Fixtures Sunday April 28th - Tottenham Hotspur - Tottenham Hotspur Stadium - 2:00 Pm

Kick-Off

       Injuries                 Steve Gleiber



Get the Latest Post Go to the Bottom of Page It is currently Sun Apr 28, 2024 12:48 pm

All times are UTC


  


Reply to topic

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], bubblechris, mcquilkie and 256 guests

 
Post #373321  Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 2:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

bromley gooner wrote:
bubblechris wrote:

So you want another Welbeck to play up front with, oh yeah Welbeck.

But who will score the goals?

You really don’t like it when someone has a different opinion do you.
One thing is for sure, whatever your opinion of Zaha, that Walcott isn’t the answer.


Bromley he's a troll who supports another club that consistently comes on here to wind up. Don't bite


 Profile  
 
 
Post #373322  Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 2:39 pm 
Online

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 7:31 pm
Posts: 4232
Location: Turnford, Broxbourne, Herts

TOP GUN wrote:
bromley gooner wrote:
You really don’t like it when someone has a different opinion do you.
One thing is for sure, whatever your opinion of Zaha, that Walcott isn’t the answer.


Bromley he's a troll who supports another club that consistently comes on here to wind up. Don't bite


Did your imaginary son tell you that or was it one of your comic characters, you buffoon................


 Profile  
 
 
Post #373323  Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 4:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 4:33 pm
Posts: 7061

TOP GUN wrote:
bromley gooner wrote:
You really don’t like it when someone has a different opinion do you.
One thing is for sure, whatever your opinion of Zaha, that Walcott isn’t the answer.


Bromley he's a troll who supports another club that consistently comes on here to wind up. Don't bite

I think you may be correct TG. So I will take your advice.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #373324  Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 5:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

bromley gooner wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:

Bromley he's a troll who supports another club that consistently comes on here to wind up. Don't bite

I think you may be correct TG. So I will take your advice.

No worries

The clue is in the name, quite literally if you know what I mean


 Profile  
 
 
Post #373325  Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 6:12 pm 
Online

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 7:31 pm
Posts: 4232
Location: Turnford, Broxbourne, Herts

Well done children. You can't win your arguments when it comes to debating facts so you just resort to slinging insults.

Well I'll be pleased to ignore your ignorant and childish comments and stick to dealing with the adults on the forum who like to debate and discuss facts.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #373326  Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 7:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26777

bubblechris wrote:
bromley gooner wrote:
You really don’t like it when someone has a different opinion do you.
One thing is for sure, whatever your opinion of Zaha, that Walcott isn’t the answer.


I have no problem with other peoples opinions but you give the impression that he is a goalscoring forward. Can you remind us how proficient a goalscorer he is, thus why he is better than Walcott?

For me, I'm beyond tired of Walcott contributing absolutely zero to 8 out of 10 games and then maybe poking in a couple of goals in the other two. Zaha, whilst clearly not the finished article is by far a better footballer than Walcott for me and I think would contribute more to our attacking play


 Profile  
 
 
Post #373327  Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 7:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26777

Wenger is just embarrassing himself with some of his quotes now. He has declared that there wasn't much between Arsenal and City, explaining that as well as the bad referee calls, under 'expected goals' Arsenal had 0.6 and City had 0.7 - which proves how close the teams are. Firstly City had 1.9 and arsenal had 0.3 so he is wrong but anyone with a pair of eyes can see there is a huge gap between the quality of Arsenal and City. City are 12 points ahead of us after 11 games. At that rate they will finish 40 points in front!


 Profile  
 
 
Post #373328  Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 11:45 pm 

TOP GUN wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:
Bromley he's a troll who supports another club that consistently comes on here to wind up. Don't bite

The clue is in the name, quite literally if you know what I mean

Evening chaps. Look, I suspect bubblechris is an Arsenal fan. I wouldn't have thought he might not be were it for Top Gun's post. I really don't get Top Gun's comment about a clue being in the name. Does 'bubblechris' imply support for another club? I've been simple and presumed he's of Greek heritage (the 'bubble' bit) and his name is Christopher (the chris bit).

Having said that, I think he has some barmy ideas. But that alone doesn't mean he isn't an Arsenal fan. Countless Arsenal fans do. I get the impression he dislikes Sanchez, but I think loads of genuine Arsenal fans do. I don't dislike him, but accept he isn't really a likeable character (in my view anyway). He's a very good player for the club (I'd count him as no more than that compared to the true greatness of the likes of Henry, Bergkamp, Brady, Vieira, Pires, Campbell, McLintock, and others). However, of the recent generation of Arsenal players, has there really been anyone better? I can't see anyone, and I've seen every single Arsenal game in the meantime. So I rate Sanchez highly, very highly. But he isn't a footballing genius, let's be realistic.


