Fixtures Sunday April 28th - Tottenham Hotspur - Tottenham Hotspur Stadium - 2:00 Pm

Kick-Off

       Injuries                 Steve Gleiber



Get the Latest Post Go to the Bottom of Page It is currently Sun Apr 28, 2024 1:44 pm

All times are UTC


  


Reply to topic

Users browsing this forum: AmericanGooner and 70 guests

 
Post #309761  Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 5:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18426

warrior wrote:
I just watched the game again.

.

*%^@*** hell !

Why the *%^@ would you do that! :laughing7:


 Profile  
 
 
Post #309762  Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 5:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 7:45 am
Posts: 25814

Bernard wrote:
Gaz from Oz, I couldn't see anything to suggest Welbeck's shot was going wide before being deflected in. His shot looked on target as far as I could see.

I also agree with Daz. VAR shouldn't have seen the penalty retaken. The evidence that he kicked it twice simply wasn't hard enough.

Very true. Because there is no way in the laws of the game that it should have been retaken if it was a double kick.

_________________
I believe in our team, I believe in our quality and I am convinced that I am right. (Arsene Wenger Dec 08)


 Profile  
 
 
Post #309763  Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 6:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:42 am
Posts: 12633
Location: Rotorua New Zealand

Parkerknoll Gooner wrote:
Gaz from Oz wrote:
Your view is based on an assumption that this is the only way the ball could have loped up like that. You nor the refs are not experts in this field, if there is such an area of study. It is not based on physical evidence that shows 2 kicks. Without that the decision could not be overturned. The ref got it right as did the linesman.


Seriously? He hits it with the instep of his left foot, it cannot possibly take the trajectory it did without a deflection, which on replay you can clearly see.

What if ..BECAUSE he slipped ......he kicked up the face of the ball instead of through it thus imparting top spin [ that's how it works in tennis ] wouldn't that produce the same result as the supposed double touch .


 Profile  
 
 
Post #309764  Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 6:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 10:36 am
Posts: 9010
Location: The Go-Between Bridge

TOP GUN wrote:
Bellerin needs to be transferred immediately. Totally disappeared up his own arse.

Off with his head. Liberation needed


[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tqXrAHuLksU[/youtube]

And when he pulls his frilly nylon panties right up tight.... I fear it will do little to assuage the envy of the northern refs.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #309765  Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 6:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18426

To be honest our fashion sense can't also be winning the hearts and minds of these northern refs too. I'm pretty sure if Mike Dean glances at Bellerin arriving for the game in the tunnel dressed as a Rupert the bear themed Gardon gnome it wouldn't appeal to his northern grit.

This must be helping the referees association in their never ending genocidal quest to wipe out our club.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #309766  Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 6:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:42 am
Posts: 12633
Location: Rotorua New Zealand

Daz wrote:
Everybody thinks Mike Dean was wrong to give that penalty. It was a hard one to deny. We all KNOW that some penalties are incorrectly given or not given, it's hardly major news. Happens in all sports even with technology. Saw an absurd one in the Lions v All Blacks at the death when NZ not given a clear penalty for offside that would have given them the series (just for you, KP!)

Yeah thanks Cobber ... I'd forgotten that ..the ultimate in screaming injustices ; would have won the series if not for that .
I loved Gatland when he was part of a very famous forward pack playing for my home team Waikato in the early 90s , but now he seems to have forgotten his Kiwi roots and turned into a snivelling little Quisling .

... but I moved on too much happening in life .

Yesterday a turkey arrives to check out building a new fence between us and the neighbours , I'm at the Op Shop .. wife says to him we agreed to get rid of that tree .... it's a source of ivy and all manner of sheight which will cover the new fence if left

" Whoa God ..... I dont fancy that , it's a big mother " ... he goes home "I'll be back in a week ".

I go out , climb a ladder ; tie two ropes high up the trunk ... hook it to tow bar of the Maxima ... take the weight ..a decent notch at the base ..... REV ... CRASH ... it's down .


 Profile  
 
 
Post #309767  Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 6:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:42 am
Posts: 12633
Location: Rotorua New Zealand

john1 wrote:
Daz wrote:

I know "I don't know" is an unfashionable term but I truly don't know. I do think it was almost a bizarre case of the slip bringing his feet together simultaneously and I don't know what the rules say on that. Is the "loop" only explicable by the second foot or could falling backwards provide that kind of uplift? I'm not a physicist so I don't know and I think the point Gaz is reasonably making is neither would the VAR refs so they would probably in the moment stick with a goal with no clear and decisive evidence to overturn. Obviously we may all disagree on what is clear and decisive but a bit like "umpire's call" in cricket we will just have to live with some decisions that are questionable not being overturned.


