Fixtures Tuesday April 1st - Fulham - Emirates Stadium - 7:45 Pm

Kick-Off

       Injuries                 Steve Gleiber



Get the Latest Post Go to the Bottom of Page It is currently Wed Mar 19, 2025 11:43 am

All times are UTC


  


Reply to topic

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], dec, warrior and 29 guests

 
Post #398721  Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2025 9:27 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2021 7:27 am
Posts: 228

Rich wrote:
One of the biggest concerns I have right now going forward is Ødegaard’s drop off.
Of course we’re all concerned with a lack of top quality striker and we all know the need for that and a top quality winger. I can’t think that efforts won’t be made to address that in the summer.
But there is no way we look to replace Ødegaard and we relied on him a lot for so much in our play. He has to drop deep to help build when we’re pressed high, he has to create, he has to combine with our wingers, he has to help win the midfield battle, he has to score goals to make up for the lack of prolific striker and he has to lead the high press. We rely on him a lot to be on top form - it’s only Saka who really shares a similar burden and responsibility in all those areas.
Is Ødegaard’s form a blip this season linked to a bad injury or is this more his level?
For me as much as we talk about attackers I think we desperately need some more creativity and ball carrying from the middle of the pitch.


It's another inevitability of flogging players - more injuries and more fatigue - both mental and physical fatigue.

Honestly I don't understand why we play decent strong sides in the League cup, Wenger had it spot on when he played the 2nd string, it is not worth the risk.

Injuries become more and more inevitable if you flog your core first team with 2/3 games a week over and over and over, it's hugely influenced by the manager's approach and sacrificing the league cup is a price worth paying for me, in terms of preserving some energy and reducing injuries.

I have to agree in terms of some of the signings not making sense, particularly Merino, we could so do with another forward, another midfielder was not a priority, plus he doesn't seem to add much.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #398722  Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2025 9:31 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 19439

The other major problem is that Martinelli is just not doing it,

Every once in a while he turns up with something and you think “Hmmn better” and I know he was playing off the right but when a 17 year old comes on and improves the side you have to question where it’s gone wrong for him. In the invincible season pires scored 23 goals. Gabby just doesn’t have that season in him. He absolutely should be a part of our future but frankly someone else needs to come in to assist. It hurts saying it.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #398723  Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2025 9:57 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 19439

socrates wrote:
Rich wrote:
The thing is yes we need stickers and wingers but the whole squad is thin.
This summer you’re looking at Neto and Sterling returning from loans, Partey and Jorginho contracts expiring, Tierney definitely off, Kiwior not good enough and should go, Zinchenko half out the door already, Trossard possibly being sold as he’s not keen on the deal we’ve offered, question marks on Tomiyasu due to fitness concerns, Jesus with an ACL otherwise he’d be sold and most fans not sold on Merino as a player.
That leaves us with a first team squad of:
Raya
Timber, white, Saliba, Gabriel, Calafiori, MLS
Rice, Ødegaard, Nwaneri
Saka, Havertz, Martinelli
13 players! Blowing any budget we have on 2-3 attackers won’t cut it. The squad needs a pretty big shake up and we can’t be thinking it’s all £50m+ players who come in….and almost certainly can’t think all those ‘problem’ players listed above will leave


Hi Rich,

I remember either Arteta or Edu saying how vital each transfer window is and the most needs to be made of each and every one.

Well, that didn't age well did it. Our last few windows have been poor and the latest non existant.

I have listened to some podcasts with a few people supposedly close to the club or close to agents who have experience of the club.

Some are saying that Arteta is a very difficult personality who gets fixated on his top targets and has no flexibility. He wanted Merino when others didn't but got his way.

Others suggest that Edu was partly to blame in that his alternative targets were just not good enough.

The suggestion seems to be that Raul Sanelhi screwed the club big time by signing players for way too much, paid agents too much and generally being terrible so Tim Lewis was brought in to act as a defacto decision maker to sign off on transfer and legal business.

Arteta wasn’t that keen on Ødegaard but Edu pushed him and got him. Arteta wanted merino but edu wasnt keen but relented. Arteta wanted Watkins but Lewis didn’t see it as value for money. I think Edu seems a big loss personally and they need a big replacement and as soon as possible. Preferably not somebody from the Mediterranean


 Profile  
 
 
Post #398724  Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2025 10:42 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:42 pm
Posts: 6186

Rich wrote:
Do you think if Liverpool had our injuries and we had theirs that the positions in the league would be reversed?


