Fixtures Thurs Nov 23rd - FC Cologne - RheinEnergieStadion - Europa League - 6:00 Pm

Kick-Off

        Injuries            Steve Gleiber


Get the Latest Post Go to the Bottom of Page It is currently Wed Nov 22, 2017 7:05 am

All times are UTC


  


Reply to topic

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], warrior and 3 guests

 
Post #482081  Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2017 7:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:42 am
Posts: 10772
Location: Rotorua New Zealand

AmericanGooner wrote:
Recipe for disaster. Neo Nazi, KKK and other such similar groups march in Virginia for the removal of Confederate general Robert E. Lee's statue's removal. Counter protesters, Virginia is an 'open carry' state which on its face is mind boggling. Protesters armed, legally, publicly! Amazed its not kicked off yet, nor do I want it to.
Its insane. If we have to train police in how to use a gun publicly and even they get it wrong, how can a society have 'open carry' with firearms by people who have no training whatsoever?! Insanity. A case can be made for the home..but in public?


I know you haven't got the gonads to answer and you probably wont see this ; but I can't resist .

"A case can be made for a gun in the home " .......Tell that to the Japanese exchange student who decided to take part in Halloween ...... door knocked with a mask and got half his head blown off .

Neo Nazi , KKK and all these other irresponsible looneys .... ???

.. an Australian woman got shot dead last week by the COPS .... AND SHE WAS THE ONE WHO PHONED IN THE DISTRESS CALL .

" Police training " :laughing7: :laughing7: ..... shoot anything that moves .


 Profile  
 
 
Post #482082  Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2017 8:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:42 am
Posts: 10772
Location: Rotorua New Zealand

socrates wrote:
Hazuki wrote:
And Bellerin just doesn't look like his usual self. His decision making yesterday was not good, constantly bombing forward at the wrong time and leaving Holding exposed. I think it would've looked completely different with just one of Mertesacker or Koscielny on the pitch.


Agree with that. Ox deserves to play there on current form



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OUesbTObC9A

:love4: :love4: " I love you Oxo cube ,
With your love so rare and true
Oh Oxo ..... my Oxo cube ,
Well I love you now ,
I love my Oxo cube ....... :icon_flower:

Okay out in the shed to revamp the engine stand .

Nice day ; a balmy 9 degrees at the moment , a predicted tropical high of 14 . Dispense with the jersey


 Profile  
 
 
Post #482083  Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2017 10:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:53 pm
Posts: 16321

Four boys in Green on the Burnley side....yeöoooooo give it a lash

_________________
It's a terrible love and I'm walking with spiders.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #482084  Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2017 2:13 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 2:55 pm
Posts: 6897

Sabir wrote:
gooner7 wrote:
Chelsea beaten at home on opening day. How sweet :icon_mrgreen:

I find it incredible that they've sold Matic. He gave them so much presence in midfield and formed a formidable partnership with Kante. Why on earth would you break that up?


Matic probably wanted to be with Mourinho much more than being with Chelsea. But I agree, crazy to let him go so easily, and to a top opponent.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #482085  Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2017 7:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:52 pm
Posts: 17275

Highlight of athletics for me was Sally Pearson's hurdles win - what joy in victory. A nod to the great Betty Cuthbert.


Attachments:


_________________
"Young and caught up in life, we seldom watched the skies.”
 Profile  
 
 
Post #482086  Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2017 9:18 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 11985

Sabir wrote:
TOP GUN wrote:
Just read that Gibbs won't be going to Watford as they won't pay his 80k a week wages and he won't take a pay cut. Mental we offered him that contract if true but shows how crazy football is that a player would prefer to barely play rather than take a pay cut. I think we may need to consider taking reduced fees for some of these players now otherwise we won't shift them

I think this is the main reason we sell players for so cheap. Their wages are so high that the club is usually prepared to accept a smaller transfer fee. I wonder if it's the new guy from team Sky that is demanding we get bigger transfer fees. I'm not sure, I think £10/12m for fringe players like Gibbs that we've turned down were reasonable offers. We need to trim the squad.

Disappointing that we don't seem to be able to concentrate on BOTH incoming and outgoing players. Any news towards transfers in is just dead. 2 players in, both look good additions, but once again Wenger has taken a squad that failed and believes he can make them 20 points better with just a couple of tweaks.

