Fixtures Sunday April 28th - Tottenham Hotspur - Tottenham Hotspur Stadium - 2:00 Pm

Kick-Off

       Injuries                 Steve Gleiber



Get the Latest Post Go to the Bottom of Page It is currently Thu Apr 25, 2024 7:56 am

All times are UTC


  


Reply to topic

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Decaf, Gaz from Oz, Googlebot, grantyboy and 361 guests

 
Post #512921  Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2020 10:52 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 4:33 pm
Posts: 1374

Rich wrote:
Everton, Burnley, Newcastle all have very winnable games this midweek, if we lose to Southampton and they all win we'll be level on points with Southampton and drop behind all 3 of these which would put us 13th :20hospitals:

Rich, no point in getting stressed about our results or league position for the rest of this car crash of a season mate. We're *%^@, plain and simple. 13th sounds about right, maybe even lower. Just be grateful we won 3 on the bounce before lockdown cos without those 9 points we really would be in bother.

We can only hope that lots of deadwood can be got rid of for the start of next season, whenever that is.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #512922  Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2020 12:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26761

Bernard wrote:
I think Guendouzi does move the ball around the pitch, and pretty damn effectively. Doesn’t he make on average 48.25 passes per game? If so, that’s moving the ball around the pitch. I just don’t get this hate in, or whatever the opposite of love in is, some have for him. Not the finished product yet, but the potential in my view is there for him to be a true great.

As I implied before, some are too obsessed with goals and assists for midfielders. The sexy things. But a midfield with only Özil types, even when he was at his peak, would be a nightmare. Midfields need balance with a variety of jobs done by different players. It would be wonderful to find a single player with Brady’s creativity, Petit’s defensive awareness, Vieira’s physical presence and tackling, Overmars’ pace, Hudson’s passing, Ljungberg’s finishing, Wiltord’s work rate and Guendouzi’s energy. Vieira is the best midfielder I’ve seen at Arsenal, but even he didn’t have Brady’s creativity or Hudson’s passing. But if there ever has been one, I’ve not seen him. Even Iniesta and Xavi needed Busquets.

Creativity is not the only thing required. Nor is ball winning, or any other single quality. Also, to be fair, Guendouzi does create opportunities for others to use the ball in dangerous positions.

You make a good point on good midfielders not having to have goals and assists. For example Liverpool's midfield 3 don't have many goals/assists between them this season whichever of them plays. Their style is a functional, disciplined midfield, assists come from full backs and goals and more assists come from a fluid and dynamic front 3. Throw a few set piece goals from CB and they've created a very effective system without any end product from a midfield 3.

Guendouzi is suffering from having to grow and learn in the team without a mentor or chaperone. Nearly all our younger players are in the same position. Which makes it all the more remarkable when players like Saka and Martinelli seem to still be able to produce and thrive in such difficult circumstances.

I'm happy to persevere with Guendouzi but there are aspects to his game that he can improve on and off the training pitch. But equally if silly money was thrown at us for him and we could replace him for a similar amount of money with someone like Ndidi (only 2 years older) I would do it as I think the club would benefit overall. We need to balance sort term gain and long term goals on a restricted budget.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #512923  Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2020 12:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 5:27 pm
Posts: 11163

Rich wrote:
Bernard wrote:
I think Guendouzi does move the ball around the pitch, and pretty damn effectively. Doesn’t he make on average 48.25 passes per game? If so, that’s moving the ball around the pitch. I just don’t get this hate in, or whatever the opposite of love in is, some have for him. Not the finished product yet, but the potential in my view is there for him to be a true great.

As I implied before, some are too obsessed with goals and assists for midfielders. The sexy things. But a midfield with only Özil types, even when he was at his peak, would be a nightmare. Midfields need balance with a variety of jobs done by different players. It would be wonderful to find a single player with Brady’s creativity, Petit’s defensive awareness, Vieira’s physical presence and tackling, Overmars’ pace, Hudson’s passing, Ljungberg’s finishing, Wiltord’s work rate and Guendouzi’s energy. Vieira is the best midfielder I’ve seen at Arsenal, but even he didn’t have Brady’s creativity or Hudson’s passing. But if there ever has been one, I’ve not seen him. Even Iniesta and Xavi needed Busquets.

