Fixtures Sunday April 28th - Tottenham Hotspur - Tottenham Hotspur Stadium - 2:00 Pm

Kick-Off

       Injuries                 Steve Gleiber



Get the Latest Post Go to the Bottom of Page It is currently Sun Apr 28, 2024 10:32 am

All times are UTC


  


Reply to topic

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], bubblechris, Decaf and 268 guests

 
Post #537801  Posted: Sat May 07, 2022 8:14 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26777

Arsenal have had the most yellow cards for time wasting this season with 7 yellows. I had a look and we’ve won games by a single goal 9 times this season, those being the games where you’d imagine time wasting was precedent. Considering what we see week in week out from every team in the league protecting a narrow lead that’s a very high ratio


 Profile  
 
 
Post #537802  Posted: Sat May 07, 2022 9:19 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:42 pm
Posts: 5695

Rich wrote:
Declan Rice could be in trouble after he was caught giving the ref some stick in the tunnel after Weet Ham were knocked out of Europe

“Ref, ref, it's so poor, all night, it's so bad," England midfielder Rice says in the video which has been widely circulated online.

"How can you be that bad, honestly? You've probably been paid."


That last bit will definitely get him into trouble.

_________________
"If you do not believe you can do it then you have no chance at all"


 Profile  
 
 
Post #537803  Posted: Sat May 07, 2022 9:21 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26777

Apparently during Abramovic Chelsea reign the club was run at a £900k loss per week on average


 Profile  
 
 
Post #537804  Posted: Sat May 07, 2022 10:45 am 
Online

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:06 am
Posts: 16486

Rich wrote:
Apparently during Abramovic Chelsea reign the club was run at a £900k loss per week on average

I see you don't say "a £900k investment per week."

I think this is different to what the Kroenke's are doing with Arsenal, and the latter is not 'doping'.

_________________
Hamba kakuhle, Madiba


 Profile  
 
 
Post #537805  Posted: Sat May 07, 2022 12:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26777

Decaf wrote:
Rich wrote:
Apparently during Abramovic Chelsea reign the club was run at a £900k loss per week on average

I see you don't say "a £900k investment per week."

I think this is different to what the Kroenke's are doing with Arsenal, and the latter is not 'doping'.

Is it an investment until it becomes a problem, then it’s a loss!


 Profile  
 
 
Post #537806  Posted: Sat May 07, 2022 12:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 5:27 pm
Posts: 11163

Decaf wrote:
Rich wrote:
Apparently during Abramovic Chelsea reign the club was run at a £900k loss per week on average

I see you don't say "a £900k investment per week."

I think this is different to what the Kroenke's are doing with Arsenal, and the latter is not 'doping'.

So how do you define doping?


 Profile  
 
 
Post #537807  Posted: Sat May 07, 2022 12:55 pm 
Online

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:06 am
Posts: 16486

Bernard wrote:
Decaf wrote:
I see you don't say "a £900k investment per week."

I think this is different to what the Kroenke's are doing with Arsenal, and the latter is not 'doping'.

So how do you define doping?

I've looked at a few definitions of 'doping' and I can see that we are talking at cross purposes because of vagueness about the definition of 'financial doping'.

It is often defined just as spending not funded out of revenue. In that case there is no distinction between 'investment' of external funds and 'doping'.

A more nuanced definition is:

"…financial means not earned by a club directly or indirectly through its sporting
operations or supporter reputation, but rather provided by an external investor,
benefactor or creditor detached from sporting merit and supporter reputation as
well as from sustainable investment motivations"

By this definition, I would suggest that a strong case could be made that Kroenke is putting money into the club for "sustainable investment motivations". The same cannot be said of Abro's motives for pouring money into Chelsea.

_________________
Hamba kakuhle, Madiba


 Profile  
 
 
Post #537808  Posted: Sat May 07, 2022 1:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 5:27 pm
Posts: 11163

Decaf wrote:
Rich wrote:
Apparently during Abramovic Chelsea reign the club was run at a £900k loss per week on average

I see you don't say "a £900k investment per week."