Right now Wenger is talking about having a squad that is too big, and it is, there are 4-5 players that should be trimmed BUT just because you have the right numbers doesn't mean you have the right quality. Central midfield is absolutely screaming out for another player. I also think a player who can play behind Lacazette is required.
On the CB we certainly have plenty of them but I'd love to have VVD and move on two lesser players. However, CB is probably the last position Wenger will be strengthening this summer


 Profile  
 
 
Post #482087  Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2017 10:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 10:02 pm
Posts: 5798

Rich wrote:
Sabir wrote:
I think this is the main reason we sell players for so cheap. Their wages are so high that the club is usually prepared to accept a smaller transfer fee. I wonder if it's the new guy from team Sky that is demanding we get bigger transfer fees. I'm not sure, I think £10/12m for fringe players like Gibbs that we've turned down were reasonable offers. We need to trim the squad.

Disappointing that we don't seem to be able to concentrate on BOTH incoming and outgoing players. Any news towards transfers in is just dead. 2 players in, both look good additions, but once again Wenger has taken a squad that failed and believes he can make them 20 points better with just a couple of tweaks.

Right now Wenger is talking about having a squad that is too big, and it is, there are 4-5 players that should be trimmed BUT just because you have the right numbers doesn't mean you have the right quality. Central midfield is absolutely screaming out for another player. I also think a player who can play behind Lacazette is required.
On the CB we certainly have plenty of them but I'd love to have VVD and move on two lesser players. However, CB is probably the last position Wenger will be strengthening this summer

Does just having players on the books mean they have to be included in the squad? I wouldn't have thought so. So if Wenger desperately wants to trim the squad, can't he just tell certain players he won't be including them in the squad for this season? Moreover, I would have thought those players would have an added incentive to agree to moves elsewhere, even if the destination clubs aren't willing to meet the wages they got at Arsenal.

Of course, whether they're in the squad or not players will all be legally entitled to continue receiving wages in accordance with the terms of their existing contracts with Arsenal, up until the point they do leave. And if they don't leave, up until the point their contract at Arsenal expires. I also suspect it's likely other clubs would be unwilling to pay so much in transfer fees for players they know aren't being included in the Arsenal's first team squad. But if Arsenal are willing to give up the £50m they could sell a player for now when they expect to him to leave for free in a year (and that's how I'm reading Wenger's 'not super optimistic' comment), is that really such a big deal?

_________________
Kroenke out!


 Profile  
 
 
Post #482088  Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2017 10:57 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 11985

Bernard wrote:
Does just having players on the books mean they have to be included in the squad? I wouldn't have thought so. So if Wenger desperately wants to trim the squad, can't he just tell certain players he won't be including them in the squad for this season? Moreover, I would have thought those players would have an added incentive to agree to moves elsewhere, even if the destination clubs aren't willing to meet the wages they got at Arsenal.

Of course, whether they're in the squad or not players will all be legally entitled to continue receiving wages in accordance with the terms of their existing contracts with Arsenal, up until the point they do leave. And if they don't leave, up until the point their contract at Arsenal expires. I also suspect it's likely other clubs would be unwilling to pay so much in transfer fees for players they know aren't being included in the Arsenal's first team squad. But if Arsenal are willing to give up the £50m they could sell a player for now when they expect to him to leave for free in a year (and that's how I'm reading Wenger's 'not super optimistic' comment), is that really such a big deal?

I agree with you on the Sanchez issue. In these situations there has to be a tipping point for the fee that means it makes more sense to sell than keep.
With regards to our squad players, they could be told they won't be registered but we should just be dropping the asking price of these players. If for example Debuchy, Jenkinson, Gibbs, Wilshere are on an average of £50k per week each (I expect it is more) then even just giving them all a free transfer saves £10m this season. You won't get much for Debuchy but we should be able to get £3m for Jenkinson, £7m for Gibbs and £10m for Wilshere which are absolute knock down prices. Fees and wages comes to £30m.

What has happened to Joel Campbell?


 Profile  
 
 
Post #482089  Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2017 11:00 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 11985

Saw some 'ball in play' stats from the first day. The matches range from 49 to 59 minutes of actual ball in play. I think there is a good argument for 60 minutes games where the clock is stopped when the ball is dead. Time-keeping can be controlled by someone other than the ref who via a mic can call "time on, time off" as he requires similar to Rugby


 Profile  
 
 
Post #482090  Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2017 11:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:22 pm
Posts: 17192

Rich wrote:
Sabir wrote:
I think this is the main reason we sell players for so cheap. Their wages are so high that the club is usually prepared to accept a smaller transfer fee. I wonder if it's the new guy from team Sky that is demanding we get bigger transfer fees. I'm not sure, I think £10/12m for fringe players like Gibbs that we've turned down were reasonable offers. We need to trim the squad.

