Fixtures Sunday April 28th - Tottenham Hotspur - Tottenham Hotspur Stadium - 2:00 Pm

Kick-Off

       Injuries                 Steve Gleiber



Get the Latest Post Go to the Bottom of Page It is currently Sat Apr 27, 2024 10:44 pm

All times are UTC


  


Reply to topic

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], warrior and 406 guests

 
Post #484201  Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 5:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 1:31 pm
Posts: 8152
Location: London

grantyboy wrote:
dec wrote:
Hi Bromley

He might get a chunky signing on fee as he can leave on a Bosman, but beyond that I would be surprised if he gets a better deal. It's not as if he is a target of City, Chelsea or Utd. Also, the contract on offer from Arsenal, apparently, will be more lucrative than his current one if he stays fit and delivers.


I was quite surprised to read that he's 28 now. How old was he when he burst into the scene alongside Fabrehas was it?. Shows how.little he has played in that time and how injury prone he is.


You should be surprised - he's still 26!

_________________
"....its up for grabs now.........THOMAS!"


 Profile  
 
 
Post #484202  Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 5:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 1:31 pm
Posts: 8152
Location: London

warrior wrote:
Yet, we don't get a pen for that ???


Martin Atkinson....

In all seriousness, it was as clear as day, and far clearer than the one for Watford, which my Liverpool supporting mate was adamant was a bad call. I can't really make up my mind about it, but Čech made it irrelevant.

_________________
"....its up for grabs now.........THOMAS!"


 Profile  
 
 
Post #484203  Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 5:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 2:55 pm
Posts: 11488
Location: Singapore

Good to see a convincing win. But still want Wenger out asap.

_________________
Onwards and Upwards!


 Profile  
 
 
Post #484204  Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 5:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

Saw some comments that Mhikitaryan basically said the fans who didn't turn up today were not real fans (in different words ) then you get this comment ....

Arsenal manager Arsene Wenger said his team had to "get the fans back on our side again" after ending a run of three successive Premier League defeats with a fine win over Watford.

..well listen Henrik and Arsene I'm sorry but you'll never get them back on board. Never, the boat has sailed and this is 22 years in the making the so notion the fans are not entitled to their view or bad fans is *%^@*** ridiculous


 Profile  
 
 
Post #484205  Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 6:27 pm 

bubblechris wrote:
Bernard wrote:
I thought Xhaka had a really good game today.

But does anybody else?

Didn't you then?


  
 
 
Post #484206  Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 6:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 10:36 pm
Posts: 3703

TOP GUN wrote:
Saw some comments that Mhikitaryan basically said the fans who didn't turn up today were not real fans (in different words ) then you get this comment ....

Arsenal manager Arsene Wenger said his team had to "get the fans back on our side again" after ending a run of three successive Premier League defeats with a fine win over Watford.

..well listen Henrik and Arsene I'm sorry but you'll never get them back on board. Never, the boat has sailed and this is 22 years in the making the so notion the fans are not entitled to their view or bad fans is *%^@*** ridiculous


This is where you have people disagreeing with your quite reasonable position of wanting Wenger to move on - because he’s clearly had his day. It had not been 22 years in the making. When the team was doing the double and winning the league unbeaten we’re all calling for his sainthood. Most everybody wants him replaced but rightly some have been picking up on the over egging of the anti-Wenger pudding over the years- without actually disagreeing with the overall sentiment of thinking we need a change. Why the easy to pick apart falsehoods?? People just damage their own argument. If you are wondering why Wenger has had such support over the years maybe think about the hyperbole used in denouncing him. 10 years maybe. 22? Not a chance.

Having said that, I dont disagree with you.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #484207  Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 6:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 7:31 pm
Posts: 4230
Location: Turnford, Broxbourne, Herts

Bernard wrote:
bubblechris wrote:
But does anybody else?

Didn't you then?


Unfortunately I had computer problems and was only half watching. I did see him make quite a few sideways passes and only one forward pass of some length. I saw him make a run with an attacking payer but heard and read many negative comments about his play.

On recent form I think he's a busted flush and needs replacing as soon as possible but as far as todays performance goes I will bow to the opinions of others.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #484208  Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 6:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

Ash wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:
Saw some comments that Mhikitaryan basically said the fans who didn't turn up today were not real fans (in different words ) then you get this comment ....

