Fixtures Sunday April 28th - Tottenham Hotspur - Tottenham Hotspur Stadium - 2:00 Pm

Kick-Off

       Injuries                 Steve Gleiber



Get the Latest Post Go to the Bottom of Page It is currently Sun Apr 28, 2024 10:56 am

All times are UTC


  


Reply to topic

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 274 guests

 
Post #536641  Posted: Mon May 30, 2022 3:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:04 am
Posts: 7392
Location: Townsville Australia

This article was online about Leno
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footb ... -Leno.html

So we are asking 8.5mil and are having trouble getting that.

_________________
If this policy does not deliver then I would say we have to change it.
AW 150810


 Profile  
 
 
Post #536642  Posted: Mon May 30, 2022 6:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 10:12 am
Posts: 4123
Location: Melbourne

Gaz from Oz wrote:
This article was online about Leno
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footb ... -Leno.html

So we are asking 8.5mil and are having trouble getting that.


One of the newly promoted teams could do much worse than signing him up as their #1.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #536643  Posted: Mon May 30, 2022 6:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 5:27 pm
Posts: 11163

gooner7 wrote:
Rich wrote:
Forest in the prem for next year. Glad they came up instead of Huddersfield for the only reason that it’s been ages since they were in the league and I like it when it’s mixed up a bit.

What’s the betting we are away to Forest on a Friday night for the first game of the new season?

The new "Brentford" next season?

Must admit I’m not pleased at all that Forest came up instead of Huddersfield. I’ve made the trek to Nottingham loads of times to see us play them and seen us lose quite a few of them, if not ‘lots’ of them. I didn’t go to the FA Cup game this season (I suppose it’s now ‘last’ season), but it cost us one of the two semi-realistic chances we had of lifting a trophy.

What reason would an Arsenal fan have to dislike Huddersfield? They beat us at their ground in the 1970/71 season, but we still won the title so who cares? Indeed, had we not lost at Huddersfield perhaps the title clincher at White Hart Lane would not have been so dramatic? I don’t recall losing a game to Huddersfield that I now see as particularly important.

Huddersfield are close neighbours (in a different but nearby location sort of way like Newcastle and Sunderland) to Leeds and since I’ve been following football have always been deeply in their shadow. Their fans will no doubt dislike Leeds, and that makes them okay by me. So do I. Indeed, I’d have much preferred Leeds to go down than Burnley. I still remember seeing Don Revie’s brilliant but violent Leeds side beat us in two cup finals (the 1968 League Cup and 1972 FA Cup). Huddersfield again being Yorkshire’s representative in the Premier League rather than Leeds would have amused me.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #536644  Posted: Mon May 30, 2022 7:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 5:27 pm
Posts: 11163

grantyboy wrote:
Gaz from Oz wrote:
This article was online about Leno
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footb ... -Leno.html

So we are asking 8.5mil and are having trouble getting that.


One of the newly promoted teams could do much worse than signing him up as their #1.

I’d go way further than saying one of the newly promoted clubs. If I was listing the best Arsenal keepers I’ve seen, Leno would be closer to the top than Fabianski who is West Ham’s first choice.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #536645  Posted: Mon May 30, 2022 8:00 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26777

There is two markets for selling players, selling them abroad and selling them to a Prem club. Our best recent sales have all been to Prem clubs. Willock, Iwobi, Even Walcott and Ox were good sales.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #536646  Posted: Mon May 30, 2022 8:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:04 am
Posts: 7392
Location: Townsville Australia

Rich wrote:
There is two markets for selling players, selling them abroad and selling them to a Prem club. Our best recent sales have all been to Prem clubs. Willock, Iwobi, Even Walcott and Ox were good sales.

Yes but convincing a German that he may be better off in the UK may be a tough sell.

_________________
If this policy does not deliver then I would say we have to change it.
AW 150810


 Profile  
 
 
Post #536647  Posted: Mon May 30, 2022 8:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 7:45 am
Posts: 25814

Rich wrote:
There is two markets for selling players, selling them abroad and selling them to a Prem club. Our best recent sales have all been to Prem clubs. Willock, Iwobi, Even Walcott and Ox were good sales.

It also feels like there is another market especially for Arsenal.

Any player that we want to buy seems to inflate in price, and any player that we want to sell has a price reduction.