Disappointing that we don't seem to be able to concentrate on BOTH incoming and outgoing players. Any news towards transfers in is just dead. 2 players in, both look good additions, but once again Wenger has taken a squad that failed and believes he can make them 20 points better with just a couple of tweaks.

Right now Wenger is talking about having a squad that is too big, and it is, there are 4-5 players that should be trimmed BUT just because you have the right numbers doesn't mean you have the right quality. Central midfield is absolutely screaming out for another player. I also think a player who can play behind Lacazette is required.
On the CB we certainly have plenty of them but I'd love to have VVD and move on two lesser players. However, CB is probably the last position Wenger will be strengthening this summer


Morning Rich,

The talk this morning is that Wenger has now given up on Lemar and that we are unlikely to make any further signings.

Quelle suprise!


 Profile  
 
 
Post #482091  Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2017 12:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 10:02 pm
Posts: 5798

socrates wrote:
The talk this morning is that Wenger has now given up on Lemar and that we are unlikely to make any further signings.

Quelle suprise!

The ambulance taking Wenger for his personality transplant must have broken down on the way to the hospital.

_________________
Kroenke out!


 Profile  
 
 
Post #482092  Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2017 12:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 10:12 am
Posts: 3081
Location: Melbourne

Rich wrote:
Saw some 'ball in play' stats from the first day. The matches range from 49 to 59 minutes of actual ball in play. I think there is a good argument for 60 minutes games where the clock is stopped when the ball is dead. Time-keeping can be controlled by someone other than the ref who via a mic can call "time on, time off" as he requires similar to Rugby


Or make them play 90 minutes ball in play and see how quickly opposition goalies suddenly want to kick off. :laughing7:


 Profile  
 
 
Post #482093  Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2017 12:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 10:12 am
Posts: 3081
Location: Melbourne

socrates wrote:
Rich wrote:
Disappointing that we don't seem to be able to concentrate on BOTH incoming and outgoing players. Any news towards transfers in is just dead. 2 players in, both look good additions, but once again Wenger has taken a squad that failed and believes he can make them 20 points better with just a couple of tweaks.

Right now Wenger is talking about having a squad that is too big, and it is, there are 4-5 players that should be trimmed BUT just because you have the right numbers doesn't mean you have the right quality. Central midfield is absolutely screaming out for another player. I also think a player who can play behind Lacazette is required.
On the CB we certainly have plenty of them but I'd love to have VVD and move on two lesser players. However, CB is probably the last position Wenger will be strengthening this summer


Morning Rich,

The talk this morning is that Wenger has now given up on Lemar and that we are unlikely to make any further signings.

Quelle suprise!


Personally not too fussed about Lemar. Looked like a skinny weakling and not really what Arsenal need.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #482094  Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2017 1:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 11985

Shelvey is an idiot. Very unsubtle stamp on Ali, straight red and pretty much gifting the 3 points to spurs. It annoys me when teams do that against our top 6 rivals


 Profile  
 
 
Post #482095  Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2017 2:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:58 am
Posts: 26324

Kane should should have been shown a straight red for that scissor tackle earlier in the match.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #482096  Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2017 2:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:21 pm
Posts: 13109
Location: Stockholm

Rich wrote:
Shelvey is an idiot. Very unsubtle stamp on Ali, straight red and pretty much gifting the 3 points to spurs. It annoys me when teams do that against our top 6 rivals

With the ref two yards away, looking right at them. What a stupid thing to do. Newcastle were hanging in there pretty well up until that.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #482097  Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2017 5:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:29 pm
Posts: 4187

Rumours persisting of sanchez in paris negotiating with psg.
We really need to call the shots if this comes off and should be demanding 2 of their players plus cash from the trio of matuidi , rabiot and draxler.
I reckon there is a good chance psg would happliy give up these players to get sanchez and either of them would greatly improve our team.
Lets be aggressive and get something that benefits us , not just cash.
If sanchez really wants out then to psg is perfect.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #482098  Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2017 5:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 11985

david.d wrote:
Rumours persisting of sanchez in paris negotiating with psg.
We really need to call the shots if this comes off and should be demanding 2 of their players plus cash from the trio of matuidi , rabiot and draxler.
I reckon there is a good chance psg would happliy give up these players to get sanchez and either of them would greatly improve our team.
Lets be aggressive and get something that benefits us , not just cash.
If sanchez really wants out then to psg is perfect.

