Fixtures Sunday April 28th - Tottenham Hotspur - Tottenham Hotspur Stadium - 2:00 Pm

Kick-Off

       Injuries                 Steve Gleiber



Get the Latest Post Go to the Bottom of Page It is currently Wed Apr 24, 2024 11:19 pm

All times are UTC


  


Reply to topic

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 239 guests

 
Post #516761  Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 4:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 9:51 pm
Posts: 3573

So E. Cavani to MU. Incredible.

_________________
Be careful who you call your friends. I'd rather have four quarters than one hundred pennies.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516762  Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 4:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18419

Zed wrote:
So E. Cavani to MU. Incredible.

Good deal for them. They are desperate for someone to lead the line


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516763  Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 4:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:22 pm
Posts: 20612

TOP GUN wrote:
socrates wrote:
Rumours of us trying for Jorginho.

Makes little sense as he lacks pace, power and is not creative either.


I think you will see Partey coming in as the club have Hobson’s choice now plus a weird signing too. Ie random Brazilian/ chelsea player loan/joorbachin client


If we couldn't go to £50m for Aouar (with the probable benefit of payments in installments) what makes you think we can pay £45m in a lump sum for Partey?

I hope you are right but I think the chances are higher of some lesser knowns or loans as you suggest.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516764  Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 4:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18419

socrates wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:

I think you will see Partey coming in as the club have Hobson’s choice now plus a weird signing too. Ie random Brazilian/ chelsea player loan/joorbachin client


If we couldn't go to £50m for Aouar (with the probable benefit of payments in installments) what makes you think we can pay £45m in a lump sum for Partey?

.


They might have been struggling to contemplate the fee for Aour. He’s still developing and 50 + 10 in add ons is mega money.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516765  Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 4:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:22 pm
Posts: 20612

TOP GUN wrote:
Zed wrote:
So E. Cavani to MU. Incredible.

Good deal for them. They are desperate for someone to lead the line


I think it could potentially be a good deal. He's not clinical but his pace, movement and strength gets him into so many goalscoring positions that he still ends up scoring lots of goals.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516766  Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 4:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:06 am
Posts: 16473

Hazuki wrote:
john1 wrote:
I agree about Pépé - he isn’t going to make the grade. He’s had enough time to adjust both through training and the matches he’s been involved in, and I think we have to put down the money spent as a bad investment. Sell him and get back whatever losses we can recoup.

I think this is a bit harsh. Coming to Arsenal in the state we were in last season is probably the worst possible circumstances imaginable to join a big club in - never mind the fact that the Premier League is a challenge for any player. He still managed 8 goals and 10 assists over the course of the season, which is not a bad return, and had som impressive displays. To me, he was possibly our best player after Aubameyang in the FA cup final.

Like everyone else, I expect more from him this season, but I think it's way premature to write him off.

I agree with that analysis. There is a huge potential upside if his talent can be harnessed and he can get going.

_________________
Hamba kakuhle, Madiba


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516767  Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 4:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:22 pm
Posts: 20612

TOP GUN wrote:
socrates wrote:

If we couldn't go to £50m for Aouar (with the probable benefit of payments in installments) what makes you think we can pay £45m in a lump sum for Partey?

.


They might have been struggling to contemplate the fee for Aour. He’s still developing and 50 + 10 in add ons is mega money.


Maybe. We'll see.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516768  Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 4:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26758

When Pépé was bought there was the thought that he was for the games when we could spring the counter attack. I think he’s suited to the games when we face packed defences because he is one of the few people in the squad who can drop a shoulder, or have a trick and make half a yard. He does need to improve the consistency of his end product and needs to learn he only needs to beat his man once


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516769  Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 5:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26758

Lyon say Aouar deal is off, we seem to be about £10m apart. Such a shame because we’ve got a free run at him this year. Won’t be the same next year.
Arsenal better have some alternatives lined up. There are plenty of very good central mids at the same price or cheaper than Aouar and Partey.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516770  Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 5:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:06 am
Posts: 16473

socrates wrote:
Hazuki wrote:
Usually reliable RMC now reporting Lyon has ended negotiations over Aouar. If we don't manage to get him or someone else in, it has to be said it's a huge failure of a transfer window. Going into the season with only two starting quality central midfielders just isn't good enough, no matter how difficult the market is at the moment.


