Fixtures Sunday April 28th - Tottenham Hotspur - Tottenham Hotspur Stadium - 2:00 Pm

Kick-Off

       Injuries                 Steve Gleiber



Get the Latest Post Go to the Bottom of Page It is currently Sun Apr 28, 2024 1:52 pm

All times are UTC


  


Reply to topic

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 83 guests

 
Post #318441  Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 8:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 10:09 am
Posts: 6806

AmericanGooner wrote:
I've posted numerous times ad nauseam about the decline of the .


you've posted ad nauseam full stop

_________________
Half a non binary lager, please


 Profile  
 
 
Post #318442  Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 8:42 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18426

john1 wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:

He’s been shocking but Mourinho is well past it and seems to be trying to get himself fired as he’s done his three years. On a footballing level city, Bayern and even united have been doing better than us in recent times. It’s not like he signed for spurs.

Any player with any ambition would have jumped off Wengers ship


If Sanchez had ambition, he would have gone to City. United offered him, or perhaps his agent, more.

True

No doubt money played a big part But do you reckon he was more likely to achieve success under Jose at United or Wenger at arsenal. Let’s be honest all our best players pretty much are desperate to jump off under Wenger. United aren’t city right now but a better long term bet than us! The last 2 years were terrible


 Profile  
 
 
Post #318443  Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 9:28 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18426

Bernard wrote:
Gaz from Oz wrote:
Just as a side issue Guendouzi is improving all the time and looks like he can ultimately be an important player. I don't mean in 5 years but late this season and next season. His passing range and ability to see attacking options is very very good.

For me Guendouzi is the most exciting break-through talent since Fabregas, who I think was 2004.


Totally agree

His most impressive thing he has for a midfielder is the ability that Vieira and Manu had which is if he has the ball at his feet and doesn’t have a pass on or a team mate free in space he’s comfortable and confident enough on the ball to swivel and dribble the ball further around rather than releasing a pass that’s unlikely to reach its target. He can do this even if he’s being pressed. Vieira had this in spades and Guendozi seems to have it. The club needs to offer him a huge long term contract because it’s clear he’s going to be a star and it’s amazing to think he’s 19.

It’s also ironic our best recent prospect is a Frenchman signed by a Spaniard rather than our previous legendary French manager


 Profile  
 
 
Post #318444  Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 9:59 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18426

On the subject of Fabregas I found the comments Michael Carrick made in his book about us interesting. Carrick spoke to Wenger who told him we wanted to sign him and would call him to sort out the details the Monday after the community shield game against united. Then famously Cesc ran rings around Roy Keane in that game and the call never came.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #318445  Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 10:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 4:02 am
Posts: 2728
Location: Liverpool

TOP GUN wrote:
john1 wrote:

If Sanchez had ambition, he would have gone to City. United offered him, or perhaps his agent, more.

True

No doubt money played a big part But do you reckon he was more likely to achieve success under Jose at United or Wenger at arsenal. Let’s be honest all our best players pretty much are desperate to jump off under Wenger. United aren’t city right now but a better long term bet than us! The last 2 years were terrible


I'd agree that under the last few years with Arsene United/City/Chelsea/Liverpool were better long term bets. But I still dont think Sanchez' transfer had much to do with winning things - follow the money, and he's probably not the brightest light in the sky, so probably fairly easily led by his agent.

_________________
Gorau chwarae cyd chwarae


 Profile  
 
 
Post #318446  Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 10:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 4:02 am
Posts: 2728
Location: Liverpool

TOP GUN wrote:
Bernard wrote:
For me Guendouzi is the most exciting break-through talent since Fabregas, who I think was 2004.


Totally agree

His most impressive thing he has for a midfielder is the ability that Vieira and Manu had which is if he has the ball at his feet and doesn’t have a pass on or a team mate free in space he’s comfortable and confident enough on the ball to swivel and dribble the ball further around rather than releasing a pass that’s unlikely to reach its target. He can do this even if he’s being pressed. Vieira had this in spades and Guendozi seems to have it. The club needs to offer him a huge long term contract because it’s clear he’s going to be a star and it’s amazing to think he’s 19.