I'd take Rabiot and Draxler in a heartbeat. I'd prefer a happy and vomited Sanchez to sign a new contract but if he won't sign then sell him to PSG and take some of their players as you've mentioned.
Rabiot may be getable I doubt draxler is, they might be willing to lose Lucas moura


 Profile  
 
 
Post #482099  Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2017 6:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 10:02 pm
Posts: 5798

Rich wrote:
I'd take Rabiot and Draxler in a heartbeat. I'd prefer a happy and vomited Sanchez to sign a new contract but if he won't sign then sell him to PSG and take some of their players as you've mentioned.
Rabiot may be getable I doubt draxler is, they might be willing to lose Lucas moura

Rich, you'd "prefer a happy and vomited Sanchez"? With c next to v on a qwerty keyboard I wondered at first if you meant happy and committed, but I'm not sure if committed is close enough to vomited with the extra m and t. So maybe you want him to be jovial after throwing up?

_________________
Kroenke out!


 Profile  
 
 
Post #482100  Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2017 6:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:22 pm
Posts: 17192

At first glance United now look a big powerful side with plenty of pace in Lukaku, Rashford, Martial etc.

Matic looks a perfect fit. A big strong unit with plenty of composure on the ball who gives Pogba the licence to roam. Seems crazy for Chelsea to let him go to a rival.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #482101  Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2017 6:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 11985

Bernard wrote:
Rich wrote:
I'd take Rabiot and Draxler in a heartbeat. I'd prefer a happy and vomited Sanchez to sign a new contract but if he won't sign then sell him to PSG and take some of their players as you've mentioned.
Rabiot may be getable I doubt draxler is, they might be willing to lose Lucas moura

Rich, you'd "prefer a happy and vomited Sanchez"? With c next to v on a qwerty keyboard I wondered at first if you meant happy and committed, but I'm not sure if committed is close enough to vomited with the extra m and t. So maybe you want him to be jovial after throwing up?

Haha, typed on an iPhone which has a tendency to autocorrect even the most simple words to something completely different. Rest assured I do not have a desire to see the contents of Sanchez's stomach!


 Profile  
 
 
Post #482102  Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2017 6:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 11985

socrates wrote:
At first glance United now look a big powerful side with plenty of pace in Lukaku, Rashford, Martial etc.

Matic looks a perfect fit. A big strong unit with plenty of composure on the ball who gives Pogba the licence to roam. Seems crazy for Chelsea to let him go to a rival.

Jose typical signings all 6ft + and makes sure players get in the gym. Good template for the league but won't suit Europe.

Both Manchester clubs should absolutely be right up there for the title given the money they have both spent in the last 4 years. It's roughly a combined £1.3 billion!

The player who could make a difference for them this year is Mykitarian. Has a history of not settling quickly but improves vastly in his second season. He's a class act and can be the creative hub for their team if Jose lets him and allows him some slack for his lack of defensive awareness


 Profile  
 
 
Post #482103  Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2017 6:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:22 pm
Posts: 17192

It just feels like we had the opportunity to bring in 3 or 4 top quality players this summer but will probably have to settle for 2.

We paid £50m for Laca and Kolasinac was free. We got £10m for Chesney and will probably sell a couple more fringe players for a combined £20m or so. Our net spend could be around £20m which is not exactly the spend of a club with massive ambition.

I understand wages have to be taken into account but its not like we have tied down Alexis, Özil or Ox to new contracts either.

I may be wrong but it feels like another underwhelming transfer window.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #482104  Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2017 8:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2015 8:52 pm
Posts: 764
Location: Salisbury

socrates wrote:
It just feels like we had the opportunity to bring in 3 or 4 top quality players this summer but will probably have to settle for 2.

We paid £50m for Laca and Kolasinac was free. We got £10m for Chesney and will probably sell a couple more fringe players for a combined £20m or so. Our net spend could be around £20m which is not exactly the spend of a club with massive ambition.

I understand wages have to be taken into account but its not like we have tied down Alexis, Özil or Ox to new contracts either.

I may be wrong but it feels like another underwhelming transfer window.