No. They have a deeper squad.
Quote:
If you want Arteta gone then you should also have to name a replacement who in your view can do better than Arteta.


Not really a fair question. None of us here know the ins and outs of managers available. That is what the club's scouting system is for. Would you have asked the question when Bruce Rioch was in charge? No one knew who Arsene was. There might well be an Arsene out there we don;t know about.

_________________
"If you do not believe you can do it then you have no chance at all"


 Profile  
 
 
Post #398725  Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2025 10:44 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:42 pm
Posts: 6186

Rich wrote:
With the thin squad we have it’s better for us to get knocked out early in both cups. If you’re not building a squad to challenge on 4 fronts then going for the domestic cups is only going to damage the rest of the season.


Agree 100%. Play the 2nd string.

_________________
"If you do not believe you can do it then you have no chance at all"


 Profile  
 
 
Post #398726  Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2025 10:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 4:02 am
Posts: 2903
Location: Liverpool

Gunfire wrote:
Rich wrote:
Do you think if Liverpool had our injuries and we had theirs that the positions in the league would be reversed?


No. They have a deeper squad.
Quote:
If you want Arteta gone then you should also have to name a replacement who in your view can do better than Arteta.


Not really a fair question. None of us here know the ins and outs of managers available. That is what the club's scouting system is for. Would you have asked the question when Bruce Rioch was in charge? No one knew who Arsene was. There might well be an Arsene out there we don;t know about.


There comes a time when everyone gets to a point where it's hard to see what more you can do or add to a situation.

Has Arteta reached that point? In my opinion, no, not quite yet.

However, if this season culminates in a less than runner up position in the league, and an early CL exit, then the summer is going to be a very high pressure zone for him. If he doesn't try something different, then he's repeating late Wenger; stubbornness, blinkers on and a level of arrogance that isn't justified by performance.

This summer needs a big statement signing, so it's not solely on Arteta. But tactics are; and we're playing tippy tappy and too slow (again a la late Wenger), as many have pointed out.

He still has my wholehearted support for now; he's done a fantastic job at correcting the late Wenger years (look at what's happened post Ferguson at United as a comparison), but no one person is bigger than the club.

_________________
Gorau chwarae cyd chwarae


 Profile  
 
 
Post #398727  Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2025 11:54 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2021 7:27 am
Posts: 228

Martinelli is probably burnt out.

He's played almost full complement of league games for 2 previous seasons. He's now getting muscle injuries, likely overuse related.

He's barely had a break - playing all our games and regularly travelling abroad for Brazil.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #398728  Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2025 3:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:06 am
Posts: 17473

1979gooner wrote:
Martinelli is probably burnt out.

He's played almost full complement of league games for 2 previous seasons. He's now getting muscle injuries, likely overuse related.

He's barely had a break - playing all our games and regularly travelling abroad for Brazil.

He also suffers from the lack of pace around him and the slowness of our attacks.

It was striking, though, to see how little phased Nwaneri was by being double-marked, whereas Martinelli had been pretty much nullified.

_________________
Hamba kakuhle, Madiba


 Profile  
 
 
Post #398729  Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2025 4:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 7:31 pm
Posts: 4331
Location: Turnford, Broxbourne, Herts

Decaf wrote:
1979gooner wrote:
Martinelli is probably burnt out.

He's played almost full complement of league games for 2 previous seasons. He's now getting muscle injuries, likely overuse related.

He's barely had a break - playing all our games and regularly travelling abroad for Brazil.

He also suffers from the lack of pace around him and the slowness of our attacks.

It was striking, though, to see how little phased Nwaneri was by being double-marked, whereas Martinelli had been pretty much nullified.

Sadly I agree with both of you. :53big-emoticons:


 Profile  
 
 
Post #398730  Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2025 4:46 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 8:30 pm
Posts: 8439

Decaf wrote:
1979gooner wrote:
Martinelli is probably burnt out.

He's played almost full complement of league games for 2 previous seasons. He's now getting muscle injuries, likely overuse related.

He's barely had a break - playing all our games and regularly travelling abroad for Brazil.

He also suffers from the lack of pace around him and the slowness of our attacks.

It was striking, though, to see how little phased Nwaneri was by being double-marked, whereas Martinelli had been pretty much nullified.

Our tactics are not ideal for Martinelli. He is very dangerous in broken play because his pace and directness are most effective. He would be really good in a Liverpool style attacking set-up.

