Fixtures Sunday April 28th - Tottenham Hotspur - Tottenham Hotspur Stadium - 2:00 Pm

Kick-Off

       Injuries                 Steve Gleiber



Get the Latest Post Go to the Bottom of Page It is currently Sun Apr 28, 2024 12:37 pm

All times are UTC


  


Reply to topic

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], bubblechris, warrior and 274 guests

 
Post #397681  Posted: Mon Apr 22, 2019 4:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 8:30 pm
Posts: 8154

Decaf wrote:
grantyboy wrote:

I'm starting to form an opinion that despite his much lauded preparation that he's overthinking it to the point of not having a clue.

I agree. After Spurs and United lost, Emery should have started with the strongest team available (including Torriera and AMN, surely) yesterday. Take the points, make a statement, keep the momentum, rather than save players for games you might lose anyway. A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush. Now we are in a bit of a fix with two massive games a week til the end of the season. There's no telling what our rivals will do (United might even come back into it now their focus is singular) but I doubt that we'll get more than another 8 points. Squeaky bum time.

Emery is prioritising the Europa League over the PL. That is just about understandable given they coold actually win the EL. However, we had a relatively easy game against Napoli. Once Lacazette scored, the tie was over so it really shouldn't have warranted having to field a weakened team against Palace.

Also, I don't but the hard luck/injury line at all. There's some revisionism here. Mustafi was definitely first choice centre back at the start of the season. Holding was a reserve and Koscielny was out long term with a question mark over his future. Bellerin's injury was a blow but that happens to every team and we supposedly bought Lichsteiner as defensive cover. There's no excuses. We had a great opportunity with Man U completely tanking this season. I hope we can take it, but I suspect we won't.

_________________
"I just kept going pretty lively. Them killers wasn't too healthy company."


 Profile  
 
 
Post #397682  Posted: Mon Apr 22, 2019 4:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

Bernard wrote:
John wrote:
Or maybe Bernard you are taking the ' I hate Mustafi' comment out of context? When it comes to playing for Arsenal I hate the useless pile of *%^@ myself.

That been said, yesterday is on Emery. It looked an absolute car crash of a team on paper and so it proved. I think we blew our top 4 chances losing that game, even a point would have been more than useful.

Hate is a very big word John (despite only having four letters) that I think people should try to use literally. I do actually agree though. Emery was the main culprit for yesterday.


Ok a few points on this. The hate thing I agree, I hate Mustafis performances but not him.

On the culprit comment im not totally in agreement. To explain why is I think you can slightly blame him for playing 5 at the back to counter all the crap defenders Wenger signed but not for his rotation.

He can’t break his better players by playing them too much otherwise we will be screwed.

Our approach for many years was to only recruit players when we were desperate or trying to placate a scout or staff member

Look at the players who played yesterday who people are hating on and shaming....

Jenkinson - purely signed off the back of us recruiting an academy coach from charlton. (hodd probably knows more about this) Was never good enough. Great person, good attitude but should be playing championship or lower

El Nenny- purely signed because jack had yet another injury and we needed numbers. Your better off playing youth players

Mustafi- signed because we had no option remember how desperate we were and had no other options. Pure desperation on our part and we probably paid 35% more than he’s worth because of our desperation. I think he’s got the worst decision making of any defender I’ve seen at arsenal including those who had far less technical ability than him like senderos and Djourou.

My point is for a long time under Arsene we only signed new players when we were screwed. That’s not how you conduct good business and get good talent.

Emery is getting pelters for playing this lot but he didn’t sign them. If a violinist is being asked to play a harmonica it might not be a positive musical experience


 Profile  
 
 
Post #397683  Posted: Mon Apr 22, 2019 4:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:22 pm
Posts: 20613

According to this we've got the joint worst record in the league for making mistakes that lead directly to goals.

https://readarsenal.com/2019/04/22/whic ... er-league/

No surprise there then.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #397684  Posted: Mon Apr 22, 2019 4:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:22 pm
Posts: 20613

Emery's team selection was not great but he can't legislate for the kind of comedy defending we saw on show yesterday. Our players are experienced professionals, and in most cases internationals, yet they are making incomprehensible errors both individually and collectively.

