Fixtures Saturday July 27 - Manchester United - Sofi Stadium - Friendly Match

Kick-Off

       Injuries                 Steve Gleiber



Get the Latest Post Go to the Bottom of Page It is currently Sun Jun 16, 2024 4:06 am

All times are UTC


  


Reply to topic

Users browsing this forum: AmericanGooner, Bing [Bot], Googlebot, warrior and 23 guests

 
Post #313161  Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2019 11:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:53 pm
Posts: 17047

Bernard wrote:
Niall wrote:
Reading some speculation Ramsey is having a Juve medical today with view to January move.

Hope it's true. At least we'll presumably get some sort of transfer fee for him rather than lose him for nothing in the summer. Makes our squad a bit weaker for the last four months of this season, but how much does that matter?

Even with him I don't see us overtaking Chelsea or Tottenham. Indeed, even with him I don't see us holding onto fifth place from Manchester United, who are now level on points and only behind us due to a goal dfference just two worse than ours. With or without Ramsey I expect us to hold off Watford for sixth place.

I agree, think we will come in 6th.

_________________
It's a terrible love and I'm walking with spiders.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #313162  Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2019 11:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 8:30 pm
Posts: 8172

Rich wrote:
long time gooner wrote:
It’s interesting, not to say alarming, just how well Man U are now doing under Solskjaer. Is perhaps Ferguson working his magic behind the scenes!

Interesting analysis on motd of Man U tactics. Playing martial and rashford wide of the pair of CB, exploring the space behind spurs full backs who push forward, the run is out to in from the striker. Balls in behind and fast forwards running on to quick and direct counter attacks usually fed by pogba.
This can only really be done against good or at least very attacking teams because weaker teams just don’t push their full backs so high. Interesting because there is no reason arsenal with our front 2 can’t do similar to Chelsea who push their full backs forward as well, particularly Alonso. The question is will we play our player in the centre of the park who is able to find these runs?

That's all very well after the event, but the reality is that Tottenham missed a crazy amount of chances.

If we are to beat Chelsea we need to do the far from revolutionary basics of football - defend properly and play through midfield.

_________________
"I just kept going pretty lively. Them killers wasn't too healthy company."


 Profile  
 
 
Post #313163  Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2019 11:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 8:30 pm
Posts: 8172

Niall wrote:
Bernard wrote:
Hope it's true. At least we'll presumably get some sort of transfer fee for him rather than lose him for nothing in the summer. Makes our squad a bit weaker for the last four months of this season, but how much does that matter?

Even with him I don't see us overtaking Chelsea or Tottenham. Indeed, even with him I don't see us holding onto fifth place from Manchester United, who are now level on points and only behind us due to a goal dfference just two worse than ours. With or without Ramsey I expect us to hold off Watford for sixth place.

I agree, think we will come in 6th.

Unfortunately, I think we will scrape 6th, which is no achievement considering how bad Man U were for most of the season.

_________________
"I just kept going pretty lively. Them killers wasn't too healthy company."


 Profile  
 
 
Post #313164  Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2019 11:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:53 pm
Posts: 17047

dec wrote:
Niall wrote:
Was very young but the Terry Neill, Don Howe era we won nothing and as a youngster those days all you had to follow the club was the match reports in the Ireland's Saturday Night newspaper my dad would bring home after a few pints in the local. Every week all you read was how boring we were! Anyone else do the league ladders back in the day?

I did Niall. Best day was the first day of the season because we were top on alphabetical order. I particularly remembere 1986, the centenary, when we were going well but it all fell apart.

For me, the last year or so of GG was the worst. We played apalling stuff. No midfield whatsoever.

Yeah we were terrible then only the cup winners cup sustained my interest at that time - just started university up in Derry. Got back into watching them a lot in Rioch's only season, we played some good football that year including a Bergkamp winner against Man Utd.