I could be wrong here but are you implying we may, yet again, be the infamous "1 or 2 (or 3!) players short".

No DoF
No new AM
No new senior coaches
No change in transfer strategy
Best player wants to leave

Catalyst for change?. Wenger will never change and Wenger will never win a major trophy but with the full backing of our unambitious owner this will continue indefinitely until both are gone, wake me up at that point please.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #482105  Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2017 9:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:22 pm
Posts: 17192

Wilts-Gooner wrote:
socrates wrote:
It just feels like we had the opportunity to bring in 3 or 4 top quality players this summer but will probably have to settle for 2.

We paid £50m for Laca and Kolasinac was free. We got £10m for Chesney and will probably sell a couple more fringe players for a combined £20m or so. Our net spend could be around £20m which is not exactly the spend of a club with massive ambition.

I understand wages have to be taken into account but its not like we have tied down Alexis, Özil or Ox to new contracts either.

I may be wrong but it feels like another underwhelming transfer window.


I could be wrong here but are you implying we may, yet again, be the infamous "1 or 2 (or 3!) players short".

No DoF
No new AM
No new senior coaches
No change in transfer strategy
Best player wants to leave

Catalyst for change?. Wenger will never change and Wenger will never win a major trophy but with the full backing of our unambitious owner this will continue indefinitely until both are gone, wake me up at that point please.


It's mad Wilts. Our biggest shareholders are two of the richest men in the world, one who doesn't want to put his hand in his pocket and the other who does but can't.

And one of the highest paid managers in the world does exactly what he pleases and routinely leaves us short of what is required.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #482106  Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2017 9:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:42 am
Posts: 10772
Location: Rotorua New Zealand

Rich wrote:
Saw some 'ball in play' stats from the first day. The matches range from 49 to 59 minutes of actual ball in play. I think there is a good argument for 60 minutes games where the clock is stopped when the ball is dead. Time-keeping can be controlled by someone other than the ref who via a mic can call "time on, time off" as he requires similar to Rugby

Don't even communicate with the ref .... have some adjudicator in the stand . He stops the clock when ball is out of play and restarts it when the goal kick or throw in has been taken . No -one but he knows how much time is left , don't put up a board saying extra time .
When time is up ...... blow a siren . That would help eliminate the time wasting , dodgy subs , prolonged goal kicks .

Rugby is far from perfect , the clock keeps ticking when scrums collapse , re set collapse , and for periods during injury breaks .

Time rattled on while both teams waited while , some plank sat on his arse to put his boot back on last week .

Rugby has a dopey rule ... play carries on after the siren until the ball goes out or the team in possession of the ball makes a mistake


 Profile  
 
 
Post #482107  Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2017 9:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 10:02 pm
Posts: 5798

kiwipete wrote:
Rich wrote:
Saw some 'ball in play' stats from the first day. The matches range from 49 to 59 minutes of actual ball in play. I think there is a good argument for 60 minutes games where the clock is stopped when the ball is dead. Time-keeping can be controlled by someone other than the ref who via a mic can call "time on, time off" as he requires similar to Rugby

Don't even communicate with the ref .... have some adjudicator in the stand . He stops the clock when ball is out of play and restarts it when the goal kick or throw in has been taken . No -one but he knows how much time is left , don't put up a board saying extra time .
When time is up ...... blow a siren . That would help eliminate the time wasting , dodgy subs , prolonged goal kicks .

Rugby is far from perfect , the clock keeps ticking when scrums collapse , re set collapse , and for periods during injury breaks .

Time rattled on while both teams waited while , some plank sat on his arse to put his boot back on last week .

Rugby has a dopey rule ... play carries on after the siren until the ball goes out or the team in possession of the ball makes a mistake

Stop the clock when the ball isn't in play, but why not make the buggers play for an hour and a half anyway? They get paid enough, after all, and we pay enough to watch games.

_________________
Kroenke out!


 Profile  
 
 
Post #482108  Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2017 9:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:42 am
Posts: 10772
Location: Rotorua New Zealand

socrates wrote:

It's mad Wilts. Our biggest shareholders are two of the richest men in the world, one who doesn't want to put his hand in his pocket and the other who does but can't.

And one of the highest paid managers in the world does exactly what he pleases and routinely leaves us short of what is required.



just to add to your misery we actually have three billionaires at the club . Farhad Moshiri owns 15% ... mind you he only has 1.4 billion so splashing a 100 mill on a couple of players might leave him a bit short .