Arsenal manager Arsene Wenger said his team had to "get the fans back on our side again" after ending a run of three successive Premier League defeats with a fine win over Watford.

..well listen Henrik and Arsene I'm sorry but you'll never get them back on board. Never, the boat has sailed and this is 22 years in the making the so notion the fans are not entitled to their view or bad fans is *%^@*** ridiculous


This is where you have people disagreeing with your quite reasonable position of wanting Wenger to move on - because he’s clearly had his day. It had not been 22 years in the making. When the team was doing the double and winning the league unbeaten we’re all calling for his sainthood. Most everybody wants him replaced but rightly some have been picking up on the over egging of the anti-Wenger pudding over the years- without actually disagreeing with the overall sentiment of thinking we need a change. Why the easy to pick apart falsehoods?? People just damage their own argument. If you are wondering why Wenger has had such support over the years maybe think about the hyperbole used in denouncing him. 10 years maybe. 22? Not a chance.

Having said that, I dont disagree with you.


Nope your wrong 22 years in the making.

He was the same manager when we were winning titles and he was still not coaching the defence just simply that the players were a different type of professional that he inherited as well as an extremely well drilled club.

The 3 titles he won in the early years provided false confidence in allowing his longevity at the club. That wouldn't have allowed him to continue to the mess we are sat in today.

So in summary your wrong the position we sit today is 22 years in the making that happened to include 3 titles along the way. It didn't go wrong after 10 years, he's always been the same person and manager who stumbled on a successfull formula for a period of time.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #484209  Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 6:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 981

Apparently young Nelson threw a strop, as he as waiting 10 minutes to come on, and he chucked his bib on the floor, don't blame him one bit, 3-0 game was won, and not for the first time Wenger didn't give the youngsters a chance!


 Profile  
 
 
Post #484210  Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 8:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:42 am
Posts: 12633
Location: Rotorua New Zealand

hoxton square wrote:
kiwipete wrote:
Here you go Daz .... the planter's wheelbarrow ...... I'll PM the instructions .

And very nice it is too!
Meanwhile the new and improved Arsenal team go 1-0 up - Come on you Reds :21encouragement:


Flowers would last about ten seconds in your summer temperature of minus 20 .

Only seen the highlights plenty of firsts Čech the penalty . Mkhitaryan premier league goal . Welbeck's first clean strike .

That's two wins in a row , thought pre match Deeney would upset our applecart .

Not sure about their penalty .... where were our defenders supposed to go ... just part and let him through ..?


 Profile  
 
 
Post #484211  Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 9:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:04 am
Posts: 7387
Location: Townsville Australia

AmericanGooner wrote:
A more Roy of the Rovers ending (although Roy wasn't a GK) would have been if his 200th was the Europa cup final and he saves the last PK in a penalty shootout with Atletico but I'll take this as a consolation.

He won’t be playing in a euro final unless Ospina is injured

_________________
If this policy does not deliver then I would say we have to change it.
AW 150810


 Profile  
 
 
Post #484212  Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 9:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 4:33 pm
Posts: 7060

Draytonkid wrote:
Apparently young Nelson threw a strop, as he as waiting 10 minutes to come on, and he chucked his bib on the floor, don't blame him one bit, 3-0 game was won, and not for the first time Wenger didn't give the youngsters a chance!

Been reading Marcus McGuane's comments after his Barca debut about how he waited for his chance and it never came. And how Wenger never spoke to him in his many years at the club.
Wouldn't be surprised to see Nelson walk like McGuane and Chris Willock.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #484213  Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 9:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 7:31 pm
Posts: 4230
Location: Turnford, Broxbourne, Herts

warrior wrote:
gooner7 wrote:
Told you, Čech will save a penalty today :icon_mrgreen:

While we're at it, that's 50 assists for Özil as of today too.


Fastest 50 in the Prem................