Creativity is not the only thing required. Nor is ball winning, or any other single quality. Also, to be fair, Guendouzi does create opportunities for others to use the ball in dangerous positions.

You make a good point on good midfielders not having to have goals and assists. For example Liverpool's midfield 3 don't have many goals/assists between them this season whichever of them plays. Their style is a functional, disciplined midfield, assists come from full backs and goals and more assists come from a fluid and dynamic front 3. Throw a few set piece goals from CB and they've created a very effective system without any end product from a midfield 3.

Guendouzi is suffering from having to grow and learn in the team without a mentor or chaperone. Nearly all our younger players are in the same position. Which makes it all the more remarkable when players like Saka and Martinelli seem to still be able to produce and thrive in such difficult circumstances.

I'm happy to persevere with Guendouzi but there are aspects to his game that he can improve on and off the training pitch. But equally if silly money was thrown at us for him and we could replace him for a similar amount of money with someone like Ndidi (only 2 years older) I would do it as I think the club would benefit overall. We need to balance sort term gain and long term goals on a restricted budget.

I would buy Ndidi to play with Guendouzi. I would sell Xhaka or Torreira before Guendouzi.

I’ll be interested to see if Saka and Martinelli develop from their bright starts. Sadly, I’m not convinced we’ll get the opportunity to see that at Arsenal with Saka. His contract ends next year and I’ve seen he’s showing little enthusiasm for extending it. I hope he does but if he doesn’t and we lose him, for all the negativity I currently feel about Kroenke’s ownership, it’ll be doubled.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #512924  Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2020 2:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 5:38 pm
Posts: 6453
Location: ɹǝpu∩uʍop

"I earn more than you EVER will! Matteo Guendouzi tastelessly taunted 's***' Brighton players over money earlier in defeat before £40k-a-week midfielder grabbed the throat of Neal Maupay at full-time"

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footb ... money.html

Hmmmm


 Profile  
 
 
Post #512925  Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2020 2:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 4:33 pm
Posts: 1374

warrior wrote:
"I earn more than you EVER will! Matteo Guendouzi tastelessly taunted 's***' Brighton players over money earlier in defeat before £40k-a-week midfielder grabbed the throat of Neal Maupay at full-time"

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footb ... money.html

Hmmmm

If true the *%^@*** idiot should be dropped for our next match


 Profile  
 
 
Post #512926  Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2020 3:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:52 pm
Posts: 18760

warrior wrote:
"I earn more than you EVER will! Matteo Guendouzi tastelessly taunted 's***' Brighton players over money earlier in defeat before £40k-a-week midfielder grabbed the throat of Neal Maupay at full-time"

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footb ... money.html

Hmmmm
Must say I can't get too bent out of shape over this as I imagine the Brighton players are not on the bones of their arses. Maybe not Guendozi-rich, and certainly not to be compared with your own mega-salary, but they won't be needing a food bank to get through the week.

Of course Guendozi's alleged comments tell us a lot about the game today - time was when reference to trophies and caps won would have been the taunt. Its all about the money now!

_________________
"Young and caught up in life, we seldom watched the skies.”


 Profile  
 
 
Post #512927  Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2020 3:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18420

Recommend this weeks new Tuesday club.

Davies goes in a comprehensive and totally nailed on rant right from the start about everything going wrong at Arsenal. Tragically funny and more concise about our problems than any pundit or journalist.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #512928  Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2020 3:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 4:33 pm
Posts: 1374

old man of hoy wrote:
warrior wrote:
"I earn more than you EVER will! Matteo Guendouzi tastelessly taunted 's***' Brighton players over money earlier in defeat before £40k-a-week midfielder grabbed the throat of Neal Maupay at full-time"

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footb ... money.html

Hmmmm
Must say I can't get too bent out of shape over this as I imagine the Brighton players are not on the bones of their arses. Maybe not Guendozi-rich, and certainly not to be compared with your own mega-salary, but they won't be needing a food bank to get through the week.

Of course Guendozi's alleged comments tell us a lot about the game today - time was when reference to trophies and caps won would have been the taunt. Its all about the money now!

It's the arrogance of it. If I saw or heard that a player at another club had said that I'd think he's a tosser. Concentrate on winning the match, you can count your money afterwards.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #512929  Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2020 3:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 7:45 am
Posts: 25814

tomc wrote:
It's the arrogance of it. If I saw or heard that a player at another club had said that I'd think he's a tosser. Concentrate on winning the match, you can count your money afterwards.

