Fixtures Sunday April 28th - Tottenham Hotspur - Tottenham Hotspur Stadium - 2:00 Pm

Kick-Off

       Injuries                 Steve Gleiber



Get the Latest Post Go to the Bottom of Page It is currently Sun Apr 28, 2024 6:07 am

All times are UTC


  


Reply to topic

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], bubblechris, gooner7, Rich, warrior and 404 guests

 
Post #516681  Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 9:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:04 am
Posts: 7389
Location: Townsville Australia

Rich wrote:
Gaz from Oz wrote:
Just looked thru the Partey and Aouta highlights and particularly the ones that say something like this is why Arsenal want..... (fill in the name) and I see nothing that would suggest they will remarkably improve our team. I have seen nothing to suggest a fast paced brilliantly creative player who will score goals and provide a lot of assists. I see people say they may need a year to settle in. Partey looks a bit like Pepe- can dribble but easily shut down. No devastating passes from either, and nothing to suggest an immense physical presence.

Did you see Partey in the 2 legs v Liverpool in last season's champions league? He was superb, shut down everything, physical, disciplined, mobile, composed.
I don't think Aouar and Partey are the only central midfielders that could improve us and whether they are hits or misses is impossible to predict but he on paper profile of each player does fit what we need in the team.

Nope never watched the game with Partey in it. But reading your email he sounds like defensively he is okay, like Torreira was and Xhaka. I thought we wanted creative players. No mention of defence splitting passes, makes way thru crowded midfields etc. maybe he has the ability - just not seeing it in the highlights reels.

_________________
If this policy does not deliver then I would say we have to change it.
AW 150810


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516682  Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 9:27 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:21 pm
Posts: 16415
Location: Stockholm

Gaz from Oz wrote:
I thought we wanted creative players. No mention of defence splitting passes, makes way thru crowded midfields etc. maybe he has the ability - just not seeing it in the highlights reels.

If you seriously haven't seen Partey make his way through a crowded midfield, then I have to question what kind of compilations you've watched. That's continually talked about as one of his biggest strengths, his ability to dribble through crowded areas with technique and power.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516683  Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 9:29 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:21 pm
Posts: 16415
Location: Stockholm

If Saliba is leaving on loan, then I can only imagine it's because Arteta feels it's best for his development. The whole thing about loaning him because we can't get rid of players makes no sense. Why would we let having Mustafi for the final year of his contract disrupt the development of one of our key pieces for the future? It's not like Arteta has anything against not playing certain players if he feels it's best for the team, nobody would force him to start Mustafi or Sokratis over Saliba.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516684  Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 9:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 5:27 pm
Posts: 11163

Hazuki wrote:
If Saliba is leaving on loan, then I can only imagine it's because Arteta feels it's best for his development. The whole thing about loaning him because we can't get rid of players makes no sense. Why would let having Mustafi for the final year of his contract disrupt the development of one of our key pieces for the future? It's not like Arteta has anything against not playing certain players if he feels it's best for the team, nobody would force him to start Mustafi or Sokratis over Saliba.

Think you’ve nailed it Hazuki. The idea we’re letting Saliba go on loan because Mustafi may stay sounds barmy. Arteta must think it’s best for Saliba’s future development meaning he doesn’t feel he’s ready for Arsenal yet.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516685  Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 9:47 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

Rich wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:
Sounds like we are having to loan out Saliba because we can’t shift Mustafi and Sokratis

Just frustrating you have players who don’t fit the bill stifling our progress and ability to change

and yet so many other clubs seem to be able to shift on this deadwood from their squads. Man U probably in a similar boat to us but in a different league financially to give more room to cover it. But chelsea and liverpool move on their poor players so much better


Is one of the reasons we can’t shift these players at Arsenal is because we persist with them too much to a point where it’s evident to all and sundry they have had a spectacular fall and aren’t up to it?

Do you know what I mean. Like Mustafi for example, clearly never a 36 million pound defender. Evident after 12 months in, surely should be sold before his star falls too far ?