As for Nwaneri, he has wonderful natural balance. He can beat a player with an instinctive drop of the shoulder.

_________________
"I just kept going pretty lively. Them killers wasn't too healthy company."


 Profile  
 
 
Post #398731  Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2025 5:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 29805

Gunfire wrote:
Rich wrote:
Do you think if Liverpool had our injuries and we had theirs that the positions in the league would be reversed?


No. They have a deeper squad.
Quote:
.

But Liverpools squad is exactly the same as last year when they did suffer a few more injuries and lost Salah to AFCON and we beat them in the league.

https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/fc-live ... /verein/31
https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/fc-arse ... /verein/11

Just look at the difference in graphical form. It’s stark.


If Liverpool missed Salah for 3 months we’d be above them for that alone.
If they had our injuries this year they’d be missing Trent for 4 months and Conor Bradley all season. Forcing them to play Joe Gomez there every game. They’d have also faced multiple injuries to Robertson and Tsimikas forcing them to play their 4th choice left back - because their 3rd choice left back Gomez is covering at right back, Konate and Van dijk stay fit but with a constant back line of Gomez, Konate, Van Dijk, academy left back or one of their midfielders and only Quansah for cover the defence plays every single game with no rotation. Gomez needs managing because of his previous long injury and so Slobaslai fills in at right back
Gravenberch would have dislocated his shoulder and missed 8 weeks leaving Liverpool to be very bare in defensive mid and have to play Endo or drop Mac Allister back there, then Macallister would have got a 2 month ankle injury playing for Argentina, then Salah would miss 3 months, Salah’s back up- Diaz would then do his cruciate and be out for 9 months and then a 3rd attacker would also get injured….so they’d be left playing Gakpo, Nunez, Elliot as a front 3.
Liverpool might have some good quality and depth in some areas but in others they don’t. Full back would be a huge problem for them and simply not having Salah who contributes 1/3rd of all their goals and 1/4 of all their assists would be a problem.
Last year they had nowhere near the injuries we had and got to 82 points, we had relatively few injuries and got 89. Liverpools squad is no deeper this year than last year - I think it would be pretty reasonable to say that Liverpool would be at least 6 points worse off with our injuries and we’d be at least 6 points better off


 Profile  
 
 
Post #398732  Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2025 5:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:06 am
Posts: 17473

dec wrote:
Decaf wrote:
He also suffers from the lack of pace around him and the slowness of our attacks.

It was striking, though, to see how little phased Nwaneri was by being double-marked, whereas Martinelli had been pretty much nullified.

Our tactics are not ideal for Martinelli. He is very dangerous in broken play because his pace and directness are most effective. He would be really good in a Liverpool style attacking set-up.

As for Nwaneri, he has wonderful natural balance. He can beat a player with an instinctive drop of the shoulder.

Evening Dec. Indeed, Nwaneri appears to have that lethal combination of balance, strength, close control, ball-striking, and footballing intelligence that characterise really elite wide players.

With Martinelli, I was thinking of how effective he would be in the Newcastle attack, basically doing what Gordon does combining with Isak. Which of course leads to thinking about how Isak might fit into our team. But you are right about Liverpool too.

_________________
Hamba kakuhle, Madiba


 Profile  
 
 
Post #398733  Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2025 6:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 29805

Seeing City drop £200m in January to try to fix their mistakes does stick in the throat. City’s spending (cheating) advantage isn’t necessarily the players they can buy, all he big 6 have regularly signed players over £50m, many of the clubs down to the bottom 5 have signed £40m strikers etc. the benefit City has is being able to sweep their mistakes under the carpet and not suffer the consequences of them.
So loads of clubs can afford big money signings but they can’t just ditch them and buy another one at the same price is the first or second one didn’t work.

I completely despise City, Chelsea and now Newcastle, I refuse to give them any credit for anything they achieve because it’s all built off cheating, every part of their success. Chelsea ran their club in to the ground and were passing buckets round the ground to save them. They got 4th the season before Roman but they were going to have to ‘do a Leeds’ if they weren’t bought. Newcastle and City have both bounced around lower divisions recently and whilst they may have decent levels of support they’d be no better than mid table clubs without their money


 Profile  
 
 
Post #398734  Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2025 6:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2021 7:27 am
Posts: 228

Rich wrote:
Gunfire wrote:

No. They have a deeper squad.