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... -list.html


 Profile  
 
 
Post #482109  Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2017 9:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:42 am
Posts: 10772
Location: Rotorua New Zealand

Bernard wrote:
kiwipete wrote:
Don't even communicate with the ref .... have some adjudicator in the stand . He stops the clock when ball is out of play and restarts it when the goal kick or throw in has been taken . No -one but he knows how much time is left , don't put up a board saying extra time .


Time rattled on while both teams waited while , some plank sat on his arse to put his boot back on last week .

Rugby has a dopey rule ... play carries on after the siren until the ball goes out or the team in possession of the ball makes a mistake

Stop the clock when the ball isn't in play, but why not make the buggers play for an hour and a half anyway? They get paid enough, after all, and we pay enough to watch games.

Ye gods ... actually PLAY for an hour and a half .

These fairies collapse clutching their face when someone brushes their sock . You'd have all manner of humanitarian groups up in arms , Amnesty International , the United Nations would be called in .

I've said it before ...contrast the reactions between the Tour de France and footballers . Bloke falls off his bike blood everywhere , skin missing .. he immediately [ barring severe injury ] leaps up repairs his bike and carries on .
Soft cock footballers allow themselves to be stretchered off , only to make the sideline then wave to come back on .

Ask them to play for that time .... they'd need oxygen tents , salt tablets , iron lungs , vitamin injections .


 Profile  
 
 
Post #482110  Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2017 10:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 10:02 pm
Posts: 5798

kiwipete wrote:
just to add to your misery we actually have three billionaires at the club . Farhad Moshiri owns 15% ... mind you he only has 1.4 billion so splashing a 100 mill on a couple of players might leave him a bit short .

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... -list.html

The article was published in March 2015 and is now out of date. When Moshiri bought into Everton, Usmanov became the sole owner of the Red and White shares.

_________________
Kroenke out!


 Profile  
 
 
Post #482111  Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2017 11:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 9:02 pm
Posts: 7959

I didn't watch the Utd game today but it was an impressive result. I expect them to be strong contenders this season. They have declined obviously since Fergie and have had several below par finishes but I also think the overall lack of quality of their squads has been exaggerated. They've had a lot of talent who just haven't clicked and the balance has been wrong but this summer appear to have added decent quality and importantly, players with size and in Matic, a dominant midfielder with winning mentality.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #482112  Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2017 12:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 1:31 pm
Posts: 7567
Location: London

Sabir wrote:
I didn't watch the Utd game today but it was an impressive result. I expect them to be strong contenders this season. They have declined obviously since Fergie and have had several below par finishes but I also think the overall lack of quality of their squads has been exaggerated. They've had a lot of talent who just haven't clicked and the balance has been wrong but this summer appear to have added decent quality and importantly, players with size and in Matic, a dominant midfielder with winning mentality.


To be fair a net spend of £600m in 5 years when starting with a title winning squad and a great youth set up should lead to a team that can challenge. Utd have a lot of very good players, but now they have a Manager who has bought the players he wants for his style and unlike his predecessors is under absolutely no pressure to use the academy. As long as he's willing to play attacking football, he can do what he wants and spend £200m every summer. They have to be considered first or second favourite this year because they have a successful manager, a strong club and the most expensively assembled squad in British history.

_________________
"....its up for grabs now.........THOMAS!"


 Profile  
 
 
Post #482113  Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2017 12:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 1:31 pm
Posts: 7567
Location: London

Sabir wrote:
I didn't watch the Utd game today but it was an impressive result. I expect them to be strong contenders this season. They have declined obviously since Fergie and have had several below par finishes but I also think the overall lack of quality of their squads has been exaggerated. They've had a lot of talent who just haven't clicked and the balance has been wrong but this summer appear to have added decent quality and importantly, players with size and in Matic, a dominant midfielder with winning mentality.


To be fair a net spend of £600m in 5 years when starting with a title winning squad and a great youth set up should lead to a team that can challenge. Utd have a lot of very good players, but now they have a Manager who has bought the players he wants for his style and unlike his predecessors is under absolutely no pressure to use the academy. As long as he's willing to play attacking football, he can do what he wants and spend £200m every summer. They have to be considered first or second favourite this year because they have a successful manager, a strong club and the most expensively assembled squad in British history.