Are we not decisive ? There must be a reason if you know what I mean


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516686  Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 9:53 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

Hazuki wrote:
If Saliba is leaving on loan, then I can only imagine it's because Arteta feels it's best for his development. The whole thing about loaning him because we can't get rid of players makes no sense. Why would we let having Mustafi for the final year of his contract disrupt the development of one of our key pieces for the future? It's not like Arteta has anything against not playing certain players if he feels it's best for the team, nobody would force him to start Mustafi or Sokratis over Saliba.


Mate the club are losing 100 million off its annual revenue sheet because of Covid. It might be a joint thing about the players development but at the moment you have Mustafi, Mari, and chambers as centre backs sitting on the sidelines probably even when they do get match fit. It doesn’t really make sense to have so many and if nobody is willing to take the Marx brothers on loan it might be best to recoup some cash for saliba


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516687  Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 9:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:58 am
Posts: 34116

DHD wrote:
Fine gk but has Leno ever saved a pen?

We should have kept Čech. :42laughter:

_________________
"Never relegated, Never Will Be" :)


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516688  Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 9:59 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:21 pm
Posts: 16415
Location: Stockholm

TOP GUN wrote:
Mate the club are losing 100 million off its annual revenue sheet because of Covid. It might be a joint thing about the players development but at the moment you have Mustafi, Mari, and chambers as centre backs sitting on the sidelines probably even when they do get match fit. It doesn’t really make sense to have so many and if nobody is willing to take the Marx brothers on loan it might be best to recoup some cash for saliba

Don't really think we're trying to offset 100 million in losses by getting Saliba's £40k per week off the books for a year. I would say all evidence (like the fact that he's playing U23 games and isn't even on the bench for the league cup) points to the fact that Arteta feels Saliba is just not ready for the Arsenal first team quite yet. And it's not really strange considering the fact that he turned 19 earlier this year. Gabriel is four years older by comparison. I would rather Saliba gets first team minutes somewhere else for a year than waste a season playing against kids in the U23s.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516689  Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 10:04 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

Hazuki wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:
Mate the club are losing 100 million off its annual revenue sheet because of Covid. It might be a joint thing about the players development but at the moment you have Mustafi, Mari, and chambers as centre backs sitting on the sidelines probably even when they do get match fit. It doesn’t really make sense to have so many and if nobody is willing to take the Marx brothers on loan it might be best to recoup some cash for saliba

Don't really think we're trying to offset 100 million in losses by getting Saliba's £40k per week off the books for a year. I would say all evidence (like the fact that he's playing U23 games and isn't even on the bench for the league cup) points to the fact that Arteta feels Saliba is just not ready for the Arsenal first team quite yet. And it's not really strange considering the fact that he turned 19 earlier this year. Gabriel is four years older by comparison. I would rather Saliba gets first team minutes somewhere else for a year than waste a season playing against kids in the U23s.


Your probably right but if Arsenal had been able to sell Mustafi and Sokratis and maybe even chambers like they were clearly trying to do you think we would have signed another centre back then if Saliba wasn’t ready


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516690  Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 10:08 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:21 pm
Posts: 16415
Location: Stockholm

TOP GUN wrote:
Your probably right but if Arsenal had been able to sell Mustafi and Sokratis and maybe even chambers like they were clearly trying to do you think we would have signed another centre back then if Saliba wasn’t ready

Haven't seen any really credible links regarding Chambers, so if we do sell Mustafi and Sokratis we still have Luiz, Holding, Gabriel, Mari and Chambers. I'd say that's enough cover if Saliba isn't deemed ready.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516691  Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 10:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:58 am
Posts: 34116

I have CNN on in the background as background noise to conduct an experiment. I didn't think it was possible to have several hours of non stop reporting of only topic since 911.