Exactly so.

_________________
I believe in our team, I believe in our quality and I am convinced that I am right. (Arsene Wenger Dec 08)


 Profile  
 
 
Post #512930  Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2020 4:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:52 pm
Posts: 18760

tomc wrote:
It's the arrogance of it. If I saw or heard that a player at another club had said that I'd think he's a tosser. Concentrate on winning the match, you can count your money afterwards.
Indeed it is arrogant, but I can't help smiling that a group of rich men (by any normal standards) could consider a taunt about money worthy of public comment. In two hours the poorest paid member of that Brighton side had probably earned more than most of their fans earn in six months. Guendozi may be a *%^@, but the Brighton boys seem to have lost some perspective too by not leaving it all in the stadium. With millions of people just about making do these days any reference to money can be highly charged.

_________________
"Young and caught up in life, we seldom watched the skies.”


 Profile  
 
 
Post #512931  Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2020 4:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 7:31 pm
Posts: 4230
Location: Turnford, Broxbourne, Herts

Did anyone see Guendouzi grabbing Moupay by the throat? Wasn't it just a gentle flick that hardly made contact?

If not then the quote could just as easily have been made up to justify the actions of Moupay.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #512932  Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2020 4:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 4:33 pm
Posts: 1374

bubblechris wrote:
Did anyone see Guendouzi grabbing Moupay by the throat? Wasn't it just a gentle flick that hardly made contact?

If not then the quote could just as easily have been made up to justify the actions of Moupay.

I think Maupay is a *%^@ too. What seems to have been ignored amongst all the outrage of why Guendouzi didn't get a ban is Maupay appealing for a handball for Leno taking the ball outside the area when the poor guy was lying there in agony with a shattered knee. No waving to get a physio on, just appealing to the ref. Very classy.

But I don't want to see or hear of an Arsenal player waving his money around during a match. It stinks. Leave that *%^@ to the likes of Robbie Savage.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #512933  Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2020 5:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 2:11 pm
Posts: 4764

bubblechris wrote:
Did anyone see Guendouzi grabbing Moupay by the throat? Wasn't it just a gentle flick that hardly made contact?

If not then the quote could just as easily have been made up to justify the actions of Moupay.

I saw it. It was a different incident than the sly flick.
I thought at the time I saw it he would get a ban. In my opinion we are very lucky that he has not been banned for the neck grab.

_________________
"It's all over now Baby Blue"


 Profile  
 
 
Post #512934  Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2020 5:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:42 pm
Posts: 5695

Can someone help me out here but why are the plod investigating the banner flown over the Burnley game last night as a hate crime? Genuinely don't understand.

_________________
"If you do not believe you can do it then you have no chance at all"


 Profile  
 
 
Post #512935  Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2020 5:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 7:53 pm
Posts: 3412
Location: Over here

Bernard wrote:
I think Guendouzi does move the ball around the pitch, and pretty damn effectively. Doesn’t he make on average 48.25 passes per game? If so, that’s moving the ball around the pitch. I just don’t get this hate in, or whatever the opposite of love in is, some have for him. Not the finished product yet, but the potential in my view is there for him to be a true great.

As I implied before, some are too obsessed with goals and assists for midfielders. The sexy things. But a midfield with only Özil types, even when he was at his peak, would be a nightmare. Midfields need balance with a variety of jobs done by different players. It would be wonderful to find a single player with Brady’s creativity, Petit’s defensive awareness, Vieira’s physical presence and tackling, Overmars’ pace, Hudson’s passing, Ljungberg’s finishing, Wiltord’s work rate and Guendouzi’s energy. Vieira is the best midfielder I’ve seen at Arsenal, but even he didn’t have Brady’s creativity or Hudson’s passing. But if there ever has been one, I’ve not seen him. Even Iniesta and Xavi needed Busquets.

Creativity is not the only thing required. Nor is ball winning, or any other single quality. Also, to be fair, Guendouzi does create opportunities for others to use the ball in dangerous positions.


I’d settle for just one midfielder who can make himself available to receive the ball from Leno and get us moving forward. The city game was just embarrassing, well the 45 minutes I could be arsed to watch.