Yep, it seems that way.

If we couldn't or wouldn't pay what Lyon wanted we should have ended negotiations a week ago giving us time to bring in targets who we could afford.

The words "wild goose chase" springs to mind.

Can't believe we would let Torreira go if we aren't bringing anyone else in, especially if its only a loan with an option to buy. It weakens us and potentailly strengthens Athletico with little risk for them.

I was hoping that the Arteta era would herald a new decisiveness at Arsenal, particularly in the transfer market. I hope this isn't a bad sign.

_________________
Hamba kakuhle, Madiba


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516771  Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 5:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:21 pm
Posts: 16415
Location: Stockholm

socrates wrote:
The rationale for buying a winger is only if they are significantly better than what we have and potential gamechangers. Zaha might fit that description but probably not Willian.

I know many will disagree, but I think Willian is a more useful player than Zaha. Not necessarily better, but more useful for what we need. Zaha has gamebreaking talent on a good day, but he also struggles a lot with inconsistency and like Pépé he can totally disappear. Willian is more dependable, won't win games on his own but over the course of a season he's proven himself to be a very consistent creative outlet. Covers several positions as well, and since he was a free agent he shouldn't really affect our transfer budget much at all.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516772  Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 5:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 5:27 pm
Posts: 11163

socrates wrote:
Hazuki wrote:
I hope you're right! I'm not dead set on Aouar or anyone in particular, I have enough faith in Arteta to identify players who fit into what he wants to do, but it would be so frustrating to leave ourselves short.

Unfortunately, we are not in a position where we can afford a bad window.

Games of brinkmanship are only good negotiating tactics if you win.

If we bring no other central midfielders in then I see it as a failed window.

Gabriel looks a promising signing in a position we needed to strengthen in but Willian is a good player who was was not a necessity.

We've weakened our GK depth and weakened our midfield depth if Torriera leaves.

We needed central midfielders and it looks increasingly like we will get none unless Edu has a couple of aces up his sleeve.

If we do let Torreira leave it will be astonishing not to recruit a midfielder or two. Especially if Torreira joins Atletico, a club with one of the two we’re supposed to want.

However good Gabriel turns out to be, and so far he’s looked very promising, if we end up losing Torreira and not getting either Aoura (I’m still not sure of the spelling) or Partey, I agree with both socrates and Hazuki (by firm implication) that it’s been a very poor transfer window for us. Even keeping Guendouzi, for me a big bonus, won’t change that. Unless a nobody who’s under the radar, like Top Gun implies is feasible, turns out to be another Brady, Vieira or Petit (and so on including Williams and Davis).


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516773  Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 5:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:22 pm
Posts: 20612

Hazuki wrote:
socrates wrote:
The rationale for buying a winger is only if they are significantly better than what we have and potential gamechangers. Zaha might fit that description but probably not Willian.

I know many will disagree, but I think Willian is a more useful player than Zaha. Not necessarily better, but more useful for what we need. Zaha has gamebreaking talent on a good day, but he also struggles a lot with inconsistency and like Pépé he can totally disappear. Willian is more dependable, won't win games on his own but over the course of a season he's proven himself to be a very consistent creative outlet. Covers several positions as well, and since he was a free agent he shouldn't really affect our transfer budget much at all.


I was using Zaha as an example of a game-changing talent that you might be able to make a case for. He is inconsistent but would be be better at a bigger club where he might see more of the ball?

Willian is an odd one because we've given him 4 year deal so despite no transfer fee I am assuming there is a big signing-on fee and fairly large wages. The total outlay is not insubstantial, plus he will have little or no sell-on value towards the end of the contract.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516774  Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 5:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:22 pm
Posts: 20612

Bernard wrote:
socrates wrote:
Unfortunately, we are not in a position where we can afford a bad window.

Games of brinkmanship are only good negotiating tactics if you win.

If we bring no other central midfielders in then I see it as a failed window.

Gabriel looks a promising signing in a position we needed to strengthen in but Willian is a good player who was was not a necessity.

We've weakened our GK depth and weakened our midfield depth if Torriera leaves.

We needed central midfielders and it looks increasingly like we will get none unless Edu has a couple of aces up his sleeve.