_________________
It's a terrible love and I'm walking with spiders.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #313165  Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 2:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:52 pm
Posts: 18777

long time gooner wrote:
old man of hoy wrote:
...We finished 3rd that season.
Third eh? One thing I really got fed up with in my early years of supporting the club was hearing just how good they were. This as I watched them struggle to 14th place in a 22 team division.
As far as the League went third in 1958/9 was the best it got until the famous double in 1971. Many years without a sniff of the title. The FA Cup was a regular disaster too - those of us of a certain age still shudder at the words Northampton, Rotherham and Peterborough. No wonder we fans hit the roof in 1970 when we finally ended our 17 year drought by beating Anderlect in the forerunner of the Europa League, the Inter-Cities Fairs Cup. The best night of my footballing life.

_________________
"Young and caught up in life, we seldom watched the skies.”


 Profile  
 
 
Post #313166  Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 6:27 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:42 am
Posts: 12653
Location: Rotorua New Zealand

Zed wrote:
kiwipete wrote:
Seeing you are all honest , I'll be honest too .... I don't think Unai's up to it ..... even allowing for the lamentable mess Wenger left us in
I feel we should be getting a lot more out of this squad .

However while Arsenal seem to be withering on the vine , Stan has other distractions his Yankee Doodle team , the LA Rams are playing the Dallas Cowboys at this very moment in the play offs .

They are leading 23 - 15 in the fourth quarter so I'm sure everyone on the Gleiber would want to wish them well ........

:5encouragement: whoopee and as I type .....they've just scored another touchdown 29 - 15 kick to come


Kiwi, I want Rams to lose. Depending on today's outcome between New Orleans Saints/Philadelphia Eagles NFL/NFC game, winner will play Rams next Sunday. Another playoff to see which side gets to the Super Bowl. The NFL/AFC game also today with LA Chargers/New England Patriots, winner today will play Kansas City next Sunday, also a playoff for Super Bowl. Needless to say, a Rams loss against either Saints or Eagles next Sunday is most appealing, let alone Rams not getting to the Super Bowl.



:toothy9: It was tongue in cheek Zed ...... I'd like the Rams to lose every game , Walmart collapse owing billions ; Kroenke's wife to run off with not one but two 300lb linebackers , Stan's hair piece to blow off and land on the old Highbury clock .

A complete jerk off as an individual ; more's the pity Lady Nina and a few other priviledged dickstops didn't think a little more on who they sold their shares to .

Usmanov isn't short of cash why he handed Kroenke who he didn't like complete control is another mystery .

Rams looked good against the Cowboys but I can't see anyone beating the Patriots .


 Profile  
 
 
Post #313167  Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 6:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:42 am
Posts: 12653
Location: Rotorua New Zealand

old man of hoy wrote:
As far as the League went third in 1958/9 was the best it got until the famous double in 1971. Many years without a sniff of the title. The FA Cup was a regular disaster too - those of us of a certain age still shudder at the words Northampton, Rotherham and Peterborough. No wonder we fans hit the roof in 1970 when we finally ended our 17 year drought by beating Anderlect in the forerunner of the Europa League, the Inter-Cities Fairs Cup. The best night of my footballing life.

Funnily enough looking back I sorted of enjoyed all that turmoil of of what was it 1973 or 74 mired in pitched battles at the bottom with illustrious names like Sheffield Utd , Luton I loved Arsenal then even know we were sh***t . There was no player I didn't like

We couldn't afford a TV so I'd be glued to the radio commentary when we got beaten by Swindon however many replays it took to beat Leicester one year in the Cup .

Life seemed so much simpler , players earning a couple of hundred quid a week with win bonuses .

Chelsea , Man Utd , Spurs all getting relegated in quick succession.

Welcome back ...ever heard of this doodle https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0EjjZmBvslo ...does a great version of Peggy Sue


 Profile  
 
 
Post #313168  Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 8:01 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:21 pm
Posts: 16415
Location: Stockholm

david.d wrote:
You don't win 3 European trophies in a row if you are a bad manager.
Emery has to be backed so he can get his players in.
He has made a few questionable decisions but I don't think his dealing of Özil is one of them. He is a great player when he feels like it and is in the mood and therein lies the problem. Özil doesn't do it enough.
How many times have we all moaned when he has played.
When he has been hauled off Emery has been right to do so.
Emery Will live or die by his decisions so he has the right to put his faith in the players he feels he can trust.

