Fixtures Sunday April 28th - Tottenham Hotspur - Tottenham Hotspur Stadium - 2:00 Pm

Kick-Off

       Injuries                 Steve Gleiber



Get the Latest Post Go to the Bottom of Page It is currently Sun Apr 28, 2024 11:40 am

All times are UTC


  


Reply to topic

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Decaf, grantyboy, mcquilkie and 266 guests

 
Post #434921  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 3:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

Hazuki wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:
Well that one game* is etched in the mind of all gooners so I question the opinion of any Arsenal fan who can't remember that or more.

Of course you do.

Let's not pretend you also mentioned Pedro and the words 'regularly destroyed'. Or that you've completely changed your opinion on Ramsey while pretending you haven't.

errr him and Čech at goodison park this season. Numerous examples anyway I can't be arsed to explain them all to a dimwit so ...


he's brilliant !! Wot a player Ramsey is too ! They are both tearing up the league ! Your absolutey right on this !!! It just weird why we're 6th nevermind


 Profile  
 
 
Post #434922  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 3:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

john1 wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:

I'm sorry he just isn't. Half a good season John that's it. Plus that was when he was literally told he could go on the pitch and do anything he wanted as we were really suffering from a lack of movement and pace at that point in time. Poor mans David Platt


Poor man's David Platt - that made me laugh anyway.

As I said, in the right position, and in the right setup.

See Euro 2016 team of the tournament selections.


Easy to look good for Wales

"Just give it to Gareth lad"


 Profile  
 
 
Post #434923  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 3:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

Goonie wrote:
john1 wrote:

Poor man's David Platt - that made me laugh anyway.

As I said, in the right position, and in the right setup.

See Euro 2016 team of the tournament selections.


Don't see why Ramsey can't give us a dozen goals in a season playing in more central and attacking position.


Your dropping him for Özil are you?

He's scored 32 goals in his career with us and he's now 27 years old. Doesn't suggest he could ever be that prolific in any way


 Profile  
 
 
Post #434924  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 3:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:21 pm
Posts: 16415
Location: Stockholm

Yes, how can we be in 6th place with a really good left back. That's a headscratcher.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #434925  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 3:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:52 pm
Posts: 18760

Daz wrote:
old man of hoy wrote:
ZZZZ


Truth might be boring but he's right.
"Truth." "Right." About something that hasn't happened yet? Methinks not.

_________________
"Young and caught up in life, we seldom watched the skies.”


 Profile  
 
 
Post #434926  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 3:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 4:33 pm
Posts: 7061

Hazuki wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:
Said thinking long term. Monreal has been decent ish but is well past his best

He's playing the best football of his life the past few seasons including this one. Great defender.

Adams was a great defender. Sansom was a great defender. Nacho is a half-decent defender.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #434927  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 3:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2018 1:57 pm
Posts: 11
Location: Coronation Street

old man of hoy wrote:
Daz wrote:

Truth might be boring but he's right.
"Truth." "Right." About something that hasn't happened yet? Methinks not.


I'm watching you, you big Southern jessie.

Sibelius!

_________________
tha wants jam on it


 Profile  
 
 
Post #434928  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 3:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:52 pm
Posts: 18760

Daz wrote:
Sticking with The Kinks - and why not - this is actually up there with Waterloo Sunset for me even though it's much later.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2M1l1Vjl6E4[/youtube]

And sticking with the metrosexual vibe that's been creeping in to the forum with John1's revelations I don't mind adding Ray Davies to Joachim Loew (prior to the finger-sniffing clips) as men I slightly fancy.
Agreed - a great song. I love being sentimental and that one has my tears every time.

_________________
"Young and caught up in life, we seldom watched the skies.”


 Profile  
 
 
Post #434929  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 3:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2018 1:57 pm
Posts: 11
Location: Coronation Street

TOP GUN wrote:
Your...

Doesn't suggest he could ever be that prolific in any way


Not like you with your bloody apostrophes, Jesus *%^@*** christ how *%^@*** hard is it they teach it at *%^@*** primary school.