If we do let Torreira leave it will be astonishing not to recruit a midfielder or two. Especially if Torreira joins Atletico, a club with one of the two we’re supposed to want.

However good Gabriel turns out to be, and so far he’s looked very promising, if we end up losing Torreira and not getting either Aoura (I’m still not sure of the spelling) or Partey, I agree with both socrates and Hazuki (by firm implication) that it’s been a very poor transfer window for us. Even keeping Guendouzi, for me a big bonus, won’t change that. Unless a nobody who’s under the radar, like Top Gun implies is feasible, turns out to be another Brady, Vieira or Petit (and so on including Williams and Davis).


i know its easier said than done, especially if you are chasing an elite talent, but we should have drawn a line under the Aouar and Partey deals days ago if it was clear we could not afford them and moved on to other targets.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516775  Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 5:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 9:51 pm
Posts: 3573

socrates wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:
Good deal for them. They are desperate for someone to lead the line


I think it could potentially be a good deal. He's not clinical but his pace, movement and strength gets him into so many goalscoring positions that he still ends up scoring lots of goals.

He's 33 on a free. A strong and still feared striker.

_________________
Be careful who you call your friends. I'd rather have four quarters than one hundred pennies.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516776  Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 5:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 9:51 pm
Posts: 3573

Zed wrote:
socrates wrote:

I think it could potentially be a good deal. He's not clinical but his pace, movement and strength gets him into so many goalscoring positions that he still ends up scoring lots of goals.

He's 33 and no fee. A strong and still feared striker.

_________________
Be careful who you call your friends. I'd rather have four quarters than one hundred pennies.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516777  Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 6:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 4:33 pm
Posts: 1374

Decaf wrote:
socrates wrote:

Yep, it seems that way.

If we couldn't or wouldn't pay what Lyon wanted we should have ended negotiations a week ago giving us time to bring in targets who we could afford.

The words "wild goose chase" springs to mind.

Can't believe we would let Torreira go if we aren't bringing anyone else in, especially if its only a loan with an option to buy. It weakens us and potentailly strengthens Athletico with little risk for them.

I was hoping that the Arteta era would herald a new decisiveness at Arsenal, particularly in the transfer market. I hope this isn't a bad sign.

Indeed. If by the end of this transfer window we end up with Torreira gone and no midfield player(s) brought in then Edu is a shoe in for the Ivan Gazidis award for doing *%^@ all to justify your handsome salary. Pull your finger out fella.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516778  Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 6:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:21 pm
Posts: 16415
Location: Stockholm

socrates wrote:
I was using Zaha as an example of a game-changing talent that you might be able to make a case for. He is inconsistent but would be be better at a bigger club where he might see more of the ball?

Willian is an odd one because we've given him 4 year deal so despite no transfer fee I am assuming there is a big signing-on fee and fairly large wages. The total outlay is not insubstantial, plus he will have little or no sell-on value towards the end of the contract.

I really don't think it's odd though. Whether we use Zaha or someone else like him as an example, we're talking a big transfer fee, and seeing how we're struggling to get our midfield targets it would've been complete neglect to spend big on a winger. Willian's wage is another matter I think, it's a big cost in total but spread out over multiple years. Getting a player of quality without taking a big chunk from the transfer budget was a really smart move on our part.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516779  Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 6:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:06 am
Posts: 16473

Great stuff from Leeds. City did well to get a point.

_________________
Hamba kakuhle, Madiba


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516780  Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 6:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:22 pm
Posts: 20612

Hazuki wrote:
socrates wrote:
I was using Zaha as an example of a game-changing talent that you might be able to make a case for. He is inconsistent but would be be better at a bigger club where he might see more of the ball?

Willian is an odd one because we've given him 4 year deal so despite no transfer fee I am assuming there is a big signing-on fee and fairly large wages. The total outlay is not insubstantial, plus he will have little or no sell-on value towards the end of the contract.

I really don't think it's odd though. Whether we use Zaha or someone else like him as an example, we're talking a big transfer fee, and seeing how we're struggling to get our midfield targets it would've been complete neglect to spend big on a winger. Willian's wage is another matter I think, it's a big cost in total but spread out over multiple years. Getting a player of quality without taking a big chunk from the transfer budget was a really smart move on our part.