_________________
"You've got to go out on a limb sometimes because that's where the fruit is."


 Profile  
 
 
Post #512936  Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2020 5:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18420

Gunfire wrote:
Can someone help me out here but why are the plod investigating the banner flown over the Burnley game last night as a hate crime? Genuinely don't understand.

Because it’s likely arranged by a Britain first type hate group who wanted to stir the pot via racial baiting and get people with xenophobic bones in their body either laughing at it or debating that there is nothing offensive in its message.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #512937  Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2020 6:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26761

Apparently Leno injury not as bad as first feared. Likely to miss the rest of the season but not months and months.
But, Martinelli picked up an injury in training that might rule him out for the rest of the season.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #512938  Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2020 7:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 3:52 pm
Posts: 13487

Apparently Luiz has signed a new deal. A few tweeting about it.

_________________
There's a man who's been out sailing in a decade full of dreams


 Profile  
 
 
Post #512939  Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2020 7:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 3:52 pm
Posts: 13487

Gunfire wrote:
Can someone help me out here but why are the plod investigating the banner flown over the Burnley game last night as a hate crime? Genuinely don't understand.

Because it was done to offend and intimidate.

_________________
There's a man who's been out sailing in a decade full of dreams


 Profile  
 
 
Post #512940  Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2020 7:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 9:51 pm
Posts: 3573

Bernard wrote:
socrates wrote:
I am not sure that you can blame all of our woes on Kroenke.

We spent heavily last summer on one of europe's most sought after players, a LB who was also very highly regarded and a midfielder who was exceptional in the Euro u21 Championships. Most fans were more than happy with the summers work. Even Luiz was seen as a gamble worth taking.

If anything, I think Arsenal players are too much in the comfort zone.......richly paid and living in cosmopolitan London, training facilities more akin to a hotel and health spa complex. No accountability whatsoever.

Poor transfer dealings, in and out. Poor coaching, poor team selections, poor tactics

Something needs to change that's for sure and perhaps the owner needs to adopt a more hands-on approach but I can't see how all the blame lies solely at his door.

I think Kroenke is the driving influence behind Arsenal’s lack of ambition. If he’s not getting accurate summaries of what’s happening from those reporting back to him because of their own self interest, he’s employing the wrong people. If he is getting accurate reports and isn’t doing much or anything about it, that’s his fault.

His main priority is the LA Rams. Would he ideally like Arsenal to win things? Yes I’m sure he would. Is he really bothered if Arsenal don’t win things? No I don’t think he is, certainly not to the extent where he’d fund the turnover in playing staff many fans, perhaps including you, think is required. He said he did not buy Arsenal to win trophies. That philosophy of non-ambition encapsulates his ownership regime, in my view.

Is absolutely everything Kroenke’s fault? Probably not. There’s a limit to how far one man can know everything going on in a sports organisation the size of Arsenal. But as he has made himself the sole owner, he is completely and totally in charge. From that, I think it’s reasonable to see him as responsible for the club’s declining fortunes. The buck stops with him. It has to. But I doubt he really cares. If Arsenal is a hierarchy, and I have no doubt it is, Stan is the man at the top of that hierarchy. He’s the Field Marshall Hague of the British army in WWI.

The Pépé signing was probably funded from staff advising him it could get us back into the Champions League. If someone, like Sanllehi, gave him bad advise over that or other transfers, he should look at the advice he got and from where.

Oh yes. Kroenke is more focussed on LA Rams. Arsenal are a side bit play thing. As pointed out on here numerous times, Kroenke's other sports clubs in the US are flat and mediocre, given their competitions. And no. I don't bother with US sports that much either, in response to your earlier post answer. I do so with owners who have acquired an English football club added to their portfolio though. If only to observe the teams they currently own or preside over, given their progress within their respective comps. I'm not a huge fan of NFL super bowl or baseball. That said, I don't give a toss about whether or not LA Rams win a super bowl. What happens to Arsenal is more of a concern. Kroenke is as much responsible for overseeing the finances, progress, management of Arsenal as much as Mark Bezos is for Amazon. At least Mark Bezos is more ambitious.