Mustafi might as well have stood in the centre circle and pulled his pants down because that is what happened to him over the course of the game.

He was not alone either.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #397685  Posted: Mon Apr 22, 2019 6:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:06 am
Posts: 16486

dec wrote:
Decaf wrote:
I agree. After Spurs and United lost, Emery should have started with the strongest team available (including Torriera and AMN, surely) yesterday. Take the points, make a statement, keep the momentum, rather than save players for games you might lose anyway. A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush. Now we are in a bit of a fix with two massive games a week til the end of the season. There's no telling what our rivals will do (United might even come back into it now their focus is singular) but I doubt that we'll get more than another 8 points. Squeaky bum time.

Emery is prioritising the Europa League over the PL. That is just about understandable given they coold actually win the EL. However, we had a relatively easy game against Napoli. Once Lacazette scored, the tie was over so it really shouldn't have warranted having to field a weakened team against Palace.

Also, I don't but the hard luck/injury line at all. There's some revisionism here. Mustafi was definitely first choice centre back at the start of the season. Holding was a reserve and Koscielny was out long term with a question mark over his future. Bellerin's injury was a blow but that happens to every team and we supposedly bought Lichsteiner as defensive cover. There's no excuses. We had a great opportunity with Man U completely tanking this season. I hope we can take it, but I suspect we won't.


Indeed. And I could understand playing a weakened team yesterday if we had actually were playing in Europe in midweek. I just don't understand the midfield selections.

_________________
Hamba kakuhle, Madiba


 Profile  
 
 
Post #397686  Posted: Mon Apr 22, 2019 7:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:58 am
Posts: 34119

Once a gooner :58big-emoticons:
Monaco star Cesc enjoys swipe at Spurs - via Roberts

https://www.tribalfootball.com/articles ... ts-4277632

_________________
"Never relegated, Never Will Be" :)


 Profile  
 
 
Post #397687  Posted: Mon Apr 22, 2019 7:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:58 am
Posts: 34119

socrates wrote:
ively.

Mustafi might as well have stood in the centre circle and pulled his pants down because that is what happened to him over the course of the game.

He was not alone either.


Is this close enough?


_________________
"Never relegated, Never Will Be" :)


 Profile  
 
 
Post #397688  Posted: Mon Apr 22, 2019 8:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 1:31 pm
Posts: 8152
Location: London

Rich wrote:
I am so fed up with our goals against being so often down to horrendous and unexplainable individual errors.
Just in the two palace games we have given them:
2 penalties for diving in
A free header 6 yards out from a set piece
A free run for a 1v1 which should have been easily covered
Another 2 unmarked free headers from a corner

It is the biggest thing holding us back.

Sokratis has made a few mistakes this season but the difference between him and mustafi is Sokratis mistakes come from him trying to help, trying to defend and make a difference. Mustafi’s mistakes far too often come from not doing his job, passing on the blame! The number of times he turns to his GK having expected them to come, or not tracked a run because he thought they were offside. It’s utterly ridiculous.

Bellerin and Holding’s injuries have really hurt us. With both fit jenkinson, Lichtsteiner, mustafi would have had far less game time.


Yup - Napoli away, no Mustafi, calm and collected clean sheet. Mustafi returns, 3 goals conceded - no great help from Jenks, Elneny, Guendouzi...

Same old issue. Our best 11 playing well is pretty good. But there are a number in our squad who simply aren't up to this level.

_________________
"....its up for grabs now.........THOMAS!"


 Profile  
 
 
Post #397689  Posted: Mon Apr 22, 2019 8:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 1:31 pm
Posts: 8152
Location: London

Rich wrote:
Are we allowed to point out another terrible penalty decision NOT given to the arsenal? Or because we played so badly we can’t complain about a bad decision.
I’ve seen Liverpool get so many soft ones this season, it seems every time salah goes down he gets a pen. I know the defender had his hands on salah and pundits are using that to defend giving a pen. But give everyone a pen then. At the moment it seems only salah gets them. These things do not even themselves out over a course of a season.
Yes I’d much prefer we do enough in games that takes any bad officiating out of the equation but it doesn’t work like that and sometimes you need the officials to make the right calls


VAR, if applied correctly will be of benefit to Arsenal and less so to Spurs, Utd & Liverpool. We've had a lot of penalties not given to us over the last few seasons....whereas Spurs & liverpool have done very nicely in the last 2-3 years.