But Liverpools squad is exactly the same as last year when they did suffer a few more injuries and lost Salah to AFCON and we beat them in the league.

https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/fc-live ... /verein/31
https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/fc-arse ... /verein/11

Just look at the difference in graphical form. It’s stark.


If Liverpool missed Salah for 3 months we’d be above them for that alone.
If they had our injuries this year they’d be missing Trent for 4 months and Conor Bradley all season. Forcing them to play Joe Gomez there every game. They’d have also faced multiple injuries to Robertson and Tsimikas forcing them to play their 4th choice left back - because their 3rd choice left back Gomez is covering at right back, Konate and Van dijk stay fit but with a constant back line of Gomez, Konate, Van Dijk, academy left back or one of their midfielders and only Quansah for cover the defence plays every single game with no rotation. Gomez needs managing because of his previous long injury and so Slobaslai fills in at right back
Gravenberch would have dislocated his shoulder and missed 8 weeks leaving Liverpool to be very bare in defensive mid and have to play Endo or drop Mac Allister back there, then Macallister would have got a 2 month ankle injury playing for Argentina, then Salah would miss 3 months, Salah’s back up- Diaz would then do his cruciate and be out for 9 months and then a 3rd attacker would also get injured….so they’d be left playing Gakpo, Nunez, Elliot as a front 3.
Liverpool might have some good quality and depth in some areas but in others they don’t. Full back would be a huge problem for them and simply not having Salah who contributes 1/3rd of all their goals and 1/4 of all their assists would be a problem.
Last year they had nowhere near the injuries we had and got to 82 points, we had relatively few injuries and got 89. Liverpools squad is no deeper this year than last year - I think it would be pretty reasonable to say that Liverpool would be at least 6 points worse off with our injuries and we’d be at least 6 points better off


This is statistics, you can get lucky, as Liverpool have done this season with injuries. On average though, I think with a better depth of squad we probably could have avoided some of our injuries, as they're mostly muscular and related to overuse.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #398735  Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2025 6:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 29805

Decaf wrote:
dec wrote:
Our tactics are not ideal for Martinelli. He is very dangerous in broken play because his pace and directness are most effective. He would be really good in a Liverpool style attacking set-up.

As for Nwaneri, he has wonderful natural balance. He can beat a player with an instinctive drop of the shoulder.

Evening Dec. Indeed, Nwaneri appears to have that lethal combination of balance, strength, close control, ball-striking, and footballing intelligence that characterise really elite wide players.

With Martinelli, I was thinking of how effective he would be in the Newcastle attack, basically doing what Gordon does combining with Isak. Which of course leads to thinking about how Isak might fit into our team. But you are right about Liverpool too.

I still think even with our desire to press high and dominate the ball there are plenty of opportunities we can use Martinelli quicker. Liverpool hardly sit back and wait for the counter but so often manage to find their front 3 with only 4 defenders up against them.
I think if you bought in a top class player like Isak then he’s presence and ability almost dictates the tactics.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #398736  Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2025 6:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 29805

1979gooner wrote:
Rich wrote:
But Liverpools squad is exactly the same as last year when they did suffer a few more injuries and lost Salah to AFCON and we beat them in the league.

https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/fc-live ... /verein/31
https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/fc-arse ... /verein/11

Just look at the difference in graphical form. It’s stark.


If Liverpool missed Salah for 3 months we’d be above them for that alone.
If they had our injuries this year they’d be missing Trent for 4 months and Conor Bradley all season. Forcing them to play Joe Gomez there every game. They’d have also faced multiple injuries to Robertson and Tsimikas forcing them to play their 4th choice left back - because their 3rd choice left back Gomez is covering at right back, Konate and Van dijk stay fit but with a constant back line of Gomez, Konate, Van Dijk, academy left back or one of their midfielders and only Quansah for cover the defence plays every single game with no rotation. Gomez needs managing because of his previous long injury and so Slobaslai fills in at right back
Gravenberch would have dislocated his shoulder and missed 8 weeks leaving Liverpool to be very bare in defensive mid and have to play Endo or drop Mac Allister back there, then Macallister would have got a 2 month ankle injury playing for Argentina, then Salah would miss 3 months, Salah’s back up- Diaz would then do his cruciate and be out for 9 months and then a 3rd attacker would also get injured….so they’d be left playing Gakpo, Nunez, Elliot as a front 3.
Liverpool might have some good quality and depth in some areas but in others they don’t. Full back would be a huge problem for them and simply not having Salah who contributes 1/3rd of all their goals and 1/4 of all their assists would be a problem.
Last year they had nowhere near the injuries we had and got to 82 points, we had relatively few injuries and got 89. Liverpools squad is no deeper this year than last year - I think it would be pretty reasonable to say that Liverpool would be at least 6 points worse off with our injuries and we’d be at least 6 points better off


This is statistics, you can get lucky, as Liverpool have done this season with injuries. On average though, I think with a better depth of squad we probably could have avoided some of our injuries, as they're mostly muscular and related to overuse.

