Fixtures Sunday April 28th - Tottenham Hotspur - Tottenham Hotspur Stadium - 2:00 Pm

Kick-Off

       Injuries                 Steve Gleiber



Get the Latest Post Go to the Bottom of Page It is currently Sun Apr 28, 2024 11:50 am

All times are UTC


  


Reply to topic

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], john1, mcquilkie and 284 guests

 
Post #489641  Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 1:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 5:27 pm
Posts: 11163

AmericanGooner wrote:
Anyway, neither Usmanov or Kroenke are acceptable to me but it is what it is. I've already beaten that horse about Dein bringing both into the club as a choice. Unforgivable and self serving.

But it was Fiszman who facilitated Kroenke’s control of the club, not Dein. Kroenke had less than 10% of the shares before Fiszman decided to sell his entire holding to Stan on his deathbed.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #489642  Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 1:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:58 am
Posts: 34119

long time gooner wrote:
The whole game (industry) has moved on so much as to be unrecognisable. I no longer have any idea about what a good owner is. I certainly can’t see many role models.

Imagine ending up like Derby County.


I'm not familiar with most of the owners in the PL these days. Who would be regarded as a good one? Leicester City maybe? I don't know.

I was initially proud of our ownership when I first became a fan. From what I know they were well respected men in and out the league.

_________________
"Never relegated, Never Will Be" :)


 Profile  
 
 
Post #489643  Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 1:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 8:30 pm
Posts: 8154

Hazuki wrote:
Everton starting with two strikers I wouldn't mind seeing at Arsenal, Richarlison and Calvert-Lewin.

With Calvert-Lewin, there's obviously the question of the price tag with him being young and English. His injury record is a little shaky as well, but I like him as a player - good target man, physical, but with some skill and not as slow as many other players of his ilk.

Richarlison I really like, versatile, can play in several positions but has been used mainly as a central striker this season. Skillful, hard working and tenacious. It's ridiculous that a starting striker for Brazil is playing in an Everton side fighting just above the relegation line.

Richarlison is a weird one. He has buckets of talent. Sometimes I look at him and wonder why he isn't playing for Real Madrid. Then on other occasions he looks like a pub league player. A move to a bigger club could benefit him. I definitely wouldn't complain if we signed him.

_________________
"I just kept going pretty lively. Them killers wasn't too healthy company."


 Profile  
 
 
Post #489644  Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 2:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:21 pm
Posts: 16415
Location: Stockholm

dec wrote:
Richarlison is a weird one. He has buckets of talent. Sometimes I look at him and wonder why he isn't playing for Real Madrid. Then on other occasions he looks like a pub league player. A move to a bigger club could benefit him. I definitely wouldn't complain if we signed him.

Yeah, I don't know if it's his temper that scares teams off because he's really talented. Could see both him and Calvert-Lewin score more in a better, more attack minded side, playing along the likes of Saka, Martinelli and Ødegaard.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #489645  Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 2:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26777

Hazuki wrote:
dec wrote:
Richarlison is a weird one. He has buckets of talent. Sometimes I look at him and wonder why he isn't playing for Real Madrid. Then on other occasions he looks like a pub league player. A move to a bigger club could benefit him. I definitely wouldn't complain if we signed him.

Yeah, I don't know if it's his temper that scares teams off because he's really talented. Could see both him and Calvert-Lewin score more in a better, more attack minded side, playing along the likes of Saka, Martinelli and Ødegaard.

I could see both of them angling for a move if there are clubs interested.
On the other side of today’s game is Ollie Watkins who I rate. Quick, full of energy, presses well, good off the ball runs, can link play and run the channels and play wide and gets in the box to score ‘classic’ striker goals.

Watkins and DCL is all about the price though.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #489646  Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 3:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:58 am
Posts: 34119

'Ammers started lively. They may get something out of this.

_________________
"Never relegated, Never Will Be" :)


 Profile  
 
 
Post #489647  Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 3:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 7:45 am
Posts: 25814

Just to wind up Top Gun. :toothy9:

The view from Xhaka (with lots of sense really).

https://www.skysports.com/share/12521125

_________________
I believe in our team, I believe in our quality and I am convinced that I am right. (Arsene Wenger Dec 08)


 Profile  
 
 
Post #489648  Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 3:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:58 am
Posts: 34119

Moyes should be a serious contender for Manager of the Year if there is any fairness.