 Profile  
 
 
Post #484214  Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 10:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 10:36 pm
Posts: 3703

TOP GUN wrote:
Ash wrote:

This is where you have people disagreeing with your quite reasonable position of wanting Wenger to move on - because he’s clearly had his day. It had not been 22 years in the making. When the team was doing the double and winning the league unbeaten we’re all calling for his sainthood. Most everybody wants him replaced but rightly some have been picking up on the over egging of the anti-Wenger pudding over the years- without actually disagreeing with the overall sentiment of thinking we need a change. Why the easy to pick apart falsehoods?? People just damage their own argument. If you are wondering why Wenger has had such support over the years maybe think about the hyperbole used in denouncing him. 10 years maybe. 22? Not a chance.

Having said that, I dont disagree with you.


Nope your wrong 22 years in the making.

He was the same manager when we were winning titles and he was still not coaching the defence just simply that the players were a different type of professional that he inherited as well as an extremely well drilled club.

The 3 titles he won in the early years provided false confidence in allowing his longevity at the club. That wouldn't have allowed him to continue to the mess we are sat in today.

So in summary your wrong the position we sit today is 22 years in the making that happened to include 3 titles along the way. It didn't go wrong after 10 years, he's always been the same person and manager who stumbled on a successfull formula for a period of time.


Yeah and I’ll be furious when a new manager comes in and does everything wrong as he wins a double and goes a season unbeaten with a completely different defence. Get him out we’ll all say. Except we won’t because winning is the only thing people measure success by and it makes a host of other things better along with it.

You don’t have to airbrush out success to say it’s all gone to crap. Which it has.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #484215  Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 11:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:06 am
Posts: 16484

Ash wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:

Nope your wrong 22 years in the making.

He was the same manager when we were winning titles and he was still not coaching the defence just simply that the players were a different type of professional that he inherited as well as an extremely well drilled club.

The 3 titles he won in the early years provided false confidence in allowing his longevity at the club. That wouldn't have allowed him to continue to the mess we are sat in today.

So in summary your wrong the position we sit today is 22 years in the making that happened to include 3 titles along the way. It didn't go wrong after 10 years, he's always been the same person and manager who stumbled on a successfull formula for a period of time.


Yeah and I’ll be furious when a new manager comes in and does everything wrong as he wins a double and goes a season unbeaten with a completely different defence. Get him out we’ll all say. Except we won’t because winning is the only thing people measure success by and it makes a host of other things better along with it.

You don’t have to airbrush out success to say it’s all gone to crap. Which it has.


I couldn't agree with you more, Ash.

"Happened to include 3 titles along the way" is so grossly unfair that one is inclined to take Wenger's side against such nonsense.

Also, there was nothing wrong with what Wenger said today. What Mkhitaryan said was questionable, but he had every right to say it.

_________________
Hamba kakuhle, Madiba


 Profile  
 
 
Post #484216  Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2018 12:11 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

Ash wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:

Nope your wrong 22 years in the making.

He was the same manager when we were winning titles and he was still not coaching the defence just simply that the players were a different type of professional that he inherited as well as an extremely well drilled club.

The 3 titles he won in the early years provided false confidence in allowing his longevity at the club. That wouldn't have allowed him to continue to the mess we are sat in today.

So in summary your wrong the position we sit today is 22 years in the making that happened to include 3 titles along the way. It didn't go wrong after 10 years, he's always been the same person and manager who stumbled on a successfull formula for a period of time.


Yeah and I’ll be furious when a new manager comes in and does everything wrong as he wins a double and goes a season unbeaten with a completely different defence. Get him out we’ll all say. Except we won’t because winning is the only thing people measure success by and it makes a host of other things better along with it.

You don’t have to airbrush out success to say it’s all gone to crap. Which it has.


It's not airbrushing out the success at all I enjoyed our early success as much as anyone I'm simply saying there was an underlying problem lying in situe throughout nobody was aware of from the start till the end.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #484217  Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2018 12:14 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

Decaf wrote:
Ash wrote:

Yeah and I’ll be furious when a new manager comes in and does everything wrong as he wins a double and goes a season unbeaten with a completely different defence. Get him out we’ll all say. Except we won’t because winning is the only thing people measure success by and it makes a host of other things better along with it.

You don’t have to airbrush out success to say it’s all gone to crap. Which it has.


I couldn't agree with you more, Ash.

"Happened to include 3 titles along the way" is so grossly unfair that one is inclined to take Wenger's side against such nonsense.