Maybe it is, maybe is isn't. Only time will tell. At his age we don't know if he's got 2,3 or 4 years left at the top.

What we did need was smart moves on the types of players who could address obvious deficiencies in the team. I'm not even talking about well known names such as Partey or Aouar, there must be some decent young talent in the Spanish, Italian, French, German, Portuguese and Dutch leagues. Not to mention South America where Edu allegedly has an advantage.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516781  Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 6:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:22 pm
Posts: 20612

Decaf wrote:
Great stuff from Leeds. City did well to get a point.


Leeds are brilliant to watch. Much more exciting than us.

Bielsa certainly gets the most out of what you would perceive as some fairly ordinary players.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516782  Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 6:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:22 pm
Posts: 20612

What I would say is that we can't be loaning out Torreira if we aren't bringing someone else in. That would be madness.

He may not have had the greatest season last year but he's still a young and talented player who would have got plenty of games in shortened season. A very useful player to have when the games are coming thick and fast.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516783  Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 7:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18419

socrates wrote:
What I would say is that we can't be loaning out Torreira if we aren't bringing someone else in. That would be madness.

.


You might be right soc

There’s no way the club can conclude it’s negotiation on Torriera without understanding clearly what’s happening with Thomas Partey. Just the natural conversations between the clubs would determine that.

I read that Torreiras option to buy is only 18.8 million which seems quite low. Just a gut feeling but I think we might have signed Thomas Partey and his price was somehow agreed in conjunction with the other transfer.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516784  Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 8:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:46 pm
Posts: 3036

Admittedly a boring position to take but let’s wait and see what’s happened with transfers in a few days time. There are a lot of poker faces and little cash around but I’ll be surprised if the only change to our midfield is effectively swapping Torreira for Elneny.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516785  Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 8:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:21 pm
Posts: 16415
Location: Stockholm

Bored wrote:
Admittedly a boring position to take but let’s wait and see what’s happened with transfers in a few days time.

Boring perhaps, but you're right of course. Shouldn't be panicking yet, though I have to admit at being disappointed that we're seemingly not getting Aouar. I watched almost an entire Lyon game last weekend to get a better look at what kind of player he is, and not it was probably all for nothing.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516786  Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 8:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 5:27 pm
Posts: 11163

TOP GUN wrote:
Just a gut feeling but I think we might have signed Thomas Partey and his price was somehow agreed in conjunction with the other transfer.

I hope you’re right but what’s the point in not confirming it on Arsenal.com if he’s already signed? It has to be confirmed in a couple of days anyway. So is there an advantage for either Arsenal or Atletico in waiting 48 hours? If there is, what is it?


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516787  Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 8:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18419

Bernard wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:
Just a gut feeling but I think we might have signed Thomas Partey and his price was somehow agreed in conjunction with the other transfer.

I hope you’re right but what’s the point in not confirming it on Arsenal.com if he’s already signed? It has to be confirmed in a couple of days anyway. So is there an advantage for either Arsenal or Atletico in waiting 48 hours? If there is, what is it?

So he could play today ? They might have been short in midfield or had already travelled to play

Aren’t all the announcements delayed also.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516788  Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 8:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:22 pm
Posts: 20612

Somebody on twitter made me chuckle.........in response to the rumours of our interest in Jorghino they said that knowing our lot they are probably offering Chelsea cash + Willian :laughing7:


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516789  Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 9:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 5:27 pm
Posts: 11163

TOP GUN wrote:
Bernard wrote:
I hope you’re right but what’s the point in not confirming it on Arsenal.com if he’s already signed? It has to be confirmed in a couple of days anyway. So is there an advantage for either Arsenal or Atletico in waiting 48 hours? If there is, what is it?

So he could play today ? They might have been short in midfield or had already travelled to play

Aren’t all the announcements delayed also.

Did Partey play today? If so and he was joining us, that sounds risky in case he got injured. Unlikely but players do get injured, so certainly possible. If he played what was the reaction of Atletico fans to him? Had he already signed for us I’d be surprised if there were no reports in Spain about it. From that, some sort of reaction from Atletico fans be it a positive ‘thanks for everything‘ or a negative ‘sod off you disloyal git’.