Have to disagree here, david. I back Emery on most of the decisions he has made, but Özil is clearly not being handled correctly. It’s one thing to not start him if you don’t think he’s the right player for that match, but to leave him out of the squad altogether is just plain wrong when you have the likes of Licthsteiner and Nketiah on there. One is a player who shouldn’t be on the pitch under any circumstances unless you’re desperately short on players, and the other is a youngster who should only be given 10-15 minutes in games that you’ve already won. We basically only had Ramsey to throw in in an attacking position.

As frustrating as Özil is, the fact is that he’s one of the best playmakers in the league. Since he arrived at Arsenal no other player has created as many chances per game as him, and we badly miss his playmaking ability. Behind our strikers Iwobi is our one creative player at the moment, and he’s more of a dribbler anyway. With the squad we have and our current injuries we can’t afford not to play someone with the talent of Özil in my opinion. Isolating your best players rarely lead to something positive – just look at United with Pogba benched and sulking vs United with Pogba firing on all cylinders.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #313169  Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 8:25 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26981

dec wrote:
Rich wrote:
Interesting analysis on motd of Man U tactics. Playing martial and rashford wide of the pair of CB, exploring the space behind spurs full backs who push forward, the run is out to in from the striker. Balls in behind and fast forwards running on to quick and direct counter attacks usually fed by pogba.
This can only really be done against good or at least very attacking teams because weaker teams just don’t push their full backs so high. Interesting because there is no reason arsenal with our front 2 can’t do similar to Chelsea who push their full backs forward as well, particularly Alonso. The question is will we play our player in the centre of the park who is able to find these runs?

That's all very well after the event, but the reality is that Tottenham missed a crazy amount of chances.

If we are to beat Chelsea we need to do the far from revolutionary basics of football - defend properly and play through midfield.

To play through midfield we need to start with a 4-2-3-1 formation because with the 5 at the back and 2 holding mids there is no midfield to play it through. With no ball carrying CB the holding mids are dropping so deep to take it off them and it leaves our only 3 attacking players far to far away.

If 5 at the back is the system Emery wants to play (and I'm certain it isn't) then we simply don't have the right players for it. It seems that Emery has tried to shore up the defence by sticking an extra body in there - without any effect to our defensive ability but a huge detrimental affect to our attacking play


 Profile  
 
 
Post #313170  Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 8:28 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26981

I read an article discussing our full back options, the basis of it was that our pairs of full backs on each side are very different from each other. One very attacking (Bellerin/Kolasinac) and one much more defensively minded and moving towards wide CB role in later years (Lichsteiner/Monreal). Having to chop and change when these full backs come in and out of the team is massively disruptive to the style of play.

I realise it isn't our biggest problem but I found it interesting that for 2 vital positions in the team the 'cover' player is the opposite style of player he's covering for.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #313171  Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 8:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:04 am
Posts: 7429
Location: Townsville Australia

Looking at the Wenger interview regarding the socialist wage policy it is one of our biggest problems. On AFTV one of the person interviewed said that Jenkinson was on 62k per week. I found it interesting that he named such a specific sum. I wondered if maybe he had some inside info. He went on to say that he got more than Torreira. In any case the whole idea was totally flawed & will continue to cost us until all the contracts expire.

The real issue to me what a hypocrite Wenger was. If he truly believed in this he would have looked at what all the other EPL managers earnt & negotiated an average wage for himself. However he was one of highest paid EPL managers of all time. Socialism his way. The chickens have come home to roost.