Well that does compound itself though. If you keep the whole squad injury free you can rotate and they are all more likely to stay injury free.
Get some injuries and you have no choice but to keep playing the same players and lo and behold they pick up more injuries than those in injury free squads


 Profile  
 
 
Post #398737  Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2025 7:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 29805

We needed a Saka back up and an Ødegaard back up. I think in the summer the Ødegaard creative midfielder is more important than the Saka back up. Nwaneri has evolved in to a player who is capable of being the Saka back up. If you get a starting left winger who can play both sides as well then more money should go on a creative midfielder.

Back up gk
Defence is fine - maybe 1 more to cover departures
Zubimendi or similar in midfield to raise the technical level
A creative centre mid
A starting left wing
A top tier striker

Then I’d also love to see us supplement this with some young exciting players in the £10-20m bracket.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #398738  Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2025 7:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2021 7:27 am
Posts: 228

Rich wrote:
Seeing City drop £200m in January to try to fix their mistakes does stick in the throat. City’s spending (cheating) advantage isn’t necessarily the players they can buy, all he big 6 have regularly signed players over £50m, many of the clubs down to the bottom 5 have signed £40m strikers etc. the benefit City has is being able to sweep their mistakes under the carpet and not suffer the consequences of them.
So loads of clubs can afford big money signings but they can’t just ditch them and buy another one at the same price is the first or second one didn’t work.

I completely despise City, Chelsea and now Newcastle, I refuse to give them any credit for anything they achieve because it’s all built off cheating, every part of their success. Chelsea ran their club in to the ground and were passing buckets round the ground to save them. They got 4th the season before Roman but they were going to have to ‘do a Leeds’ if they weren’t bought. Newcastle and City have both bounced around lower divisions recently and whilst they may have decent levels of support they’d be no better than mid table clubs without their money


100%. These clubs are cheats. Chelsea and City the worst.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #398739  Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2025 8:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 7:31 pm
Posts: 4331
Location: Turnford, Broxbourne, Herts

Harry Kane, would you?


 Profile  
 
 
Post #398740  Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2025 8:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 11:56 am
Posts: 1463

bubblechris wrote:
Harry Kane, would you?


Yes but he wouldn't.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #398741  Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2025 8:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 19439

Just seen that. I mean I would do it for comedy value alone but if Kane cost 64 at 31 years old Tim Lewis won’t agree as he wouldn’t do 60 for a 29 year old.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #398742  Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2025 8:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 11:56 am
Posts: 1463

TOP GUN wrote:
Just seen that. I mean I would do it for comedy value alone but if Kane cost 64 at 31 years old Tim Lewis won’t agree as he wouldn’t do 60 for a 29 year old.


He'd be perfect in our team against what youngsters call the low block.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #398743  Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2025 8:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:06 am
Posts: 17473

bubblechris wrote:
Harry Kane, would you?

:58big-emoticons: :42laughter:

_________________
Hamba kakuhle, Madiba


 Profile  
 
 
Post #398744  Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2025 8:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 29805

https://x.com/adamkeys_/status/18875818 ... -j6VVZXEoA

When Carragher is sitting next to Henry he doesn’t say a bad word about Arsenal. Here is is lauding MLS footballing ‘arrogance’. 3 days later on the Overlap with no Henry but with Neville instead he’s saying the senior pros need to get hold of MLS and get him in check

I long for the day where we have presenters who call out the pundit on these hypocritical opinions


 Profile  
 
 
Post #398745  Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2025 8:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2021 7:27 am
Posts: 228

Wouldn't touch Kane with a barge pole.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #398746  Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2025 9:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 11:56 am
Posts: 1463

1979gooner wrote:
Wouldn't touch Kane with a barge pole.