Also, there was nothing wrong with what Wenger said today. What Mkhitaryan said was questionable, but he had every right to say it.


Are you joking ? He had zero right to say it.

He's been here 2 months, we've been here all our lives.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #484218  Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2018 12:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:04 am
Posts: 7387
Location: Townsville Australia

Decaf wrote:
Ash wrote:

Yeah and I’ll be furious when a new manager comes in and does everything wrong as he wins a double and goes a season unbeaten with a completely different defence. Get him out we’ll all say. Except we won’t because winning is the only thing people measure success by and it makes a host of other things better along with it.

You don’t have to airbrush out success to say it’s all gone to crap. Which it has.


I couldn't agree with you more, Ash.

"Happened to include 3 titles along the way" is so grossly unfair that one is inclined to take Wenger's side against such nonsense.

Also, there was nothing wrong with what Wenger said today. What Mkhitaryan said was questionable, but he had every right to say it.

Yes freedom of speech is his right. Just as it will be our right to call him a f...en joke if he puts in even one shite performance on the money he is paid. I think he has already gone missing in a few games & been great in others. One thing is he has f all appreciation of how far this team has tumbled and the top prices people pay to watch them.

_________________
If this policy does not deliver then I would say we have to change it.
AW 150810


 Profile  
 
 
Post #484219  Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2018 2:10 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 9:20 am
Posts: 9123

bromley gooner wrote:
Draytonkid wrote:
Apparently young Nelson threw a strop, as he as waiting 10 minutes to come on, and he chucked his bib on the floor, don't blame him one bit, 3-0 game was won, and not for the first time Wenger didn't give the youngsters a chance!

Been reading Marcus McGuane's comments after his Barca debut about how he waited for his chance and it never came. And how Wenger never spoke to him in his many years at the club.
Wouldn't be surprised to see Nelson walk like McGuane and Chris Willock.

Hmm... so just because they feel they deserve to be given a chance, Wenger should play them?


 Profile  
 
 
Post #484220  Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2018 3:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 2:55 pm
Posts: 11488
Location: Singapore

TOP GUN wrote:
Saw some comments that Mhikitaryan basically said the fans who didn't turn up today were not real fans (in different words ) then you get this comment ....

Arsenal manager Arsene Wenger said his team had to "get the fans back on our side again" after ending a run of three successive Premier League defeats with a fine win over Watford.

..well listen Henrik and Arsene I'm sorry but you'll never get them back on board. Never, the boat has sailed and this is 22 years in the making the so notion the fans are not entitled to their view or bad fans is *%^@*** ridiculous


Wenger was arrogant with "his" fans, when the going was bad.
Now he wants to extend an olive branch?
You cannot have the cake and eat it, you wanker.
After so many embarrassing defeats, and really poor performances, you expect one good victory against a "outside top 6" team, to win back your fans?

_________________
Onwards and Upwards!


 Profile  
 
 
Post #484221  Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2018 8:23 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 5:38 pm
Posts: 6457
Location: ɹǝpu∩uʍop

Shkodran Mustafi has been added to the Injury Room - Groin Strain

He has suffered a groin strain injury and he is estimated to spend around 3 weeks on the sidelines.
The average time lost for this particular injury is 12 days, based on a sample size of 18 injuries of the same type.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #484222  Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2018 8:25 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 5:38 pm
Posts: 6457
Location: ɹǝpu∩uʍop

bubblechris wrote:
warrior wrote:
While we're at it, that's 50 assists for Özil as of today too.


Fastest 50 in the Prem................

Sometimes being the fastest at something isn't a good thing as I'm sure my missus would attest to. :icon_eek:


 Profile  
 
 
Post #484223  Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2018 8:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 7:53 pm
Posts: 3412
Location: Over here

Ash wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:

Nope your wrong 22 years in the making.

He was the same manager when we were winning titles and he was still not coaching the defence just simply that the players were a different type of professional that he inherited as well as an extremely well drilled club.

The 3 titles he won in the early years provided false confidence in allowing his longevity at the club. That wouldn't have allowed him to continue to the mess we are sat in today.