It’s also ironic our best recent prospect is a Frenchman signed by a Spaniard rather than our previous legendary French manager


Get a bit more bulk on him. He has massive potential; hope he keeps his head down and works hard. I think Emery will be better for him in that regard than Wenger would have been.

_________________
Gorau chwarae cyd chwarae


 Profile  
 
 
Post #318447  Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 10:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:04 am
Posts: 7393
Location: Townsville Australia

Bernard wrote:
Gaz from Oz wrote:
Just as a side issue Guendouzi is improving all the time and looks like he can ultimately be an important player. I don't mean in 5 years but late this season and next season. His passing range and ability to see attacking options is very very good.

For me Guendouzi is the most exciting break-through talent since Fabregas, who I think was 2004.

I do not disagree. Some of his 40 metre cross field passes really are great. I hate bigging players up early but I think Emery can make this kid a great player.

_________________
If this policy does not deliver then I would say we have to change it.
AW 150810


 Profile  
 
 
Post #318448  Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 10:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:04 am
Posts: 7393
Location: Townsville Australia

john1 wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:
True

No doubt money played a big part But do you reckon he was more likely to achieve success under Jose at United or Wenger at arsenal. Let’s be honest all our best players pretty much are desperate to jump off under Wenger. United aren’t city right now but a better long term bet than us! The last 2 years were terrible


I'd agree that under the last few years with Arsene United/City/Chelsea/Liverpool were better long term bets. But I still dont think Sanchez' transfer had much to do with winning things - follow the money, and he's probably not the brightest light in the sky, so probably fairly easily led by his agent.

I don’t think you are wrong but I will never criticise him for this. He is from Chile & his whole life & his families & probably the next generation will be different with money like this. I’d want a *%^@ load of money to put up with Mourinho.

_________________
If this policy does not deliver then I would say we have to change it.
AW 150810


 Profile  
 
 
Post #318449  Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 11:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 10:12 am
Posts: 4124
Location: Melbourne

Bloody dull affair. Dunno what it is about el and cl broadcasts but the sounds is usually crap and there is almost nothing resembling an atmosphere.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #318450  Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 11:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:52 pm
Posts: 18760

john1 wrote:
... But I still dont think Sanchez' transfer had much to do with winning things - follow the money, and he's probably not the brightest light in the sky, so probably fairly easily led by his agent.
Yes. If he wanted to win medals why not stay at Barca? They usually have plenty on offer. Anyway, good luck to him earning what he can out of the stupidly rich United.

_________________
"Young and caught up in life, we seldom watched the skies.”


 Profile  
 
 
Post #318451  Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 11:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 10:12 am
Posts: 4124
Location: Melbourne

TOP GUN wrote:
john1 wrote:

If Sanchez had ambition, he would have gone to City. United offered him, or perhaps his agent, more.

True

No doubt money played a big part But do you reckon he was more likely to achieve success under Jose at United or Wenger at arsenal. Let’s be honest all our best players pretty much are desperate to jump off under Wenger. United aren’t city right now but a better long term bet than us! The last 2 years were terrible


Arsenal may have been bad but Man U have been shite too. 400 million and they're still crap. Escape Wenger, yep but Mourinho is a narcissistic *%^@ who I would think most would want to avoid unless motivated by other things.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #318452  Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 11:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 5:27 pm
Posts: 11163

One noticeable thing about Guendouzi, beyond his passing ability and ball control, is the way he makes himself available to receive passes. For a teenager I think that's really impressive and surely says something about his personality as well as his talent. He plays with intelligence. He's a very confident young man, and just as vital is that his confidence doesn't appear misplaced.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #318453  Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 11:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 4:33 pm
Posts: 7066

old man of hoy wrote:
john1 wrote:
... But I still dont think Sanchez' transfer had much to do with winning things - follow the money, and he's probably not the brightest light in the sky, so probably fairly easily led by his agent.
Yes. If he wanted to win medals why not stay at Barca? They usually have plenty on offer. Anyway, good luck to him earning what he can out of the stupidly rich United.