Oops. Cover blown.

_________________
tha wants jam on it


 Profile  
 
 
Post #434930  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 3:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2018 1:57 pm
Posts: 11
Location: Coronation Street

Anyway off to take my whippet to the vet to have her anal glands squeezed.

This is actually true apart from the breed of dog; she is a soft southern cockerpoo.

_________________
tha wants jam on it


 Profile  
 
 
Post #434931  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 4:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

bromley gooner wrote:
Hazuki wrote:
He's playing the best football of his life the past few seasons including this one. Great defender.

Adams was a great defender. Sansom was a great defender. Nacho is a half-decent defender.


I think that's a decent summary he's a 6/10 type. He's a half decent lad prone to a roasting every once in a while. Better than clichy and Gibbs so he became a bit of a favourite for locking down the position.

Ashley 9/10
Sagna 8/10
Bellerin and Monreal 6/10


 Profile  
 
 
Post #434932  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 4:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:52 pm
Posts: 18760

TOP GUN wrote:
...He's a player not without issue...
No need to bring his kids into the argument.

_________________
"Young and caught up in life, we seldom watched the skies.”


 Profile  
 
 
Post #434933  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 4:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:21 pm
Posts: 16415
Location: Stockholm

bromley gooner wrote:
Adams was a great defender. Sansom was a great defender. Nacho is a half-decent defender.

I would say Adams was a world class defender, if we are going to get tied down in subjective player classifications.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #434934  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 4:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:21 pm
Posts: 16415
Location: Stockholm

Anyway, half-decent is obviously preposterous when talking about Monreal in the last few seasons. He's even managed to consistently look good in our defensive setup.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #434935  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 4:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:52 pm
Posts: 18760

Northern Ref wrote:
old man of hoy wrote:
"Truth." "Right." About something that hasn't happened yet? Methinks not.


I'm watching you, you big Southern jessie.

Sibelius!

Oi ref! Get a load of the immortal Jascha giving the Violin Concerto some finger.

https://youtu.be/R5FkrVq-uws

_________________
"Young and caught up in life, we seldom watched the skies.”


 Profile  
 
 
Post #434936  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 4:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:52 pm
Posts: 18760

Hazuki wrote:
bromley gooner wrote:
Adams was a great defender. Sansom was a great defender. Nacho is a half-decent defender.

I would say Adams was a world class defender, if we are going to get tied down in subjective player classifications.
Apart from at Trudie's Bondage Parlour no better place to get tied down. I give you Robert Moore, Paolo Maldini and Franco Baresi as other great defenders. Of all those I have seen in an Arsenal shirt O'Leary and Simpson were the only ones to match Adams.

_________________
"Young and caught up in life, we seldom watched the skies.”


 Profile  
 
 
Post #434937  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 4:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

Goonie wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:

Your dropping him for Özil are you?

He's scored 32 goals in his career with us and he's now 27 years old. Doesn't suggest he could ever be that prolific in any way


I don't think Özil is staying.


Then your saying we can compete for the title with Aaron playing the number ten role?

On the basis he's scored 32 goals in his career now aged 27 if keeps up this strike rate he could finish his Arsenal career on around 50/60 goals depending on his time of retirement or being sold off. This is about a third of what Frank Lampard scored at Chelsea and their games were similar as based on making runs into the box and movement rather than passing attributes.

Therefore Ramsey is a third of the player Lampard was. You don't win titles with players of this type being your focal midfielder


 Profile  
 
 
Post #434938  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 4:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:21 pm
Posts: 16415
Location: Stockholm

TOP GUN wrote:
Therefore Ramsey is a third of the player Lampard was.

Can't compete with math.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #434939  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 4:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:52 pm
Posts: 18760

Shlomo is good too.
https://youtu.be/oQPSQzfOrL4

_________________
"Young and caught up in life, we seldom watched the skies.”


 Profile  
 
 
Post #434940  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 4:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 4:33 pm
Posts: 7061

Hazuki wrote:
Anyway, half-decent is obviously preposterous when talking about Monreal in the last few seasons. He's even managed to consistently look good in our defensive setup.