_________________
"Never relegated, Never Will Be" :)


 Profile  
 
 
Post #489649  Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 3:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 7:45 am
Posts: 25814

Each week that goes by I ask myself how on earth we managed to be the one team to lose to Everton. :36angers:

_________________
I believe in our team, I believe in our quality and I am convinced that I am right. (Arsene Wenger Dec 08)


 Profile  
 
 
Post #489650  Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 4:49 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 5:38 pm
Posts: 6462
Location: ɹǝpu∩uʍop

Play suspended at Brentford and Wolverhampton EPL game due to drone hovering above field

https://www.theage.com.au/sport/soccer/ ... e=rss_feed


 Profile  
 
 
Post #489651  Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 4:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:21 pm
Posts: 16415
Location: Stockholm

Man Utd wins the game in the 94th minute after their first good attack of the game.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #489652  Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 4:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26777

Hazuki wrote:
Man Utd wins the game in the 94th minute after their first good attack of the game.

Gutted, close to the perfect result for us. Spurs and Man U winning games in the last second 3 times in a row between them, and we lost to everton and Man City with last minute goals. Huge points swing.

What spurs and Man U are doing right now is winning marginal games. Two evenly matched teams and they’re sneaking the wins and winning when playing poorly time and time again. If we play poorly we don’t win, nearly all of our victories this season have been us playing really well.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #489653  Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 5:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26777

Stuttgart are second from bottom in Germany. If they get relegated their obligation to purchase Mavropanos for about £3m becomes an option to purchase him for that price. Which means Arsenal can refuse and either bring him back or more likely sell him to a higher bidder


 Profile  
 
 
Post #489654  Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 5:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:21 pm
Posts: 16415
Location: Stockholm

Rich wrote:
Stuttgart are second from bottom in Germany. If they get relegated their obligation to purchase Mavropanos for about £3m becomes an option to purchase him for that price. Which means Arsenal can refuse and either bring him back or more likely sell him to a higher bidder

Doesn't the option to buy mean we can't refuse the bid if it's for the right amount?


 Profile  
 
 
Post #489655  Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 5:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:21 pm
Posts: 16415
Location: Stockholm

Seen the replay for the Man Utd goal a couple of times now, and it still looks offside to me. They did a VAR check so I assume they got it right, but...


 Profile  
 
 
Post #489656  Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 5:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 7:45 am
Posts: 25814

Hazuki wrote:
Seen the replay for the Man Utd goal a couple of times now, and it still looks offside to me. They did a VAR check so I assume they got it right, but...

Are you Rich in disguise? :15laughter:

_________________
I believe in our team, I believe in our quality and I am convinced that I am right. (Arsene Wenger Dec 08)


 Profile  
 
 
Post #489657  Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 5:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 9:51 pm
Posts: 3574

warrior wrote:
Play suspended at Brentford and Wolverhampton EPL game due to drone hovering above field

https://www.theage.com.au/sport/soccer/ ... e=rss_feed

Match resumed. Ref also had a communication equipment failure that got fixed.

_________________
Be careful who you call your friends. I'd rather have four quarters than one hundred pennies.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #489658  Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 5:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:21 pm
Posts: 16415
Location: Stockholm

long time gooner wrote:
Hazuki wrote:
Seen the replay for the Man Utd goal a couple of times now, and it still looks offside to me. They did a VAR check so I assume they got it right, but...

Are you Rich in disguise? :15laughter:

You be the judge!


Attachments:
resize.jpg
resize.jpg [ 21.8 KB | Viewed 4231 times ]
 Profile  
 
 
Post #489659  Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 6:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 5:27 pm
Posts: 11163

I didn’t watch the game but had a look at the stats for the Manchester United (MU) vs West Ham (WH) game, and BBC Sport (a site I trust and rate very highly) give this.

Possession
MU 57% - WH 43%

Shots
MU 18 - WH 6

Shots on target
MU 3 - WH 1

Corners
MU 3 - WH 3

Fouls
MU 9 - WH 8

Nothing material between the corners and fouls, but on the stuff that arguably give a better guide as to who deserved to win, to me it looks like MU.

As I said, I didn’t watch the match and MOTD will no doubt provide the expected goals stat, which the BBC Sports website didn’t. But unless MU’s 15 off target shots (18 in total less 3 on target) were from miles out or so wide and high they went nearer the nets at the Etihad than Old Trafford while WH’s 5 off target (6 in total less 1 on target) were terrible misses from a few yards out, with the same sort of principles applying to the on target shots, then I anticipate MU’s expected goal stat to be higher.