I thought Sanchez was a tremendous player for us, but unfortunate to arrive for the toxic last few years of the Wenger era. There was very little right at the club and this obviously frustrated him.
I'm sure he's gone for the loot but who can blame him under the circumstances.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #318454  Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 11:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 10:12 am
Posts: 4124
Location: Melbourne

Gaz from Oz wrote:
Just as a side issue Guendouzi is improving all the time and looks like he can ultimately be an important player. I don't mean in 5 years but late this season and next season. His passing range and ability to see attacking options is very very good. Coupled with Iwobi and other players generally improving, do we miss Wilshire and Walcott - I don't. The medical staff probably miss the regular contact with Wilshire.


Oh you big ol tease. The only person to have missed Walcott would be Lomekian and that was around 2014. The rest wrote him off in 2012.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #318455  Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 11:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 10:12 am
Posts: 4124
Location: Melbourne

dec wrote:
Alexis transfer had feck all to do with Wenger. He just wanted a monstrous pay packet. He negotiated himself out of offers from Bayern and Man City. I can't believe people still miss given how utterly shite he's been playing for 12 months now.


Too bloody right. He had lost motivation before he left and has done zero at United. Would have preferred a bit more cash in the transfer but he didn't want to play for Arsenal anymore so good riddance.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #318456  Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 11:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 10:12 am
Posts: 4124
Location: Melbourne

Hazuki wrote:
dec wrote:
Alexis transfer had feck all to do with Wenger. He just wanted a monstrous pay packet. He negotiated himself out of offers from Bayern and Man City. I can't believe people still miss given how utterly shite he's been playing for 12 months now.

Exactly. The mistake was not getting rid of him sooner so we could get full value, but he would've left regardless. And we're better off with Mkhitaryan anyway.


Agree first bit but think Mkhitaryan had been pretty poor so far. He's being played in different positions but also seems to play with the motivation of someone who feels he's already done enough in his working/football life.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #318457  Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 11:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 5:27 pm
Posts: 11163

TOP GUN wrote:
On the subject of Fabregas I found the comments Michael Carrick made in his book about us interesting. Carrick spoke to Wenger who told him we wanted to sign him and would call him to sort out the details the Monday after the community shield game against united. Then famously Cesc ran rings around Roy Keane in that game and the call never came.

When Carrick was a kid at West Ham, Wenger said at an AGM (now a thing of the past) how much he liked him. Wenger made it perfectly obvious that at that point in time (which would have been earlier than the Community Shield game you mention) he wanted to sign Carrick.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #318458  Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 12:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:06 am
Posts: 16492

TOP GUN wrote:
dec wrote:
Alexis transfer had feck all to do with Wenger. He just wanted a monstrous pay packet. He negotiated himself out of offers from Bayern and Man City. I can't believe people still miss given how utterly shite he's been playing for 12 months now.


He’s been shocking but Mourinho is well past it and seems to be trying to get himself fired as he’s done his three years. On a footballing level city, Bayern and even united have been doing better than us in recent times. It’s not like he signed for spurs.

Any player with any ambition would have jumped off Wengers ship

This is largely about having a drum and casting around for a stick to beat it with. The exit of Sanchez, RvP and Fabregas were more about those players than Wenger.

Alexis and RvP were both after the big payday. RvP had one brilliant season with us and then hit the road--this after we'd show patience for 7 years. Cesc ... well.

_________________
Hamba kakuhle, Madiba


 Profile  
 
 
Post #318459  Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 12:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:06 am
Posts: 16492

bromley gooner wrote:
old man of hoy wrote:
Yes. If he wanted to win medals why not stay at Barca? They usually have plenty on offer. Anyway, good luck to him earning what he can out of the stupidly rich United.