_________________
I believe in our team, I believe in our quality and I am convinced that I am right. (Arsene Wenger Dec 08)


 Profile  
 
 
Post #536648  Posted: Mon May 30, 2022 9:10 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26777

Apparently Gnabry has turned down a 19m euro a year deal from Bayern - that is over £300k a week. I don't think we can or should go there at all if that is the kind of money he wants


 Profile  
 
 
Post #536649  Posted: Mon May 30, 2022 9:18 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26777

https://breakingthelines.com/data-analy ... el-arteta/

A good read if you're in to stats analysis


 Profile  
 
 
Post #536650  Posted: Mon May 30, 2022 10:46 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

Rich wrote:
Apparently Gnabry has turned down a 19m euro a year deal from Bayern - that is over £300k a week. I don't think we can or should go there at all if that is the kind of money he wants


This whole thing screams to me of a player negotiating his final large contract with existing club. Expect an announcement he’s signed a new contract and wants to end his career in Germany shortly.

On the 300k thing I’m not sure what the answer is. If you want top players they will ask for big wages. What’s the alternative ? You opt out ? Well then you will never compete.

I think because we’ve been burned by ozils contract we are too wary.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #536651  Posted: Mon May 30, 2022 10:50 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

On Leno if a club can’t afford 8.5 million for him then don’t sell him. Selling him for less is lunacy.

Benfica can’t afford 8 million for Leno when we paid them the same amount for Tavares. Literally hang up the phone. Go away and don’t come back


 Profile  
 
 
Post #536652  Posted: Mon May 30, 2022 10:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 7:45 am
Posts: 25814

TOP GUN wrote:
On Leno if a club can’t afford 8.5 million for him then don’t sell him. Selling him for less is lunacy.

Benfica can’t afford 8 million for Leno when we paid them the same amount for Tavares. Literally hang up the phone. Go away and don’t come back

It does seem quite remarkable in today’s football finances that no clubs fancy picking him up at that price. He looks like a real bargain.

_________________
I believe in our team, I believe in our quality and I am convinced that I am right. (Arsene Wenger Dec 08)


 Profile  
 
 
Post #536653  Posted: Mon May 30, 2022 11:01 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

long time gooner wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:
On Leno if a club can’t afford 8.5 million for him then don’t sell him. Selling him for less is lunacy.

Benfica can’t afford 8 million for Leno when we paid them the same amount for Tavares. Literally hang up the phone. Go away and don’t come back

It does seem quite remarkable in today’s football finances that no clubs fancy picking him up at that price. He looks like a real bargain.

He’s a steal at 15 million never mind half that. Easily got another 5 years for a keeper

We signed Peter Čech for 10 million and he was 3 years older.

I’m surprised a club like Southampton haven’t bitten. They have a load of bad keepers. Would be a no brainier of a transfer


 Profile  
 
 
Post #536654  Posted: Mon May 30, 2022 11:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 7:45 am
Posts: 25814

TOP GUN wrote:
long time gooner wrote:
It does seem quite remarkable in today’s football finances that no clubs fancy picking him up at that price. He looks like a real bargain.

He’s a steal at 15 million never mind half that. Easily got another 5 years for a keeper

We signed Peter Čech for 10 million and he was 3 years older.

I’m surprised a club like Southampton haven’t bitten. They have a load of bad keepers. Would be a no brainier of a transfer

Painful memory of the Southampton keeper Fraser Forster playing out of his skin against us last month.

_________________
I believe in our team, I believe in our quality and I am convinced that I am right. (Arsene Wenger Dec 08)


 Profile  
 
 
Post #536655  Posted: Mon May 30, 2022 11:23 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26777

TOP GUN wrote:
Rich wrote:
Apparently Gnabry has turned down a 19m euro a year deal from Bayern - that is over £300k a week. I don't think we can or should go there at all if that is the kind of money he wants


This whole thing screams to me of a player negotiating his final large contract with existing club. Expect an announcement he’s signed a new contract and wants to end his career in Germany shortly.

On the 300k thing I’m not sure what the answer is. If you want top players they will ask for big wages. What’s the alternative ? You opt out ? Well then you will never compete.

I think because we’ve been burned by ozils contract we are too wary.

I agree top players get top contracts but no one at Liverpool is on £300k a week, and that's even after all the success they've had. We're really not a club who can afford £300k a week before success. We need to grow players in to £300k a week players not buy them at that wage.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #536656  Posted: Mon May 30, 2022 11:45 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

Rich wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:

This whole thing screams to me of a player negotiating his final large contract with existing club. Expect an announcement he’s signed a new contract and wants to end his career in Germany shortly.

On the 300k thing I’m not sure what the answer is. If you want top players they will ask for big wages. What’s the alternative ? You opt out ? Well then you will never compete.

I think because we’ve been burned by ozils contract we are too wary.

I agree top players get top contracts but no one at Liverpool is on £300k a week, and that's even after all the success they've had. We're really not a club who can afford £300k a week before success. We need to grow players in to £300k a week players not buy them at that wage.