I honestly feel MU win so many games with late goals that it’s a positive characteristic that deserves respect, even if it’s annoying.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #489660  Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 6:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 7:45 am
Posts: 25814

Bernard wrote:
I didn’t watch the game but had a look at the stats for the Manchester United (MU) vs West Ham (WH) game, and BBC Sport (a site I trust and rate very highly) give this.

Possession
MU 57% - WH 43%

Shots
MU 18 - WH 6

Shots on target
MU 3 - WH 1

Corners
MU 3 - WH 3

Fouls
MU 9 - WH 8

Nothing material between the corners and fouls, but on the stuff that arguably give a better guide as to who deserved to win, to me it looks like MU.

As I said, I didn’t watch the match and MOTD will no doubt provide the expected goals stat, which the BBC Sports website didn’t. But unless MU’s 15 off target shots (18 in total less 3 on target) were from miles out or so wide and high they went nearer the nets at the Etihad than Old Trafford while WH’s 5 off target (6 in total less 1 on target) were terrible misses from a few yards out, with the same sort of principles applying to the on target shots, then I anticipate MU’s expected goal stat to be higher.

I honestly feel MU win so many games with late goals that it’s a positive characteristic that deserves respect, even if it’s annoying.

So regular that it can hardly be regarded as mere luck.

_________________
I believe in our team, I believe in our quality and I am convinced that I am right. (Arsene Wenger Dec 08)


 Profile  
 
 
Post #489661  Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 6:10 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 5:38 pm
Posts: 6462
Location: ɹǝpu∩uʍop

Zed wrote:
Match resumed. Ref also had a communication equipment failure that got fixed.

Communicating with the betting agency ?


 Profile  
 
 
Post #489662  Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 6:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 5:27 pm
Posts: 11163

long time gooner wrote:
Bernard wrote:
I honestly feel MU win so many games with late goals that it’s a positive characteristic that deserves respect, even if it’s annoying.

So regular that it can hardly be regarded as mere luck.

Exactly.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #489663  Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 6:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

warrior wrote:
Zed wrote:
Match resumed. Ref also had a communication equipment failure that got fixed.

Communicating with the betting agency ?

Here we go :laughing7:

Your telling me the staff at Stockley park where the VAR decisions are made don’t have what’s app and online betting apps on their phones….. purlease.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #489664  Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 6:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 9:51 pm
Posts: 3574

TOP GUN wrote:
warrior wrote:
Communicating with the betting agency ?

Here we go :laughing7:

Your telling me the staff at Stockley park where the VAR decisions are made don’t have what’s app and online betting apps on their phones….. purlease.

:15laughter:
Ref has hotline to William Hill.

_________________
Be careful who you call your friends. I'd rather have four quarters than one hundred pennies.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #489665  Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 7:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:21 pm
Posts: 16415
Location: Stockholm

long time gooner wrote:
So regular that it can hardly be regarded as mere luck.

I wouldn't say it's necessarily 'luck', but in terms of ways to win a game it's certainly not as sustainable over a long period of time compared to generally outplaying your opponents.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #489666  Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 7:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26777

Hazuki wrote:
long time gooner wrote:
Are you Rich in disguise? :15laughter:

You be the judge!

They have released the actual lines and he’s well inside. The angle of the freeze frame is always deceptive when seen like that. Defenders toe is quite a way behind Cavani’s shoulder.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #489667  Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 8:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26777

Hazuki wrote:
long time gooner wrote:
So regular that it can hardly be regarded as mere luck.

I wouldn't say it's necessarily 'luck', but in terms of ways to win a game it's certainly not as sustainable over a long period of time compared to generally outplaying your opponents.

It was only their second late winner in the league this year. Away to West Ham was the other, they’ve had 3 or so in the champions league to win or save a game.
But they also lost to an 89th minute goal 1-0 to Villa, conceded two late ones to Villa away to draw 2-2 and lost late to wolves at home 1-0.

The last minute wins stick in the mind more because of the annoyance of them.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #489668  Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 8:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 8:30 pm
Posts: 8154

Rich wrote:
Hazuki wrote:
I wouldn't say it's necessarily 'luck', but in terms of ways to win a game it's certainly not as sustainable over a long period of time compared to generally outplaying your opponents.