_________________
Be careful who you call your friends. I'd rather have four quarters than one hundred pennies.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #512941  Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2020 7:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 9:51 pm
Posts: 3573

Wirral Gooner wrote:
bubblechris wrote:
Did anyone see Guendouzi grabbing Moupay by the throat? Wasn't it just a gentle flick that hardly made contact?

If not then the quote could just as easily have been made up to justify the actions of Moupay.

I saw it. It was a different incident than the sly flick.
I thought at the time I saw it he would get a ban. In my opinion we are very lucky that he has not been banned for the neck grab.

Wirral. Three days later and Maupay showed no signs of any visible finger imprints or bruising to his neck today. There is a way to grasp someone on the neck without squeezing. No matter. That missed penalty by Maupay against Leicester was a fair humiliation. :15laughter:

_________________
Be careful who you call your friends. I'd rather have four quarters than one hundred pennies.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #512942  Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2020 7:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26761

A guy on twitter has done a detailed analysis of potential Arsenal signings in midfield based on what Ramsey gave us. He's taken Ramsey's key stats for goals, shooting, passing, chance creation, tackles, interceptions, pressure - basically any metric you want and this is the list of players that come out of it (a StatDNA approach if you like)
Kai Havertz
Mason Mount
Todd Cantwell
Florian Neuhaus
Angelo Fulgini
Lorenzo Pellegrini
Suat Serdar

The first two are not available to us. Roma's Pellegrini is interesting especially considering how much Roma want Mkhitaryan. There's rumours of us wanted Kluivert in return, but he's a winger so I don't see any sense in that.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #512943  Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2020 7:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26761

Darren wrote:
Apparently Luiz has signed a new deal. A few tweeting about it.

Is that the extension to the end of the season like a lot of out of contract players have done, or a deal that keeps him here next season?!


 Profile  
 
 
Post #512944  Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2020 8:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 2:11 pm
Posts: 4764

Zed wrote:
Wirral Gooner wrote:
I saw it. It was a different incident than the sly flick.
I thought at the time I saw it he would get a ban. In my opinion we are very lucky that he has not been banned for the neck grab.

Wirral. Three days later and Maupay showed no signs of any visible finger imprints or bruising to his neck today. There is a way to grasp someone on the neck without squeezing. No matter. That missed penalty by Maupay against Leicester was a fair humiliation. :15laughter:


Fair enough. Glad he missed the pen. But Guendouzi still lucky.
The Guardian saying Martinelli going to miss start of next season. Luiz signing something to keep him at club. God we are unlucky

_________________
"It's all over now Baby Blue"


 Profile  
 
 
Post #512945  Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2020 8:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 7:45 am
Posts: 25814

Really disappointed to read the news about Martinelli.

_________________
I believe in our team, I believe in our quality and I am convinced that I am right. (Arsene Wenger Dec 08)


 Profile  
 
 
Post #512946  Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2020 9:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 7:45 am
Posts: 25814

Gunfire wrote:
Can someone help me out here but why are the plod investigating the banner flown over the Burnley game last night as a hate crime? Genuinely don't understand.

http://www.skysports.com/share/12013169

_________________
I believe in our team, I believe in our quality and I am convinced that I am right. (Arsene Wenger Dec 08)


 Profile  
 
 
Post #512947  Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2020 9:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 5:27 pm
Posts: 11163

Wirral Gooner wrote:
Luiz signing something to keep him at club. God we are unlucky

Nothing unlucky about Luiz signing a new contract, if it’s true he has. It was surely the club’s decision to offer him a new deal. Luiz couldn’t force them to, and you can’t blame him for signing it.

The conclusion can only be that Arteta rates Luiz more highly that some of us. Again, that isn’t bad luck. It’s the head coach’s opinion. I disagree with it myself. Personally I’d rather keep Mustafi, although maybe we still will.

Going back to my previous point, maybe it reflects the financial restrictions of the owner. He would presumably rather extend Luiz’s contract than buy someone new as it’s cheaper. Poor old Stan does only have ten billion after all.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #512948  Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2020 9:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 3:52 pm
Posts: 13487

Rich wrote:
Darren wrote:
Apparently Luiz has signed a new deal. A few tweeting about it.

Is that the extension to the end of the season like a lot of out of contract players have done, or a deal that keeps him here next season?!

One year extension. Mari and Cédric Soares signing 4 year deals apparently.