_________________
"Never relegated, Never Will Be" :)


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516692  Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 11:49 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:42 pm
Posts: 5695

Arsenal here in Ireland since I don't know when and no fans let in. :1cry:

_________________
"If you do not believe you can do it then you have no chance at all"


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516693  Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 11:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:22 pm
Posts: 20613

Hazuki wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:
Mate the club are losing 100 million off its annual revenue sheet because of Covid. It might be a joint thing about the players development but at the moment you have Mustafi, Mari, and chambers as centre backs sitting on the sidelines probably even when they do get match fit. It doesn’t really make sense to have so many and if nobody is willing to take the Marx brothers on loan it might be best to recoup some cash for saliba

Don't really think we're trying to offset 100 million in losses by getting Saliba's £40k per week off the books for a year. I would say all evidence (like the fact that he's playing U23 games and isn't even on the bench for the league cup) points to the fact that Arteta feels Saliba is just not ready for the Arsenal first team quite yet. And it's not really strange considering the fact that he turned 19 earlier this year. Gabriel is four years older by comparison. I would rather Saliba gets first team minutes somewhere else for a year than waste a season playing against kids in the U23s.



That would be my take on it as well, Haz.

I suspect that Arteta and the coaching staff feel he's not yet ready for the demands of the PL. How many PL teams have 19 year old CBs. Not many, if any. It's a specialist position that usually requires a degree of experience that comes with age.

It is also said that there are some personal issues he needs to deal with and these may better be resolved back in France for a year.

It is disappointing purely from the fact we will be relying on some substandard CBs for another year but its not entirely unexpected. I was never one of those who thought that at 19 years old he would be shoved straight in the team and start playing like VVD, but there are fans who clearly did.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516694  Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 11:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:58 am
Posts: 34116

Arsenal had one of their videos on my feed and it was Wenger's top ten signings

1. Henry
2. Vieira
3. Pires
4. Ljundberg
5. Sol
6. Özil
7. Fabregas
8. Kolo
9. Anelka
10. Ramsey

How the hell is Özil ahead of Fabregas? Kolo top 10? Hmm....okay. Honorable mentions: Lehmann, Reyes, Gilberto Silva, even Clichy could get a shout...lol, Wiltord, van Persie


_________________
"Never relegated, Never Will Be" :)


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516695  Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 12:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 5:27 pm
Posts: 11163

socrates wrote:
It is also said that there are some personal issues he needs to deal with and these may better be resolved back in France for a year.

You’ve mentioned this before, haven’t you? Any idea what these personal issues are supposed to be?


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516696  Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 12:33 pm 
Online

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26776

Players with 1 year left on their deal: Luiz, Sokratis, Özil Mustafi
Players with 2 years left on their deal: Lacazette, Nketiah, Guendouzi, Kolasinac, Elneny, Chambers

Luiz we know about, he can leave on a free next year. Özil we'll happily get rid on a free. Mustafi and Sokratis need to leave this window - or you need to look at protecting the value of a player like Mustafi and giving him a 1 year extension

On the 2 year deals we need to sign Nketiah up to protect his value - if Brewster is worth £23m then Eddie should fetch the same if we decide he won't make it with us, but he wont if he hasn't got a good few years on his deal.
Guendouzi is an awkward one because I can't imagine him signing a new deal so we protect his value, his bridges seem burned, but there is no point loaning him out without an obligation to buy has all that does is take his value down by being so close to the end of his contract
Elneny, Kolasinac really have to leave. Chambers and Lacazette - not many probably see them as the future of the club so again we need to make decisions on these players.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516697  Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 12:34 pm 
Online

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26776

Hazuki wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:
Your probably right but if Arsenal had been able to sell Mustafi and Sokratis and maybe even chambers like they were clearly trying to do you think we would have signed another centre back then if Saliba wasn’t ready

Haven't seen any really credible links regarding Chambers, so if we do sell Mustafi and Sokratis we still have Luiz, Holding, Gabriel, Mari and Chambers. I'd say that's enough cover if Saliba isn't deemed ready.

I can't believe Fulham don't want to come back for Chambers, he was voted their player of the season when they had him on loan and they are desperate for defenders.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516698  Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 12:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:58 am
Posts: 34116

What about Mari and Soares?