So in summary your wrong the position we sit today is 22 years in the making that happened to include 3 titles along the way. It didn't go wrong after 10 years, he's always been the same person and manager who stumbled on a successfull formula for a period of time.


Yeah and I’ll be furious when a new manager comes in and does everything wrong as he wins a double and goes a season unbeaten with a completely different defence. Get him out we’ll all say. Except we won’t because winning is the only thing people measure success by and it makes a host of other things better along with it.

You don’t have to airbrush out success to say it’s all gone to crap. Which it has.


Well said Ash. The bullhooks spouted about Wenger only having success on the back of inheriting a defence totally ignores the fact he put together the invincibles. It also forgets that Graham's unit was widely regarded as being well past their sell by date before Wenger arrived.

A major reason we are where we are is lack of investment on the playing side, which for any long term Arsenal fan should be nothing new.

_________________
"You've got to go out on a limb sometimes because that's where the fruit is."


 Profile  
 
 
Post #484224  Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2018 10:00 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:46 pm
Posts: 3036

There are many reasons to want Wenger out but to refer to his 3 titles as simply 'something that happened along the way' is a bit silly. Those three titles are more than some teams have won in their entire history.
Prior to the stadium move he was a genius manager who won doubles on a budget with wonderful flair. Since then he has increasingly become a dysfunctional manager who has presided over Arsenal's slow and boring decline.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #484225  Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2018 11:16 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

Parkerknoll Gooner wrote:
Ash wrote:

Yeah and I’ll be furious when a new manager comes in and does everything wrong as he wins a double and goes a season unbeaten with a completely different defence. Get him out we’ll all say. Except we won’t because winning is the only thing people measure success by and it makes a host of other things better along with it.

You don’t have to airbrush out success to say it’s all gone to crap. Which it has.




A major reason we are where we are is lack of investment on the playing side, which for any long term Arsenal fan should be nothing new.


Nope, it's a contributor but not the overall reason.

How can you explain Leicester winning the title then? Tottenham being above us


 Profile  
 
 
Post #484226  Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2018 11:21 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 9:20 am
Posts: 9123

Parkerknoll Gooner wrote:
Ash wrote:

Yeah and I’ll be furious when a new manager comes in and does everything wrong as he wins a double and goes a season unbeaten with a completely different defence. Get him out we’ll all say. Except we won’t because winning is the only thing people measure success by and it makes a host of other things better along with it.

You don’t have to airbrush out success to say it’s all gone to crap. Which it has.


Well said Ash. The bullhooks spouted about Wenger only having success on the back of inheriting a defence totally ignores the fact he put together the invincibles. It also forgets that Graham's unit was widely regarded as being well past their sell by date before Wenger arrived.

A major reason we are where we are is lack of investment on the playing side, which for any long term Arsenal fan should be nothing new.

Speaking of defence and investment, I hope a new GK, a couple of defenders and a defensive mid will be our manager's priorities this summer.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #484227  Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2018 11:22 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

Bored wrote:
There are many reasons to want Wenger out but to refer to his 3 titles as simply 'something that happened along the way' is a bit silly. Those three titles are more than some teams have won in their entire history.
Prior to the stadium move he was a genius manager who won doubles on a budget with wonderful flair. Since then he has increasingly become a dysfunctional manager who has presided over Arsenal's slow and boring decline.


I'm not sure I agree that it's only recently he transformed into a increasingly dysfunctional manager, I think he's always been the same guy but the formula that worked to bring such huge success in the early years didn't later on because time had changed and he didn't change style.

The point I'm making isnt so much to deride his achievements which in the early years were significant and fantastic but to simply say that he's always been the same manager, same person with the same stubborn attitude and it just isn't working anymore.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #484228  Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2018 11:29 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 9:20 am
Posts: 9123

TOP GUN wrote:
Parkerknoll Gooner wrote:



A major reason we are where we are is lack of investment on the playing side, which for any long term Arsenal fan should be nothing new.


Nope, it's a contributor but not the overall reason.

How can you explain Leicester winning the title then? Tottenham being above us


Wenger changing his playing style and philosophy. We always look better defensively when the midfield is dominating middle of the park. This doesn't happen as much in the post-Vieira era with our skillful midgets getting bullied and received no protection from refs.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #484229  Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2018 11:32 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:06 am
Posts: 16484

TOP GUN wrote:
Parkerknoll Gooner wrote:



A major reason we are where we are is lack of investment on the playing side, which for any long term Arsenal fan should be nothing new.