  
 
 
Post #373329  Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2017 12:19 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

Bernard wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:
The clue is in the name, quite literally if you know what I mean

Evening chaps. Look, I suspect bubblechris is an Arsenal fan. I wouldn't have thought he might not be were it for Top Gun's post. I really don't get Top Gun's comment about a clue being in the name. Does 'bubblechris' imply support for another club? I've been simple and presumed he's of Greek heritage (the 'bubble' bit) and his name is Christopher (the chris bit).

him.


Goodness mate

https://youtu.be/yvuOtlpSAeY


 Profile  
 
 
Post #373330  Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2017 12:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 2:55 pm
Posts: 11489
Location: Singapore

Rich wrote:
Wenger is just embarrassing himself with some of his quotes now. He has declared that there wasn't much between Arsenal and City, explaining that as well as the bad referee calls, under 'expected goals' Arsenal had 0.6 and City had 0.7 - which proves how close the teams are. Firstly City had 1.9 and arsenal had 0.3 so he is wrong but anyone with a pair of eyes can see there is a huge gap between the quality of Arsenal and City. City are 12 points ahead of us after 11 games. At that rate they will finish 40 points in front!


I will always jump on the anti-Wenger bandwagon. He is a joke.

_________________
Onwards and Upwards!


 Profile  
 
 
Post #373331  Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2017 6:16 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26777

Mike Dean the spurs fan is the ref for the north London derby this weekend. Spurs win a lot of penalties against us and mike dean is notorious for being the ref who gives more pens than any other ref in recent history. It is like Dean is making a point of saying he’s brave enough to give pens, irrespective of whether he is making the right call. I hope we’re on our guard and making sure we throw ourselves at the slightest contact in their box


 Profile  
 
 
Post #373332  Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2017 8:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:04 am
Posts: 7392
Location: Townsville Australia

Rich wrote:
Mike Dean the spurs fan is the ref for the north London derby this weekend. Spurs win a lot of penalties against us and mike dean is notorious for being the ref who gives more pens than any other ref in recent history. It is like Dean is making a point of saying he’s brave enough to give pens, irrespective of whether he is making the right call. I hope we’re on our guard and making sure we throw ourselves at the slightest contact in their box

Wenger asked for him so he will have an excuse in case it goes pear shaped.

Here is part of Wengers after match interview that he has prepared which follows on from some of his recent interviews.

Journo :What could Arsenal have done better:

I am sick of all these pointless questions from someone who has never managed a team. So let me explain...but we got .375 of a portion to their .469 and with the easterly wind that is sufficient for me to make a decision to play Walcott in goal for the second half....Čech will not last forever...duckworth lewis....minus the square root of F A.

Journo : So were you happy with the referee.

_________________
If this policy does not deliver then I would say we have to change it.
AW 150810


 Profile  
 
 
Post #373333  Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2017 9:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 8:30 pm
Posts: 8154

Bernard wrote:
I get the impression he dislikes Sanchez, but I think loads of genuine Arsenal fans do. I don't dislike him, but accept he isn't really a likeable character (in my view anyway). He's a very good player for the club (I'd count him as no more than that compared to the true greatness of the likes of Henry, Bergkamp, Brady, Vieira, Pires, Campbell, McLintock, and others). However, of the recent generation of Arsenal players, has there really been anyone better? I can't see anyone, and I've seen every single Arsenal game in the meantime. So I rate Sanchez highly, very highly. But he isn't a footballing genius, let's be realistic.

I hope Gael doesn't read this. He'll be devastated......

Seriously though, I would rate RVP above Sanchez. Obviously, the way he left the club tarnishes his standing as an Arsenal player, but he was absolutely phenomenal in his final two seasons with us. He was undoubtedly one of the best strikers in the world at that time. As good as Sanchez is, I don't think he is one of the top 3 or 4 in the world in his position, which is what RVP was.

_________________
"I just kept going pretty lively. Them killers wasn't too healthy company."


 Profile  
 
 
Post #373334  Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2017 10:11 am 

dec wrote:
Bernard wrote:
I get the impression he dislikes Sanchez, but I think loads of genuine Arsenal fans do. I don't dislike him, but accept he isn't really a likeable character (in my view anyway). He's a very good player for the club (I'd count him as no more than that compared to the true greatness of the likes of Henry, Bergkamp, Brady, Vieira, Pires, Campbell, McLintock, and others). However, of the recent generation of Arsenal players, has there really been anyone better? I can't see anyone, and I've seen every single Arsenal game in the meantime. So I rate Sanchez highly, very highly. But he isn't a footballing genius, let's be realistic.