Yeah Watch this space on that. Apparently Mané is leaving because of his wages and no way will they let salah go in the same window and he’s on 200.

If we are selling players left right and centre we can afford to have a couple of players on big money in the right part of the pitch.

I also doubt we are going to sign a gamechanging striker this summer and probably won’t end up paying him over 200k. It’s going to be a big contract.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #536657  Posted: Mon May 30, 2022 11:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:06 am
Posts: 16486

Rich wrote:
long time gooner wrote:
After many decades of watching football I find the laws slipping away from me. I used to understand the offside law but no longer.

The Benzema disallowance baffled me last night. It seemed that a Liverpool player had played it through to him thus making it onside.

But no…according to the official Laws of the Game:
"A player in an offside position receiving the ball from an opponent who deliberately plays the ball, including by deliberate handball, is not considered to have gained an advantage, unless it was a deliberate save by any opponent."

So as it turns out the key word is deliberate. So the referee/VAR has to be a mind reader then.

It’s right up there with the handball nonsense.

What player ever ‘deliberately’ plays the ball to an opponent?

I guess it means that if the ball deflects off a defender it doesn't count, as with an accidental backpass to the keeper.

One can see the reasoning with a backpass. It would be silly to say a keeper cannot attempt to save a deflected shot, so it is worth having a rule that requires a judgement about the intent of the player.

But in the offside case it does just seem to be introducing unnecessary complexity. What is the point of the rule?

_________________
Hamba kakuhle, Madiba


 Profile  
 
 
Post #536658  Posted: Mon May 30, 2022 2:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26777

Ben White withdraws from the England squad due to injury. That's good news as long as it isn't a long term injury, White played a lot of football and was carrying an injury at the end of the season - the last thing we need is him being used in 4 England friendlies.

Now if Saka could do the same that would be great


 Profile  
 
 
Post #536659  Posted: Mon May 30, 2022 2:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26777

A number of reports in Italy suggest we've made a 25m euro bid (£21m) for Aaron Hickey from Bologna. Quotes saying a 'farewell' is likely.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #536660  Posted: Mon May 30, 2022 2:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26777

Decaf wrote:
Rich wrote:
What player ever ‘deliberately’ plays the ball to an opponent?

I guess it means that if the ball deflects off a defender it doesn't count, as with an accidental backpass to the keeper.

One can see the reasoning with a backpass. It would be silly to say a keeper cannot attempt to save a deflected shot, so it is worth having a rule that requires a judgement about the intent of the player.

But in the offside case it does just seem to be introducing unnecessary complexity. What is the point of the rule?

https://www.espn.co.uk/football/uefa-ch ... ague-final

A good explanation of the rules here. It is one of the few occasions an offside decision requires a subjective opinion.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #536661  Posted: Mon May 30, 2022 3:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

Rich wrote:
Ben White withdraws from the England squad due to injury. That's good news as long as it isn't a long term injury


Probably an excuse and they actually dropped him because of his poor passing.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #536662  Posted: Mon May 30, 2022 5:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 7:43 pm
Posts: 70

TOP GUN wrote:
Actually the policing from the French for our cup winners cup final there was a bit mental too if I recall. They tried to lock our fans in after the game if I remember and it led to a group of fans bashing the gate open.

I remember walking past a huge platoon of armed French policeman on the way out. Seemed unreal

Every time I’ve been to Paris involves arsenal losing a football match

I remember everyone naturally wanting to leave asap after the final whistle and finding exit doors locked. Just to add to the chaos police lobbed in some tear gas. I still can’t work out why. Cloud of the stuff was drifting around and I got my first and last ( I hope) whiff of it - truly horrible stuff.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #536663  Posted: Mon May 30, 2022 5:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:06 am
Posts: 16486

Rich wrote:
Decaf wrote:
I guess it means that if the ball deflects off a defender it doesn't count, as with an accidental backpass to the keeper.

One can see the reasoning with a backpass. It would be silly to say a keeper cannot attempt to save a deflected shot, so it is worth having a rule that requires a judgement about the intent of the player.

But in the offside case it does just seem to be introducing unnecessary complexity. What is the point of the rule?

https://www.espn.co.uk/football/uefa-ch ... ague-final

A good explanation of the rules here. It is one of the few occasions an offside decision requires a subjective opinion.

I just don't see the point of it, and the need for such fine distinctions (the distinction between a 'deliberate block' and an involuntary deflection), and consequently 5 minute delays while var grapples with issues that make general relatively theory seem simple.