I used to be a free kick geek back in the 70s. Spent hours practising them with my school goalie mate.

The only time I managed an effect like that pen was when I slipped and double hit. No way that ball does that without hitting his other foot. Physics would suggest the same too. (The look on the Forest player's face suggests also that he thought it was a fluke)


not hard to put this one to bed .... free kick Geek you may well have been but were you any good ...?

Those half dozen admiring sheilas in their gym slips , hands clasped , ready to swoon " Oh John you are so talented " on the sidelines doesn't mean you reached Denis Bergkamp status .

The look on his face doesn't suggest a fluke ... he was laughing because in spite of the slip he still managed to put the ball in the net .

Plenty of our players Iwobi , Bellerin , Welbeck get the ball three as high as that with firm footing .


 Profile  
 
 
Post #309768  Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 7:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 4:02 am
Posts: 2728
Location: Liverpool

kiwipete wrote:
john1 wrote:

I used to be a free kick geek back in the 70s. Spent hours practising them with my school goalie mate.

The only time I managed an effect like that pen was when I slipped and double hit. No way that ball does that without hitting his other foot. Physics would suggest the same too. (The look on the Forest player's face suggests also that he thought it was a fluke)


not hard to put this one to bed .... free kick Geek you may well have been but were you any good ...?

Those half dozen admiring sheilas in their gym slips , hands clasped , ready to swoon " Oh John you are so talented " on the sidelines doesn't mean you reached Denis Bergkamp status .

The look on his face doesn't suggest a fluke ... he was laughing because in spite of the slip he still managed to put the ball in the net .

Plenty of our players Iwobi , Bellerin , Welbeck get the ball three as high as that with firm footing .


Half a dozen? If only it were that few, the local constabulary could have had a day off crowd control at Shrewsbury Tech. The English girls loved a bit of Welsh rough (still do in fact). :icon_mrgreen:

It was the mullet/pudding bowl haircut, really tiny tight satin shorts (Arsenal of course) and socks properly rolled down to the ankles wot done it. Oh, and the aluminium studs on the Winfield (Woolworth) special boots.

_________________
Gorau chwarae cyd chwarae


 Profile  
 
 
Post #309769  Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 7:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 4:33 pm
Posts: 7066

john1 wrote:
It was the mullet/pudding bowl haircut, really tiny tight satin shorts (Arsenal of course) and socks properly rolled down to the ankles wot done it. Oh, and the aluminium studs on the Winfield (Woolworth) special boots.

Stop it John you're getting me excited :laughing7:


 Profile  
 
 
Post #309770  Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 7:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:42 am
Posts: 12633
Location: Rotorua New Zealand

TOP GUN wrote:
warrior wrote:
I just watched the game again.

.

*%^@*** hell !

Why the *%^@ would you do that! :laughing7:



sheltered life
closet Forest fan
Masochist


 Profile  
 
 
Post #309771  Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 7:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:42 am
Posts: 12633
Location: Rotorua New Zealand

bromley gooner wrote:
john1 wrote:
It was the mullet/pudding bowl haircut, really tiny tight satin shorts (Arsenal of course) and socks properly rolled down to the ankles wot done it. Oh, and the aluminium studs on the Winfield (Woolworth) special boots.

Stop it John you're getting me excited :laughing7:

didn't realise you were gay Brom .... no shame in that I hurriedly add , strictly women and sheep for me .


 Profile  
 
 
Post #309772  Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 7:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 4:33 pm
Posts: 7066

kiwipete wrote:
bromley gooner wrote:
Stop it John you're getting me excited :laughing7:

didn't realise you were gay Brom .... no shame in that I hurriedly add , strictly women and sheep for me .

I'm not gay Kiwi, but if John carries on like that he might change my mind :laughing7:


 Profile  
 
 
Post #309773  Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 8:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 9:51 pm
Posts: 3574

TOP GUN wrote:
Bellerin needs to be transferred immediately. Totally disappeared up his own arse.

Off with his head. Liberation needed

As opposed to this. Who knows Hector may have.