It was only their second late winner in the league this year. Away to West Ham was the other, they’ve had 3 or so in the champions league to win or save a game.
But they also lost to an 89th minute goal 1-0 to Villa, conceded two late ones to Villa away to draw 2-2 and lost late to wolves at home 1-0.

The last minute wins stick in the mind more because of the annoyance of them.

With Man Utd, I think it's the fact that they have so many first halves where they are second best but still come out on top in the end. I view them as a team that is well short of winning the league but have enough good players to win plenty of games.

_________________
"I just kept going pretty lively. Them killers wasn't too healthy company."


 Profile  
 
 
Post #489669  Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 11:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 5:27 pm
Posts: 11163

Bernard wrote:
As I said, I didn’t watch the match and MOTD will no doubt provide the expected goals stat, which the BBC Sports website didn’t. But unless MU’s 15 off target shots (18 in total less 3 on target) were from miles out or so wide and high they went nearer the nets at the Etihad than Old Trafford while WH’s 5 off target (6 in total less 1 on target) were terrible misses from a few yards out, with the same sort of principles applying to the on target shots, then I anticipate MU’s expected goal stat to be higher.

MOTD did give the expected goals stat. It was 1.63 for Manchester United and 0.29 for West Ham. Along with the other stats I reported here earlier, I’m finding it hard to accept that Manchester United didn’t fully deserve their win today.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #489670  Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 11:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:04 am
Posts: 7392
Location: Townsville Australia

Bernard wrote:
Bernard wrote:
As I said, I didn’t watch the match and MOTD will no doubt provide the expected goals stat, which the BBC Sports website didn’t. But unless MU’s 15 off target shots (18 in total less 3 on target) were from miles out or so wide and high they went nearer the nets at the Etihad than Old Trafford while WH’s 5 off target (6 in total less 1 on target) were terrible misses from a few yards out, with the same sort of principles applying to the on target shots, then I anticipate MU’s expected goal stat to be higher.

MOTD did give the expected goals stat. It was 1.69 for Manchester United and 0.29 for West Ham. Along with the other stats I reported here earlier, I’m finding it hard to accept that Manchester United didn’t fully deserve their win today.

You don’t always get what you deserve: if you did someone would have kicked Boris Johnson in the bollocks this week.

_________________
If this policy does not deliver then I would say we have to change it.
AW 150810


 Profile  
 
 
Post #489671  Posted: Sun Jan 23, 2022 2:50 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 5:38 pm
Posts: 6462
Location: ɹǝpu∩uʍop

TOP GUN wrote:
Your telling me the staff at Stockley park where the VAR decisions are made don't have what's app and online betting apps on their phone's.. purlease.

I'll have you know the EPL has the finest referees that money can buy.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #489672  Posted: Sun Jan 23, 2022 4:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:58 am
Posts: 34119

Had an exchange with a Man Utd supporting person I know. Whenever Rooney's dive is brought up (and as aside despite clear video evidence they never fully admit it), they bring up Pires and Pompey.


First, the Rooney dive is clear cut. The Pires penalty is not. Second, Rooney's dive came at the end of the game. Pires' at the 28th minute. I asked him "Would you take odds that, that Arsenal side wouldn't be able to equalize over the next 62 minutes? Really? Consider Leicester has down a goal too."

A lot of 'you never knows' and 'you can't predict football' and such. But really. When we scored, we took the foot off the gas against Portsmouth. They were not a threat. We played for a draw but could have turned it on at any time.

_________________
"Never relegated, Never Will Be" :)


 Profile  
 
 
Post #489673  Posted: Sun Jan 23, 2022 7:21 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26777

Strange one that Armstrong wasn’t sent off for his studs to the thigh foul on Laporte yesterday. It went to var but wasn’t given. Plenty of Arsenal fans online pointing out Nketiah was sent off for something similar, and City fans pointing out Stones was sent off v Villa for something similar too.
Of course var is still the subjective decision of a referee but you’d hope that with the benefit of time to fully review that there would be more consistency and that as a ref group they have agreed what constitutes a red.
There will be plenty saying ‘if that was Xhaka’ and they’re not wrong. I can’t recall any time we’ve had a var review for a possible red and they’ve decided to keep it at a yellow or less.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #489674  Posted: Sun Jan 23, 2022 7:31 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26777

Bernard wrote:
Bernard wrote:
As I said, I didn’t watch the match and MOTD will no doubt provide the expected goals stat, which the BBC Sports website didn’t. But unless MU’s 15 off target shots (18 in total less 3 on target) were from miles out or so wide and high they went nearer the nets at the Etihad than Old Trafford while WH’s 5 off target (6 in total less 1 on target) were terrible misses from a few yards out, with the same sort of principles applying to the on target shots, then I anticipate MU’s expected goal stat to be higher.