Why not just say that you can't be offside if an the opposition player is the last to have touched the ball?

_________________
Hamba kakuhle, Madiba


 Profile  
 
 
Post #536664  Posted: Mon May 30, 2022 6:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:52 pm
Posts: 18760

Decaf wrote:
...Why not just say that you can't be offside if an the opposition player is the last to have touched the ball?
Indeed - and wasn't that how it used to be?

_________________
"Young and caught up in life, we seldom watched the skies.”


 Profile  
 
 
Post #536665  Posted: Mon May 30, 2022 7:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26777

A table of GKs ranked by 1v1's and the expected goals they've saved in those duels. Alison a long way in front - but also look at the amount of 1v1's Liverpool expose Alison to vs how many we expose Ramsdale to for example.

Naturally teams who defend very deep will expose their GK to fewer 1v1's but our numbers are in line with Chelsea, Spurs and City. Perhaps Liverpool's high line isn't actually that good in terms of defending, they are just being bailed out by a phenomenal GK


Attachments:

 Profile  
 
 
Post #536666  Posted: Tue May 31, 2022 12:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 5:27 pm
Posts: 11163

This story shows no sign of going away and probably won’t until Saka renews his contract. If he doesn’t, it’ll start getting mega annoying.

Another reason for detesting Liverpool.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.sports ... senal-star


 Profile  
 
 
Post #536667  Posted: Tue May 31, 2022 12:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 5:27 pm
Posts: 11163

The shortlist of six candidates given on Arsenal.com for the player of the year are: Ramsdale, White, Xhaka, Smith Rowe, Ødegaard, Saka.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #536668  Posted: Tue May 31, 2022 12:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 2:55 pm
Posts: 11489
Location: Singapore

Bernard wrote:
The shortlist of six candidates given on Arsenal.com for the player of the year are: Ramsdale, White, Xhaka, Smith Rowe, Ødegaard, Saka.


Why are White and Xhaka on the list? I think Gabriel did better than White.

_________________
Onwards and Upwards!


 Profile  
 
 
Post #536669  Posted: Tue May 31, 2022 6:36 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

Bernard wrote:
This story shows no sign of going away and probably won’t until Saka renews his contract. If he doesn’t, it’ll start getting mega annoying.

Another reason for detesting Liverpool.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.sports ... senal-star


There was more respectable press saying he was in talks to sign a new contract a few weeks back. This time with a release clause of over 100 million. The release clause thing was discussed here about saka before. A blessing and curse as you keep the player but know at some point a club is going to try it with the release clause. It would be the first time Arsenal would have agreed one if it happens


 Profile  
 
 
Post #536670  Posted: Tue May 31, 2022 6:42 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

Yellowquadrant wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:
Actually the policing from the French for our cup winners cup final there was a bit mental too if I recall. They tried to lock our fans in after the game if I remember and it led to a group of fans bashing the gate open.

I remember walking past a huge platoon of armed French policeman on the way out. Seemed unreal

Every time I’ve been to Paris involves arsenal losing a football match

I remember everyone naturally wanting to leave asap after the final whistle and finding exit doors locked. Just to add to the chaos police lobbed in some tear gas. I still can’t work out why. Cloud of the stuff was drifting around and I got my first and last ( I hope) whiff of it - truly horrible stuff.

Yes this is it. Was crazy , just nuts.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #536671  Posted: Tue May 31, 2022 7:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 5:27 pm
Posts: 11163

TOP GUN wrote:
Bernard wrote:
This story shows no sign of going away and probably won’t until Saka renews his contract. If he doesn’t, it’ll start getting mega annoying.

Another reason for detesting Liverpool.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.sports ... senal-star


There was more respectable press saying he was in talks to sign a new contract a few weeks back. This time with a release clause of over 100 million. The release clause thing was discussed here about saka before. A blessing and curse as you keep the player but know at some point a club is going to try it with the release clause. It would be the first time Arsenal would have agreed one if it happens

In talks to sign a new contract, with or without a release clause, is not the same as Saka signing one yet. There is nothing to suggest he has and until he has, the threat from Liverpool taking him will be there.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #536672  Posted: Tue May 31, 2022 7:14 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

Bernard wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:

There was more respectable press saying he was in talks to sign a new contract a few weeks back. This time with a release clause of over 100 million. The release clause thing was discussed here about saka before. A blessing and curse as you keep the player but know at some point a club is going to try it with the release clause. It would be the first time Arsenal would have agreed one if it happens

In talks to sign a new contract, with or without a release clause, is not the same as Saka signing one yet. There is nothing to suggest he has and until he has, the threat from Liverpool taking him will be there.