Nope, it's a contributor but not the overall reason.

How can you explain Leicester winning the title then? Tottenham being above us

Leicester can be discounted as a once off. Spurs have spent more than us so that doesn't count. The fact that the purse strings have loosened somewhat in recent year is besides the point.

The point is that I would argue that Arsenal plateauing after 04 then declining from about 08 onwards is absolutely to do with under-investment on the playing side. Players like Cole, Campbell, Vieira, Pires, Bergkamp, and Henry moved on and we went to the bargain basement to look for replacement. We were perpetually one or two class players short of having a really formidable squad. United never did that. Fergie always made sure their reinforces were top notch. How much of Arsenal's parsimony was due to enforced austerity and how much to Wenger thinking he could pull rabbits out of hats, I'm not sure.

_________________
Hamba kakuhle, Madiba


 Profile  
 
 
Post #484230  Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2018 11:33 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

Goonie wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:

Nope, it's a contributor but not the overall reason.

How can you explain Leicester winning the title then? Tottenham being above us


Wenger changing his playing style and philosophy. We always look better defensively when the midfield is dominating middle of the park. This doesn't happen as much in the post-Vieira era with our skillful midgets getting bullied and received no protection from refs.


Hang on a minute, you seem to be suggesting that philosophy, tactics, players and organisation seem to contribute to the results of football matches. Clearly that must be a mistake


 Profile  
 
 
Post #484231  Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2018 11:43 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 9:20 am
Posts: 9123

TOP GUN wrote:
Goonie wrote:

Wenger changing his playing style and philosophy. We always look better defensively when the midfield is dominating middle of the park. This doesn't happen as much in the post-Vieira era with our skillful midgets getting bullied and received no protection from refs.


Hang on a minute, you seem to be suggesting that philosophy, tactics, players and organisation seem to contribute to the results of football matches. Clearly that must be a mistake


Erm now i am not sure what point you are making anymore. :1laughter:


 Profile  
 
 
Post #484232  Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2018 11:58 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:42 am
Posts: 12633
Location: Rotorua New Zealand

Parkerknoll Gooner wrote:


Well said Ash. The bullhooks spouted about Wenger only having success on the back of inheriting a defence totally ignores the fact he put together the invincibles. It also forgets that Graham's unit was widely regarded as being well past their sell by date before Wenger arrived.

A major reason we are where we are is lack of investment on the playing side, which for any long term Arsenal fan should be nothing new.

Not at all Parker .....he inherited rock solid defenders who knew their main task was to DEFEND , then the best centre half in the world at the time Sol Campbell decided to join us , sure he bought well Anelka , Henry , Pires , Vieira so no -one should poo hoo his achievements for that period but a case could be made with Bergkamp , Overmars , Pires they were fabulous artisans already .

no amount of Wengerisation [ make Bernard happy ] could alter that .

Imagine telling Bergkamp he should play the rubbish little triangles we specialise in these days

Where he has totally lost the plot of late is not due to lack of investment

He has bought midgets and decided no goal should be scored before a four thousand pass build up .


 Profile  
 
 
Post #484233  Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2018 12:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

kiwipete wrote:
Parkerknoll Gooner wrote:


Well said Ash. The bullhooks spouted about Wenger only having success on the back of inheriting a defence totally ignores the fact he put together the invincibles. It also forgets that Graham's unit was widely regarded as being well past their sell by date before Wenger arrived.

A major reason we are where we are is lack of investment on the playing side, which for any long term Arsenal fan should be nothing new.

Not at all Parker .....he inherited rock solid defenders who knew their main task was to DEFEND , then the best centre half in the world at the time Sol Campbell decided to join us , sure he bought well Anelka , Henry , Pires , Vieira so no -one should poo hoo his achievements for that period but a case could be made with Bergkamp , Overmars , Pires they were fabulous artisans already .

no amount of Wengerisation [ make Bernard happy ] could alter that .