I thought Sanchez was a tremendous player for us, but unfortunate to arrive for the toxic last few years of the Wenger era. There was very little right at the club and this obviously frustrated him.
I'm sure he's gone for the loot but who can blame him under the circumstances.

Wasn't Sanchez a major contributor to that toxicity?

_________________
Hamba kakuhle, Madiba


 Profile  
 
 
Post #318460  Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 12:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:06 am
Posts: 16492

Gaz from Oz wrote:
john1 wrote:

I'd agree that under the last few years with Arsene United/City/Chelsea/Liverpool were better long term bets. But I still dont think Sanchez' transfer had much to do with winning things - follow the money, and he's probably not the brightest light in the sky, so probably fairly easily led by his agent.

I don’t think you are wrong but I will never criticise him for this. He is from Chile & his whole life & his families & probably the next generation will be different with money like this. I’d want a *%^@ load of money to put up with Mourinho.

I don't think that is a valid reason for being a (^*&*. Lots of players who come from poor backgrounds aren't.

_________________
Hamba kakuhle, Madiba


 Profile  
 
 
Post #318461  Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 12:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18426

Decaf wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:

He’s been shocking but Mourinho is well past it and seems to be trying to get himself fired as he’s done his three years. On a footballing level city, Bayern and even united have been doing better than us in recent times. It’s not like he signed for spurs.

Any player with any ambition would have jumped off Wengers ship

This is largely about having a drum and casting around for a stick to beat it with. The exit of Sanchez, RvP and Fabregas were more about those players than Wenger.

Alexis and RvP were both after the big payday. RvP had one brilliant season with us and then hit the road--this after we'd show patience for 7 years. Cesc ... well.


If your a top professional footballer and you have a descision to make which is money aside shall I play alongside Wayne Rooney or Maroune Chamakh ? Would you understand the obvious outcome.

Money contributed to Van Persie decision but even then he was on the fence about going then won the title in his first season.

I can now forgive Cesc and Van Persie for leaving
They were right.

The only player who rightly deserves dogs abuse for running off was Ashley Cole who met with Mourinho the season after we won the league and were still champions. That was totally motivated by greed even if we did miss manage the situation a bit.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #318462  Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 12:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 4:33 pm
Posts: 7066

Decaf wrote:
bromley gooner wrote:
I thought Sanchez was a tremendous player for us, but unfortunate to arrive for the toxic last few years of the Wenger era. There was very little right at the club and this obviously frustrated him.
I'm sure he's gone for the loot but who can blame him under the circumstances.

Wasn't Sanchez a major contributor to that toxicity?

There were times I watched him busting a gut to do something for the team with little input from the rest. You'd have to be an insider to know the truth, but one reading of his often visible moody demeanour might be that he was frustrated with the mediocrity and lack of urgency around him. The toxicity came just as much from the fans, so perhaps he was as pissed off as the rest of us.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #318463  Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 2:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 2:55 pm
Posts: 11498
Location: Singapore

dec wrote:
Alexis transfer had feck all to do with Wenger. He just wanted a monstrous pay packet. He negotiated himself out of offers from Bayern and Man City. I can't believe people still miss given how utterly shite he's been playing for 12 months now.


My point being he would have remained committed and played for the team (and manager), had his opinions been taken into consideration by Wenger. Instead of appreciating his drive and desire (on the field and through his words), Wenger chose to marginalise him. The Wenger favourites who were always picked for games despite more unassured performance, joined the litany of criticism. If I were in Alexis' situation, I would go too. Why stay when my drive and desire is unappreciated.

_________________
Onwards and Upwards!


 Profile  
 
 
Post #318464  Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 2:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 2:55 pm
Posts: 11498
Location: Singapore

TOP GUN wrote:
dec wrote:
Alexis transfer had feck all to do with Wenger. He just wanted a monstrous pay packet. He negotiated himself out of offers from Bayern and Man City. I can't believe people still miss given how utterly shite he's been playing for 12 months now.