_________________
"Never relegated, Never Will Be" :)


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516699  Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 1:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:21 pm
Posts: 16415
Location: Stockholm

socrates wrote:
It appears that the Aouar deal is now looking less likely which means we will have wasted an entire window chasing a player who was always going to be tricky to sign. Do we have back-up plans or is it too late to execute those now as well.

Actually, I think we'll get Aouar done. It's looking increasingly unlikely that we'll sign anyone else though, which is a shame. Then again, a lot can happen in the final days of a transfer window, as we've seen many times before.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516700  Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 1:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

AmericanGooner wrote:
Arsenal had one of their videos on my feed and it was Wenger's top ten signings

1. Henry
2. Vieira
3. Pires
4. Ljundberg
5. Sol
6. Özil
7. Fabregas
8. Kolo
9. Anelka
10. Ramsey

How the hell is Özil ahead of Fabregas? Kolo top 10? Hmm....okay. Honorable mentions: Lehmann, Reyes, Gilberto Silva, even Clichy could get a shout...lol, Wiltord, van Persie



Özil would feature in my top ten worst signings now purely because of the associated cost. It’s incredible to think he’s prepared to sit an entire season out on the sidelines, if he wanted to he could go elsewhere and agree a new contract admittedly probably on a lower wage but for a longer term whilst he can. He’s essentially trading his reputation and self respect for money

What’s more remarkable is that Arteta was his teammate as well so probably knows him better than most so he must be a real *%^@ if he’s decided to not persist with him.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516701  Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 2:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 5:27 pm
Posts: 11163

Rich wrote:
I can't believe Fulham don't want to come back for Chambers, he was voted their player of the season when they had him on loan and they are desperate for defenders.

The thing is he won Fulham’s player of the season award for his excellent performances in midfield. In defence he was hopeless, according to my Fulham supporting cousin.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516702  Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 3:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

Bernard wrote:
Rich wrote:
I can't believe Fulham don't want to come back for Chambers, he was voted their player of the season when they had him on loan and they are desperate for defenders.

The thing is he won Fulham’s player of the season award for his excellent performances in midfield. In defence he was hopeless, according to my Fulham supporting cousin.


A Fulham supporting mate told me it wasn’t that he was bad in defence so much they were so bad generally. They would definitely have him if they could.

Btw I thought chambers was playing very well before he got injured. Was having something of a renaissance


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516703  Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 3:51 pm 
Online

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26776

Torreira to Atletico as a loan with OPTION to buy is all but a done deal.

At least Torreira's length of contract protects his value, it also frees up a non home grown space in the squad, but does very little in helping us bring in new signings. I assume Atletico will cover his wages.

Atletico refusing to negotiate on Partey. He has a release clause so it is black and white for them, pay it or he stays.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516704  Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 3:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:22 pm
Posts: 20613

Bernard wrote:
socrates wrote:
It is also said that there are some personal issues he needs to deal with and these may better be resolved back in France for a year.

You’ve mentioned this before, haven’t you? Any idea what these personal issues are supposed to be?


Yes, it has been suggested that his mum died a few months back and he is still grieving.

No idea if that's true but if it is then it is perfectly undertandable that he needs time.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516705  Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 4:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:22 pm
Posts: 20613

Rich wrote:
Torreira to Atletico as a loan with OPTION to buy is all but a done deal.

At least Torreira's length of contract protects his value, it also frees up a non home grown space in the squad, but does very little in helping us bring in new signings. I assume Atletico will cover his wages.

Atletico refusing to negotiate on Partey. He has a release clause so it is black and white for them, pay it or he stays.



Nice to see us helping out Athletic whilst at the same time being told where to stick our offers for Partey. :laughing7:


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516706  Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 4:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 5:27 pm
Posts: 11163

TOP GUN wrote:
Bernard wrote:
The thing is he won Fulham’s player of the season award for his excellent performances in midfield. In defence he was hopeless, according to my Fulham supporting cousin.

A Fulham supporting mate told me it wasn’t that he was bad in defence so much they were so bad generally. They would definitely have him if they could.