_________________
"....its up for grabs now.........THOMAS!"


 Profile  
 
 
Post #397690  Posted: Mon Apr 22, 2019 8:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 1:31 pm
Posts: 8152
Location: London

grantyboy wrote:
Rich wrote:
I think we now stand a better chance of getting CL from the Europa League than the prem. yesterday’s loss will prove fatal to top 4 and I think it will be spurs and Chelsea now.
Spurs will coast in to 3rd with their fixtures. Chelsea will take 8-10 points from their games which we won’t be able to match from ours.

Games like these really highlight the lack of quality in so many positions in the squad, also the rotten luck with injuries.


Is it really bad.luck when every single season Arsenal has an injury crisis?


This isn't Rosicky, Diaby and an aging Arteta though. Holding & Bellerin have barely had an injury of any note before, and weren't being overplayed unlike under wenger. Welbeck and Ramsey are the only consistently injury prone players we have left and both are leaving. Of course, chumps like Mustafi and Elneny only ever get minor knocks...

_________________
"....its up for grabs now.........THOMAS!"


 Profile  
 
 
Post #397691  Posted: Mon Apr 22, 2019 8:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

Just seen their 2nd goal. My god that’s the worst thing I’ve ever seen. It tops the city final blooper.

Also just the way Leno scrambled to get it and mustafi blamed him afterwards.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #397692  Posted: Mon Apr 22, 2019 8:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 1:31 pm
Posts: 8152
Location: London

Rich wrote:
I think we now stand a better chance of getting CL from the Europa League than the prem. yesterday’s loss will prove fatal to top 4 and I think it will be spurs and Chelsea now.
Spurs will coast in to 3rd with their fixtures. Chelsea will take 8-10 points from their games which we won’t be able to match from ours.

Games like these really highlight the lack of quality in so many positions in the squad, also the rotten luck with injuries.


Not so sure about Chelsea getting that amount of points after tonight. Teams 3-6 are woefully inconsistent at the mo

_________________
"....its up for grabs now.........THOMAS!"


 Profile  
 
 
Post #397693  Posted: Mon Apr 22, 2019 8:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26777

Chelsea 2-2 Burnley full time

Big bonus for Chelsea to drop 2 points at home. Wasn’t expecting that.

Chelsea’s remaining fixtures
Man U away
Watford home
Leicester away

If we pick up at least a point at wolves we’re level with Chelsea with easier fixtures


 Profile  
 
 
Post #397694  Posted: Mon Apr 22, 2019 9:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

Rich wrote:
Chelsea 2-2 Burnley full time

Big bonus for Chelsea to drop 2 points at home. Wasn’t expecting that.

Chelsea’s remaining fixtures
Man U away
Watford home
Leicester away

If we pick up at least a point at wolves we’re level with Chelsea with easier fixtures

We need united to take 3 points off them. If we had won yesterday we would be absolutely laughing.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #397695  Posted: Mon Apr 22, 2019 9:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:52 pm
Posts: 18760

TOP GUN wrote:
...Emery is getting pelters for playing this lot but he didn’t sign them. If a violinist is being asked to play a harmonica it might not be a positive musical experience
On the other hand Arsene did sign Holding and Bellerin, who we are apparently missing greatly...

_________________
"Young and caught up in life, we seldom watched the skies.”


 Profile  
 
 
Post #397696  Posted: Mon Apr 22, 2019 9:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:58 am
Posts: 34119

The football gods keep throwing us gifts, Tottenham losing to City, Man Utd losing, Chelsea drawing at home and we spit in the football gods eyes.

_________________
"Never relegated, Never Will Be" :)


 Profile  
 
 
Post #397697  Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 12:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 5:27 pm
Posts: 11163

Goonie wrote:
I wonder what the plans are for next season... surely we can't rely on Monreal and Koscielny to be first-teamers still?

