going to get screwed over in trade deals outside the EU if you send the likes of Farage and Johnson to negotiate them.

_________________
Hamba kakuhle, Madiba


 Profile  
 
 
Post #320553  Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2019 8:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:06 am
Posts: 16498

old man of hoy wrote:
Decaf wrote:
Come again?
When Parliament asked the people to vote on the issue - and it did - and the people in huge numbers then made known their view - Parliament will lose credibility if it does not implement the vote.

So you don't acknowledge the primacy of Parliament when if comes to the details of Brexit? They must just rubber-stamp what the Tories come up with?

I am an outsider, so perhaps I am missing something.

_________________
Hamba kakuhle, Madiba


 Profile  
 
 
Post #320554  Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2019 8:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:06 am
Posts: 16498

old man of hoy wrote:
Decaf wrote:
The achievements of the broader European project have been immense. 70 years of peace and prosperity. What's good for Europe is good for Britain.

Yes I like apples too, but I was talking about oranges!

" simply said it has in almost half a century made minimal positive impact on the key issues facing ordinary people in our country" = oranges.

What I said = oranges.

(in fact, your statement was so encompassing that its apples too, but I'll leave that).

_________________
Hamba kakuhle, Madiba


 Profile  
 
 
Post #320555  Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2019 9:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 2:02 pm
Posts: 8186

old man of hoy wrote:
DHD wrote:
But all the stuff you’re quoting there is the prerogative of national governments. The EU has never intruded beyond setting some entirely reasonable and pan-European agreed standards that establish baseline human requirements for an acceptable standard of living. It’s the UK government’s responsibility to provide for its people in the areas you mention. The fact that that hasn’t happened is the responsibility of successive administrations, not Europe.
Yes I agree where the ultimate domestic responsibility lies, but you make my point for me. EU membership is not about helping us solve our real social needs, but it may impact socially and economically on our ability to do so. I think it is widely accepted that overall we are a net contributor rather than beneficiaries of the market and its freedom of movement, and that has had an impact on our finances. In time we can probably do better outside the EU.


Sorry Old Man but I make no point at all in support of your notion that Europe has somehow failed the UK. Your arguments make no sense.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #320556  Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2019 11:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:42 am
Posts: 12636
Location: Rotorua New Zealand

Decaf wrote:

Your view that not implementing the referendum shakes democracy to the roots makes no sense to me.

The vote to leave won the day and now you have the crazies , looneys and " the think they know betters " out in force trying to force a reversal

... if they get their way ...... ..... that will galvanise the crazies , looneys and " think they know betters ' from the other side to start rabble rousing .

You can't see that is a danger to democracy ....... ? :icon_scratch:


 Profile  
 
 
Post #320557  Posted: Sat Aug 31, 2019 5:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:04 am
Posts: 7393
Location: Townsville Australia

I know we still have a day before Spurs but I would be interested to know what others think about players & tactics for the game. Not sure I would play Xhaka( but think Emery will); would select Pépé but bring him on after 60 minutes; Lacazette & Aubameyang to start; I suppose we have no choice but to pick Luiz but I think he is problem. I want us to attacking & only occasionally play it out from the back but I think I will be whistling for that to happen & I expect Spurs to be shutting us down all the time. I am more than a little concerned with this game although Spurs are not playing all that well so we should be okay.

_________________
If this policy does not deliver then I would say we have to change it.
AW 150810


 Profile  
 
 
Post #320558  Posted: Sat Aug 31, 2019 6:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:31 pm
Posts: 329
Location: Pompey

old man of hoy wrote:
Tell me exactly how being part of the EU has benefited ordinary people of the UK in terms of social housing, education, health and social equality, all of which have deteriorated in our years of EU membership.


Ok, youre so wrong on this it hurts. My son is doing a PHD at Bath University which is entirely funded by an EU grant, as are the vast majority of higher diplomas in this country. He is also 40k in debt because our own government, the ones we want to hand power back to, have made sure that further education now costs an absolute fortune. His degree cost 40k because thats the UK education system, his PHD has cost nothing because of the EU. In Germany his degree would have cost nothing because the German government recognise the importance of higher education for their population and the positive effect it will have on their future, and they have the ability to make independent decisions on who should pay for it. They are not bound by EU directives on this. My son is also not doing a PHD because his mum and dad are rich, powerful, or entitled. Hes clever.