_________________
There's a man who's been out sailing in a decade full of dreams


 Profile  
 
 
Post #512949  Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2020 9:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:22 pm
Posts: 20612

Darren wrote:
Rich wrote:
Is that the extension to the end of the season like a lot of out of contract players have done, or a deal that keeps him here next season?!

One year extension. Mari and Cédric Soares signing 4 year deals apparently.


Hi mate.

I find that totally shocking, or at least I would do if decisions like this weren't par for the course at Arsenal these days.

Frankly, I don't rate Luiz or Mari. I've no idea about Soares but do we really need to give him and Mari 4 year contracts?.

None of them would be anywhere near Liverpool or City.

It just seems we are going around signing mediocre players and the fact that Arteta actually rates them is a bigger worry than anything else.

It would not surprise me if Arteta is on the ropes by Christmas, bar some major investment in the summer. He talks a good talk but his team selections and tactics leave much to be desired.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #512950  Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2020 9:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26761

Darren wrote:
Rich wrote:
Is that the extension to the end of the season like a lot of out of contract players have done, or a deal that keeps him here next season?!

One year extension. Mari and Cédric Soares signing 4 year deals apparently.

That’s some big contracts handed out to a couple of players we’ve seen little of. Looks like we’re going cheap in defence again.
I read on twitter that there are rumours of offers for Sokratis and Holding.
Saliba, Mari, Luiz, Mustafi as CB
Bellerin, Cédric, Tierney, Kolasinac as full backs
That group is not getting top 4 and is conceding 45+ goals again next season.
Dominant leader at CB required preferably another left footer. Take the money raised by sales of holding, Sokratis and others like elneny and pump it all on a top class CB
Spend any of the budget that’s left on a dominant CM.
Feel like we’ve been saying this for years


 Profile  
 
 
Post #512951  Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2020 9:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26761

A big problem at the moment is I don’t think we’d be interested in Luiz and Cédric if they had a different agent.
How is that allowed to dictate transfer business? Surely someone somewhere at Arsenal can put their head above the parapet and make a case for old fashioned scouting over any player attached to Raul’s flavour of the month super agent.
I fail to see what we get out of this relationship. If it is meant to be access to the top players who have the top agents we’ll our current standing in the game means that is pointless right now


 Profile  
 
 
Post #512952  Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2020 9:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18420

Luiz, soares and Mari. 3 journeyman players. Doesn’t feel like the revolution we were hoping. We are at Hobson’s choice.

Don’t expect too much too soon.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #512953  Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2020 9:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18420

Rich wrote:
A big problem at the moment is I don’t think we’d be interested in Luiz and Cédric if they had a different agent.
How is that allowed to dictate transfer business? Surely someone somewhere at Arsenal can put their head above the parapet and make a case for old fashioned scouting over any player attached to Raul’s flavour of the month super agent.


Valid point. We are being linked strongly to Willian now because he’s the player of Kia Joorbachin.

Just like soares and Luiz. Seems crazy. Players of the wrong age group who have been exceptionally hit and miss on huge money. I’m not sure anything we do makes sense anymore it’s so illogical


 Profile  
 
 
Post #512954  Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2020 10:09 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:04 am
Posts: 7386
Location: Townsville Australia

Bernard wrote:
Wirral Gooner wrote:
Luiz signing something to keep him at club. God we are unlucky

Nothing unlucky about Luiz signing a new contract, if it’s true he has. It was surely the club’s decision to offer him a new deal. Luiz couldn’t force them to, and you can’t blame him for signing it.

The conclusion can only be that Arteta rates Luiz more highly that some of us. Again, that isn’t bad luck. It’s the head coach’s opinion. I disagree with it myself. Personally I’d rather keep Mustafi, although maybe we still will.

Going back to my previous point, maybe it reflects the financial restrictions of the owner. He would presumably rather extend Luiz’s contract than buy someone new as it’s cheaper. Poor old Stan does only have ten billion after all.

I expect you are correct in that Arteta sanctioned it. I will be surprised if Arteta is still in a job at Arsenal by next Easter. I am calling him already. The Brighton game did my head in because it was obvious Arteta was happy to play for a 1-1 draw after we conceded. I repeat we see no style of play and the players he rates and plays have failed us before.