I very much doubt it. Doesn't Monreal's contract end this summer? If so I suspect he'll move on. I think Koscielny's contract ends in the summer of 2020. So I think he'll stay but next season will be his last at Arsenal.

Here's my guess of what will happen with the defence for next season. Mustafi will be sold this summer. A new central defender will be signed from somewhere, probably a player in his early twenties who shows big promise which will push the price up without being a Van Dijk type cost. The other possibility is someone like Boateng. In his day great but the rumours I'm getting is he's had a poor season and Bayern are willing to let go. But the younger player is, I reckon, more likely.

Whether we play four or five at the back (with two or three central defenders), I suspect the new player will be the obvious first choice. Alongside him will be either Sokratis or Holding in a back four or both with a back five. Koscielny and I hope Medley will be used to cover injuries, suspensions, and resting players. I see Mavropanos going on loan somewhere.

If Monreal goes we're left with Kolasinac who's decent going forward but can't defend to save his life. So I expect a new left back to arrive. With Bellerin and Maitland-Niles (I'm sure Lichtsteiner will go) that should hopefully be enough at right back. Maybe Jenkinson will be kept for dire emergencies or will be sold. I think it could come down to when his contract ends, which I don't know.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #397698  Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 1:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:58 am
Posts: 34119

Seems there is a petition to name the stadium after Wenger. I fully support the re-naming of the stadium. I am not sure if its possible contractually from Emirates but if its so I would agree but I would call it the Chapman-Wenger stadium or Wenger-Chapman stadium. Chapman got us to national (and to some extent international) prominence and can't be overlooked in my humble opinion.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8uKeGXZ5cPQ

_________________
"Never relegated, Never Will Be" :)


 Profile  
 
 
Post #397699  Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 4:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:04 am
Posts: 7392
Location: Townsville Australia

Rich wrote:
Chelsea 2-2 Burnley full time

Big bonus for Chelsea to drop 2 points at home. Wasn’t expecting that.

Chelsea’s remaining fixtures
Man U away
Watford home
Leicester away

If we pick up at least a point at wolves we’re level with Chelsea with easier fixtures

Easier fixtures - mate if ever a team can turn an easy fixture into a nail biter we can because of arrogance (failure to pay respect to our opponents) or the number of mistakes we make.

The fact we are still in with a chance of fourth means we have improved from last year IMO but our carefree attitude persists. The no personal responsibility that permeates the current generation, has been allowed to develop and grow at the club. Changing that is the first challenge.

Do an exercise we used to do in Oz when we were playing cricket against the great West Indies sides and fast bowlers - who would you want to bat for your life. Look at the current Arsenal team and tell me who you would select to play for you if your life depended upon it. It is difficult to select 11 players. You know the Tony Adams, David Oleary, Dixon, Henry, or even someone like Perry Groves or Giles Grimandi would try their guts out for you. Whose attitude would you prefer Patrick Viera or our current teams.

When managing change, like Emery is trying to do, you cannot change culture of a business in under three years. We have a long way to go.

_________________
If this policy does not deliver then I would say we have to change it.
AW 150810


 Profile  
 
 
Post #397700  Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 5:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:04 am
Posts: 7392
Location: Townsville Australia

AmericanGooner wrote:
Seems there is a petition to name the stadium after Wenger. I fully support the re-naming of the stadium. I am not sure if its possible contractually from Emirates but if its so I would agree but I would call it the Chapman-Wenger stadium or Wenger-Chapman stadium. Chapman got us to national (and to some extent international) prominence and can't be overlooked in my humble opinion.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8uKeGXZ5cPQ

Is Merson back on the sauce because his judgement is lacking. They are still trying to sift through the rubble after his departure. I would rather it be named the Chapman Mee Graham Stadium but I suspect it will probably change name to .."(insert name of sponsor who offers most money) Stadium".

_________________
If this policy does not deliver then I would say we have to change it.
AW 150810


 Profile  
 
 
Post #397701  Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 5:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:04 am
Posts: 7392
Location: Townsville Australia

As for the Wolves game - are they celebrating 60 years since their last title this week. Yeah I don't expect their players to be up for this game - give them something to celebrate for the season - will no doubt not be within their thoughts. Just in case some on here don't recognise it - sarcasm.