He’s been shocking but Mourinho is well past it and seems to be trying to get himself fired as he’s done his three years. On a footballing level city, Bayern and even united have been doing better than us in recent times. It’s not like he signed for spurs.

Any player with any ambition would have jumped off Wengers ship


Spot on

_________________
Onwards and Upwards!


 Profile  
 
 
Post #318465  Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 2:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 2:55 pm
Posts: 11498
Location: Singapore

Bernard wrote:
Gaz from Oz wrote:
Just as a side issue Guendouzi is improving all the time and looks like he can ultimately be an important player. I don't mean in 5 years but late this season and next season. His passing range and ability to see attacking options is very very good.

For me Guendouzi is the most exciting break-through talent since Fabregas, who I think was 2004.


He has a lot of promise. Nelson and Smith-Rowe will join his ranks soon.

_________________
Onwards and Upwards!


 Profile  
 
 
Post #318466  Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 2:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 2:55 pm
Posts: 11498
Location: Singapore

john1 wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:

Totally agree

His most impressive thing he has for a midfielder is the ability that Vieira and Manu had which is if he has the ball at his feet and doesn’t have a pass on or a team mate free in space he’s comfortable and confident enough on the ball to swivel and dribble the ball further around rather than releasing a pass that’s unlikely to reach its target. He can do this even if he’s being pressed. Vieira had this in spades and Guendozi seems to have it. The club needs to offer him a huge long term contract because it’s clear he’s going to be a star and it’s amazing to think he’s 19.

It’s also ironic our best recent prospect is a Frenchman signed by a Spaniard rather than our previous legendary French manager


Get a bit more bulk on him. He has massive potential; hope he keeps his head down and works hard. I think Emery will be better for him in that regard than Wenger would have been.


Agree completely, especially the comparison between Emery and Wenger.

_________________
Onwards and Upwards!


 Profile  
 
 
Post #318467  Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 2:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 2:55 pm
Posts: 11498
Location: Singapore

Gaz from Oz wrote:
Bernard wrote:
For me Guendouzi is the most exciting break-through talent since Fabregas, who I think was 2004.

I do not disagree. Some of his 40 metre cross field passes really are great. I hate bigging players up early but I think Emery can make this kid a great player.


Agree

_________________
Onwards and Upwards!


 Profile  
 
 
Post #318468  Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 2:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 2:55 pm
Posts: 11498
Location: Singapore

Bernard wrote:
One noticeable thing about Guendouzi, beyond his passing ability and ball control, is the way he makes himself available to receive passes. For a teenager I think that's really impressive and surely says something about his personality as well as his talent. He plays with intelligence. He's a very confident young man, and just as vital is that his confidence doesn't appear misplaced.


I like it that he is not arrogant

_________________
Onwards and Upwards!


 Profile  
 
 
Post #318469  Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 2:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:58 am
Posts: 34129

I want to avoid my needless anxiety as last season with City going so long without a loss and hoping the scum beat the sky blue scum on Monday. Man Utd suffering more would be nice. I love seeing Mourinho suffering. Love it.

_________________
"Never relegated, Never Will Be" :)


 Profile  
 
 
Post #318470  Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 2:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 2:55 pm
Posts: 11498
Location: Singapore

grantyboy wrote:
Hazuki wrote:
Exactly. The mistake was not getting rid of him sooner so we could get full value, but he would've left regardless. And we're better off with Mkhitaryan anyway.


Agree first bit but think Mkhitaryan had been pretty poor so far. He's being played in different positions but also seems to play with the motivation of someone who feels he's already done enough in his working/football life.


I think Mkhitaryan is trying, but he is a limited player. He will not grow into a top class player, not even a level just below it. His star performance at Dortmund is perhaps just like Ramsey was good for us, for about 2 seasons. Both are finding it hard to rediscover the same vein of form, and perhaps would never have it again.