Attachments:
saggy_pants--300x450.jpg
saggy_pants--300x450.jpg [ 21.11 KB | Viewed 5163 times ]

_________________
Be careful who you call your friends. I'd rather have four quarters than one hundred pennies.
 Profile  
 
 
Post #309774  Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 9:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:04 am
Posts: 7393
Location: Townsville Australia

old man of hoy wrote:
Gaz from Oz wrote:
Can I make a point about VAR and the allegedly twice touched penalty. So much depends on what the VAR person gets to see...
Indeed, and this is another murky and unsatisfactory area of football. What gets shown on the screen will be completely dependent upon a person who is not formally part of the match taking place - namely, an unaccountable TV producer! For years we have had 'trial by television' and retrospective disciplinary action for incidents unseen by the officials during the course of a match, but who actually decided which of those incidents merited scrutiny remains a mystery. That TV runs so much of football now is obvious, but its influence over on-field issues should be carefully limited. VAR may be useful in certain circumstances but overall I'd sooner live with the vagaries of the officials, biased or unbiased.

Everyone take a seat. I agree generally with Hoy on this. Looking at the conditions of the VAR I understand that we will never know what footage the VAR person gets to look at. Remember he has a short time to make a decision. Do not for a second believe that what they are replaying on your TV will be exactly what he/she currently looks at. If they have 5 camera angles of a decision they may only really use 3. Old mate in the VAR may make the decision. Then 5 minutes later on the TV they show camera angle 4 and you will be totally outraged.

Looking at some of the recent decisions you can see how people and indeed experts are split on whether it is a penalty or not. A human being with the same mind skills as us will make the decision.

Plus wait for the time ou have aperson fouled in an attacking position, he loses the ball and the other team break and score. Don't expect that they will automatically go back that far to make a decision.

VAR or the equivalent in rugby league has been used for seasons and some of the decisions are bizarre.

We are heading to be american football which is totally f...d as a sport. Review after review.

_________________
If this policy does not deliver then I would say we have to change it.
AW 150810


 Profile  
 
 
Post #309775  Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 9:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:04 am
Posts: 7393
Location: Townsville Australia

mcquilkie wrote:
old man of hoy wrote:
Indeed, and this is another murky and unsatisfactory area of football. What gets shown on the screen will be completely dependent upon a person who is not formally part of the match taking place - namely, an unaccountable TV producer! For years we have had 'trial by television' and retrospective disciplinary action for incidents unseen by the officials during the course of a match, but who actually decided which of those incidents merited scrutiny remains a mystery. That TV runs so much of football now is obvious, but its influence over on-field issues should be carefully limited. VAR may be useful in certain circumstances but overall I'd sooner live with the vagaries of the officials, biased or unbiased.

VAR has been used in the Australian league this season and it's truly horrible in its current guise. Tonight, a goal was ruled out courtesy of a player being registered as offside by the VAR in the move (or do I mean phase) before the move before the move before the goal. It was a 'violation' spotted by no-one on or off the park; which would have been argued afterwards by precisely nobody other than the kind of saddos who occupy forums like this one (lovable saddos though we are); and which resulted in a goal being ruled out as the two teams were lining up for kick-off, both of whom had believed it was valid. A better way to suck the life out of football, I can't imagine.

Missed the game and some of the decisions on cards recently have been plain stupid.

_________________
If this policy does not deliver then I would say we have to change it.
AW 150810


 Profile  
 
 
Post #309776  Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 9:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26780

Strong rumours today linking Coq with a move. Few prem clubs and Valencia linked. Good move for both arsenal and coq as long as we replace him.
No doubt the fee will be derisory as it always seems to be with us. 26, 3.5 years left on his contract. I reckon we’ll end up getting something under £10m


 Profile  
 
 
Post #309777  Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 10:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18426

Tomorrow's paper. Life after Sanchez looks rosy. What a crowd


Attachments:

 Profile  
 
 
Post #309778  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 1:41 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:42 am
Posts: 12633
Location: Rotorua New Zealand

Gaz from Oz wrote:
Looking at the conditions of the VAR I understand that we will never know what footage the VAR person gets to look at. Remember he has a short time to make a decision. Do not for a second believe that what they are replaying on your TV will be exactly what he/she currently looks at.

I dont know where you are coming from .... in the Aussie rugby league they show EXACTLY what " The Bunker " ie video ref is looking at on the Big Screen and the television broadcast ...... with Phil Gould usually chipping with ' what is taking them so long "

They've had a few shockers but they've had more wins than losses in my view .


