I thought we played really well today, dominated a decent Fulham side from start to finish at Craven Cottage which not many teams do.

However, if you look at our xG stats from open play its abysmal. Apparently, only one xG from open play in the last 8 PL matches and only 3 in 15 games since the beginning of the season. That ranks us 13th in the PL for open play xG.

A title challenge is just not sustainable based on those kind of stats.

I think Rich said it earlier but the way we are playing, we desperately need a top striker and a more productive left sided player because Martinelli has looked increasingly like a great option from the bench.

Could easily see Chelsea winning their next 7 in the league. They’ve got a pretty much fully fit squad, their first 11 only plays once a week and their second 11 should win the conference league in their sleep. Their defence isn’t strong but they score a lot of goals to compensate. I don’t see Chelsea losing many games 1-0 - but that’s the only way I see us losing.

If we take out the 2 league cup games we’ve had 20 games so far this season so 19 opportunities to name the same back 4 as the previous game, we’ve only been able to do it 5 times!

https://x.com/carra23/status/1865848786 ... -j6VVZXEoA

Carragher shamelessly stealing an Arteta analogy and passing it off as his own punditry

At what point should we give Sterling a start wide left, I think it’s his best position but he’s generally been used wide right as Saka cover

We’re on the wrong end of fine margins currently - BUT, it feels like we play a lot of games to allow games to be decided by fine margins.

Why couldn't we play Tierney left back and keep Partey in midfield?

https://x.com/kimmofc/status/1865810166 ... -j6VVZXEoA

Looks like a deliberate elbow to the head here. Follows Caicedo’s tackle he was lucky not to be red carded for. Refs are not clamping down on this and 2 footed tackles but we’re getting 3 red cards for technical infringements no one else picks up

When was the last time Tierney played a competitive game? He’s not the profile Arteta wants at all, MLS if fit could have played at LB

The defensive injuries are such an exceptional set of circumstances right now, 5 senior defenders out injured. Every team would suffer, I posted earlier what the Liverpool and City defence would look like with the same injuries

Hi Soc,

I don't think we played really well. We had lots of controlled possession but we barely caused them any problem at all in the first half. Out of possession we are very very good, but our attacking play is almost designed to prioritise safeguarding against the impact of losing possession rather than playing free flowing football with risk but high reward.

Sometimes I wonder about that too

Just when I started to heap praise on Kiwior, he resorts to his brainless, fearful self again. What was he doing before the build-up to the Fulham goal? Caught in 2 minds because he is not as switched on as Gabriel would have been. Gabriel would have either cut Jimenez off, failing which, would have run hard at him to prevent Jimenez a clear runway. Instead, he remained static for nearly a second, and that was enough for Jimenez to speed away.

Kiwior lost his opportunity to show Arteta that he can be counted on.

It just doesn't make sense to me. If Arteta knows he is not the profile at all, why keep him and if he is not match-ready, why keep having him on the bench week after week?

Moving Partey to right back should be absolutely a last resort, given that

a) we absolutely need Partey at the base of midfleld.
b) we aboslutely need Timber at right back.

Saka and Ødegaard seem far more effective when we do that. It seems mad to mess with that.

To be fair, I think the wind held it up and he wasn't expecting it. It still look very dozy. I think he was trying to control it rather than hit says it all really.

He wasn't the only one of our forwards who looked a bit blunt and sheepish when presented with opportunities. The over-elaboration disease seems to have struck again. There was one Saka one where he was in an excellent position to hit one with his left foot, and strangely chose to take it wide and try a right footed shot. Even with our goal, I have a suspicion that Havertz was trying to head it across goal rather than score himself.

People saying it is a decent away result. It wasn't. It was two points needlessly thrown away. They were there for the taking, but we gifted them a goal and then failed to take advantage of some very decent opportunities, both from set pieces and open play.

I think Tierney was there as experienced LB and CB cover in an emergency. Our only other defenders n the bench were MLS and Heaven we literally have no one else which is the only reason he’s on the bench

I think he’s been criminally under used. He’s a far better player than the minutes he’s getting.

Hi Rich,

Was playing Partey at RB not an emergency then?

Given Partey's form I would have though keeping him in the middle would be a priority.

At least Tierney is a proper LB, albeit old school.

Timber could have remained ar RB continuing his evolving relationship with Saka and Ødegaard.

Talking of which, our team is so unbalanced. The right side bias in attack might be one of the reasons we score so few goals from open play.

Two of those 5 defenders are hopelessly injury prone. The defence wasn't the problem yesterday in any case. The attacking was slow and predictable and this in a game where both Saka and Rice played very well. Havertz is back to being ineffective (notwithstanding his physical effort) and we are terribly short of players who just stick it in the net. The summer transfer business isn't looking too hot right now.

Hi Dec,

There is a lot to admire about Havertz's game, his touch, movement, hold-up play and physical effort but ultimately his ball striking is poor and his finishing is decent but not clinical.

I know we have this transfer approach of only signing the right players at the right price but sometimes title chasers only have a small window of opportunity to bag that trophy. We've been in the mix for three years now but still so not have a recognised CF, a back-up for Saka or a topclass LW threat (Martinelli is simply no longer hitting the heights required and Trossard is not a winger).

If slot and the new Chelsea manager finish above us this season people will start questioning the manager for the first time in a while.

When he has played he hasn't exactly set the world alight.

You could have something there TG.
Really like what that guy is doing at Bournemouth. Wondering if he could make the step up in the future with a big club like us.

Really disappointing result exacerbated by celebrating like a madman thinking we had got the win only for *%^@*** var to get involved.
You can't even celebrate without having the fear that var are going to get involved.
Absolutely detest it.
I'm staggered that wolves were not backed more heavily when they suggested it be scrapped.
If the scorer is not offside then why do they have to keep going back into previous phases to find an offside. Just looking for a reason to cancel the goal.
We should have done more. We started really well like we meant business then give away such an annoying cheap goal.
At least Liverpool have been pulled back to 4.
Unfortunately not by us.
Everyone including me laughed at Chelsea for having so many players but it's working out for then as they are resting all their important players for Europe and the domestic cups.
They are a real threat again Unfortunately.

We have to win all our games before we play Brentford and Brighton away back to back. Not sure we will as Palace away is tricky as city found out