_________________
"....its up for grabs now.........THOMAS!"


 Profile  
 
 
Post #482114  Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2017 12:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 1:31 pm
Posts: 7567
Location: London

socrates wrote:
It just feels like we had the opportunity to bring in 3 or 4 top quality players this summer but will probably have to settle for 2.

We paid £50m for Laca and Kolasinac was free. We got £10m for Chesney and will probably sell a couple more fringe players for a combined £20m or so. Our net spend could be around £20m which is not exactly the spend of a club with massive ambition.

I understand wages have to be taken into account but its not like we have tied down Alexis, Özil or Ox to new contracts either.

I may be wrong but it feels like another underwhelming transfer window.


I agree. I'm not sure its the wages that are the issue, but that the transfer merry go round has been stop start and with the usual teams who sell top players to buy shiny new toys just haven't been selling those players. I do think Monaco's summer business and the suddenly filthy rich Milan's has been enviable, but to be honest when City are spending 140m on 3 full backs, none of whom would represent significant upgrades over ours, its not been the best time to be buying, especially as we've totally failed in cleaning out the deadwood.

I like the players we've been chasing, both in terms of need and talent and long-term value (Mbappe, Lemar, Asensio, Rugani, Goretzka the best examples), but none of those clubs have any need to sell. My suspicion is that we'll see two more outs and one more in before the end of August, but I'd be delighted if we could pick up another central midfielder and another pacey left-footed wide-man. Of course, if Sanchez goes, our entire strategy has to change in a hurry.

_________________
"....its up for grabs now.........THOMAS!"


 Profile  
 
 
Post #482115  Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2017 2:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 10:12 am
Posts: 3081
Location: Melbourne

If Sanchez leaves then maybe we were a little hasty in selling Sanogo.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #482116  Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2017 3:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:58 am
Posts: 26324



 Profile  
 
 
Post #482117  Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2017 4:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:58 am
Posts: 26324

At Stoke next. Never an easy place to get a result. I think everyone agrees we need another signing before the window closes. I doubt we'll get one. Wenger will pat himself on the back for saving the club money.
I wish there was some way we could accomodate Lacazette and Giroud in the same XI.
The midfield pairing needs to get sorted. Find the right combination.

Hoping for a win at Stoke before we got to Anfield. Hate to see Man Utd back...if they really are.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #482118  Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2017 4:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:58 am
Posts: 26324

Alexis is in Paris? Rumors.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #482119  Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2017 6:11 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:21 pm
Posts: 13109
Location: Stockholm

lomekian wrote:
They have to be considered first or second favourite this year because they have a successful manager, a strong club and the most expensively assembled squad in British history.

They really don’t. They’ve been terrible the last few years, and while Matic is a good signing that could help free up Pogba their squad just isn’t as good as ours, Man Citys, Chelseas or Tottenhams in my opinion. As far as I’m concerned Mourinho must prove he still has what it takes at this level.

But yeah, impressive result against West Ham. Looking forward to a week of hearing how great the tallness of their players are. Just can’t see how they could’ve scored those goals if Martial, Pogba and Lukaku weren’t over 6 feet tall.


 Profile  
 
 
Post #482120  Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2017 9:52 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:06 am
Posts: 12025

socrates wrote:
Jonathan wrote:
Hi all, Mee’s son here.

August 11th was Dad’s birthday, this would have been his 71st. I can guarantee that he would have spent hours of this one on these infamous green pages. Me and Mum both agreed he’d have secretly liked nothing better. Following a less than convincing opening day victory, it’s also a safe assumption that he wouldn’t have the most optimistic outlook for the season ahead…

Seemed like as good a time as any to check in. Glad this community seems to be still going strong, hope you’re all doing well


Hi Jonathan,

It's so sad that your dad is no longer with us. His tongue-in-cheek "doom and gloom" Arsenal prophesies were so beautifully written, without even a hint of bad language or abuse, you could not help but smile whenever you read them.

I think everyone really misses him on here.

Regards.....Soc

I second that, Soc. Those Jeramiads were delightful. And he never stooped to abuse. He is certainly missed.

_________________
Hamba kakuhle, Madiba


 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
     [ 485879 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1 ... 12050, 12051, 12052, 12053, 12054, 12055, 12056 ... 12147  Next

All times are UTC

Gooners Online - Click to see what Everyones Doing

Colour Key:  Visited Profile    Members Profile      Admin

Get Latest Post

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], warrior and 3 guests


Search for:

cron

Go to Top

Powered by php BB © 1993 - 2016