 Profile  
 
 
Post #309779  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 1:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 2:55 pm
Posts: 11498
Location: Singapore

TOP GUN wrote:
Today's rumour is Ramsey and Welbeck are both refusing to sign new contracts as the club has offered them extensions but with no improved terms.

Welbeck I couldn't care less about now as he's Kevin Campbell -40% but Ramsey can still do a job in the premiership.

Everything literally everything is in disarray


Wenger papered over fundamental fixes with band-aids. Now the band-aids are dropping off, and the wounds did not just not heal, but has infection. Wenger made a relatively smaller issue, into a very big one for the club. Along the way he had opportunities to make the fixes, but chose to stay arrogant about his belief. It is all breaking apart now, and I cannot see how he can stay on.

The same thing happened at Monaco. He started very well, but ended badly.

Agree ... couldn't care less about Welbeck. He has not proven his worth. Ramsey seems to be coming good.

_________________
Onwards and Upwards!


 Profile  
 
 
Post #309780  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 2:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 2:55 pm
Posts: 11498
Location: Singapore

Bored wrote:
Assuming that 4th place looks unlikely given how poorly the team is playing, surely winning the Europa League is Wenger's only possible salvation?


This Arsenal team will not be winning anything. Definitely not with Wenger still in charge. Players are leaving, and the better ones at that. Too many hanging on because of high wage or Wenger's indulgence. No Captain on the field. Zonal defence still not effective. Lack of urgency on the pitch. To top it all, a Manager lost in the old ways.

_________________
Onwards and Upwards!


 Profile  
 
 
Post #309781  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 2:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 2:55 pm
Posts: 11498
Location: Singapore

Niall wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:
Wenger won't win the Europa. He's hopeless at 2 legged ties and Milan,Lazio and others are still in the competition.

Milan and Lazio aren't any great shakes.


But a few 3rd placed teams coming through from their failed ECL campaign are. Atletico, Napoli & Dortmund. CSKA & Spartak Moscow may also be too much of a challenge.

_________________
Onwards and Upwards!


 Profile  
 
 
Post #309782  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 2:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:04 am
Posts: 7393
Location: Townsville Australia

kiwipete wrote:
Gaz from Oz wrote:
Looking at the conditions of the VAR I understand that we will never know what footage the VAR person gets to look at. Remember he has a short time to make a decision. Do not for a second believe that what they are replaying on your TV will be exactly what he/she currently looks at.

I dont know where you are coming from .... in the Aussie rugby league they show EXACTLY what " The Bunker " ie video ref is looking at on the Big Screen and the television broadcast ...... with Phil Gould usually chipping with ' what is taking them so long "

They've had a few shockers but they've had more wins than losses in my view .

You are correct in he NRL we see the same footage. But the EPL conditions you do not and never get to see what they decided on.

But as for injustices - the cowboys for instance:
I suggest you have a look at the clearly knock on try from Manly in the finals a couple of years ago.
Then the seven tackle try by Cronulla in he finals
A clearly forward pass by the Broncos to beat the Cowboys last year or the year before.

_________________
If this policy does not deliver then I would say we have to change it.
AW 150810


 Profile  
 
 
Post #309783  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 7:17 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:58 am
Posts: 34127

gooner7 wrote:
Bored wrote:
Assuming that 4th place looks unlikely given how poorly the team is playing, surely winning the Europa League is Wenger's only possible salvation?


This Arsenal team will not be winning anything. Definitely not with Wenger still in charge. Players are leaving, and the better ones at that. Too many hanging on because of high wage or Wenger's indulgence. No Captain on the field. Zonal defence still not effective. Lack of urgency on the pitch. To top it all, a Manager lost in the old ways.

We are certainly out of the league title and have been for a few months. Of the two remaining competitions, the Europa Cup is the easier of the two. To repeat what we did in the FAC last season in reverse order of the semis and finals is a tall order and very unlikely. I'd suggest its slightly easier to get past Lazio, Milan and any of the 3rd place group stages sides over Chelsea and City. Both of whom I'd fancy winning the Europa Cup if they were still in it.

As an aside, City will win the ECL I would guess within the next 3-5 years. I could even conceive Tottenham winning it in the next 5-10 years but a few things have to happen (they remain competitive keep key players and strengthen, most importantly keep the manager when slots open when big clubs need a manager).