Well Fulham have shown no interest in signing him so maybe my cousin is more right than your mate, as it was their needs in defence that got Rich questioning their lack of interest (unless I misunderstood his point). In defence my cousin reckons he was a major reason why they were so bad. I still recall the expression he used: ‘a disgrace to the shirt’. That’s a Fulham shirt, it’s not even an Arsenal shirt let alone a Bayern, Barcelona and others at their level.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516707  Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 4:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 9:51 pm
Posts: 3574

In reference to this Aouar business...
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.joe.co ... uar-251630

Saw same yesterday on L'Equipe that PSG owner Khelaifi was in talks with Lyon owner Aulas about Aouar. Quite amusing. :14laughter: Possible hijack? Arsenal being blown out of the water is an understatement. Looks like money will talk again if this happens.

_________________
Be careful who you call your friends. I'd rather have four quarters than one hundred pennies.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516708  Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 4:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 5:27 pm
Posts: 11163

Zed wrote:
In reference to this Aouar business...
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.joe.co ... uar-251630

Saw same yesterday on L'Equipe that PSG owner Khelaifi was in talks with Lyon owner Aulas about Aouar. Quite amusing. :14laughter: Possible hijack? Arsenal being blown out of the water is an understatement. Looks like money will talk again if this happens.

Hadn’t mentioned it, and to be honest I haven’t opened your link. But I read yesterday that Aouar is most likely to join PSG.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516709  Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 5:18 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 5:38 pm
Posts: 6458
Location: ɹǝpu∩uʍop

AmericanGooner wrote:
I have CNN on in the background as background noise to conduct an experiment. I didn't think it was possible to have several hours of non stop reporting of only topic since 911.

Wishing the President a speedy recovfefe.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516710  Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 5:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:42 pm
Posts: 5695

Bernard wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:
A Fulham supporting mate told me it wasn’t that he was bad in defence so much they were so bad generally. They would definitely have him if they could.

Well Fulham have shown no interest in signing him so maybe my cousin is more right than your mate, as it was their needs in defence that got Rich questioning their lack of interest (unless I misunderstood his point). In defence my cousin reckons he was a major reason why they were so bad. I still recall the expression he used: ‘a disgrace to the shirt’. That’s a Fulham shirt, it’s not even an Arsenal shirt let alone a Bayern, Barcelona and others at their level.


Might he be a decent back up DM for us based on that?

_________________
"If you do not believe you can do it then you have no chance at all"


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516711  Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 6:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

Bernard wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:
A Fulham supporting mate told me it wasn’t that he was bad in defence so much they were so bad generally. They would definitely have him if they could.

Well Fulham have shown no interest in signing him


It’s all loans right now Bernard, loans with obligations blah blah blah

Plus he’s injured. They may not think it’s a great deal to loan an injured player.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516712  Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 6:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:21 pm
Posts: 16415
Location: Stockholm

Rich wrote:
Torreira to Atletico as a loan with OPTION to buy is all but a done deal.

At least Torreira's length of contract protects his value, it also frees up a non home grown space in the squad, but does very little in helping us bring in new signings. I assume Atletico will cover his wages.

Atletico refusing to negotiate on Partey. He has a release clause so it is black and white for them, pay it or he stays.

Seen some mentions of a 7m loan fee, if that's true and we can sell him for his full value next year I guess it's an okay deal. Won't help us much in this transfer window though...


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516713  Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 8:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 5:27 pm
Posts: 11163

Gunfire wrote:
Bernard wrote:
Well Fulham have shown no interest in signing him so maybe my cousin is more right than your mate, as it was their needs in defence that got Rich questioning their lack of interest (unless I misunderstood his point). In defence my cousin reckons he was a major reason why they were so bad. I still recall the expression he used: ‘a disgrace to the shirt’. That’s a Fulham shirt, it’s not even an Arsenal shirt let alone a Bayern, Barcelona and others at their level.

Might he be a decent back up DM for us based on that?