Pretty sure someone somewhere said the same of Sol Campbell circa 2000


 Profile  
 
 
Post #398747  Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2025 9:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 29805

I do think Van Dijk is one of the most protected players in the game. No one is brave enough to card him, he has a status, no pundit will say a bad word about him or call him out on anything ever. Of course he’s a brilliant CB but this season alone
Dragged back a palace player in the box but no penalty
Kicked out at Havertz twice off the ball
Deliberately charged his shoulder through on Gordon’s face off the ball and in the box when Gordon wasn’t looking
Threw an elbow at Outtara last week
Raked his studs down Solanke’s calf
Threw an elbow at Richarlison tonight

Now the last 3 could be deemed yellows but the first two are reds for me because they are off the ball


 Profile  
 
 
Post #398748  Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2025 9:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 29805

….of all time…


Attachments:

 Profile  
 
 
Post #398749  Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2025 9:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 10:36 pm
Posts: 4132

Rich wrote:
….of all time…


:42laughter: That’s ridiculous, it’s not even as close to the corners as it could be. Every penalty that’s scored is the greatest of all time! Shearer used to hit the roof of the net on every single penalty. Penalties have won World Cup finals. Who wrote this??


 Profile  
 
 
Post #398750  Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2025 10:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 29805

Liverpool frighteningly good tonight albeit against a depleted and pretty abject spurs team who can’t defend.

Our only hope is the sheer volume of games Liverpool have left to play and the congestion it will cause from league games being postponed if/when they go deep in all cups. Whilst it’s not inconceivable that Liverpool drop the required points for us to catch them I just don’t think we’ve got it in us right now to get enough points to catch them even with them maybe slipping up.

It’s absolutely rotten luck for us.
City have 2 amazing years and 1 awful one
Liverpool have 1 awful, 1 good and 1 amazing
We have 2 good years and 1 amazing year
And we’ll be the ones without a league title.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #398751  Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2025 10:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 29805

Ash wrote:
Rich wrote:
….of all time…


:42laughter: That’s ridiculous, it’s not even as close to the corners as it could be. Every penalty that’s scored is the greatest of all time! Shearer used to hit the roof of the net on every single penalty. Penalties have won World Cup finals. Who wrote this??

There must be a million ‘un-save able’ penalties in the top corner so to even start to think about best ever penalty you have to bring the pressure and occasion in to it. Perhaps the best penalty is the penalty you have to score (and do score) or your nation loses the World Cup final as there is more pressure on that than the penalty to win the World Cup


 Profile  
 
 
Post #398752  Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2025 11:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 3:56 pm
Posts: 1024

Rich wrote:
Ash wrote:

:42laughter: That’s ridiculous, it’s not even as close to the corners as it could be. Every penalty that’s scored is the greatest of all time! Shearer used to hit the roof of the net on every single penalty. Penalties have won World Cup finals. Who wrote this??

There must be a million ‘un-save able’ penalties in the top corner so to even start to think about best ever penalty you have to bring the pressure and occasion in to it. Perhaps the best penalty is the penalty you have to score (and do score) or your nation loses the World Cup final as there is more pressure on that than the penalty to win the World Cup


Statistically who is the best…criteria …say minimum of 50 penalties …in a recognised top league or international….
Dennis Tueart was pretty good as was Greavsie ….best ever …who knows…I’ll let the statisticians decide …closest to 100% wins…


 Profile  
 
 
Post #398753  Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2025 11:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 3:56 pm
Posts: 1024

Rich wrote:
I do think Van Dijk is one of the most protected players in the game. No one is brave enough to card him, he has a status, no pundit will say a bad word about him or call him out on anything ever. Of course he’s a brilliant CB but this season alone
Dragged back a palace player in the box but no penalty
Kicked out at Havertz twice off the ball
Deliberately charged his shoulder through on Gordon’s face off the ball and in the box when Gordon wasn’t looking
Threw an elbow at Outtara last week
Raked his studs down Solanke’s calf
Threw an elbow at Richarlison tonight

Now the last 3 could be deemed yellows but the first two are reds for me because they are off the ball


Spot on Rich…he gets away with murder


 Profile  
 
 
Post #398754  Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2025 3:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:04 am
Posts: 7612
Location: Townsville Australia

The Liverpool manager:

"It's always nice to play a final," he said.

"We come in every day, we try to improve the team. The players try so hard to improve themselves, but in the end it's about reaching finals and winning things."