_________________
If this policy does not deliver then I would say we have to change it.
AW 150810


 Profile  
 
 
Post #313172  Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 9:04 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18515

Our wages quite interesting

https://www.totalsportek.com/money/arse ... -salaries/


 Profile  
 
 
Post #313173  Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 9:14 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18515

Hazuki wrote:
david.d wrote:
You don't win 3 European trophies in a row if you are a bad manager.
Emery has to be backed so he can get his players in.
He has made a few questionable decisions but I don't think his dealing of Özil is one of them. He is a great player when he feels like it and is in the mood and therein lies the problem. Özil doesn't do it enough.
How many times have we all moaned when he has played.
When he has been hauled off Emery has been right to do so.
Emery Will live or die by his decisions so he has the right to put his faith in the players he feels he can trust.

Have to disagree here, david. I back Emery on most of the decisions he has made, but Özil is clearly not being handled correctly. It’s one thing to not start him if you don’t think he’s the right player for that match, but to leave him out of the squad altogether is just plain wrong when you have the likes of Licthsteiner and Nketiah on there.


Not sure you can make this assumption that he’s not being handled correctly. For me he has to start every week as we have a poverty of options but don’t know what’s going on behind closed doors.

The fanzines have constantly hinted at rumours of his lack of application and throwing wild parties at his London home etc etc

It might be that Emery doesn’t fancy him however trying to sell him to get rid of his 350k a week salary seems ridiculous if your are paying Čech and Lichtsteiner 200k a week to sit on a bench.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #313174  Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 9:19 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:21 pm
Posts: 16415
Location: Stockholm

TOP GUN wrote:

Quite a bit coming off the books after the season. Ramsey is gone, probably Welbeck too. Even though I like Čech as a player, there’s obviously no reason to keep him around as a backup on that type of wage. Lichtsteiner should be able to secure a contract as a night club bouncer somewehere. Don’t think we would have much problem offloading Elneny, Chambers and Mustafi or Koscielny. Guess we’re stuck with Jenkinson and Perez. Özil is obviously a big issue if he’s not going to play, but I don’t think it would be difficult to sell him if we just decide to do that.

Definitely some room on the wage bill opening up in the near future though. Ramsey, Welbeck, Lichtsteiner and Čech all look like goners and they make up about two very good players worth of wages.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #313175  Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 9:28 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:21 pm
Posts: 16415
Location: Stockholm

TOP GUN wrote:
Not sure you can make this assumption that he’s not being handled correctly. For me he has to start every week as we have a poverty of options but don’t know what’s going on behind closed doors.

Then sell him. The transfer window is open, and if he’s not going to play there’s no reason to keep him or he would want to stay. He left Real Madrid when he had 50+ appearances every season because he wanted to be the main guy in his team, I don’t think he would be happy to just collect his wages and never play.

Lots of talk about how nobody would want him with the wage he’s on but I don’t buy that. People said no top clubs would want Ramsey, and he had some of the biggest clubs in the world competing to sign him and ended up with a five year contract at one of the best run clubs in Europé. Our players are more highly rated than fans seem to think.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #313176  Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 9:38 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18515

Gaz from Oz wrote:
Looking at the Wenger interview regarding the socialist wage policy it is one of our biggest problems. On AFTV one of the person interviewed said that Jenkinson was on 62k per week. I found it interesting that he named such a specific sum. I wondered if maybe he had some inside info. He went on to say that he got more than Torreira. In any case the whole idea was totally flawed & will continue to cost us until all the contracts expire.

The real issue to me what a hypocrite Wenger was. If he truly believed in this he would have looked at what all the other EPL managers earnt & negotiated an average wage for himself. However he was one of highest paid EPL managers of all time. Socialism his way.


I don’t think you can really describe it as a socialist policy as he has guys being paid twice and even 3 or times as much as others it’s just it’s more of a “stupid” policy. Paying a reserve keeper a hundred grand a week, 2 reserve right backs around 160k a week. Just doesn’t make sense

Isn’t the Barcelona model the opposite. They have a first 11 which they pay handsomely but their subs and squad players are on nowhere near as much so after 2 or 3 seasons they have to move to get more money. Ie essentially how we got Sanchez


 Profile  
 
 
Post #313177  Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 9:43 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18515

Hazuki wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:
Not sure you can make this assumption that he’s not being handled correctly. For me he has to start every week as we have a poverty of options but don’t know what’s going on behind closed doors.