There’s certainly an argument for that.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516714  Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 8:33 pm 
Online

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26776

Gunfire wrote:
Bernard wrote:
Well Fulham have shown no interest in signing him so maybe my cousin is more right than your mate, as it was their needs in defence that got Rich questioning their lack of interest (unless I misunderstood his point). In defence my cousin reckons he was a major reason why they were so bad. I still recall the expression he used: ‘a disgrace to the shirt’. That’s a Fulham shirt, it’s not even an Arsenal shirt let alone a Bayern, Barcelona and others at their level.


Might he be a decent back up DM for us based on that?

Is that how desperate we are for central midfielders? On the basis that we’re looking to upgrade from players who lack pace, power, mobility, first touch, technique in tight spaces and ability to dribble out of a high press I really can’t see how Chambers fits the bill at all.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516715  Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 9:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:04 am
Posts: 7389
Location: Townsville Australia

Hazuki wrote:
Gaz from Oz wrote:
I thought we wanted creative players. No mention of defence splitting passes, makes way thru crowded midfields etc. maybe he has the ability - just not seeing it in the highlights reels.

If you seriously haven't seen Partey make his way through a crowded midfield, then I have to question what kind of compilations you've watched. That's continually talked about as one of his biggest strengths, his ability to dribble through crowded areas with technique and power.

What I have seen is a player who can dribble but often goes nowhere or turns backwards in order to keep the ball. Nothing at the end of the run. Gervinho and Pépé looked exactly the same. So what is he a defensive player or creative or a bit of both. He might be okay but so might Cellabos of Willian but they don’t seem to showing it.

_________________
If this policy does not deliver then I would say we have to change it.
AW 150810


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516716  Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 9:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 9:51 pm
Posts: 3574

Borat... :15laughter:


Attachments:
images.jpeg.jpg
images.jpeg.jpg [ 9.59 KB | Viewed 5689 times ]

_________________
Be careful who you call your friends. I'd rather have four quarters than one hundred pennies.
 Profile  
 
 
Post #516717  Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 9:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:21 pm
Posts: 16415
Location: Stockholm

Gaz from Oz wrote:
What I have seen is a player who can dribble but often goes nowhere or turns backwards in order to keep the ball. Nothing at the end of the run. Gervinho and Pépé looked exactly the same. So what is he a defensive player or creative or a bit of both. He might be okay but so might Cellabos of Willian but they don’t seem to showing it.

He's not 'okay', he's an excellent player who's been a mainstay in a very good Atletico Madrid team for three years now. Whether that translates to the PL is impossible to predict (and sadly I don't think we'll find out) but there's no doubting his quality. You just have to watch him play, or listen to literally anybody who's seen him.

Again I have to ask who you'd like us to sign, if Aouar and Partey are so clearly not good enough.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516718  Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 9:56 pm 
Online

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26776

Mané has tested positive for Covid


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516719  Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 9:59 pm 
Online

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26776

Fabrizio Romano still saying Arsenal in pole
Position for Aouar. He says Real, PSG and June not in the race. Any recent media speculation is rumoured to be a Lyon tactic to force Arsenal’s price up.
It is a game of poker, do we call their bluff and wait until the last minute and force the deal at our price or go up to their price to ensure the deal is done


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516720  Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 3:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:58 am
Posts: 34116

Arteta, learning as he goes along and adjusting. Nice to hear that.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football ... zwWzaFwnAM

"Yes, the boys can play better but I am not sure they can play better after two days' training against a changed Arsenal team."

The result sees Liverpool yet again disappoint in a domestic cup under Klopp, but the Reds boss had nothing but praise for his opponents after the defeat.

"They did their analysis as well and didn't give us the space like the last game," he added. "You have to learn from the game and I thought the boys did really well.

_________________
"Never relegated, Never Will Be" :)


 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
     [ 572039 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1 ... 12915, 12916, 12917, 12918, 12919, 12920, 12921 ... 14301  Next

All times are UTC

Gooners Online - Click to see what Everyones Doing

Colour Key:  Visited Profile    Members Profile      Admin

Get Latest Post

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], bubblechris, gooner7, Rich, warrior and 404 guests


Search for:

Go to Top

Powered by php BB © 1993 - 2018