_________________
If this policy does not deliver then I would say we have to change it.
AW 150810


 Profile  
 
 
Post #398755  Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2025 7:12 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 29805

Andy Green wrote:
Rich wrote:
There must be a million ‘un-save able’ penalties in the top corner so to even start to think about best ever penalty you have to bring the pressure and occasion in to it. Perhaps the best penalty is the penalty you have to score (and do score) or your nation loses the World Cup final as there is more pressure on that than the penalty to win the World Cup


Statistically who is the best…criteria …say minimum of 50 penalties …in a recognised top league or international….
Dennis Tueart was pretty good as was Greavsie ….best ever …who knows…I’ll let the statisticians decide …closest to 100% wins…

Not that many have got to 50 pens. Le Tissier scored 48 out of 49 for 98% scored. There are some players with 100% records in the prem but on way fewer pens. Cole Palmer has the most with 12/12, he’d do well to beat Le Tissier


 Profile  
 
 
Post #398756  Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2025 7:16 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 8:30 pm
Posts: 8439

Andy Green wrote:
Rich wrote:
There must be a million ‘un-save able’ penalties in the top corner so to even start to think about best ever penalty you have to bring the pressure and occasion in to it. Perhaps the best penalty is the penalty you have to score (and do score) or your nation loses the World Cup final as there is more pressure on that than the penalty to win the World Cup


Statistically who is the best…criteria …say minimum of 50 penalties …in a recognised top league or international….
Dennis Tueart was pretty good as was Greavsie ….best ever …who knows…I’ll let the statisticians decide …closest to 100% wins…

50 penos is pretty high, especially when you go back a few years. So I will offer Matt LeTissier with 47 goals from 48 pens.

As for best ever penalty, that's obviously not measurable but Messi's one in the shoot-out of the last world cup must be up there. The weight of a nation, his miss in the Copa, his last chance to win a world cup and arguably his status as the world's greatest ever player on the line. I'm not sure there was a penalty with more pressure even if it wasn't the one to win it.

_________________
"I just kept going pretty lively. Them killers wasn't too healthy company."


 Profile  
 
 
Post #398757  Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2025 7:23 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 29805

https://x.com/tuckers35/status/18876163 ... -j6VVZXEoA

Given as a goal kick. There is always some sympathy with genuine big 50/50 decisions (less sympathy for var) but this kind of decision blows the mind. Even if you think you saw something your brain should tell you it’s impossible for it to be a goal kick.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #398758  Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2025 7:59 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 29805

Andy Green wrote:
Rich wrote:
I do think Van Dijk is one of the most protected players in the game. No one is brave enough to card him, he has a status, no pundit will say a bad word about him or call him out on anything ever. Of course he’s a brilliant CB but this season alone
Dragged back a palace player in the box but no penalty
Kicked out at Havertz twice off the ball
Deliberately charged his shoulder through on Gordon’s face off the ball and in the box when Gordon wasn’t looking
Threw an elbow at Outtara last week
Raked his studs down Solanke’s calf
Threw an elbow at Richarlison tonight

Now the last 3 could be deemed yellows but the first two are reds for me because they are off the ball


Spot on Rich…he gets away with murder


The same guy who wrote that MLS was the real villain after his wrong red card wrote this on Van Dijk’s elbow on Richarlison

“When you are as good and as cool as Virgil van Dijk, perhaps it is inevitable a referee or VAR will occasionally give you the benefit of the doubt.”

I don’t necessary think what Van Dijk did was a red card, they are rarely given when you’re tussling with a player but he is getting away with stuff because refs are in awe of him and don’t want to punish such a great player - particularly at Anfield. It’s the same as what Kane got away with for years


 Profile  
 
 
Post #398759  Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2025 8:03 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 29805

I always see rivals say Arteta only won the FA cup ‘with Emery’s team’, are we to give Slot zero credit for doing so well with Klopp’s team then!?

Literally one of the most braindead things to say in football


 Profile  
 
 
Post #398760  Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2025 8:16 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 29805

Ethan Nwaneri is two goals away from Michael Owen & Wayne Rooney’s record of nine before turning 18. He has 7 games before he turns 18. Both of those other two were strikers


 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
     [ 400204 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1 ... 9966, 9967, 9968, 9969, 9970, 9971, 9972 ... 10006  Next

All times are UTC

Gooners Online - Click to see what Everyones Doing

Colour Key:  Visited Profile    Members Profile      Admin

Get Latest Post

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], dec, warrior and 29 guests


Search for:

Go to Top

Powered by php BB © 1993 - 2018