_________________
Onwards and Upwards!


 Profile  
 
 
Post #318471  Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 2:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 2:55 pm
Posts: 11498
Location: Singapore

bromley gooner wrote:
Decaf wrote:
Wasn't Sanchez a major contributor to that toxicity?

There were times I watched him busting a gut to do something for the team with little input from the rest. You'd have to be an insider to know the truth, but one reading of his often visible moody demeanour might be that he was frustrated with the mediocrity and lack of urgency around him. The toxicity came just as much from the fans, so perhaps he was as pissed off as the rest of us.


Spot on

_________________
Onwards and Upwards!


 Profile  
 
 
Post #318472  Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 2:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:58 am
Posts: 34129

I know its pretty much a cert that the PL winning manager is voted Manager of the Year with a few exceptions but if Emery gets 3rd I think he should have a shout as well and especially so if he can pick up a trophy. Were I him I'd try for the league cup. Its the most winnable of the domestic trophies.

_________________
"Never relegated, Never Will Be" :)


 Profile  
 
 
Post #318473  Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 2:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 2:55 pm
Posts: 11498
Location: Singapore

AmericanGooner wrote:
I know its pretty much a cert that the PL winning manager is voted Manager of the Year with a few exceptions but if Emery gets 3rd I think he should have a shout as well and especially so if he can pick up a trophy. Were I him I'd try for the league cup. Its the most winnable of the domestic trophies.


Why aim so low?
First priority - Europa League
Second priority - FA Cup
Third priority - EPL Champions (why not aim for it than concede to a lesser position right now)
Final priority - Carabao Cup

Europa league is the most realistic right now, and yet the competition are not "run of the mill" teams. Currently there are top sides in the competition, and there is still the 3rd place teams from the ECL to come. Aiming for it is a show of ambition. Aiming for the Carabao Cup is a lack of ambition. That would be the Wenger days, all over again.

_________________
Onwards and Upwards!


 Profile  
 
 
Post #318474  Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 3:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:58 am
Posts: 34129

Do you think its easier to get in the CL proper by way of winning the Europa cup or getting top 4?
Interesting question.
This season is all about getting back into the CL and then the PL title. Given a choice between another FA cup or a league cup or gettin back into the CL, I'll take the CL.
For a start, its easier to attract players when you are in the competition. Second, its a stepping stone to the title. It would mean we are competing with the best of the league by being 3rd or 4th. And we go from there.

_________________
"Never relegated, Never Will Be" :)


 Profile  
 
 
Post #318475  Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 4:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:06 am
Posts: 16492

gooner7 wrote:
AmericanGooner wrote:
I know its pretty much a cert that the PL winning manager is voted Manager of the Year with a few exceptions but if Emery gets 3rd I think he should have a shout as well and especially so if he can pick up a trophy. Were I him I'd try for the league cup. Its the most winnable of the domestic trophies.


Why aim so low?
First priority - Europa League
Second priority - FA Cup
Third priority - EPL Champions (why not aim for it than concede to a lesser position right now)
Final priority - Carabao Cup

Europa league is the most realistic right now, and yet the competition are not "run of the mill" teams. Currently there are top sides in the competition, and there is still the 3rd place teams from the ECL to come. Aiming for it is a show of ambition. Aiming for the Carabao Cup is a lack of ambition. That would be the Wenger days, all over again.

I agree. One day we'll win the league. And I bet we wouldn't have been expecting it at the beginning of the season. I cant recall us ever winning the league when I expected us to :).

BUT let talk again on 6 december. We're still in the phony war stage of the season. Extrapolation from current trajectories at this stage of the season is a bit unwise.

_________________
Hamba kakuhle, Madiba


 Profile  
 
 
Post #318476  Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 4:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:06 am
Posts: 16492

gooner7 wrote:
AmericanGooner wrote:
I know its pretty much a cert that the PL winning manager is voted Manager of the Year with a few exceptions but if Emery gets 3rd I think he should have a shout as well and especially so if he can pick up a trophy. Were I him I'd try for the league cup. Its the most winnable of the domestic trophies.