Recently my wifes health deteriorated due to her ulcerative colitis. Last year she had the majority of her large intestine, colon, and rectum removed and just about fought off septicaemia and now lives with a stoma bag. Her operation was performed by a marvellous Italian surgeon on the NHS, and 90% of the nurses who cared for her during her 3 weeks in hospital were EU immigrants. Without the EU and the free movement of trade and people our NHS wouldnt exist and my wife might well be dead.

So both of my direct family members have had their lives positively enhanced by the EU.

_________________
"Rather than spending millions relaying the wembley pitch, they should be putting money into grassroots" - Collymore, Stan


 Profile  
 
 
Post #320559  Posted: Sat Aug 31, 2019 6:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 2:55 pm
Posts: 11512
Location: Singapore

Gaz from Oz wrote:
I know we still have a day before Spurs but I would be interested to know what others think about players & tactics for the game. Not sure I would play Xhaka( but think Emery will); would select Pépé but bring him on after 60 minutes; Lacazette & Aubameyang to start; I suppose we have no choice but to pick Luiz but I think he is problem. I want us to attacking & only occasionally play it out from the back but I think I will be whistling for that to happen & I expect Spurs to be shutting us down all the time. I am more than a little concerned with this game although Spurs are not playing all that well so we should be okay.


I would pick Luiz, and have him mark Kane. Give him lots of grief, but ask him not to be stupid with his hands around the box. We need the guile of Luiz to counter Kane and or Son.

Unfortunately Xhaka will start, because his size matters. He just needs to be faster with the ball. When will Emery start to get him to release the ball earlier?

Torreira is a starter for me. His tenacity is needed. Guendozi has become less effective in his role. He is becoming an "Elneny", abeit a notch higher.

Be brave and start all of Aubameyang, Lacazette and Pépé. Give Spurs something to worry about from the onset. Emery has to stop doubting his team and his players. Play these 3, and let them give Spurs little time to settle.

Talking of which, please play faster from the back. The slow-mo, many triangle passes at the back, is as irritating as the tippy-tappy from the past era. This facet of Emery's tactics is my current dislike of his style. It is not even effective, so why keep doing the same over and over?

Leno
AMN Sok Luiz Monreal
Torreira Xhaka
Pépé Ceballos Aubameyang
Lacazette

_________________
Onwards and Upwards!


 Profile  
 
 
Post #320560  Posted: Sat Aug 31, 2019 6:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:04 am
Posts: 7393
Location: Townsville Australia

gooner7 wrote:
Gaz from Oz wrote:
I know we still have a day before Spurs but I would be interested to know what others think about players & tactics for the game. Not sure I would play Xhaka( but think Emery will); would select Pépé but bring him on after 60 minutes; Lacazette & Aubameyang to start; I suppose we have no choice but to pick Luiz but I think he is problem. I want us to attacking & only occasionally play it out from the back but I think I will be whistling for that to happen & I expect Spurs to be shutting us down all the time. I am more than a little concerned with this game although Spurs are not playing all that well so we should be okay.


I would pick Luiz, and have him mark Kane. Give him lots of grief, but ask him not to be stupid with his hands around the box. We need the guile of Luiz to counter Kane and or Son.

Unfortunately Xhaka will start, because his size matters. He just needs to be faster with the ball. When will Emery start to get him to release the ball earlier?

Torreira is a starter for me. His tenacity is needed. Guendozi has become less effective in his role. He is becoming an "Elneny", abeit a notch higher.

Be brave and start all of Aubameyang, Lacazette and Pépé. Give Spurs something to worry about from the onset. Emery has to stop doubting his team and his players. Play these 3, and let them give Spurs little time to settle.

Talking of which, please play faster from the back. The slow-mo, many triangle passes at the back, is as irritating as the tippy-tappy from the past era. This facet of Emery's tactics is my current dislike of his style. It is not even effective, so why keep doing the same over and over?

Leno
AMN Sok Luiz Monreal
Torreira Xhaka
Pépé Ceballos Aubameyang
Lacazette

I will be surprised if Emery has the courage to select all 3 up front. I would pick Lacazette with Pépé but I think Emery likes Aubameyang and he is the first on the sheet. I know one thing I still think our defence looks poor.

_________________
If this policy does not deliver then I would say we have to change it.
AW 150810


 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
     [ 390298 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1 ... 8011, 8012, 8013, 8014, 8015, 8016, 8017 ... 9758  Next

All times are UTC

Gooners Online - Click to see what Everyones Doing

Colour Key:  Visited Profile    Members Profile      Admin

Get Latest Post

Users browsing this forum: AmericanGooner, dec and 83 guests


Search for:

Go to Top

Powered by php BB © 1993 - 2018