_________________
"Never relegated, Never Will Be" :)


 Profile  
 
 
Post #309784  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 7:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 4:02 am
Posts: 2728
Location: Liverpool

bromley gooner wrote:
john1 wrote:
It was the mullet/pudding bowl haircut, really tiny tight satin shorts (Arsenal of course) and socks properly rolled down to the ankles wot done it. Oh, and the aluminium studs on the Winfield (Woolworth) special boots.

Stop it John you're getting me excited :laughing7:


Nice to know I can still get someone excited!! :angel4:

_________________
Gorau chwarae cyd chwarae


 Profile  
 
 
Post #309785  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 7:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 4:02 am
Posts: 2728
Location: Liverpool

kiwipete wrote:
bromley gooner wrote:
Stop it John you're getting me excited :laughing7:

strictly women and sheep for me .


And not necessarily in that order?

_________________
Gorau chwarae cyd chwarae


 Profile  
 
 
Post #309786  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 7:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 4:02 am
Posts: 2728
Location: Liverpool

Gaz from Oz wrote:
old man of hoy wrote:
Indeed, and this is another murky and unsatisfactory area of football. What gets shown on the screen will be completely dependent upon a person who is not formally part of the match taking place - namely, an unaccountable TV producer! For years we have had 'trial by television' and retrospective disciplinary action for incidents unseen by the officials during the course of a match, but who actually decided which of those incidents merited scrutiny remains a mystery. That TV runs so much of football now is obvious, but its influence over on-field issues should be carefully limited. VAR may be useful in certain circumstances but overall I'd sooner live with the vagaries of the officials, biased or unbiased.


We are heading to be american football which is totally f...d as a sport.


I think the whole world is becoming American, and not just in sport, which means we will all be totally f...d

_________________
Gorau chwarae cyd chwarae


 Profile  
 
 
Post #309787  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 8:28 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:21 pm
Posts: 16415
Location: Stockholm

Rumours from Spain that Coquelin will sign for Valencia for £10m. Doubt we’ll see a midfield signing out of the blue, so I wonder if this means Wenger wants to tray Maitland-Niles in central midfield? I would honestly be ok with that for the remainder of the season.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #309788  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 10:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:52 pm
Posts: 18760

Daz wrote:
old man of hoy wrote:
What interested me about that situation was the way in which many Arsenal players quickly appealed for a double touch. Not something you would do unless it happened. They clearly saw, and most probably heard, that something was wrong when the penalty taker made impact with the ball. Truth is the referee missed what the players didn't, and in the context of the match it was a significant error.
I do agree with that. They seemed absolutely certain and vehement. I don't quite agree on its significance though but I await a ton of hypothetical certainties, phrases like "everybody knows" and "balance of game shifting".
Methinks you underestimate the significance. 2-3 Gunners may well have got a draw. 2-4 not on.

_________________
"Young and caught up in life, we seldom watched the skies.”


 Profile  
 
 
Post #309789  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 10:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:52 pm
Posts: 18760

mcquilkie wrote:
...As a rule of thumb, we try to imagine Dennis Lillee or Jeff Thomson uttering the phrase: if we can't picture Thommo casually chatting about nibbles, hubbies or chrimbo, it's out the window, mate. Quick smart.
Imagining Lillee or Thommo reading a book is the greater feat of imagination.

_________________
"Young and caught up in life, we seldom watched the skies.”


 Profile  
 
 
Post #309790  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 10:19 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:21 pm
Posts: 16415
Location: Stockholm

And now there are rumours we're open to selling Elneny to West Ham. Apparently Wenger does not think we need to have midfielders in the squad. Watch him revolutionize English football again with a 5-0-5 formation.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #309791  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 10:58 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18426

Hazuki wrote:
And now there are rumours we're open to selling Elneny to West Ham. Apparently Wenger does not think we need to have midfielders in the squad. Watch him revolutionize English football again with a 5-0-5 formation.

El Nenny and Coquelin are useless and not up to standard. Surely better options using youth or an indicator somebody new is coming in.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #309792  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 11:11 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:21 pm
Posts: 16415
Location: Stockholm

TOP GUN wrote:
El Nenny and Coquelin are useless and not up to standard. Surely better options using youth or an indicator somebody new is coming in.

Disagree that they're useless, but wouldn't mind seeing them replaced with someone better. If they're replaced by Joe Willock though, I don't see the point. No point in making the team worse just because we're probably not winning anything.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #309793  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 11:31 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18426

Hazuki wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:
El Nenny and Coquelin are useless and not up to standard. Surely better options using youth or an indicator somebody new is coming in.