Why aim so low?
First priority - Europa League
Second priority - FA Cup
Third priority - EPL Champions (why not aim for it than concede to a lesser position right now)
Final priority - Carabao Cup

Europa league is the most realistic right now, and yet the competition are not "run of the mill" teams. Currently there are top sides in the competition, and there is still the 3rd place teams from the ECL to come. Aiming for it is a show of ambition. Aiming for the Carabao Cup is a lack of ambition. That would be the Wenger days, all over again.

I agree. One day we'll win the league. And I bet we wouldn't have been expecting it at the beginning of the season. I cant recall us ever winning the league when I expected us to :).

BUT let talk again on 6 december. We're still in the phony war stage of the season. Extrapolation from current trajectories at this stage of the season is a bit unwise.

_________________
Hamba kakuhle, Madiba


 Profile  
 
 
Post #318477  Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 5:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 5:27 pm
Posts: 11163

Decaf wrote:
I agree. One day we'll win the league. And I bet we wouldn't have been expecting it at the beginning of the season. I cant recall us ever winning the league when I expected us to :).

I had a £10 bet on us winning the league in both 1989 and 1991. In 1989 it was partly to do with the odds, 16/1. But in 1991 I only got 5/1, so I assume I must have been expecting it that year. £10 was worth a lot more then than it is now, so I doubt I'd have put it on a bet I had little hope would come off.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #318478  Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 6:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:06 am
Posts: 16492

Bernard wrote:
Decaf wrote:
I agree. One day we'll win the league. And I bet we wouldn't have been expecting it at the beginning of the season. I cant recall us ever winning the league when I expected us to :).

I had a £10 bet on us winning the league in both 1989 and 1991. In 1989 it was partly to do with the odds, 16/1. But in 1991 I only got 5/1, so I assume I must have been expecting it that year. £10 was worth a lot more then than it is now, so I doubt I'd have put it on a bet I had little hope would come off.

The only time I actually thought we would win the league before the season started was after the 2004 win. In 1991 I was still assuming that our wins were temporary aberrations to the usual Liverpool dominance.

_________________
Hamba kakuhle, Madiba


 Profile  
 
 
Post #318479  Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 7:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26780

I would love a team next season to just decide randomly they are going to play one of their games at Wembley, just say their home ground is undergoing some essential maintenance and see what the FA say......this is basically what spurs are doing this season, just deciding almost week by week where they want to play their home game. New stadium won’t be ready until 2019 at the earliest. Surely if enough games are played at Wembley they have to be forced to finish the entire season there.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #318480  Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 11:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 8:58 pm
Posts: 2018

Bernard wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:
On the subject of Fabregas I found the comments Michael Carrick made in his book about us interesting. Carrick spoke to Wenger who told him we wanted to sign him and would call him to sort out the details the Monday after the community shield game against united. Then famously Cesc ran rings around Roy Keane in that game and the call never came.

When Carrick was a kid at West Ham, Wenger said at an AGM (now a thing of the past) how much he liked him. Wenger made it perfectly obvious that at that point in time (which would have been earlier than the Community Shield game you mention) he wanted to sign Carrick.



Hi guys just a quick visit ,

I don’t think it was to do with fabregas at that point . I think what happened in O4 was it looked all summer after euros that paddy was going to finally go to Real Madrid , and as a result wenger had lined up carrick as a replacement . Then paddy had a last minute change of heart and stayed, so the carrick deal was off .

Of course 12 months later we sold paddy, but that was then down more to fabregas’s rise And changing the structure of the team

Very enjoyable start to the season , how long we been waiting huh?


 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
     [ 398393 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1 ... 7959, 7960, 7961, 7962, 7963, 7964, 7965 ... 9960  Next

All times are UTC

Gooners Online - Click to see what Everyones Doing

Colour Key:  Visited Profile    Members Profile      Admin

Get Latest Post

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 83 guests


Search for:

Go to Top

Powered by php BB © 1993 - 2018