_________________
If this policy does not deliver then I would say we have to change it.
AW 150810


 Profile  
 
 
Post #512955  Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2020 10:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 5:27 pm
Posts: 11163

socrates wrote:
Darren wrote:
One year extension. Mari and Cédric Soares signing 4 year deals apparently.

Hi mate.

I find that totally shocking, or at least I would do if decisions like this weren't par for the course at Arsenal these days.

Frankly, I don't rate Luiz or Mari. I've no idea about Soares but do we really need to give him and Mari 4 year contracts?.

None of them would be anywhere near Liverpool or City.

It just seems we are going around signing mediocre players and the fact that Arteta actually rates them is a bigger worry than anything else.

It would not surprise me if Arteta is on the ropes by Christmas, bar some major investment in the summer. He talks a good talk but his team selections and tactics leave much to be desired.

Evening socrates. As you say, it is par for the course these days. I know you tried to deflect the blame from Kroenke, but as the sole owner of the club I still say the buck stops with him. He employs every senior member of staff, and I bet he knows who they are far more than he’s aware who we’re playing on Thursday. Okay, he may not know anything about the standard of hot dogs served at the Emirates (when fans go to games), but the financial policy and the big staff, he will know and it’s for him to know enough to measure how they’re performing.

I’m not against Arteta yet as I think he has to be given some time. But I’m very much in two minds about his start. He still has it all to do in order to convince me. But whether me, you, or anyone else amongst the fan base likes or dislikes Arteta, Sanllehi and others in the club’s hierarchy or playing staff is approaching meaningless. It’s down to Stan whether they remain in post, and I don’t think Stan even cares what the fans think as long as enough continue to buy tickets, replica shirts and so on.

I think Rich said recently the fans can influence what players are bought and sold, when I argued about how irrelevant that was in comparison to Stan’s ownership. Apologies to Rich if he didn’t or I misunderstood him. But I thought he did. Us debating what players get new contracts or are bought and sold have close to zero influence. Stan’s tucked away in one of his huge ranches, pretty oblivious to what goes on at Arsenal on a day to day basis. He leaves it to Sanllehi, Arteta and others he employs.

Zed pointed out that it’s not just Arsenal, but his other American clubs. When Kroenke buys a sports club, the main thing their fans have to look forward to is long-term mediocrity. It’s the KSE way.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #512956  Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2020 10:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 5:27 pm
Posts: 11163

Zed wrote:
Arsenal are a side bit play thing. As pointed out on here numerous times, Kroenke's other sports clubs in the US are flat and mediocre, given their competitions.........Kroenke is as much responsible for overseeing the finances, progress, management of Arsenal as much as Mark Bezos is for Amazon. At least Mark Bezos is more ambitious.

I think you’ve hit the proverbial nail on the head, Zed. I’ve no idea what Dangote would be like as an owner. But I’d welcome him buying the club with open arms because I can see what Kroenke is like as an owner.

Bugger me, I’m tempted to say I’d rather have serial killer Myra Hindley as the owner than Stan, and she’s bloody dead.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #512957  Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2020 10:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 9:51 pm
Posts: 3573

Bernard wrote:
Zed wrote:
Arsenal are a side bit play thing. As pointed out on here numerous times, Kroenke's other sports clubs in the US are flat and mediocre, given their competitions.........Kroenke is as much responsible for overseeing the finances, progress, management of Arsenal as much as Mark Bezos is for Amazon. At least Mark Bezos is more ambitious.

I think you’ve hit the proverbial nail on the head, Zed. I’ve no idea what Dangote would be like as an owner. But I’d welcome him buying the club with open arms because I can see what Kroenke is like as an owner.

Bugger me, I’m tempted to say I’d rather have serial killer Myra Hindley as the owner than Stan, and she’s bloody dead.

Hi Bern,
Edit: I meant Jeff Bezos. Mark is his brother.
I may have mentioned one time I'd take Al Capone even.Big Al wasn't only organised and authoritative, he was ruthless with swagger. You did mention Myra Hindley.

_________________
Be careful who you call your friends. I'd rather have four quarters than one hundred pennies.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #512958  Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2020 11:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 5:27 pm
Posts: 11163

Gaz from Oz wrote:
Bernard wrote:
Nothing unlucky about Luiz signing a new contract, if it’s true he has. It was surely the club’s decision to offer him a new deal. Luiz couldn’t force them to, and you can’t blame him for signing it.