_________________
If this policy does not deliver then I would say we have to change it.
AW 150810


 Profile  
 
 
Post #397702  Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 5:15 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:06 am
Posts: 16486

AmericanGooner wrote:
The football gods keep throwing us gifts, Tottenham losing to City, Man Utd losing, Chelsea drawing at home and we spit in the football gods eyes.

... or maybe its just very hard to play two games a week after a long season unless, apparently, you are Liverpool or City. United might even come back into it ...

_________________
Hamba kakuhle, Madiba


 Profile  
 
 
Post #397703  Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 5:37 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:06 am
Posts: 16486

Gaz from Oz wrote:
Rich wrote:
Chelsea 2-2 Burnley full time

Big bonus for Chelsea to drop 2 points at home. Wasn’t expecting that.

Chelsea’s remaining fixtures
Man U away
Watford home
Leicester away

If we pick up at least a point at wolves we’re level with Chelsea with easier fixtures

Easier fixtures - mate if ever a team can turn an easy fixture into a nail biter we can because of arrogance (failure to pay respect to our opponents) or the number of mistakes we make.

The fact we are still in with a chance of fourth means we have improved from last year IMO but our carefree attitude persists. The no personal responsibility that permeates the current generation, has been allowed to develop and grow at the club. Changing that is the first challenge.

Do an exercise we used to do in Oz when we were playing cricket against the great West Indies sides and fast bowlers - who would you want to bat for your life. Look at the current Arsenal team and tell me who you would select to play for you if your life depended upon it. It is difficult to select 11 players. You know the Tony Adams, David Oleary, Dixon, Henry, or even someone like Perry Groves or Giles Grimandi would try their guts out for you. Whose attitude would you prefer Patrick Viera or our current teams.

When managing change, like Emery is trying to do, you cannot change culture of a business in under three years. We have a long way to go.

I disagree. Özil is the only player whose attitude one might question. And there is nothing specifically 'modern' about being something of a maverick.

The problem with El Neny, Jenks, Mavrapanos and Mustafi is that they are just not quite good enough, for whatever reason.

Kos, Sokratis, Monreal, ANM, Torriera, and Xhaka are seriously nuggety characters. Monreal and Kos are getting on, but who can deny that they've been admirable characters and great servants to the club? Its not their fault that we haven't been more successful.

We blew the palace game because Emery gambled and it didn't pay off. The gamble was a bit reckless considering that Palace have been upsetting top six teams all season.

_________________
Hamba kakuhle, Madiba


 Profile  
 
 
Post #397704  Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 5:46 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:06 am
Posts: 16486

Gaz from Oz wrote:
AmericanGooner wrote:
Seems there is a petition to name the stadium after Wenger. I fully support the re-naming of the stadium. I am not sure if its possible contractually from Emirates but if its so I would agree but I would call it the Chapman-Wenger stadium or Wenger-Chapman stadium. Chapman got us to national (and to some extent international) prominence and can't be overlooked in my humble opinion.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8uKeGXZ5cPQ

Is Merson back on the sauce because his judgement is lacking. They are still trying to sift through the rubble after his departure. I would rather it be named the Chapman Mee Graham Stadium but I suspect it will probably change name to .."(insert name of sponsor who offers most money) Stadium".

I would go for the Herbert Chapman stadium. Next time we move we can call it the Arsene Wenger stadium. But right now the name is a bit too divisive.

_________________
Hamba kakuhle, Madiba


 Profile  
 
 
Post #397705  Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 6:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 5:27 pm
Posts: 11163

Decaf wrote:
Gaz from Oz wrote:
Is Merson back on the sauce because his judgement is lacking. They are still trying to sift through the rubble after his departure. I would rather it be named the Chapman Mee Graham Stadium but I suspect it will probably change name to .."(insert name of sponsor who offers most money) Stadium".

I would go for the Herbert Chapman stadium. Next time we move we can call it the Arsene Wenger stadium. But right now the name is a bit too divisive.