Sorry Haz but half-decent means 'pretty good' or 'not bad' which I think is obviously a fair assessment.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #434941  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 4:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:52 pm
Posts: 18760

Or Benjamin?
https://youtu.be/qZMkvfdv_Sk

_________________
"Young and caught up in life, we seldom watched the skies.”


 Profile  
 
 
Post #434942  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 6:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 2:11 pm
Posts: 4764

Daz wrote:
Sticking with The Kinks - and why not - this is actually up there with Waterloo Sunset for me even though it's much later.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2M1l1Vjl6E4[/youtube]

And sticking with the metrosexual vibe that's been creeping in to the forum with John1's revelations I don't mind adding Ray Davies to Joachim Loew (prior to the finger-sniffing clips) as men I slightly fancy.



Great song writer and super live band. Saw them in 81 and either 82 or 83.

"The day they knocked down the Palais, my sister stood and cried. The day they knocked down the Palais, part of my childhood died."

_________________
"It's all over now Baby Blue"


 Profile  
 
 
Post #434943  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 6:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

On bands .... couple of questions


The Smiths ? Any good and where should I start

Stone roses ? Some good songs but are they over rated ?


 Profile  
 
 
Post #434944  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 7:15 pm 

bromley gooner wrote:
Hazuki wrote:
Anyway, half-decent is obviously preposterous when talking about Monreal in the last few seasons. He's even managed to consistently look good in our defensive setup.

Sorry Haz but half-decent means 'pretty good' or 'not bad' which I think is obviously a fair assessment.

Sorry bromley but I don't think half-decent, or pretty good, or not bad is anything like a fair assessment. Monreal is comfortably better than that on a consistent basis.


  
 
 
Post #434945  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 7:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26777

We have conceded the last 23 penalties we have given away in the league. Stretching back to August 2013

The most shocking part is that we’ve conceded 23 penalties in 4.5 seasons. Top clubs just don’t concede that many.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #434946  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 7:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

Bernard wrote:
bromley gooner wrote:
Sorry Haz but half-decent means 'pretty good' or 'not bad' which I think is obviously a fair assessment.

Sorry bromley but I don't think half-decent, or pretty good, or not bad is anything like a fair assessment. Monreal is comfortably better than that on a consistent basis.

He's better than "pretty good" ? Really what's that excellent ? He's a 6/10 or 7 at most. The fact we have an absence of talent is lending people to think these players are better than they are.

I seriously think some folks on here are over rating our players, there's a reason we are 6th.

Mourinho, pep, klopp even Poch are not touching Monreal or Ramsey and they would be shipped out in 5 seconds


 Profile  
 
 
Post #434947  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 7:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 8:30 pm
Posts: 8154

TOP GUN wrote:
On bands .... couple of questions


The Smiths ? Any good and where should I start

Stone roses ? Some good songs but are they over rated ?

The Smiths were very good. There's a compilation called Louder Than Bombs which would be a good place to start. The Queen is Dead is a brilliant album.

Stone Roses. The first album and the associated singles and b sides are great along with Fools Gold, One Love and to a lesser extent Elephant Stone. The second album wasn't great at all although Love Spreads is ok.

Steer well clear of anything live though as Ian Brown is an abysmal lead singer.

_________________
"I just kept going pretty lively. Them killers wasn't too healthy company."


 Profile  
 
 
Post #434948  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 7:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

dec wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:
On bands .... couple of questions


The Smiths ? Any good and where should I start

Stone roses ? Some good songs but are they over rated ?

The Smiths were very good. There's a compilation called Louder Than Bombs which would be a good place to start. The Queen is Dead is a brilliant album.

Stone Roses. The first album and the associated singles and b sides are great along with Fools Gold, One Love and to a lesser extent Elephant Stone. The second album wasn't great at all although Love Spreads is ok.

Steer well clear of anything live though as Ian Brown is an abysmal lead singer.