The conclusion can only be that Arteta rates Luiz more highly that some of us. Again, that isn’t bad luck. It’s the head coach’s opinion. I disagree with it myself. Personally I’d rather keep Mustafi, although maybe we still will.

Going back to my previous point, maybe it reflects the financial restrictions of the owner. He would presumably rather extend Luiz’s contract than buy someone new as it’s cheaper. Poor old Stan does only have ten billion after all.

I expect you are correct in that Arteta sanctioned it. I will be surprised if Arteta is still in a job at Arsenal by next Easter. I am calling him already. The Brighton game did my head in because it was obvious Arteta was happy to play for a 1-1 draw after we conceded. I repeat we see no style of play and the players he rates and plays have failed us before.

Do you know that Emery had thirteen Premier League games in charge this season from which we won eighteen points. Arteta has had twelve Premier League games in charge from which we’ve won seventeen points. If we draw at Southampton on Thursday, our points total from Arteta’s first thirteen league games will be exactly the same as the points total from Emery’s last thirteen league games, which had got him the sack.

If we win at Southampton Arteta’s points per game will be a bit better, and if we lose it will be a bit worse. But whatever happens the difference isn’t that big or noticeable. The biggest managerial plonker at Arsenal this season was Ljungberg. We got five points from his five games.

I realise it’s not a perfect measure, mainly because it takes no account of the opposition in their fixtures. From memory Arteta had both our games against Chelsea but Emery had games against Liverpool and Tottenham, which Arteta hasn’t yet. They’ve both had one each against both of the Manchester clubs. So again, not that different. Indeed, Emery had a game against Leicester, which Arteta hasn’t.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #512959  Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2020 1:50 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:04 am
Posts: 7386
Location: Townsville Australia

Bernard wrote:
Gaz from Oz wrote:
I expect you are correct in that Arteta sanctioned it. I will be surprised if Arteta is still in a job at Arsenal by next Easter. I am calling him already. The Brighton game did my head in because it was obvious Arteta was happy to play for a 1-1 draw after we conceded. I repeat we see no style of play and the players he rates and plays have failed us before.

Do you know that Emery had thirteen Premier League games in charge this season from which we won eighteen points. Arteta has had twelve Premier League games in charge from which we’ve won seventeen points. If we draw at Southampton on Thursday, our points total from Arteta’s first thirteen league games will be exactly the same as the points total from Emery’s last thirteen league games, which had got him the sack.

If we win at Southampton Arteta’s points per game will be a bit better, and if we lose it will be a bit worse. But whatever happens the difference isn’t that big or noticeable. The biggest managerial plonker at Arsenal this season was Ljungberg. We got five points from his five games.

I realise it’s not a perfect measure, mainly because it takes no account of the opposition in their fixtures. From memory Arteta had both our games against Chelsea but Emery had games against Liverpool and Tottenham, which Arteta hasn’t yet. They’ve both had one each against both of the Manchester clubs. So again, not that different. Indeed, Emery had a game against Leicester, which Arteta hasn’t.

I know I am harsh but just not seeing anything to brighten the horizon. The players he seems to favour are just not good enough or he has not been able to improve them. Luiz - what can I say. Ceballos - a nothing player who will cost us. His Martenelli stance - not just now. And I can go on. Tactically I have seen nothing. But he is looking like Emery II. The players he is bringing in for the defence are ordinary and we are signing them to long contracts but have not got Saka in contract.

_________________
If this policy does not deliver then I would say we have to change it.
AW 150810


 Profile  
 
 
Post #512960  Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2020 2:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:58 am
Posts: 34096

I had no idea the beloved Philly mob boss the late Angelo Bruno had ties to the Krays and Wilf Pine.


_________________
"Never relegated, Never Will Be" :)


 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
     [ 571978 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1 ... 12821, 12822, 12823, 12824, 12825, 12826, 12827 ... 14300  Next

All times are UTC

Gooners Online - Click to see what Everyones Doing

Colour Key:  Visited Profile    Members Profile      Admin

Get Latest Post

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Decaf, Gaz from Oz, Googlebot, grantyboy and 361 guests


Search for:

Go to Top

Powered by php BB © 1993 - 2018