Imagine telling Bergkamp he should play the rubbish little triangles we specialise in these days

Where he has totally lost the plot of late is not due to lack of investment

He has bought midgets and decided no goal should be scored before a four thousand pass build up .

:53big-emoticons:


 Profile  
 
 
Post #484234  Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2018 12:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 8:30 pm
Posts: 8154

TOP GUN wrote:
Bored wrote:
There are many reasons to want Wenger out but to refer to his 3 titles as simply 'something that happened along the way' is a bit silly. Those three titles are more than some teams have won in their entire history.
Prior to the stadium move he was a genius manager who won doubles on a budget with wonderful flair. Since then he has increasingly become a dysfunctional manager who has presided over Arsenal's slow and boring decline.


I'm not sure I agree that it's only recently he transformed into a increasingly dysfunctional manager, I think he's always been the same guy but the formula that worked to bring such huge success in the early years didn't later on because time had changed and he didn't change style.

The point I'm making isnt so much to deride his achievements which in the early years were significant and fantastic but to simply say that he's always been the same manager, same person with the same stubborn attitude and it just isn't working anymore.

He absolutely changed style. Take a look at the footage from any season prior to 2006 and you will see a team that moved the ball on very quickly. It wasn't one-touch stuff either. It was control and pass, or what has been forgotten to a large extent is that we had plenty of attackers and midfielders who would actually take on and beat a man. Obviously, we had tremendously gifted players, most of them brought to the club by Wenger, but we also had players who were good but not very top level (Freddie, Parlour, Edu, Lauren, Toure, Wiltord) who contributed greatly and part of that was due to the style of play and the coaching from Wenger. I would say that every single one of them would struggle if you put them in the current team. Edu might be fine.

It changed considerably once Fabregas became the focal point of the team, even though that 2008 side was a very good one. Since then it we have become less and less direct, aping a Barcelona style that we just cannot replicate.

I also think Wenger has changed considerably as a person. Again, look at the footage of him on the sideline in 1998. The guy was brimming with confidence and completely self-assured in his approach. These days he just looks haunted as he frequently runs his fingers through his hair and stares at the ground.

_________________
"I just kept going pretty lively. Them killers wasn't too healthy company."


 Profile  
 
 
Post #484235  Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2018 12:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

dec wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:

I'm not sure I agree that it's only recently he transformed into a increasingly dysfunctional manager, I think he's always been the same guy but the formula that worked to bring such huge success in the early years didn't later on because time had changed and he didn't change style.

The point I'm making isnt so much to deride his achievements which in the early years were significant and fantastic but to simply say that he's always been the same manager, same person with the same stubborn attitude and it just isn't working anymore.

He absolutely changed style. Take a look at the footage from any season prior to 2006 and you will see a team that moved the ball on very quickly. It wasn't one-touch stuff either. It was control and pass, or what has been forgotten to a large extent is that we had plenty of attackers and midfielders who would actually take on and beat a man. Obviously, we had tremendously gifted players, most of them brought to the club by Wenger, but we also had players who were good but not very top level (Freddie, Parlour, Edu, Lauren, Toure, Wiltord) who contributed greatly and part of that was due to the style of play and the coaching from Wenger. I would say that every single one of them would struggle if you put them in the current team. Edu might be fine.

It changed considerably once Fabregas became the focal point of the team, even though that 2008 side was a very good one. Since then it we have become less and less direct, aping a Barcelona style that we just cannot replicate.

I also think Wenger has changed considerably as a person. Again, look at the footage of him on the sideline in 1998. The guy was brimming with confidence and completely self-assured in his approach. These days he just looks haunted as he frequently runs his fingers through his hair and stares at the ground.


I acknowledge the change in style in terms of our play but I believe it was an organic growth contributed by the type of players we signed (think nasri, cazorla, Hleb etc) and actually the lack of coaching rather than a different tactical approach. Also I think kiwi made a decent point in that many of these players only ever knew Wenger, and your not going to tell a player like Bergkamp or Campbell what to do.