I hope Gael doesn't read this. He'll be devastated......

Seriously though, I would rate RVP above Sanchez. Obviously, the way he left the club tarnishes his standing as an Arsenal player, but he was absolutely phenomenal in his final two seasons with us. He was undoubtedly one of the best strikers in the world at that time. As good as Sanchez is, I don't think he is one of the top 3 or 4 in the world in his position, which is what RVP was.

I wouldn't argue with that dec. Sorry, by 'recent generation of Arsenal players' I was talking more about current players.


  
 
 
Post #373335  Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2017 11:43 am 

TOP GUN wrote:
Bernard wrote:
Evening chaps. Look, I suspect bubblechris is an Arsenal fan. I wouldn't have thought he might not be were it for Top Gun's post. I really don't get Top Gun's comment about a clue being in the name. Does 'bubblechris' imply support for another club? I've been simple and presumed he's of Greek heritage (the 'bubble' bit) and his name is Christopher (the chris bit).

Goodness mate

https://youtu.be/yvuOtlpSAeY

Fair point as I'd never thought of that. I suspect both your and my ideas are feasible though.


  
 
 
Post #373336  Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2017 3:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:06 am
Posts: 16486

Bernard wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:
The clue is in the name, quite literally if you know what I mean

Evening chaps. Look, I suspect bubblechris is an Arsenal fan. I wouldn't have thought he might not be were it for Top Gun's post. I really don't get Top Gun's comment about a clue being in the name. Does 'bubblechris' imply support for another club? I've been simple and presumed he's of Greek heritage (the 'bubble' bit) and his name is Christopher (the chris bit).

Having said that, I think he has some barmy ideas. But that alone doesn't mean he isn't an Arsenal fan. Countless Arsenal fans do.

These days, its almost a requirement. So I can't see how that would single him out.
But I agree with your post. Not sure what Top Gun is on about.

_________________
Hamba kakuhle, Madiba


 Profile  
 
 
Post #373337  Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2017 3:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 3:56 pm
Posts: 980

Not being racist but I assumed bubblechris was of Greek descent....the old rhyming slang...bubble and squeak etc...didn't connect it to the Hammers at all


 Profile  
 
 
Post #373338  Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2017 4:22 pm 
Online

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 7:31 pm
Posts: 4232
Location: Turnford, Broxbourne, Herts

You're right chaps I am not a Hammers fan. I did go to West Ham once. Vieira was sent off for spitting i think. He was getting the shite kicked out of him and reacted. Swore I'd never go again it took ages to drive away from the ground.

What's daft about realising before everybody else that Sanchez was not good for the team and for calling Ox a loss before others started? Was it saying that a goal shy Welbeck was no use to us or that I thought Zaha Walcott were as bad as each other?

Can't think of anything else you might consider daft and wonder if it's not me that's the daft one.

TG has just proved what a child he is by making such a pathetic assumption or was it just to get back at me for saying he wasn't a gooner some time back?


 Profile  
 
 
Post #373339  Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2017 4:59 pm 

Andy Green wrote:
Not being racist but I assumed bubblechris was of Greek descent....the old rhyming slang...bubble and squeak etc...didn't connect it to the Hammers at all

As explained earlier, exactly my thoughts too.


  
 
 
Post #373340  Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2017 5:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

Bernard wrote:
Andy Green wrote:
Not being racist but I assumed bubblechris was of Greek descent....the old rhyming slang...bubble and squeak etc...didn't connect it to the Hammers at all

As explained earlier, exactly my thoughts too.


Would a Greek call themselves that? I'm not so sure.

Fan of other club trolling, sort yourselves out lads. Bromleys right, comes on here trolling which is more of a giveaway than the name if that's not enough alone


 Profile  
 
 
Post #373341  Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2017 5:33 pm 

bubblechris wrote:
What's daft about realising before everybody else that Sanchez was not good for the team and for calling Ox a loss before others started? Was it saying that a goal shy Welbeck was no use to us or that I thought Zaha Walcott were as bad as each other?

Do you seriously not think we look a better team when Welbeck is in the lineup?


  
 
 
Post #373342  Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2017 5:40 pm 

TOP GUN wrote:
Would a Greek call themselves that? I'm not so sure.

I think there are plenty that would. Heavy dose of irony, I accept. But I reckon so.


  
 
 
Post #373343  Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2017 6:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 4:33 pm
Posts: 7061

I'd take Zaha and so would Rich. Our West Ham supporting Greek colleague would take Theo. What does the rest of the forum think?