Thanks Dec I'll start with the Smiths. Sound advice


 Profile  
 
 
Post #434949  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 8:05 pm 

Well according to you Top Gun, Monreal is better than Clichy, which I'd agree with. When Manchester City, one of the world's richest clubs, decided they wanted a new left back they bought him. When Guardiola arrived there he got rid of the likes of Hart immediately and Toure pretty damn quickly. But he kept Clichy a whole season, only getting rid of him when he was well in his thirties. As Monreal is better than Clichy who he kept until around 32, there's nothing to suggest Guardiola would have shipped him out in 5 seconds.

Sorry, I agree with lots of your viewpoints but you come out with a load of bollocks about many. Monreal is one of them.


  
 
 
Post #434950  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 8:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:42 am
Posts: 12633
Location: Rotorua New Zealand

john1 wrote:
kiwipete wrote:
strictly women and sheep for me .


And not necessarily in that order?


At this very moment I'd take the sheep any day of the week .

Two blokes arrived to do the fence one with a bobcat [ that's a little tractor thing for all you highfalutin physicists , scriptwriters and deskbound blowflies ] and are happy to cart away the mountain of debris I've created the day before at no cost to me .

I'm excited [ not as excited as Brom over John1 or Daz over Joechim the Kraut ] but very pleased ...... say to Mrs Kiwi .... "magic they are getting rid of the tree for nothing " .... saved probably three trips to the dump $45 plus a mountain of labour for me .
She with a face like a twisted prune .

"Whats wrong with you "

"Oh I hardly slept last night worrying about the fence ... we have had no official statement outlining what exactly they are going to do .... go and tell them to stop "

"Bit late for that I'm not telling them , you go out if you feel that strongly "


 Profile  
 
 
Post #434951  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 8:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:53 pm
Posts: 17047

Monreal gets a 7 from me. Still comfortably better than Clichy to be fair.

_________________
It's a terrible love and I'm walking with spiders.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #434952  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 8:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

Bernard wrote:
Well according to you Top Gun, Monreal is better than Clichy, which I'd agree with. When Manchester City, one of the world's richest clubs, decided they wanted a new left back they bought him. When Guardiola arrived there he got rid of the likes of Hart immediately and Toure pretty damn quickly. But he kept Clichy a whole season, only getting rid of him when he was well in his thirties. As Monreal is better than Clichy who he kept until around 32, there's nothing to suggest Guardiola would have shipped him out in 5 seconds.

Sorry, I agree with lots of your viewpoints but you come out with a load of bollocks about many. Monreal is one of them.


city were signing our players left right and centre including Toure when he had malaria for 15 million and adebayor. Doesn't mean they are amazing players, Monreal is better than clichy but Clichy wouldn't have got anywhere near a regular role in a pep side. He was a squaddie

Monreal wouldn't be a bad substitute for arsenal.

Nachos heavy heights were playing for osasuna and Malaga. No one of note ever displayed an interest. He is a trier and "not bad" but not much more.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #434953  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 8:27 pm 

Niall wrote:
Monreal gets a 7 from me. Still comfortably better than Clichy to be fair.

Seriously, what would you give Clichy then? He was much better than people here used to admit and better than Gibbs.


  
 
 
Post #434954  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 8:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 4:33 pm
Posts: 7061

Bernard wrote:
bromley gooner wrote:
Sorry Haz but half-decent means 'pretty good' or 'not bad' which I think is obviously a fair assessment.

Sorry bromley but I don't think half-decent, or pretty good, or not bad is anything like a fair assessment. Monreal is comfortably better than that on a consistent basis.

Evening Bernard.
In my language any of the statements (maybe I should have said 'not bad at all' as opposed to a simple 'not bad'), accompanied by a knowing nod (hard to get across on the forum) are intended as compliments. I like Nacho. He's competent and committed. But I also think he's a bit limited and prefer him at left back in a 4 than as a centre back in a 3, and he's definitely not a centre back in a back 4. I just thought Haz was over-egging the pudding describing him as 'great' - we've been blessed with a few great defenders over the years but he's not one of them.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #434955  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 8:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

Bernard wrote:
Niall wrote:
Monreal gets a 7 from me. Still comfortably better than Clichy to be fair.