I wouldn't support naming any ground after any former manager. Be it this one, the last one retrospectively, or the next one. Does any club? Old Trafford isn't called the Busby or Ferguson Stadium; Anfield isn't called the Shankley or Paisley Stadium. The Nicholson Stadium isn't, from what I've heard, being considered for the new Tottenham ground.

Gaz is right. It'll be the Emirates until a new sponsor pays us more for naming rights. That's what Tottenham are waiting for too.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #397706  Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 7:01 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

Bernard wrote:
Decaf wrote:
I would go for the Herbert Chapman stadium. Next time we move we can call it the Arsene Wenger stadium. But right now the name is a bit too divisive.

I wouldn't support naming any ground after any former manager.


Totally agree ridiculous to do otherwise.

New Highbury, or The Arsenal stadium but stadiums will be sponsor forever and always now anyway.

The skodran Mustafi stand or whatever sounds ridiculous.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #397707  Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 9:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 5:27 pm
Posts: 11163

TOP GUN wrote:
Bernard wrote:
I wouldn't support naming any ground after any former manager.


Totally agree ridiculous to do otherwise.

New Highbury, or The Arsenal stadium but stadiums will be sponsor forever and always now anyway.

The skodran Mustafi stand or whatever sounds ridiculous.

I think some clubs name stands after club legends. Isn't there a Moore stand at the London Stadium? There was certainly a Brooking stand at Upton Park as the away end was in it. I don't even like that, let alone naming the whole stadium after someone. I even wish they'd left the two bridges leading from Drayton Park to the Emirates as the north and south bridges, rather than the Friar and Fitzman bridges.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #397708  Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 10:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:52 pm
Posts: 18760

Decaf wrote:
...We blew the palace game because Emery gambled and it didn't pay off. The gamble was a bit reckless considering that Palace have been upsetting top six teams all season.
Yes, it was an error which could prove very costly. Strange to not play his strongest cards in a London derby at home as the league campaign reaches its climax. Few managers would do that.

_________________
"Young and caught up in life, we seldom watched the skies.”


 Profile  
 
 
Post #397709  Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 10:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:52 pm
Posts: 18760

Bernard wrote:
I wouldn't support naming any ground after any former manager. Be it this one, the last one retrospectively, or the next one...
I agree. Arsenal Stadium would please me.

_________________
"Young and caught up in life, we seldom watched the skies.”


 Profile  
 
 
Post #397710  Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 11:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:04 am
Posts: 7392
Location: Townsville Australia

Decaf wrote:
Gaz from Oz wrote:
Easier fixtures - mate if ever a team can turn an easy fixture into a nail biter we can because of arrogance (failure to pay respect to our opponents) or the number of mistakes we make.

The fact we are still in with a chance of fourth means we have improved from last year IMO but our carefree attitude persists. The no personal responsibility that permeates the current generation, has been allowed to develop and grow at the club. Changing that is the first challenge.

Do an exercise we used to do in Oz when we were playing cricket against the great West Indies sides and fast bowlers - who would you want to bat for your life. Look at the current Arsenal team and tell me who you would select to play for you if your life depended upon it. It is difficult to select 11 players. You know the Tony Adams, David Oleary, Dixon, Henry, or even someone like Perry Groves or Giles Grimandi would try their guts out for you. Whose attitude would you prefer Patrick Viera or our current teams.

When managing change, like Emery is trying to do, you cannot change culture of a business in under three years. We have a long way to go.

I disagree. Özil is the only player whose attitude one might question. And there is nothing specifically 'modern' about being something of a maverick.

The problem with El Neny, Jenks, Mavrapanos and Mustafi is that they are just not quite good enough, for whatever reason.

Kos, Sokratis, Monreal, ANM, Torriera, and Xhaka are seriously nuggety characters. Monreal and Kos are getting on, but who can deny that they've been admirable characters and great servants to the club? Its not their fault that we haven't been more successful.

We blew the palace game because Emery gambled and it didn't pay off. The gamble was a bit reckless considering that Palace have been upsetting top six teams all season.