I think this is different to what the Kroenke's are doing with Arsenal, and the latter is not 'doping'.

Just looked the figures up. Abramovich bought Chelsea in 2003 for £140m. £60m for the club itself and £80m to pay off their debt at the time.

If Rich is right and Abramovich has spent £900k a week on them, then over the nineteen years that equates to £205.2m (£900k x 12 = £10.8m a year. £10.8m x 19 = £205.2m). Add that to the £140m purchase price (the cost of the club at £60m and it’s debt at the time of £80m), and it amounts to £345.2m.

Reports suggest that the preferred bidder for Chelsea, Todd Boehly, is buying (or has bought) the club for £4.3b. Does that not give Abramovich a profit of approaching £4b? Even if Abramovich doesn’t get back the £1.5b that Chelsea are in debt to him for, that’s still a net profit for Abramovich approaching £2.5b. It was a long-term investment that ended up being for nineteen years. But is a £2.5b profit not an investment?


 Profile  
 
 
Post #537809  Posted: Sat May 07, 2022 1:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 5:27 pm
Posts: 11163

Decaf wrote:
By this definition, I would suggest that a strong case could be made that Kroenke is putting money into the club for "sustainable investment motivations". The same cannot be said of Abro's motives for pouring money into Chelsea.

Doesn’t my last post suggest something different? I accept Abramovich is only getting his profit from being forced to sell Chelsea. But some might take his ‘investment’ in them not to make money (even if he ended up doing so) as more noble (almost a sort of ‘as a fan’ scenario) than what you may be suggesting are Stan’s motivations?

For example, if someone gave me so many billions for my wine collection that I could offer not only offer enough money to Kroenke to make him sell Arsenal to me, but to give me enough to blow Sheik Mansour’s expenditure on City out the water (let alone Abramovich’s on Chelsea), then I would. Not as a financial investment, but motivated by me wanting Arsenal to win trophies.

Is that not more noble than Stan treating Arsenal as a financial investment, if that’s what you think he’s doing?


 Profile  
 
 
Post #537810  Posted: Sat May 07, 2022 1:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 2:02 pm
Posts: 8186

It was 20 years ago today…….


 Profile  
 
 
Post #537811  Posted: Sat May 07, 2022 2:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

DHD wrote:
It was 20 years ago today…….


Yes it’s pretty hard to comprehend Steps broke up 20 years ago.

Wonder what H is up to these days.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #537812  Posted: Sat May 07, 2022 2:13 pm 
Online

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:06 am
Posts: 16486

Bernard wrote:
Decaf wrote:
I see you don't say "a £900k investment per week."

I think this is different to what the Kroenke's are doing with Arsenal, and the latter is not 'doping'.

Just looked the figures up. Abramovich bought Chelsea in 2003 for £140m. £60m for the club itself and £80m to pay off their debt at the time.

If Rich is right and Abramovich has spent £900k a week on them, then over the nineteen years that equates to £205.2m (£900k x 12 = £10.8m a year. £10.8m x 19 = £205.2m). Add that to the £140m purchase price (the cost of the club at £60m and it’s debt at the time of £80m), and it amounts to £345.2m.

Reports suggest that the preferred bidder for Chelsea, Todd Boehly, is buying (or has bought) the club for £4.3b. Does that not give Abramovich a profit of approaching £4b? Even if Abramovich doesn’t get back the £1.5b that Chelsea are in debt to him for, that’s still a net profit for Abramovich approaching £2.5b. It was a long-term investment that ended up being for nineteen years. But is a £2.5b profit not an investment?

52 weeks in a year. But even so, (900 000 x 52 x 19 =) 889 200 000 + 140 000 000, is well short of £4.3b. So either the figures are wrong or you are right.