Then sell him. The transfer window is open, and if he’s not going to play there’s no reason to keep him or he would want to stay. He left Real Madrid when he had 50+ appearances every season because he wanted to be the main guy in his team, I don’t think he would be happy to just collect his wages and never play.

Lots of talk about how nobody would want him with the wage he’s on but I don’t buy that. People said no top clubs would want Ramsey, and he had some of the biggest clubs in the world competing to sign him and ended up with a five year contract at one of the best run clubs in Europé. Our players are more highly rated than fans seem to think.


The Ramsey thing is different as he’s free. If you attached a 40 million pound fee to him as well as his 140k a week salary I’m not convinced these clubs would be after him. It’s just a no brainier of a transfer

Juve can keep him on the bench for a season then sell him back to a UK club after 12 months for a decent fee.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #313178  Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 9:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:21 pm
Posts: 16415
Location: Stockholm

TOP GUN wrote:
The Ramsey thing is different as he’s free. If you attached a 40 million pound fee to him as well as his 140k a week salary I’m not convinced these clubs would be after him.

That’s all speculation though. What we do know is that some very big clubs rate him highly enough to be willing to invest big money in him, in terms of wages over several years and probably a hefty sign on fee. He could get a big injury in year one and never really contribute to the club, and they’d be stuck with him. You don’t make that type of commitment to a player you don’t rate rather highly.

Think it would be the same with Özil. We wouldn’t get £100 million for him, but if the decision was made to get rid I would expect us to have many clubs lining up for him.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #313179  Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 9:55 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18515

Hazuki wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:
The Ramsey thing is different as he’s free. If you attached a 40 million pound fee to him as well as his 140k a week salary I’m not convinced these clubs would be after him.

That’s all speculation though. What we do know is that some very big clubs rate him highly enough to be willing to invest big money in him, in terms of wages over several years and probably a hefty sign on fee. He could get a big injury in year one and never really contribute to the club, and they’d be stuck with him. You don’t make that type of commitment to a player you don’t rate rather highly.

Think it would be the same with Özil. We wouldn’t get £100 million for him, but if the decision was made to get rid I would expect us to have many clubs lining up for him.


You might be right about Özil I think many teams will want him but on Ramsey it’s not the same. If Juve pay him 140k a week and give him a decent signing on fee it still pales into insignificance bearing in mind they can sell him 12 months later for 25-30 million minimum.

It’s like handing somebody a 30 grand Mercedes convertible for free and then suggesting they are making a big commitment paying its petrol and running costs. Basically free money and Juve must be cracking up at our expense.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #313180  Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 10:03 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:21 pm
Posts: 16415
Location: Stockholm

TOP GUN wrote:
You might be right about Özil I think many teams will want him but on Ramsey it’s not the same. If Juve pay him 140k a week and give him a decent signing on fee it still pales into insignificance bearing in mind they can sell him 12 months later for 25-30 million minimum.

They can't sell him on if he's injured, and he doesn't have the best track record in that regard. So even if it's a sweet deal for them because they don't have to pay a transfer fee it's still a big financial commitment for a club that isn't bankrolled by a billionaire.

If we had decided to sell him in the summer of 2018 (which we should have) then there would've been big clubs fighting for his signature. That much is obvious from the interest in him this winter.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #313181  Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 10:14 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18515

Hazuki wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:
You might be right about Özil I think many teams will want him but on Ramsey it’s not the same. If Juve pay him 140k a week and give him a decent signing on fee it still pales into insignificance bearing in mind they can sell him 12 months later for 25-30 million minimum.

They can't sell him on if he's injured, and he doesn't have the best track record in that regard. So even if it's a sweet deal for them because they don't have to pay a transfer fee it's still a big financial commitment for a club that isn't bankrolled by a billionaire.