Disagree that they're useless, but wouldn't mind seeing them replaced with someone better. If they're replaced by Joe Willock though, I don't see the point. No point in making the team worse just because we're probably not winning anything.


Why not start rebuilding (although with Wenger it's pointless), we will finish 6th and win nothing this year. Everyone can see it, knows it and has accepted it.

The process of rebuilding the squad is essential. Our talent pool is slim and we have barely any week to week match winners after Özil and Sanchez go. You have to start somewhere


 Profile  
 
 
Post #309794  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 11:36 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:21 pm
Posts: 16415
Location: Stockholm

TOP GUN wrote:
Why not start rebuilding

I don't know, who says we shouldn't? However an important part of rebuilding is to replace players who are sold with better players, or at least players who have the potential to be better. Gutting the squad mid-season hardly helps our current situation much. That's why I'm wondering if we're looking to sign a midfielder in January.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #309795  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 11:36 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18426

Tickets on sale for red members now at 10 quid a pop for the lower tier for the 2nd leg v Chelsea.

The drop off of demand for tickets is incredible. This wouldn't have happened a few years back.

Fascinating situation at Arsenal off the pitch. On it it's tedious


 Profile  
 
 
Post #309796  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 11:46 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 5:38 pm
Posts: 6470
Location: ɹǝpu∩uʍop

AmericanGooner wrote:
We are certainly out of the league title and have been for a few months.

You spelled 'years' wrong.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #309797  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 11:56 am 

TOP GUN wrote:
Tickets on sale for red members now at 10 quid a pop for the lower tier for the 2nd leg v Chelsea.

The drop off of demand for tickets is incredible. This wouldn't have happened a few years back.

Fascinating situation at Arsenal off the pitch. On it it's tedious

Perhaps this is the type of thing, more than the mediocrity we're routinely seeing on the pitch, that will make Kroenke think about whether it's time to bring in a new manager? If Darren is right though, I won't be happy with Wenger joining the board. He's such a control freak I just don't see him being able to stop himself from interfering. I reckon he'd want to choose the new manager who will be someone willing to listen to Wenger's advice, which is a way of saying do as he's told.


  
 
 
Post #309798  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 12:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18426

warrior wrote:
AmericanGooner wrote:
We are certainly out of the league title and have been for a few months.

You spelled 'years' wrong.


You spelled a decade wrong


 Profile  
 
 
Post #309799  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 12:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 10:36 am
Posts: 9010
Location: The Go-Between Bridge

TOP GUN wrote:
Tomorrow's paper. Life after Sanchez looks rosy. What a crowd


Nah I will be disappointed on the day young footballers with a ton of money don't rent an Air B and B for a party the night before a cup game. Good on you, Alex. It sits nicely with Bellerin's yellow hat at London Fashion Week.

Like the Style Council, my moods are ever-changing and the Arsenal soap opera is becoming more and more entertaining by the day. Nobody could have failed to derive a degree of entertainment and amusement from the debacle at Forest which in a sterile football world is something. It is the Eighteenth Brumaire of Arsene Wenger - first time tragedy, second time farce.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #309800  Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 12:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 10:36 am
Posts: 9010
Location: The Go-Between Bridge

old man of hoy wrote:
Daz wrote:
I do agree with that. They seemed absolutely certain and vehement. I don't quite agree on its significance though but I await a ton of hypothetical certainties, phrases like "everybody knows" and "balance of game shifting".
Methinks you underestimate the significance. 2-3 Gunners may well have got a draw. 2-4 not on.


You may be right I certainly worried we might snatch an annoying equaliser if that goal was disallowed. Although equally likely we would have managed a miss like the one that did happen right at the end.

Anyway, I don't think a highly marginal decision (I KNOW forum physicists, but you are just going to have to resign yourself to shrieking into the void on this one) really serves as a deodorant for the stench coming out of Denmark right now.


 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
     [ 400663 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1 ... 7742, 7743, 7744, 7745, 7746, 7747, 7748 ... 10017  Next

All times are UTC

Gooners Online - Click to see what Everyones Doing

Colour Key:  Visited Profile    Members Profile      Admin

Get Latest Post

Users browsing this forum: AmericanGooner and 70 guests


Search for:

Go to Top

Powered by php BB © 1993 - 2018