_________________
Hamba kakuhle, Madiba


 Profile  
 
 
Post #537813  Posted: Sat May 07, 2022 2:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 10:12 am
Posts: 4123
Location: Melbourne

Bernard wrote:
Ash wrote:
Absolute scenes at Ibrox. Rangers Frankfurt Europa final. Brilliant for Rangers. They’re celebrating as if they’ve won it though, which as we know is a heinous crime…

Rangers have beaten Dortmund (2nd in the Bundesliga) in an earlier round and Leipzig (5th in the Bundesliga) in the semi-final tonight. Frankfurt are 11th in the Bundesliga. What’s the betting they balls it up against the weakest German side they’ve faced in this season’s Europa League?

But does league form matter? There was a lot of speculation on here about what would it mean if Wham won the Europa league and my thought at the time was let's see when they win it. Arsenal being no stranger to the same experience. Frankfurt have done something right so I think would be equal odds to beat Rangers.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #537814  Posted: Sat May 07, 2022 2:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 10:12 am
Posts: 4123
Location: Melbourne

Gaz from Oz wrote:
Concerned about Leeds. Without exception, many podcasts are talking about the Spurs game and making assumptions that Leeds is an easy win for us. I don’t think we have had a controlled managed game since before Crystal Palace. We might have won games but the level of comfort during those games has not been high. A focused quick start is essential. I want the players to demonstrate the mentality required by teams heading upwards.


I agree there have been some squeaky bum games recently. Only consolation I can provide is that this is the youngest team in the league and also the likely most improved in many areas. (I'll let Rich provide stats), I think due to the low experience, the team is nervous about fast starts.

Equally look at city. Mega bucks, the best players in the league, but so used to attacking and controlling possession that they fell apart under sustained scrutiny.

All I can think right now is that if we keep improving then that is what I want to see


 Profile  
 
 
Post #537815  Posted: Sat May 07, 2022 2:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 10:12 am
Posts: 4123
Location: Melbourne

Decaf wrote:
Rich wrote:
Apparently during Abramovic Chelsea reign the club was run at a £900k loss per week on average

I see you don't say "a £900k investment per week."

I think this is different to what the Kroenke's are doing with Arsenal, and the latter is not 'doping'.



I'm not familiar with UK tax laws but could this loss have been claimed back from the govt? E.g written off income, etc


 Profile  
 
 
Post #537816  Posted: Sat May 07, 2022 3:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 10:12 am
Posts: 4123
Location: Melbourne

Open question to the forum...ratings on Tuchel since becoming Chelsea manager?


 Profile  
 
 
Post #537817  Posted: Sat May 07, 2022 3:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

grantyboy wrote:
Open question to the forum...ratings on Tuchel since becoming Chelsea manager?


I don’t really know what to say. I think he did well to win the champions league last year but look at his bench today.

1Arrizabalaga
4Christensen
14Chalobah
17Saúl
18Barkley
19Mount
22Ziyech
29Havertz
31Sarr

Do you think Artetas public opinion would be affected if he could call on such an Armoury in reserve should things be not working out.

To be honest I think anyone who manages chelsea, united or city is a compete wanker

Klopp gets more respect but not infinite.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #537818  Posted: Sat May 07, 2022 3:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

We are all scousers today.

Oh and Brighton.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #537819  Posted: Sat May 07, 2022 4:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:58 am
Posts: 34119

Wolves equalize on nearly the last kick of the game against Chelsea. We threw away 3rd. Oh well. No title next year. :42laughter:

_________________
"Never relegated, Never Will Be" :)


 Profile  
 
 
Post #537820  Posted: Sat May 07, 2022 4:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 4:33 pm
Posts: 7061

Late Wolves equaliser at Chelsea. Beat Leeds and we're a point behind them with 3 games left.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #537821  Posted: Sat May 07, 2022 4:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 2:55 pm
Posts: 11489
Location: Singapore

What a shocker, Chelsea stumble so late in the game. Long may they keep giving us shocks like these.

_________________
Onwards and Upwards!


 Profile  
 
 
Post #537822  Posted: Sat May 07, 2022 4:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

Got your answer Granty :laughing7:


 Profile  
 
 
Post #537823  Posted: Sat May 07, 2022 4:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 10:36 pm
Posts: 3703

What’s the minimum we need squad wise to compete next season?