If we had decided to sell him in the summer of 2018 (which we should have) then there would've been big clubs fighting for his signature. That much is obvious from the interest in him this winter.


Mate it’s just a no brainer admit it. It’s essentially a free player.

In the same way we probably wouldn’t have signed Kolasinac if he wasn’t free Juve wouldn’t have signed Ramsey if they had to pay a 40 million transfer fee.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #313182  Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 10:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 5:27 pm
Posts: 11163

TOP GUN wrote:

Not read the whole article but does it give the source? If it's correct, how the hell can Monreal only earn 54% of Kolasinac's salary? Of the two, Monreal is the better defender by a pretty wide margin.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #313183  Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 10:18 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18515

Bernard wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:

Not read the whole article but does it give the source? If it's correct, how the hell can Monreal only earn 54% of Kolasinac's salary? Of the two, Monreal is the better defender by a pretty wide margin.


Kolasinac went on a free transfer sol Campbell style. Hence much bigger wages


 Profile  
 
 
Post #313184  Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 10:24 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:21 pm
Posts: 16415
Location: Stockholm

TOP GUN wrote:
Mate it’s just a no brainer admit it. It’s essentially a free player.

It’s not free, it’s just cheaper. You’re still at risk of being stuck with him as one of your highest paid players in case of a big injury etc. Reports are suggesting he’ll become Juventus second-highest earner. That doesn’t happen unless they rate him highly. We can not on one hand say it’s problematic to have the likes of Jenkinson picking up wages without contributing much and on the other hand say it’s risk free to sign someone to a five-year contract with a very high salary.

But leaving that aside, we seem stuck in the middle with Özil. Surely the way forward is either getting rid of him or making him a key figure in the team like his ability suggests he could be. We don’t seem to have commited to either position and I can’t see anything positive come from that.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #313185  Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 10:35 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18515

Hazuki wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:
Mate it’s just a no brainer admit it. It’s essentially a free player.

It’s not free, it’s just cheaper. You’re still at risk of being stuck with him as one of your highest paid players in case of a big injury etc. Reports are suggesting he’ll become Juventus second-highest earner.
.


So basically unless he suffers a career ending injury they could sell him in 2 seasons for 20 million quid and not only break even make a small profit out of the whole thing. It’s a zero risk transfer really.

How many players can a team sign where not only does it cost them nothing but at the end of the contract they make a profit. Few and far between.

Chuck a fat guy in the mix and it’s Christmas for Juve


 Profile  
 
 
Post #313186  Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 10:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:21 pm
Posts: 16415
Location: Stockholm

TOP GUN wrote:
So basically unless he suffers a career ending injury they could sell him in 2 seasons for 20 million quid and not only break even make a small profit out of the whole thing.

And while they're trying to offload him, he takes up a big spot on their wage bill, effectively hindering their ability to strengthen the team.

It's obivously a great deal when you can get a good player at 28 on a free transfer, but it's quite frankly silly to suggest there's no risk involved, or that those who claimed he was destined for the likes of Everton weren't wrong in their assessment of how clubs rate Ramsey.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #313187  Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 10:57 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18515

Hazuki wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:
So basically unless he suffers a career ending injury they could sell him in 2 seasons for 20 million quid and not only break even make a small profit out of the whole thing.

And while they're trying to offload him, he takes up a big spot on their wage bill, effectively hindering their ability to strengthen the team.

It's obivously a great deal when you can get a good player at 28 on a free transfer, but it's quite frankly silly to suggest there's no risk involved, or that those who claimed he was destined for the likes of Everton weren't wrong in their assessment of how clubs rate Ramsey.


There is a fractional risk involved but more likely profitable but to suggest it’s a huge move for Juve is wrong. Not saying he’d sign for an Everton but there would be less interest but not from these big guns.