MOTD did give the expected goals stat. It was 1.63 for Manchester United and 0.29 for West Ham. Along with the other stats I reported here earlier, I’m finding it hard to accept that Manchester United didn’t fully deserve their win today.

Given that Rashford’s goal, an open goal tap in, would account for at least 0.9 of that xG the rest of the game ls chances would seem quite even. I watched the highlights and it does seem to be quite even, nothing clear cut for either side. A header each from a corner and a couple of shots from range from Fred and bowen- but the highlights didn’t show a single save required by either gk.
Man U deserve it because they created the one certain goal moment but from what I’ve seen there wasn’t much between the teams and it goes down as a marginal game that Man U found a way to win rather than a dominant Man U up against a dogged defence and top performing gk and they finally found a way through at the death


 Profile  
 
 
Post #489675  Posted: Sun Jan 23, 2022 7:37 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26777

This is the xG map of the Man U v West Ham game. Location of shot and size of circle shows the chances of that shot being a goal (bigger is better). Lots of very low chance shots from range for Man U then one single great chance in the last minute.


Attachments:

 Profile  
 
 
Post #489676  Posted: Sun Jan 23, 2022 8:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 7:45 am
Posts: 25814

Rich wrote:
This is the xG map of the Man U v West Ham game. Location of shot and size of circle shows the chances of that shot being a goal (bigger is better). Lots of very low chance shots from range for Man U then one single great chance in the last minute.

I was fully persuaded by Bernard’s perspective until you posted that. Slam dunk.

_________________
I believe in our team, I believe in our quality and I am convinced that I am right. (Arsene Wenger Dec 08)


 Profile  
 
 
Post #489677  Posted: Sun Jan 23, 2022 8:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:58 am
Posts: 34119

Man Utd won. They pulled a last second goal out of their Arsenal. We can only control our results. We beat Burnley, we beat Tottenham when that match is rescheduled. We keep playing well. Other results become less important surprisingly.

I recall a frustrated Ferguson complaining other sides were bending over for us in the spring of 2002. I used to love hearing Man Utd fans at the pub in LA complain about how the opposition gives up early on us. As an aside, we made the same claim in Man Utd games as well...lol.

My guess is many opposition fans of our challengers would say Liverpool or Man City are 'letting us in the game' instead of we playing well.

We have Burnley, Woves, Brenford (at home), Watford, Leicester (at home), Villa. Tottenham in there somewhere or later. But this squad is more than capable of beating the aforementioned home or away. The effort I saw away at Liverpool would beat any of these sides if we take each seriously enough.

_________________
"Never relegated, Never Will Be" :)


 Profile  
 
 
Post #489678  Posted: Sun Jan 23, 2022 8:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:58 am
Posts: 34119

Tottenham are still in the FA cup. Man Utd are in both the FA cup and CL. This obviously works to our advantage. We are in a very good position. There are other variables that could affect things (transfers this month, injuries, red cards, etc.) but right now, we have the advantage schedule wise.

_________________
"Never relegated, Never Will Be" :)


 Profile  
 
 
Post #489679  Posted: Sun Jan 23, 2022 8:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 2:55 pm
Posts: 11489
Location: Singapore

I hope Arteta has re-built the confidence of the team after so many massive disappointments
Lost to City despite playing so well
Lost to Championship side in FA Cup
Lost SF to Pool

_________________
Onwards and Upwards!


 Profile  
 
 
Post #489680  Posted: Sun Jan 23, 2022 9:00 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26777

Watching Everton and seeing their run of results just emphasises how bad that performance was to lose to them. Their only win in about 15.

I recall a similar one v Southampton when they beat us 4-0 in a run of 15 or so other winless games

Win today and we go 4th


 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
     [ 520210 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1 ... 12239, 12240, 12241, 12242, 12243, 12244, 12245 ... 13006  Next

All times are UTC

Gooners Online - Click to see what Everyones Doing

Colour Key:  Visited Profile    Members Profile      Admin

Get Latest Post

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], john1, mcquilkie and 284 guests


Search for:

Go to Top

Powered by php BB © 1993 - 2018