 Profile  
 
 
Post #373344  Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2017 6:51 pm 
Online

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 7:31 pm
Posts: 4232
Location: Turnford, Broxbourne, Herts

Bernard wrote:
bubblechris wrote:
What's daft about realising before everybody else that Sanchez was not good for the team and for calling Ox a loss before others started? Was it saying that a goal shy Welbeck was no use to us or that I thought Zaha Walcott were as bad as each other?

Do you seriously not think we look a better team when Welbeck is in the lineup?


Yes I think he's a great player but not what we need in a front 2. He plays as a winger and that's not what we need, imo we need Welbeck to be a goalscorer.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #373345  Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2017 6:53 pm 
Online

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 7:31 pm
Posts: 4232
Location: Turnford, Broxbourne, Herts

bromley gooner wrote:
I'd take Zaha and so would Rich. Our West Ham supporting Greek colleague would take Theo. What does the rest of the forum think?


I don't think I said I would keep Walcott I believe I said they were too similar but one had a better end product the the other.

When Sanchez goes we have only one out and out goalscorer. I believe we've all been saying for a long time that that was what we needed.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #373346  Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2017 7:04 pm 

bubblechris wrote:
When Sanchez goes we have no out and out goalscorer. I believe we've all been saying that for years.

Isn't that what Lacazette is supposed to be?


  
 
 
Post #373347  Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2017 7:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

bromley gooner wrote:
I'd take Zaha and so would Rich. Our West Ham supporting Greek colleague would take Theo. What does the rest of the forum think?


If ever you needed to demonstrate somebody was on a wind up :laughing7:

Stevie Wonder just called by the way and he takes Zaha as well


 Profile  
 
 
Post #373348  Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2017 7:18 pm 
Online

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 7:31 pm
Posts: 4232
Location: Turnford, Broxbourne, Herts

Bernard wrote:
bubblechris wrote:
When Sanchez goes we have no out and out goalscorer. I believe we've all been saying that for years.

Isn't that what Lacazette is supposed to be?


I rephrased that quote but are you happy having just Lacazette, and or Giroud as our only back up?


 Profile  
 
 
Post #373349  Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2017 7:29 pm 

bubblechris wrote:
Bernard wrote:
I rephrased that quote but are you happy having just Lacazette, and or Giroud as our only back up?

If you don't consider him worthy of a mention, I think you seriously underestimate Welbeck.


  
 
 
Post #373350  Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2017 8:46 pm 
Online

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 7:31 pm
Posts: 4232
Location: Turnford, Broxbourne, Herts

Bernard wrote:
bubblechris wrote:

If you don't consider him worthy of a mention, I think you seriously underestimate Welbeck.


Well Iwobi just scored 2 goals to give Nigeria a win. Giroud scored for France, Eddie for the U19s. I can't recall Welbeck's last goal or when he last had a good run. Of course I hope he makes it but can the Arsenal wait for him to come good?

We need another goalscorer when Sanchez goes, maybe sooner as he's not exactly banging them in. Can we afford to wait?


 Profile  
 
 
Post #373351  Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2017 8:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:42 am
Posts: 12633
Location: Rotorua New Zealand

.

The irony ..... most find international week a pain in the arse not having club football yet when that same club football is played...for us it's usually cue for gnashing of teeth and hair being torn out in clumps .

I think the FA should get some balls and play matches at this time it benefits the minnows ; who are at a disadvantage for the rest of the season against mega $$$$$$$$$$

On the Bubblechris affair .....[ of which I have little interest ] though it does spice things up

An argument between Bubblechris and Top Gun who obviously dont like each other ; with the latter busily trying to organise a tag team to gain the upperhand .

Greeks and West Ham are thrown in to adversely typecast the former .


 Profile  
 
 
Post #373352  Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2017 9:41 pm 

bubblechris, being a striker isn't only about how many goals they score. Welbeck has a very strong all round game outside of his goal scoring and that's why we look a better team when he's playing, which I thought you accept yourself. He gives us physical presence, pace and power in attack, as well as a terrific work rate. In my view, considering our squad as it stands, he gets in Arsenal's strongest side.


  
 
 
Post #373353  Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2017 9:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:06 am
Posts: 16486

bubblechris wrote:
You're right chaps I am not a Hammers fan. I did go to West Ham once. Vieira was sent off for spitting i think. He was getting the shite kicked out of him and reacted. Swore I'd never go again it took ages to drive away from the ground.