Real Madrid, Barcelona or Juve aren’t signing this guy if he’s not free. Simple as that, he can’t get in the arsenal team but Madrid drop Modric and play Ramsey instead? come off it.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #313188  Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 12:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:52 pm
Posts: 18777

kiwipete wrote:
Welcome back ...ever heard of this doodle https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0EjjZmBvslo ...does a great version of Peggy Sue
Loved that Kiwi, so thanks. Different tricks but try this guy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zJ_pDcjICtw

_________________
"Young and caught up in life, we seldom watched the skies.”


 Profile  
 
 
Post #313189  Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 7:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2015 8:52 pm
Posts: 988
Location: Salisbury

http://dailycannon.com/2019/01/arsenal- ... -no-money/

Written very eloquently by our resident Lomekian I believe.

To sum up in my very simple manner - Wenger/Gazidis wasted a lot of money on average players who we then had to shift on the cheap because they were on high wages, that along with allowing 'star' players to run down their contracts and leave for nothing mean't we wasted £200M odd which we could not afford to do under our self-sustaining model.

Now we need investment to get ourselves back amongst the big players, can't see it happening though, we have an owner who just doesn't do that and is happy, or at least indifferent towards mediocrity. Boring boring Arsenal.

_________________
Wake me up when wiggy snuffs it


 Profile  
 
 
Post #313190  Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 8:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26981

Wilts-Gooner wrote:
http://dailycannon.com/2019/01/arsenal-dropped-the-ball-at-the-wrong-time-why-they-have-no-money/

Written very eloquently by our resident Lomekian I believe.

To sum up in my very simple manner - Wenger/Gazidis wasted a lot of money on average players who we then had to shift on the cheap because they were on high wages, that along with allowing 'star' players to run down their contracts and leave for nothing mean't we wasted £200M odd which we could not afford to do under our self-sustaining model.

Now we need investment to get ourselves back amongst the big players, can't see it happening though, we have an owner who just doesn't do that and is happy, or at least indifferent towards mediocrity. Boring boring Arsenal.

Quite the perfect (sh*t) storm


 Profile  
 
 
Post #313191  Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 8:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26981

TOP GUN wrote:
Mate it’s just a no brainer admit it. It’s essentially a free player.

In the same way we probably wouldn’t have signed Kolasinac if he wasn’t free Juve wouldn’t have signed Ramsey if they had to pay a 40 million transfer fee.

I read an article basically saying there is no such thing as a free transfer. The transfer fee is instead replaced by payments to player and agent that are much greater than a normal transfer, plus much higher wages. That’s obviously not to say Juve would have got a better deal by just giving us £40m for Ramsey but it certainly isn’t as free as it seems


 Profile  
 
 
Post #313192  Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 8:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26981

Mavropanos starting for the U23 tonight.

Not sure if he’s the ball playing CB we need right now but good to get some depth back.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #313193  Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 8:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26981

When I look at our results in the league I think the defeats to city, Chelsea and away to Liverpool could have been predicted no matter who the manager, tactics or players. We’re a long way behind those teams. Although it would have been nice not to have our pants pulled down again at Anfield.
The results that have frustrated me the most are defeat to Southampton and West Ham and throwing away the win away to palace with a stupid penalty in the last few minutes. Saints and West Ham have awful defences that we should be beating. Saints putting 3 past us was particularly embarrassing. That’s 8 points thrown away that would put us a point above spurs.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #313194  Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 8:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26981

U23 beat Man City 5-1 tonight. Our team looked strong not sure about city but they generally boss it at most youth levels so a very good result.

Saka with a couple of goals and willock with another goal. Willock pushing hard for some more first team minutes at the moment


 Profile  
 
 
Post #313195  Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 9:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18515

Rich wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:
Mate it’s just a no brainer admit it. It’s essentially a free player.

In the same way we probably wouldn’t have signed Kolasinac if he wasn’t free Juve wouldn’t have signed Ramsey if they had to pay a 40 million transfer fee.

I read an article basically saying there is no such thing as a free transfer. The transfer fee is instead replaced by payments to player and agent that are much greater than a normal transfer, plus much higher wages.