I’m not sure if announcements are delayed. Perhaps they are but Arsenal.com always seem to confirm them pretty quickly, as far as I’ve noticed anyway.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516790  Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 9:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26758

We made a £32m bid for Aouar, no excuse to not spend that on another centre mid. We’re not in the position to keep our money and wait for the preferred target.
Pellegrini, Zakaria, Soumare....something must be done.

We have maybe 6-7 players who will contribute barely anything this season and will eat up close to £1m a week in wages.

Not being able to shift these players is holding us back more than anything at the moment


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516791  Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 9:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18419

Bernard wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:
So he could play today ? They might have been short in midfield or had already travelled to play

Aren’t all the announcements delayed also.

Did Partey play today? If so and he was joining us, that sounds risky in case he got injured. Unlikely but players do get injured, so certainly risky. If he played what was the reaction of Atletico fans to him? Had he already signed for us I’d be surprised if there was no reports in Spain about it. From that, some sort of reaction from Atletico fans be it a positive ‘thanks for everything‘ or a negative ‘sod off you disloyal git’.



Do you remember when Nasri played for us at the weekend and it was totally evident he was leaving for city on the Monday. Everyone knew. Possibly the same thing. I don’t know just a hunch.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516792  Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2020 5:36 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26758

Saliba potentially going on loan is a strange one. Looking at the Europa league draw there are game right there than he can play, use those to see if he’s ready. He’s not exactly some inexperienced kid, he’s still played at the top level in France against Neymar and Mbappe.

Right now the best back 3 for me is Mustafi, Luiz, Gabriel. Mari and Tierney May be more reliable than Mustafi but we’ve left ourselves unbalanced with better left sided CB now

I don’t expect much transfer work to be done today with a game on so it could all go to the last day. We’re ideally still looking at 5 or so out and at least 2 in. Right now this squad is still only a top 8 squad. We’re at the level of Leicester and Everton And Wolves for quality in the squad, our second 11 is probably stronger than those 3 but I’m not certain the first 11 is


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516793  Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2020 6:57 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:46 pm
Posts: 3036

As a club there is a undoubted feeling we are on the up again. We have have one of the most promising managers in the league, we’ve just won the FA cup, we have kept Aubameyang, and we are developing into a properly drilled team with tactics and fight. Yet annoyingly it’s all relative to what other clubs are doing. Unless we see some significant transfers in the next few days, it’s hard to argue that the team has been equipped to make up ground on our immediate rivals who have all strengthened. Perhaps Wolves and Sheffield Utd look the most vulnerable but then Leeds and Everton look very promising at this very early stage. Right now, on a very wet and gloomy Sunday, I would say the best we can hope for this season is to tread water. Hopefully a cup run and Europa League qualification, but with the team settling down and developing tactically and mentally. Hopefully by next summer we will finally get rid of some serious deadwood, whilst getting some serious money back into the club and rebuilding can continue.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516794  Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2020 7:02 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:46 pm
Posts: 3036

having just re-read my previous post, perhaps I should have said I expect us to tread water this season, but my big hope is that we win a trophy and actually compete for a place in the top four.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516795  Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2020 7:47 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:46 pm
Posts: 3036

In this mornings Arseblog he says that FFP has been relaxed and now is the moment for KSE to kick in with some extra £££ for team building.
Nobody expects them to do that as they clearly aren’t interested in Arsenal’s sporting performance. But it will be a massive statement of DISINTENT not to use this opportunity to push Arsenal forward.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516796  Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2020 8:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 5:27 pm
Posts: 11163

TOP GUN wrote:
Do you remember when Nasri played for us at the weekend and it was totally evident he was leaving for city on the Monday. Everyone knew. Possibly the same thing. I don’t know just a hunch.

No I don’t remember Nasri’s final game for Arsenal. But if Partey is joining Arsenal I still find it odd for Atletico to play him, and he did play yesterday, and risk him getting injured. Whether Wenger played Nasri or not. Wenger was a bit of a nutter in some respects, anyway.

What I find more supportive of your hunch is if Torreira goes to Atletico, whether it’s a loan or a permanent deal. Swaps are more difficult to conclude, but if they’re both defensive midfielders it seems strange for Arsenal to offload Torreira to Atletico without Partey coming the other way. Unless they know Aouar is arriving.