What's daft about realising before everybody else that Sanchez was not good for the team and for calling Ox a loss before others started? Was it saying that a goal shy Welbeck was no use to us or that I thought Zaha Walcott were as bad as each other?

Can't think of anything else you might consider daft and wonder if it's not me that's the daft one.

TG has just proved what a child he is by making such a pathetic assumption or was it just to get back at me for saying he wasn't a gooner some time back?

Indeed. TG protesteth too much, you think? Top Gun is an anogram for got pun. I think that's may be significant although for the moment I can think of what it might imply ...

Nevertheless, we can't be too vigilant. The forum may be crawling with third columnists who make thousands of posts in order to get deep cover and so they can ... I'll get back to you on that one too.

_________________
Hamba kakuhle, Madiba


 Profile  
 
 
Post #373354  Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2017 9:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:06 am
Posts: 16486

TOP GUN wrote:
bromley gooner wrote:
I'd take Zaha and so would Rich. Our West Ham supporting Greek colleague would take Theo. What does the rest of the forum think?


If ever you needed to demonstrate somebody was on a wind up :laughing7:

Stevie Wonder just called by the way and he takes Zaha as well

Perhaps you missheard and he said "I just called ... to say .. I love you"?

_________________
Hamba kakuhle, Madiba


 Profile  
 
 
Post #373355  Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2017 10:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26777

Bernard wrote:
bubblechris wrote:
When Sanchez goes we have no out and out goalscorer. I believe we've all been saying that for years.

Isn't that what Lacazette is supposed to be?

He scored twice tonight against the Germans....


 Profile  
 
 
Post #373356  Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2017 11:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:04 am
Posts: 7392
Location: Townsville Australia

Rich wrote:
Bernard wrote:
Isn't that what Lacazette is supposed to be?

He scored twice tonight against the Germans....

Well he should be our goalscorer but Wenger has decided he is not good enough to have a starting place in big games. So we should be asking Wenger this question.

_________________
If this policy does not deliver then I would say we have to change it.
AW 150810


 Profile  
 
 
Post #373357  Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 12:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 2:55 pm
Posts: 11489
Location: Singapore

bromley gooner wrote:
I'd take Zaha and so would Rich. Our West Ham supporting Greek colleague would take Theo. What does the rest of the forum think?


Zaha over Theo

_________________
Onwards and Upwards!


 Profile  
 
 
Post #373358  Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 12:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 2:55 pm
Posts: 11489
Location: Singapore

Goonie wrote:
Rich wrote:
He scored twice tonight against the Germans....


Iwobi scored two as well. Wonder if he can add scoring consistently to his game. We need our front four to be able to give us 50 league goals a season.


I think Iwobi will eventually come good. Perhaps in the latter half of this season. He needs more exposure to success and failure. The experience will build him.

_________________
Onwards and Upwards!


 Profile  
 
 
Post #373359  Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 5:33 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:42 am
Posts: 12633
Location: Rotorua New Zealand

Gaz from Oz wrote:
Rich wrote:
He scored twice tonight against the Germans....

Well he should be our goalscorer but Wenger has decided he is not good enough to have a starting place in big games. So we should be asking Wenger this question.


I think in Arsene's arse backwards way of thinking he likes to keep a bit in reserve , hope to keep the scoreline blank and bring on his aces when the opposition are tiring .

If I was Lacazette I'd be saying to Wenger ....." I had better start v Spurs , Man U and Chelsea otherwise I'm heading back to Francais Land"


 Profile  
 
 
Post #373360  Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 8:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:04 am
Posts: 7392
Location: Townsville Australia

kiwipete wrote:
Gaz from Oz wrote:
Well he should be our goalscorer but Wenger has decided he is not good enough to have a starting place in big games. So we should be asking Wenger this question.


I think in Arsene's arse backwards way of thinking he likes to keep a bit in reserve , hope to keep the scoreline blank and bring on his aces when the opposition are tiring .

If I was Lacazette I'd be saying to Wenger ....." I had better start v Spurs , Man U and Chelsea otherwise I'm heading back to Francais Land"

WC year so Lacazette needs to play.

On the WC - Aust game about 20 minutes away and your lot play in Peru tomorrow morning. Lets hope both of us are there.

_________________
If this policy does not deliver then I would say we have to change it.
AW 150810


 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
     [ 466819 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1 ... 9331, 9332, 9333, 9334, 9335, 9336, 9337 ... 11671  Next

All times are UTC

Gooners Online - Click to see what Everyones Doing

Colour Key:  Visited Profile    Members Profile      Admin

Get Latest Post

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], bubblechris, mcquilkie and 256 guests


Search for:

Go to Top

Powered by php BB © 1993 - 2018