I get that I mean to provide an example we’re paying Kolasinac 120k a week because we didn’t have to pay a fee right but if we sold Kolasinac we could get anywhere around 25 million probably and that would pay his entire salary over his 4 year contract. There would be no cost at all.

However in the case of Ramsey you have a player easily worth 40 million on a 7 million per year deal. Even allowing for some agents fees and additional costs if you sell him 12 months later your still in for an absolute windfall. No wonder Juve jumped on it and they are always on point when it comes to free transfers. Look at Pogba, bagged him on a free sold him for 90 million.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #313196  Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 9:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26981

I’m not saying throw him in the first 11 but look at Saka’s goal for the U23 tonight, gets the ball on the wide left corner of the box, faces his man up straight away and drives at him, shimmies and shakes and dummies all the while backing the defender up before shifting it on to his right foot rapidly and banging it across the gk in to the far corner.

Nothing that a lot of good wide forwards aren’t trying in most teams but the sort of play we desperately miss in the first team. Who was the last player we had in the first team who regularly had 1v1’s v a full back and drove at him and took him on with pace and skill?


 Profile  
 
 
Post #313197  Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 9:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 8:30 pm
Posts: 8172

Rich wrote:
I’m not saying throw him in the first 11 but look at Saka’s goal for the U23 tonight, gets the ball on the wide left corner of the box, faces his man up straight away and drives at him, shimmies and shakes and dummies all the while backing the defender up before shifting it on to his right foot rapidly and banging it across the gk in to the far corner.

Nothing that a lot of good wide forwards aren’t trying in most teams but the sort of play we desperately miss in the first team. Who was the last player we had in the first team who regularly had 1v1’s v a full back and drove at him and took him on with pace and skill?

Sanchez.

_________________
"I just kept going pretty lively. Them killers wasn't too healthy company."


 Profile  
 
 
Post #313198  Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 10:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 7:45 am
Posts: 25814

Goonie wrote:
Thinking about it, Özil is to Emery what Charlie Nicholas was to GG...

Or Pogba to Mourinho?

_________________
I believe in our team, I believe in our quality and I am convinced that I am right. (Arsene Wenger Dec 08)


 Profile  
 
 
Post #313199  Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 10:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:53 pm
Posts: 17047

Goonie wrote:
Rich wrote:
U23 beat Man City 5-1 tonight. Our team looked strong not sure about city but they generally boss it at most youth levels so a very good result.

Saka with a couple of goals and willock with another goal. Willock pushing hard for some more first team minutes at the moment


We might as well promote our young players to the first team since we got no money to bring in new players. Someone (Niall, I think) mentioned Martin Hayes recently. He was our top scorer in GG's first season. A one season wonder but other young players like Adams, Rocastle, Merson went on to become legends for us. Thinking about it, Özil is to Emery what Charlie Nicholas was to GG...

Wasn't me, Cookie.

_________________
It's a terrible love and I'm walking with spiders.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #313200  Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 10:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 8:30 pm
Posts: 8172

long time gooner wrote:
Goonie wrote:
Thinking about it, Özil is to Emery what Charlie Nicholas was to GG...

Or Pogba to Mourinho?

Indeed. The Pogba v Mourinho stuff was hilarious while it lasted. Unlike Pogba, Özil has kept quiet, but it is farcical that our most talented player is dropped from the squad while we have kids in ahead of him. Also, worth pointing out that Ramsey has been thoroughly professional in all of this despite rarely being selected to start a game.

_________________
"I just kept going pretty lively. Them killers wasn't too healthy company."


 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
     [ 391425 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1 ... 7827, 7828, 7829, 7830, 7831, 7832, 7833 ... 9786  Next

All times are UTC

Gooners Online - Click to see what Everyones Doing

Colour Key:  Visited Profile    Members Profile      Admin

Get Latest Post

Users browsing this forum: AmericanGooner, Bing [Bot], Googlebot, warrior and 23 guests


Search for:

Go to Top

Powered by php BB © 1993 - 2018