Well, all will be known tomorrow evening. But I am less confident than you.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516797  Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2020 9:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 5:27 pm
Posts: 11163

Bored wrote:
In this mornings Arseblog he says that FFP has been relaxed and now is the moment for KSE to kick in with some extra £££ for team building.
Nobody expects them to do that as they clearly aren’t interested in Arsenal’s sporting performance. But it will be a massive statement of DISINTENT not to use this opportunity to push Arsenal forward.

Sums it up. Stan Kroenke: “I didn’t buy Arsenal stake to win trophies” and “If you want to win championships then you would never get involved”.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.standa ... html%3Famp


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516798  Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2020 9:03 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:02 pm
Posts: 18419

Bernard wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:
Do you remember when Nasri played for us at the weekend and it was totally evident he was leaving for city on the Monday. Everyone knew. Possibly the same thing. I don’t know just a hunch.



What I find more supportive of your hunch is if Torreira goes to Atletico, whether it’s a loan or a permanent deal. Swaps are more difficult to conclude, but if they’re both defensive midfielders it seems strange for Arsenal to offload Torreira to Atletico without Partey coming the other way. Unless they know Aouar is arriving.

.


This is kind of why I think Socrates was right. We bid 38 million for Aour and we know that because they said. The club decided not to make any further offers for a reason and that might be that he was too expensive or it could mean that we have decided to go in a different direction. What hasn’t changed is we are desperate for midfield reinforcements so do we believe we have simply decided not to do anything and at the same time we’ve been locked in discussions with athletico. I wouldn’t be shocked if Partey turns up tomorrow


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516799  Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2020 9:10 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 9:20 am
Posts: 9123

Rich wrote:
Saliba potentially going on loan is a strange one. Looking at the Europa league draw there are game right there than he can play, use those to see if he’s ready. He’s not exactly some inexperienced kid, he’s still played at the top level in France against Neymar and Mbappe.

Right now the best back 3 for me is Mustafi, Luiz, Gabriel. Mari and Tierney May be more reliable than Mustafi but we’ve left ourselves unbalanced with better left sided CB now

I don’t expect much transfer work to be done today with a game on so it could all go to the last day. We’re ideally still looking at 5 or so out and at least 2 in. Right now this squad is still only a top 8 squad. We’re at the level of Leicester and Everton And Wolves for quality in the squad, our second 11 is probably stronger than those 3 but I’m not certain the first 11 is


If Wolves continue to struggle, I would like to see us try get some of their players next season.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #516800  Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2020 9:11 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 26758

Bernard wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:
Do you remember when Nasri played for us at the weekend and it was totally evident he was leaving for city on the Monday. Everyone knew. Possibly the same thing. I don’t know just a hunch.

No I don’t remember Nasri’s final game for Arsenal. But if Partey is joining Arsenal I still find it odd for Atletico to play him, and he did play yesterday, and risk him getting injured. Whether Wenger played Nasri or not. Wenger was a bit of a nutter in some respects, anyway.

What I find more supportive of your hunch is if Torreira goes to Atletico, whether it’s a loan or a permanent deal. Swaps are more difficult to conclude, but if they’re both defensive midfielders it seems strange for Arsenal to offload Torreira to Atletico without Partey coming the other way. Unless they know Aouar is arriving.

Well, all will be known tomorrow evening. But I am less confident than you.

I think I heard there is a rule for Spanish clubs where they can only spend 25% of money coming in. Not sure if this is all Spanish clubs but it has been mentioned in relation to Atletico. Could suggest why they don’t want to do a swap or a linked deal. They want the most cash direct in to the club.
If Torriera is a £7m Liam with option to buy for a further £19m then that sounds ok as long as we replace him. Getting decent loan fees is a decent income, chelsea loaned Zouma to stoke and Everton for a combined £15m, so £15m in for a player who is still on your books and retains his transfer value to you


 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
     [ 571945 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1 ... 12917, 12918, 12919, 12920, 12921, 12922, 12923 ... 14299  Next

All times are UTC

Gooners Online - Click to see what Everyones Doing

Colour Key:  Visited Profile    Members Profile      Admin

Get Latest Post

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 239 guests


Search for:

cron

Go to Top

Powered by php BB © 1993 - 2018