Wenger has never been mister tactician I think it was a consequence of everything going on not a proactive change. I just can't see Wenger rocking up in training one day saying "alright lads let's start playing like Barcelona"

Agree with your last point, he looks a shell of a man these days. Exudes zero confidence


 Profile  
 
 
Post #484236  Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2018 12:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

I'm not trying to put down his magnificent achievements early on but Kiwi is right, history will show that once all the original Arsenal influence before his tenure left the club he floundered miserably. After the invincibles finished and Martin Keown, an Adams coached Ashley Cole and ray parlour who played 12 games that season left he was never able to reinvent the team.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #484237  Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2018 1:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:46 pm
Posts: 3036

TOP GUN wrote:
[

I'm not sure I agree that it's only recently he transformed into a increasingly dysfunctional manager, I think he's always been the same guy but the formula that worked to bring such huge success in the early years didn't later on because time had changed and he didn't change style.


Greetings Top Gun. I don't think I said he only recently transformed into a dysfunctional manager. My guess is that the move to the new stadium was the turning point in the teams downward trajectory. However, its hard to be precise because the decline has been very gradual yet clear over time. In hindsight what seems most obvious in terms of his team development was the move away from recruiting dominant, strong players particularly in midfield. Is that an example of Wenger changing his approach albeit for the worst?!


 Profile  
 
 
Post #484238  Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2018 2:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

Bored wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:
[

I'm not sure I agree that it's only recently he transformed into a increasingly dysfunctional manager, I think he's always been the same guy but the formula that worked to bring such huge success in the early years didn't later on because time had changed and he didn't change style.


Greetings Top Gun. I don't think I said he only recently transformed into a dysfunctional manager. My guess is that the move to the new stadium was the turning point in the teams downward trajectory. However, its hard to be precise because the decline has been very gradual yet clear over time. In hindsight what seems most obvious in terms of his team development was the move away from recruiting dominant, strong players particularly in midfield. Is that an example of Wenger changing his approach albeit for the worst?!


Hi mate. You said increasingly dysfunctional, seems recent. For a long time our transfer policy has been very negative and reactive and I think we just acquired player who were of a certain build because that's who was available. Then as an afterthought he now realised he needs power and pace hence signing Aubameyang and Xhaka.

The tippy tappy seems a result of lack of direct coaching and lack of Confidence on the part of the players to play a decisive final ball.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #484239  Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2018 5:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 7:53 pm
Posts: 3412
Location: Over here

TOP GUN wrote:
Nope, it's a contributor but not the overall reason.


It was a bloody huge 'contributor', do you really think a large percentage of those early signings were his first choices, or just maybe he had to take a bit of a punt because he was unable to secure his preferred targets?

_________________
"You've got to go out on a limb sometimes because that's where the fruit is."


 Profile  
 
 
Post #484240  Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2018 5:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 7:53 pm
Posts: 3412
Location: Over here

kiwipete wrote:
Not at all Parker .....he inherited rock solid defenders who knew their main task was to DEFEND , then the best centre half in the world at the time Sol Campbell decided to join us , sure he bought well Anelka , Henry , Pires , Vieira so no -one should poo hoo his achievements for that period but a case could be made with Bergkamp , Overmars , Pires they were fabulous artisans already .

no amount of Wengerisation [ make Bernard happy ] could alter that .

Imagine telling Bergkamp he should play the rubbish little triangles we specialise in these days

Where he has totally lost the plot of late is not due to lack of investment

He has bought midgets and decided no goal should be scored before a four thousand pass build up .


The lack of investment was more an historical point and an important one, I'm sure we would be in a different place now if the Club had backed him more a decade ago. Agree of late he has amassed an inordinate amount of dross. My gripe was more with the nonsense about his earlier incarnation, remember AW was the one that converted Lauren into a very effective full back; promoted Cole to the first team; persuaded Campbell to make the leap of faith; turned Toure into a cb and capped it off with the fruit loop between the sticks. I would say that was quite a demonstration of how to build a defence.

_________________
"You've got to go out on a limb sometimes because that's where the fruit is."


 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
     [ 572035 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1 ... 12103, 12104, 12105, 12106, 12107, 12108, 12109 ... 14301  Next

All times are UTC

Gooners Online - Click to see what Everyones Doing

Colour Key:  Visited Profile    Members Profile      Admin

Get Latest Post

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], warrior and 406 guests


Search for:

Go to Top

Powered by php BB © 1993 - 2018