By minimum I guess I mean new players in to compete in the Europa, Premier league and cups. By my reckoning we need:

Another CB to compete/rotate with White and Gabriel
A new RB to rotate with Tomiyasu
A CM
2 strikers/forwards if Eddie leaves.

That’s 5 players.

I’m happy for Saliba to be the 3rd/4th CB with Holding, young player of the season in France after all! Not sure there’s a place for Nelson as well as he’s now doing in the Netherlands and then there’s the question could MN come in as back up RB? With European games he could get 15 starts with sub appearances over the season which is a higher rate than he’s been playing on loan at Roma.

If we went big on a CM and striker I’d be happy with returning loanees giving us depth for rotation but what we’ve seen from this season is these players will definitely play. You’ll be relying on Taveres and M-N at some point if they’re your back up full backs.

Another big summer coming up!


 Profile  
 
 
Post #537824  Posted: Sat May 07, 2022 4:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 7:45 am
Posts: 25814

That’s kind of unlucky. Northampton Town were vying with Bristol Rovers for the final automatic promotion spot today.

Dead level on points but Northampton were 5 goals clear on goal difference before start of play.

A 3-1 away win for Northampton should have been job done.

But Bristol won 7-0 to level up the goal difference and to clinch promotion on goals scored. Very surreal.

_________________
I believe in our team, I believe in our quality and I am convinced that I am right. (Arsene Wenger Dec 08)


 Profile  
 
 
Post #537825  Posted: Sat May 07, 2022 5:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

Ash wrote:
What’s the minimum we need squad wise to compete next season?

By minimum I guess I mean new players in to compete in the Europa, Premier league and cups. By my reckoning we need:

Another CB to compete/rotate with White and Gabriel
A new RB to rotate with Tomiyasu
A CM
2 strikers/forwards if Eddie leaves.

That’s 5 players.

I’m happy for Saliba to be the 3rd/4th CB with Holding, young player of the season in France after all! Not sure there’s a place for Nelson as well as he’s now doing in the Netherlands and then there’s the question could MN come in as back up RB? With European games he could get 15 starts with sub appearances over the season which is a higher rate than he’s been playing on loan at Roma.

If we went big on a CM and striker I’d be happy with returning loanees giving us depth for rotation but what we’ve seen from this season is these players will definitely play. You’ll be relying on Taveres and M-N at some point if they’re your back up full backs.

Another big summer coming up!


Assuming Mari leaves and saliba comes in to replace him ..

The minimum

2 strikers
Midfielder
Left back (No way can you rely on Tavares, I can’t recall such a liability. He’s targeted every week. Arteta will know this. Bloke needs to be loaned and a replacement sourced. )

However I think it’s patently obvious Pépé will leave so expect a wide player too. I don’t think we will sign a right back.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #537826  Posted: Sat May 07, 2022 5:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:58 am
Posts: 34119

Brighton is turning out to be a tough nut to crack for Man Utd. :42laughter:

_________________
"Never relegated, Never Will Be" :)


 Profile  
 
 
Post #537827  Posted: Sat May 07, 2022 6:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 4:33 pm
Posts: 7061

Man U getting humiliated at Brighton. Happy days :26encouragement:


 Profile  
 
 
Post #537828  Posted: Sat May 07, 2022 6:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 7:45 am
Posts: 25814

That Potter bloke seems to know what he is doing.

Sorry Top Gun :1laughter:

Couldn’t resist.

_________________
I believe in our team, I believe in our quality and I am convinced that I am right. (Arsene Wenger Dec 08)


 Profile  
 
 
Post #537829  Posted: Sat May 07, 2022 6:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

long time gooner wrote:
That Potter bloke seems to know what he is doing.

Sorry Top Gun :1laughter:

Couldn’t resist.


LETS GET POTTER :1laughter:

To be honest I think that new united manager needs to go full Arteta and dismantle that Squad.