Totally disagree. Watch how they started off the game. No chasing down no effort - just drifting. Now watch the Man City players and even the Spurs players. It is not a matter of lack of ability - it is lack of application. Otherwise we would beat Southhampton, CP, and a host of others

_________________
If this policy does not deliver then I would say we have to change it.
AW 150810


 Profile  
 
 
Post #397711  Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 2:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 5:27 pm
Posts: 11163

Goonie wrote:
Bernard wrote:
I very much doubt it. Doesn't Monreal's contract end this summer? If so I suspect he'll move on. I think Koscielny's contract ends in the summer of 2020. So I think he'll stay but next season will be his last at Arsenal.

Here's my guess of what will happen with the defence for next season. Mustafi will be sold this summer. A new central defender will be signed from somewhere, probably a player in his early twenties who shows big promise which will push the price up without being a Van Dijk type cost. The other possibility is someone like Boateng. In his day great but the rumours I'm getting is he's had a poor season and Bayern are willing to let go. But the younger player is, I reckon, more likely.

Whether we play four or five at the back (with two or three central defenders), I suspect the new player will be the obvious first choice. Alongside him will be either Sokratis or Holding in a back four or both with a back five. Koscielny and I hope Medley will be used to cover injuries, suspensions, and resting players. I see Mavropanos going on loan somewhere.

If Monreal goes we're left with Kolasinac who's decent going forward but can't defend to save his life. So I expect a new left back to arrive. With Bellerin and Maitland-Niles (I'm sure Lichtsteiner will go) that should hopefully be enough at right back. Maybe Jenkinson will be kept for dire emergencies or will be sold. I think it could come down to when his contract ends, which I don't know.

So we definitely need a new left back if Monreal's contract is not renewed.
Not confident about Mustafi being sold - which club would buy him? Fifth choice CB and third choice RB role for him, I guess.
We need a new GK too. Unless both Emery and Martinez are happy with Martinez as second choice GK.
Wonder if Chambers will be part of the squad next season.

Yes, with Čech retiring a decision will need to be made about the reserve keeper. Martinez or someone new. As long as it isn't bloody Ospina coming back, I'll be happy anyway. I was focussing on defenders though. Think there are plenty of clubs who would pay a transfer fee for Mustafi. The Palace game is fresh in our minds, but up to then he hadn't had a bad season. We won't get our money back, but he isn't 'non-sellable'.

Chambers! Are you being serious? My Fulham supporting relatives say he's been worse than useless. Terrible defender who won't even be good enough for Fulham in the Championship.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #397712  Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 3:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:22 pm
Posts: 20613

Bernard wrote:

Chambers! Are you being serious? My Fulham supporting relatives say he's been worse than useless. Terrible defender who won't even be good enough for Fulham in the Championship.


I think that's a little unfair, Bernard. He's played the majority of the season in midfield as a DM and from what I have seen and read has been one of Fulham's best performers, if not the best performer, over the course of the season.

That said I would expect him to be sold if a decent offer comes in.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #397713  Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 3:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:22 pm
Posts: 20613

TOP GUN wrote:
Bernard wrote:
I wouldn't support naming any ground after any former manager.


Totally agree ridiculous to do otherwise.

New Highbury, or The Arsenal stadium but stadiums will be sponsor forever and always now anyway.

The skodran Mustafi stand or whatever sounds ridiculous.


How about the Mustafi Big Top, sponsored by Billy Smart.

Roll-up, roll-up.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #397714  Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 3:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:52 pm
Posts: 18760

A great defender - and attacker - RIP.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BMnFrVk1rrM

_________________
"Young and caught up in life, we seldom watched the skies.”


 Profile  
 
 
Post #397715  Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 4:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26777

Man U have lost 6 of their last 8, and the two they won 2-1 at home to Watford and West Ham they were second best and very lucky to win. They should be on a run of 8 straight defeats

I was pretty happy when they gave Ole a 3 year deal. He came in and did the obvious things, all out attack, positivity, gave players like pogba freedom....but I always felt he was riding the crest of a wave as the results even in that early period were better than performances suggested.

No doubt another tonne of money will be thrown at the problem in the summer


 Profile  
 
 
Post #397716  Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 4:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 5:27 pm
Posts: 11163

socrates wrote:
Bernard wrote:
Chambers! Are you being serious? My Fulham supporting relatives say he's been worse than useless. Terrible defender who won't even be good enough for Fulham in the Championship.