Seriously, what would you give Clichy then? He was much better than people here used to admit and better than Gibbs.


On reflection I think Clichy has a slightly bad rap, in the end he was better than Gibbs but not much worse than Monreal. Those 3 are proper Wenger defenders


 Profile  
 
 
Post #434956  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 8:32 pm 

All of the players City bought from us were intended to improve them. I thought Clichy played lots of games for Guardiola last season.


  
 
 
Post #434957  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 8:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

Bernard wrote:
All of the players City bought from us were intended to improve them. I thought Clichy played lots of games for Guardiola last season.

His first season. Didn't win the league.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #434958  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 9:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26777

TOP GUN wrote:
Bernard wrote:
Well according to you Top Gun, Monreal is better than Clichy, which I'd agree with. When Manchester City, one of the world's richest clubs, decided they wanted a new left back they bought him. When Guardiola arrived there he got rid of the likes of Hart immediately and Toure pretty damn quickly. But he kept Clichy a whole season, only getting rid of him when he was well in his thirties. As Monreal is better than Clichy who he kept until around 32, there's nothing to suggest Guardiola would have shipped him out in 5 seconds.

Sorry, I agree with lots of your viewpoints but you come out with a load of bollocks about many. Monreal is one of them.


city were signing our players left right and centre including Toure when he had malaria for 15 million and adebayor. Doesn't mean they are amazing players, Monreal is better than clichy but Clichy wouldn't have got anywhere near a regular role in a pep side. He was a squaddie

Monreal wouldn't be a bad substitute for arsenal.

Nachos heavy heights were playing for osasuna and Malaga. No one of note ever displayed an interest. He is a trier and "not bad" but not much more.

Also worth noting that Clichy counted as a 'homegrown' player at a time when City were busy signing lots of non homegrown players and were struggling to meet the quota.
It is no coincidence that they have signed Stones, Walker and Sterling - some of the best young homegrown talent to ensure they are well stocked in that area because it is unlikely (however good they are) that City are bringing through any of their own youngsters to the first team proper.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #434959  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 9:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:04 am
Posts: 7392
Location: Townsville Australia

Bernard wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:
Tickets on sale for red members now at 10 quid a pop for the lower tier for the 2nd leg v Chelsea.

The drop off of demand for tickets is incredible. This wouldn't have happened a few years back.

Fascinating situation at Arsenal off the pitch. On it it's tedious

Perhaps this is the type of thing, more than the mediocrity we're routinely seeing on the pitch, that will make Kroenke think about whether it's time to bring in a new manager? If Darren is right though, I won't be happy with Wenger joining the board. He's such a control freak I just don't see him being able to stop himself from interfering. I reckon he'd want to choose the new manager who will be someone willing to listen to Wenger's advice, which is a way of saying do as he's told.

I am with you on this situation. Under no circumstances do I want Wenger to help select his successor and I don't want him to have any position at the club. I do not want a statue erected to him. Maybe after they put up one to George Graham. The chances of that are pretty slim.

_________________
If this policy does not deliver then I would say we have to change it.
AW 150810


 Profile  
 
 
Post #434960  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 9:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:53 pm
Posts: 17047

Simple header at the far post goal from Lemar for Monaco tonight. For those like me who follow French football their game vs Nice (feat. Seri) is on BTSport.

Bernard not much between Clichy and Montreal. Personally, I think Monreal does not close down crosses well enough to be considered top drawer though I do like his commitment and he can be effective going forward.

_________________
It's a terrible love and I'm walking with spiders.


 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
     [ 526021 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1 ... 10871, 10872, 10873, 10874, 10875, 10876, 10877 ... 13151  Next

All times are UTC

Gooners Online - Click to see what Everyones Doing

Colour Key:  Visited Profile    Members Profile      Admin

Get Latest Post

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Decaf, grantyboy, mcquilkie and 266 guests


Search for:

Go to Top

Powered by php BB © 1993 - 2018