That’s is an abysmal showing. Shameful


 Profile  
 
 
Post #537830  Posted: Sat May 07, 2022 6:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 4:33 pm
Posts: 7061

TOP GUN wrote:
Left back (No way can you rely on Tavares, I can’t recall such a liability. He’s targeted every week. Arteta will know this. Bloke needs to be loaned and a replacement sourced. )

Cuccurella at Brighton looks excellent. Might cost a bit though.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #537831  Posted: Sat May 07, 2022 6:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

This performance from united reminds me of our home game v city in Emery’s last season.

Players not giving a toss ambling around not running behaving like arseholes. Just downed tools literally and visibly. No wonder Mikel chucked all that lot out.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #537832  Posted: Sat May 07, 2022 6:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

bromley gooner wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:
Left back (No way can you rely on Tavares, I can’t recall such a liability. He’s targeted every week. Arteta will know this. Bloke needs to be loaned and a replacement sourced. )

Cuccurella at Brighton looks excellent. Might cost a bit though.

Was thinking exactly the same. He looks terrific. Always offers himself. He would fit in our system too


 Profile  
 
 
Post #537833  Posted: Sat May 07, 2022 6:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:42 pm
Posts: 5695

long time gooner wrote:
That Potter bloke seems to know what he is doing.

Sorry Top Gun :1laughter:

Couldn’t resist.


It will be their 4th home win of the season.

_________________
"If you do not believe you can do it then you have no chance at all"


 Profile  
 
 
Post #537834  Posted: Sat May 07, 2022 6:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:29 pm
Posts: 5015

I'm sure commentator said that's Trossards first goal of 2022.
Did I just dream his goal against us and spurs then.....


 Profile  
 
 
Post #537835  Posted: Sat May 07, 2022 6:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:29 pm
Posts: 5015

Curucella has impressed me for a while.
Brilliant player.
Would love him


 Profile  
 
 
Post #537836  Posted: Sat May 07, 2022 6:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:29 pm
Posts: 5015

Guaranteed top 5 now with that utd defeat


 Profile  
 
 
Post #537837  Posted: Sat May 07, 2022 6:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:29 pm
Posts: 5015

Come on Liverpool
Batter Spurs please


 Profile  
 
 
Post #537838  Posted: Sat May 07, 2022 6:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 10:36 pm
Posts: 3703

david.d wrote:
Come on Liverpool
Batter Spurs please


I expect Spurs to put on a far better performance away to Liverpool than Utd just did away to Brighton.. Having said that, Saturday evening, Liverpool fans should be boozed up and raucous! Sunny day, balmy evening by northern standards, that ferry going back and forth across the Mersey and the Liver birds in full song. 10-0 easy!


 Profile  
 
 
Post #537839  Posted: Sat May 07, 2022 6:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:29 pm
Posts: 5015

Spurs are such a scummy club and team ......just bloody Sods law they go and pull off a result akin to the away win at City.
Liverpool want that title so surely not...


 Profile  
 
 
Post #537840  Posted: Sat May 07, 2022 6:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 5:27 pm
Posts: 11163

grantyboy wrote:
Bernard wrote:
Rangers have beaten Dortmund (2nd in the Bundesliga) in an earlier round and Leipzig (5th in the Bundesliga) in the semi-final tonight. Frankfurt are 11th in the Bundesliga. What’s the betting they balls it up against the weakest German side they’ve faced in this season’s Europa League?

But does league form matter? There was a lot of speculation on here about what would it mean if Wham won the Europa league and my thought at the time was let's see when they win it. Arsenal being no stranger to the same experience. Frankfurt have done something right so I think would be equal odds to beat Rangers.

I would agree that Frankfurt are at least equal odds for the final. My point was more to do with Rangers having already beaten the second and fifth placed Bundesliga sides (Dortmund and Leipzig respectively). With Frankfurt being eleventh they are surely the weakest of the three German sides Rangers have met.


 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
     [ 563338 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1 ... 13443, 13444, 13445, 13446, 13447, 13448, 13449 ... 14084  Next

All times are UTC

Gooners Online - Click to see what Everyones Doing

Colour Key:  Visited Profile    Members Profile      Admin

Get Latest Post

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], bubblechris, Decaf and 268 guests


Search for:

Go to Top

Powered by php BB © 1993 - 2018