I think that's a little unfair, Bernard. He's played the majority of the season in midfield as a DM and from what I have seen and read has been one of Fulham's best performers, if not the best performer, over the course of the season.

That said I would expect him to be sold if a decent offer comes in.

I don't think it's unfair at all. I mentioned fairly recently that my relatives thought he'd been less bad in midfield. But as a defender they don't consider him 'fit to wear the shirt' (and we're talking of Fulham's shrt). Shocking defender. Blimey, knowing how you go on about our defenders/defending, if Chambers came back you wouldn't have any time to eat or sleep. Y,ou'd be writing posts here twenty four hours a day moaning about our defending.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #397717  Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 4:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26777

Gaz from Oz wrote:
Decaf wrote:
I disagree. Özil is the only player whose attitude one might question. And there is nothing specifically 'modern' about being something of a maverick.

The problem with El Neny, Jenks, Mavrapanos and Mustafi is that they are just not quite good enough, for whatever reason.

Kos, Sokratis, Monreal, ANM, Torriera, and Xhaka are seriously nuggety characters. Monreal and Kos are getting on, but who can deny that they've been admirable characters and great servants to the club? Its not their fault that we haven't been more successful.

We blew the palace game because Emery gambled and it didn't pay off. The gamble was a bit reckless considering that Palace have been upsetting top six teams all season.

Totally disagree. Watch how they started off the game. No chasing down no effort - just drifting. Now watch the Man City players and even the Spurs players. It is not a matter of lack of ability - it is lack of application. Otherwise we would beat Southhampton, CP, and a host of others

I agree on the comparison with city and spurs, the attitude to start fast is there in nearly every game. Liverpool as well, incredible intensity.

If emery wants that style he certainly didn’t inherit a group of players who have the natural attributes for it. Off the top of my head, I’d say the following players suit the sort of high tempo, high press,fast paced game employed by city/Liverpool: Leno, Bellerin, Sokratis, torreira, Ramsey, maybe Iwobi and AMN.

But that kind of football and attitude doesn’t guarantee you beat the lesser lights. City have lost to Newcastle, palace and Leicester this season. Maybe their attitude was switched off in those games?

The attitude needs to be better and more consistent. The fast starts in the home games v spurs, Man U, chelsea, Napoli....and the other two European Ko games is how we should approach every game. But there is also a big lack of ability in many of our squad.

Many wanted to see a new man take the same players and see what he can get out of them. Emery has improved some. Those who were poor before and are still poor now will, I suspect, be shown the door this summer


 Profile  
 
 
Post #397718  Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 5:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26777

There is no reason why there shouldn’t be clubs willing to buy Mustafi. I mean other clubs manage to buy big, he’s a total flop and still shift him on for a decent fee.
Benteke at Liverpool is one that springs to mind.

Maybe a team that doesn’t play such a high line and rely on defenders to make 1v1 decisions might think Mustafi can do a decent job. His rep is probably a lot stronger abroad as well.

He’s a must sell. Pointless keeping him as 5th CB, the £20m we might get for him can be used better in the squad than having him as a 5th CB


 Profile  
 
 
Post #397719  Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 5:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 5:27 pm
Posts: 11163

Rich wrote:
There is no reason why there shouldn’t be clubs willing to buy Mustafi

Exactly. The suggestion that nobody would buy him was a strange one. As I said, I can't see us getting back what we paid for him. But that doesn't mean no-one would buy him.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #397720  Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 6:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

Rich wrote:
There is no reason why there shouldn’t be clubs willing to buy Mustafi.


Oh absolutely but he might have to switch continents, word gets about quickly these days !


 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
     [ 472100 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1 ... 9940, 9941, 9942, 9943, 9944, 9945, 9946 ... 11803  Next

All times are UTC

Gooners Online - Click to see what Everyones Doing

Colour Key:  Visited Profile    Members Profile      Admin

Get Latest Post

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], bubblechris, warrior and 274 guests


Search for:

Go to Top

Powered by php BB © 1993 - 2018