Que sera sera

For what it’s worth I don’t think he’s leaving. This summer anyway


 Profile  
 
 
Post #536673  Posted: Tue May 31, 2022 7:22 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

Bernard wrote:
The shortlist of six candidates given on Arsenal.com for the player of the year are: Ramsdale, White, Xhaka, Smith Rowe, Ødegaard, Saka.

Mine would be in order

Saka
Ramsdale
Gabriel
White
Ødegaard

Not sure how you can put Smithers on the list but not Gabriel


 Profile  
 
 
Post #536674  Posted: Tue May 31, 2022 8:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 5:27 pm
Posts: 11163

TOP GUN wrote:
Bernard wrote:
In talks to sign a new contract, with or without a release clause, is not the same as Saka signing one yet. There is nothing to suggest he has and until he has, the threat from Liverpool taking him will be there.

Que sera sera

For what it’s worth I don’t think he’s leaving. This summer anyway

His contract expires in 2023, only a year away. If he doesn’t sign a new contract this summer, now is surely the logical time to sell? Otherwise the club is risking losing its most valuable player for zero in a year at the end of his contract.

I realise Nketiah is apparently signing a new deal when his contract was on the point of expiring (or has he already?). But the financial risk of losing him for nothing was minuscule compared to Saka, simply because of the difference in their transfer values.

If Saka does sign a new longish term deal at Arsenal, I think he’ll stay for longer than next season. But if he doesn’t, as I say now is the logical time to sell. Until he does and it’s confirmed on Arsenal.com, I’m going to feel nervous.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #536675  Posted: Tue May 31, 2022 8:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 8:30 pm
Posts: 8154

Saka's contract expires in 2024, Bernard. We have some time yet to sort it.

_________________
"I just kept going pretty lively. Them killers wasn't too healthy company."


 Profile  
 
 
Post #536676  Posted: Tue May 31, 2022 9:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 5:27 pm
Posts: 11163

dec wrote:
Saka's contract expires in 2024, Bernard. We have some time yet to sort it.

Does it? Phew. I thought it was next year. In that case you’re right, we do have some time to sort it out. Top Gun is also right and he will be here next season, at least.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #536677  Posted: Tue May 31, 2022 9:12 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

Bernard wrote:
dec wrote:
Saka's contract expires in 2024, Bernard. We have some time yet to sort it.

Does it? Phew. I thought it was next year. In that case you’re right, we do have some time to sort it out. Top Gun is also right and he will be here next season, at least.


We only need to start worrying if it looks like we won’t qualify for the champions league next season or we will end up without a trophy. Honestly at that point he will probably call it a day and all bets are off.

They need to offer him a massive contract this summer really he can’t turn down.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #536678  Posted: Tue May 31, 2022 9:21 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

I can’t really imagine what would happen if we sold Saka. The goodwill built up at the emirates this season would turn to anger and belief in the project would diminish. Probably mean the end of the manager and really the fans would turn on the kroenkes again.

Pick a number you know he won’t turn down folks because the alternative is changing everything


 Profile  
 
 
Post #536679  Posted: Tue May 31, 2022 9:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 5:27 pm
Posts: 11163

TOP GUN wrote:
I can’t really imagine what would happen if we sold Saka. The goodwill built up at the emirates this season would turn to anger and belief in the project would diminish. Probably mean the end of the manager and really the fans would turn on the kroenkes again.

Pick a number you know he won’t turn down folks because the alternative is changing everything

Think that sums it up pretty well. Wonder what figure he won’t turn down? £300k a week? £350k the same as Özil? Are we talking barmy figures upwards of that?


 Profile  
 
 
Post #536680  Posted: Tue May 31, 2022 10:05 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18425

Bernard wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:
I can’t really imagine what would happen if we sold Saka. The goodwill built up at the emirates this season would turn to anger and belief in the project would diminish. Probably mean the end of the manager and really the fans would turn on the kroenkes again.

Pick a number you know he won’t turn down folks because the alternative is changing everything

Think that sums it up pretty well. Wonder what figure he won’t turn down? £300k a week? £350k the same as Özil? Are we talking barmy figures upwards of that?

Jack Grealish makes 230k a week and John stones 250k. Sterling is 300k. Surely in this ball park as he’s a comparative player.


 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
     [ 560837 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1 ... 13414, 13415, 13416, 13417, 13418, 13419, 13420 ... 14021  Next

All times are UTC

Gooners Online - Click to see what Everyones Doing

Colour Key:  Visited Profile    Members Profile      Admin

Get Latest Post

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 274 guests


Search for:

Go to Top

Powered by php BB © 1993 - 2018